Acid Mine Drainage Treatment Using a Process Train with Laterite Mine Waste, Concrete Waste, and Limestone as Treatment Media
Without treatment, the harmful effects of acid mine drainage (AMD) lead to the destruction of surrounding ecosystems, including serious health impacts to affected communities. Active methods, like chemical neutralization, are the most widely used approach to AMD management. However, these techniques...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Water (Basel) 2022-04, Vol.14 (7), p.1070 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 7 |
container_start_page | 1070 |
container_title | Water (Basel) |
container_volume | 14 |
creator | Turingan, Casey Oliver A. Cordero, Kristina S. Santos, Aileen L. Tan, Gillian Sue L. Tabelin, Carlito B. Alorro, Richard D. Orbecido, Aileen H. |
description | Without treatment, the harmful effects of acid mine drainage (AMD) lead to the destruction of surrounding ecosystems, including serious health impacts to affected communities. Active methods, like chemical neutralization, are the most widely used approach to AMD management. However, these techniques require constant inputs of energy, chemicals, and manpower, which become unsustainable in the long-term. One promising and sustainable alternative for AMD management is to use passive treatment systems with locally available and waste-derived alkalinity-generating materials. In this study, the treatment of synthetic AMD with laterite mine waste (LMW), concrete waste, and limestone in a successive process train was elucidated, and the optimal process train configuration was determined. Six full factorial analyses were performed following a constant ratio of 0.75 mL AMD/g media with a 15-min retention time. The evolution of the pH, redox potential (Eh), total dissolved solids (TDS), heavy metals concentration, and sulfates concentrations were monitored as the basis for evaluating the treatment performance of each run. LMW had the highest metal and sulfates removal, while concrete waste caused the largest pH increase. A ranking system was utilized in which each parameter was normalized based on the Philippine effluent standards (DENR Administrative Order (DAO) 2016–08 and 2021–19). Run 4 (Limestone-LMW-Concrete waste) showed the best performance, that is, the pH increased from 1.35 to 8.08 and removed 39% Fe, 94% Ni, 72% Al, and 52% sulfate. With this, the process train is more effective to treat AMD, and the order of the media in treatment is significant. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3390/w14071070 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2649067830</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A791348888</galeid><sourcerecordid>A791348888</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c261t-a93aff8f888fcf4aaf017f2436c612a7f6a7bee8a57c19de46e5abb71e40743f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNUU1LAzEQXUTBUnvwHwQ8CW5NNukmeyz1E7boocXjMs1Oakp3tyYpxYP_3chKaeaQzOS9yZu8JLlmdMx5Qe8PTFDJqKRnySCjkqdCCHZ-cr5MRt5vaFyiUGpCB8nPVNuazG2L5MGBbWGNZOEQQoNtIEtv2zUB8u46jd7HmwghBxs-SQkBnQ3Ycz_AB7wjs67VDsMxh7YmpW3Qhy6CwJ-0nmNt4Sq5MLD1OPrfh8ny6XExe0nLt-fX2bRMdZazkELBwRhllFJGGwFgKJMmEzzXOctAmhzkClHBRGpW1ChynMBqJRnG_xDc8GFy0_fdue5rH-VUm27v2vhkleWioLlUnEbUuEetYYuVbU0XHOgYNTZWxwmMjfWpLBgXUYqKhNueoF3nvUNT7ZxtwH1XjFZ_jlRHR_gvIGN9SA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2649067830</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Acid Mine Drainage Treatment Using a Process Train with Laterite Mine Waste, Concrete Waste, and Limestone as Treatment Media</title><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Turingan, Casey Oliver A. ; Cordero, Kristina S. ; Santos, Aileen L. ; Tan, Gillian Sue L. ; Tabelin, Carlito B. ; Alorro, Richard D. ; Orbecido, Aileen H.</creator><creatorcontrib>Turingan, Casey Oliver A. ; Cordero, Kristina S. ; Santos, Aileen L. ; Tan, Gillian Sue L. ; Tabelin, Carlito B. ; Alorro, Richard D. ; Orbecido, Aileen H.</creatorcontrib><description>Without treatment, the harmful effects of acid mine drainage (AMD) lead to the destruction of surrounding ecosystems, including serious health impacts to affected communities. Active methods, like chemical neutralization, are the most widely used approach to AMD management. However, these techniques require constant inputs of energy, chemicals, and manpower, which become unsustainable in the long-term. One promising and sustainable alternative for AMD management is to use passive treatment systems with locally available and waste-derived alkalinity-generating materials. In this study, the treatment of synthetic AMD with laterite mine waste (LMW), concrete waste, and limestone in a successive process train was elucidated, and the optimal process train configuration was determined. Six full factorial analyses were performed following a constant ratio of 0.75 mL AMD/g media with a 15-min retention time. The evolution of the pH, redox potential (Eh), total dissolved solids (TDS), heavy metals concentration, and sulfates concentrations were monitored as the basis for evaluating the treatment performance of each run. LMW had the highest metal and sulfates removal, while concrete waste caused the largest pH increase. A ranking system was utilized in which each parameter was normalized based on the Philippine effluent standards (DENR Administrative Order (DAO) 2016–08 and 2021–19). Run 4 (Limestone-LMW-Concrete waste) showed the best performance, that is, the pH increased from 1.35 to 8.08 and removed 39% Fe, 94% Ni, 72% Al, and 52% sulfate. With this, the process train is more effective to treat AMD, and the order of the media in treatment is significant.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2073-4441</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2073-4441</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/w14071070</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Acid mine drainage ; Alkalinity ; Analysis ; Concrete ; Dissolved solids ; Efficiency ; Effluent standards ; Environmental degradation ; Environmental impact ; Heavy metals ; Laterites ; Limestone ; Manpower ; Mediation ; Metal concentrations ; Metals ; Mine drainage ; Mine wastes ; Minerals ; Mines ; Mining ; Neutralization ; Redox potential ; Retention time ; Sulfates ; Total dissolved solids ; Water quality ; Water quality standards</subject><ispartof>Water (Basel), 2022-04, Vol.14 (7), p.1070</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2022 MDPI AG</rights><rights>2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c261t-a93aff8f888fcf4aaf017f2436c612a7f6a7bee8a57c19de46e5abb71e40743f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c261t-a93aff8f888fcf4aaf017f2436c612a7f6a7bee8a57c19de46e5abb71e40743f3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7917-983X ; 0000-0002-2841-7479 ; 0000-0001-8314-6344</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Turingan, Casey Oliver A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cordero, Kristina S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santos, Aileen L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tan, Gillian Sue L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tabelin, Carlito B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alorro, Richard D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Orbecido, Aileen H.</creatorcontrib><title>Acid Mine Drainage Treatment Using a Process Train with Laterite Mine Waste, Concrete Waste, and Limestone as Treatment Media</title><title>Water (Basel)</title><description>Without treatment, the harmful effects of acid mine drainage (AMD) lead to the destruction of surrounding ecosystems, including serious health impacts to affected communities. Active methods, like chemical neutralization, are the most widely used approach to AMD management. However, these techniques require constant inputs of energy, chemicals, and manpower, which become unsustainable in the long-term. One promising and sustainable alternative for AMD management is to use passive treatment systems with locally available and waste-derived alkalinity-generating materials. In this study, the treatment of synthetic AMD with laterite mine waste (LMW), concrete waste, and limestone in a successive process train was elucidated, and the optimal process train configuration was determined. Six full factorial analyses were performed following a constant ratio of 0.75 mL AMD/g media with a 15-min retention time. The evolution of the pH, redox potential (Eh), total dissolved solids (TDS), heavy metals concentration, and sulfates concentrations were monitored as the basis for evaluating the treatment performance of each run. LMW had the highest metal and sulfates removal, while concrete waste caused the largest pH increase. A ranking system was utilized in which each parameter was normalized based on the Philippine effluent standards (DENR Administrative Order (DAO) 2016–08 and 2021–19). Run 4 (Limestone-LMW-Concrete waste) showed the best performance, that is, the pH increased from 1.35 to 8.08 and removed 39% Fe, 94% Ni, 72% Al, and 52% sulfate. With this, the process train is more effective to treat AMD, and the order of the media in treatment is significant.</description><subject>Acid mine drainage</subject><subject>Alkalinity</subject><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Concrete</subject><subject>Dissolved solids</subject><subject>Efficiency</subject><subject>Effluent standards</subject><subject>Environmental degradation</subject><subject>Environmental impact</subject><subject>Heavy metals</subject><subject>Laterites</subject><subject>Limestone</subject><subject>Manpower</subject><subject>Mediation</subject><subject>Metal concentrations</subject><subject>Metals</subject><subject>Mine drainage</subject><subject>Mine wastes</subject><subject>Minerals</subject><subject>Mines</subject><subject>Mining</subject><subject>Neutralization</subject><subject>Redox potential</subject><subject>Retention time</subject><subject>Sulfates</subject><subject>Total dissolved solids</subject><subject>Water quality</subject><subject>Water quality standards</subject><issn>2073-4441</issn><issn>2073-4441</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNpNUU1LAzEQXUTBUnvwHwQ8CW5NNukmeyz1E7boocXjMs1Oakp3tyYpxYP_3chKaeaQzOS9yZu8JLlmdMx5Qe8PTFDJqKRnySCjkqdCCHZ-cr5MRt5vaFyiUGpCB8nPVNuazG2L5MGBbWGNZOEQQoNtIEtv2zUB8u46jd7HmwghBxs-SQkBnQ3Ycz_AB7wjs67VDsMxh7YmpW3Qhy6CwJ-0nmNt4Sq5MLD1OPrfh8ny6XExe0nLt-fX2bRMdZazkELBwRhllFJGGwFgKJMmEzzXOctAmhzkClHBRGpW1ChynMBqJRnG_xDc8GFy0_fdue5rH-VUm27v2vhkleWioLlUnEbUuEetYYuVbU0XHOgYNTZWxwmMjfWpLBgXUYqKhNueoF3nvUNT7ZxtwH1XjFZ_jlRHR_gvIGN9SA</recordid><startdate>20220401</startdate><enddate>20220401</enddate><creator>Turingan, Casey Oliver A.</creator><creator>Cordero, Kristina S.</creator><creator>Santos, Aileen L.</creator><creator>Tan, Gillian Sue L.</creator><creator>Tabelin, Carlito B.</creator><creator>Alorro, Richard D.</creator><creator>Orbecido, Aileen H.</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7917-983X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2841-7479</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8314-6344</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220401</creationdate><title>Acid Mine Drainage Treatment Using a Process Train with Laterite Mine Waste, Concrete Waste, and Limestone as Treatment Media</title><author>Turingan, Casey Oliver A. ; Cordero, Kristina S. ; Santos, Aileen L. ; Tan, Gillian Sue L. ; Tabelin, Carlito B. ; Alorro, Richard D. ; Orbecido, Aileen H.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c261t-a93aff8f888fcf4aaf017f2436c612a7f6a7bee8a57c19de46e5abb71e40743f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Acid mine drainage</topic><topic>Alkalinity</topic><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Concrete</topic><topic>Dissolved solids</topic><topic>Efficiency</topic><topic>Effluent standards</topic><topic>Environmental degradation</topic><topic>Environmental impact</topic><topic>Heavy metals</topic><topic>Laterites</topic><topic>Limestone</topic><topic>Manpower</topic><topic>Mediation</topic><topic>Metal concentrations</topic><topic>Metals</topic><topic>Mine drainage</topic><topic>Mine wastes</topic><topic>Minerals</topic><topic>Mines</topic><topic>Mining</topic><topic>Neutralization</topic><topic>Redox potential</topic><topic>Retention time</topic><topic>Sulfates</topic><topic>Total dissolved solids</topic><topic>Water quality</topic><topic>Water quality standards</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Turingan, Casey Oliver A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cordero, Kristina S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santos, Aileen L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tan, Gillian Sue L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tabelin, Carlito B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alorro, Richard D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Orbecido, Aileen H.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Water (Basel)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Turingan, Casey Oliver A.</au><au>Cordero, Kristina S.</au><au>Santos, Aileen L.</au><au>Tan, Gillian Sue L.</au><au>Tabelin, Carlito B.</au><au>Alorro, Richard D.</au><au>Orbecido, Aileen H.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Acid Mine Drainage Treatment Using a Process Train with Laterite Mine Waste, Concrete Waste, and Limestone as Treatment Media</atitle><jtitle>Water (Basel)</jtitle><date>2022-04-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>1070</spage><pages>1070-</pages><issn>2073-4441</issn><eissn>2073-4441</eissn><abstract>Without treatment, the harmful effects of acid mine drainage (AMD) lead to the destruction of surrounding ecosystems, including serious health impacts to affected communities. Active methods, like chemical neutralization, are the most widely used approach to AMD management. However, these techniques require constant inputs of energy, chemicals, and manpower, which become unsustainable in the long-term. One promising and sustainable alternative for AMD management is to use passive treatment systems with locally available and waste-derived alkalinity-generating materials. In this study, the treatment of synthetic AMD with laterite mine waste (LMW), concrete waste, and limestone in a successive process train was elucidated, and the optimal process train configuration was determined. Six full factorial analyses were performed following a constant ratio of 0.75 mL AMD/g media with a 15-min retention time. The evolution of the pH, redox potential (Eh), total dissolved solids (TDS), heavy metals concentration, and sulfates concentrations were monitored as the basis for evaluating the treatment performance of each run. LMW had the highest metal and sulfates removal, while concrete waste caused the largest pH increase. A ranking system was utilized in which each parameter was normalized based on the Philippine effluent standards (DENR Administrative Order (DAO) 2016–08 and 2021–19). Run 4 (Limestone-LMW-Concrete waste) showed the best performance, that is, the pH increased from 1.35 to 8.08 and removed 39% Fe, 94% Ni, 72% Al, and 52% sulfate. With this, the process train is more effective to treat AMD, and the order of the media in treatment is significant.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><doi>10.3390/w14071070</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7917-983X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2841-7479</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8314-6344</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2073-4441 |
ispartof | Water (Basel), 2022-04, Vol.14 (7), p.1070 |
issn | 2073-4441 2073-4441 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2649067830 |
source | MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
subjects | Acid mine drainage Alkalinity Analysis Concrete Dissolved solids Efficiency Effluent standards Environmental degradation Environmental impact Heavy metals Laterites Limestone Manpower Mediation Metal concentrations Metals Mine drainage Mine wastes Minerals Mines Mining Neutralization Redox potential Retention time Sulfates Total dissolved solids Water quality Water quality standards |
title | Acid Mine Drainage Treatment Using a Process Train with Laterite Mine Waste, Concrete Waste, and Limestone as Treatment Media |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T12%3A04%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Acid%20Mine%20Drainage%20Treatment%20Using%20a%20Process%20Train%20with%20Laterite%20Mine%20Waste,%20Concrete%20Waste,%20and%20Limestone%20as%20Treatment%20Media&rft.jtitle=Water%20(Basel)&rft.au=Turingan,%20Casey%20Oliver%20A.&rft.date=2022-04-01&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=1070&rft.pages=1070-&rft.issn=2073-4441&rft.eissn=2073-4441&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/w14071070&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA791348888%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2649067830&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A791348888&rfr_iscdi=true |