Wave Hindcast in Enclosed Basins: Comparison among SWAN, STWAVE and CMS-Wave Models
This paper highlights the issue of the model consistency for wave hindcasts in enclosed basins, such as lakes and lagoons. For these applications, the wind input mechanism is essential and the differences in the model approaches and available settings make it critical and difficult for the users to...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Water (Basel) 2022-04, Vol.14 (7), p.1087 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 7 |
| container_start_page | 1087 |
| container_title | Water (Basel) |
| container_volume | 14 |
| creator | Favaretto, Chiara Martinelli, Luca Vigneron, Emma M. Philippine Ruol, Piero |
| description | This paper highlights the issue of the model consistency for wave hindcasts in enclosed basins, such as lakes and lagoons. For these applications, the wind input mechanism is essential and the differences in the model approaches and available settings make it critical and difficult for the users to comprehensively understand each of the model’s capabilities and limitations. Therefore, three freely accessible regional scale spectral wave models (SWAN, STWAVE, and CMS-Wave), using the Half and Full plane modes where available, are used for wave hindcast purposes in two locations of the Garda Lake (IT). Results achieved with default settings are compared and discussed. Significant differences are found showing that, unfortunately, specific calibration, which is, however, not possible in many practical cases, is essential for applications in enclosed basins. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.3390/w14071087 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2649061908</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A793269774</galeid><sourcerecordid>A793269774</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-612c48e5097e493b53912203979c2b1be7891288ae25d6413ce5c33003d175383</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNUF1LwzAUDaLgmHvwHwR8EuzMV5vEt1qmEzZ96HSPJUvTkbEmM-kU_72dE_Heh3s5nA84AFxiNKZUottPzBDHSPATMCCI04Qxhk___edgFOMG9cOkECkagHKpPgycWldrFTtoHZw4vfXR1PBeReviHSx8u1PBRu-gar1bw3KZP9_AcrHM3yZQuRoW8zL58Zn72mzjBThr1Daa0e8dgteHyaKYJrOXx6cinyWaUtwlGSaaCZMiyQ2TdJVSiQlBVHKpyQqvDBc9IIQyJK0zhqk2aa9EiNaYp1TQIbg6-u6Cf9-b2FUbvw-uj6xIxiTKsEQH1vjIWqutqaxrfBeU7rc2rdXemcb2eM4lJZnknPWC66NABx9jME21C7ZV4avCqDr0XP31TL8BPWZqOQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2649061908</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Wave Hindcast in Enclosed Basins: Comparison among SWAN, STWAVE and CMS-Wave Models</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><creator>Favaretto, Chiara ; Martinelli, Luca ; Vigneron, Emma M. Philippine ; Ruol, Piero</creator><creatorcontrib>Favaretto, Chiara ; Martinelli, Luca ; Vigneron, Emma M. Philippine ; Ruol, Piero</creatorcontrib><description>This paper highlights the issue of the model consistency for wave hindcasts in enclosed basins, such as lakes and lagoons. For these applications, the wind input mechanism is essential and the differences in the model approaches and available settings make it critical and difficult for the users to comprehensively understand each of the model’s capabilities and limitations. Therefore, three freely accessible regional scale spectral wave models (SWAN, STWAVE, and CMS-Wave), using the Half and Full plane modes where available, are used for wave hindcast purposes in two locations of the Garda Lake (IT). Results achieved with default settings are compared and discussed. Significant differences are found showing that, unfortunately, specific calibration, which is, however, not possible in many practical cases, is essential for applications in enclosed basins.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2073-4441</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2073-4441</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/w14071087</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Basins ; Calibration ; Coasts ; Lagoons ; Lake basins ; Lakes ; Propagation ; R&D ; Research & development ; Wind</subject><ispartof>Water (Basel), 2022-04, Vol.14 (7), p.1087</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2022 MDPI AG</rights><rights>2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-612c48e5097e493b53912203979c2b1be7891288ae25d6413ce5c33003d175383</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-612c48e5097e493b53912203979c2b1be7891288ae25d6413ce5c33003d175383</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0910-8443 ; 0000-0003-1848-8764 ; 0000-0002-5238-4136</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Favaretto, Chiara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martinelli, Luca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vigneron, Emma M. Philippine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ruol, Piero</creatorcontrib><title>Wave Hindcast in Enclosed Basins: Comparison among SWAN, STWAVE and CMS-Wave Models</title><title>Water (Basel)</title><description>This paper highlights the issue of the model consistency for wave hindcasts in enclosed basins, such as lakes and lagoons. For these applications, the wind input mechanism is essential and the differences in the model approaches and available settings make it critical and difficult for the users to comprehensively understand each of the model’s capabilities and limitations. Therefore, three freely accessible regional scale spectral wave models (SWAN, STWAVE, and CMS-Wave), using the Half and Full plane modes where available, are used for wave hindcast purposes in two locations of the Garda Lake (IT). Results achieved with default settings are compared and discussed. Significant differences are found showing that, unfortunately, specific calibration, which is, however, not possible in many practical cases, is essential for applications in enclosed basins.</description><subject>Basins</subject><subject>Calibration</subject><subject>Coasts</subject><subject>Lagoons</subject><subject>Lake basins</subject><subject>Lakes</subject><subject>Propagation</subject><subject>R&D</subject><subject>Research & development</subject><subject>Wind</subject><issn>2073-4441</issn><issn>2073-4441</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNpNUF1LwzAUDaLgmHvwHwR8EuzMV5vEt1qmEzZ96HSPJUvTkbEmM-kU_72dE_Heh3s5nA84AFxiNKZUottPzBDHSPATMCCI04Qxhk___edgFOMG9cOkECkagHKpPgycWldrFTtoHZw4vfXR1PBeReviHSx8u1PBRu-gar1bw3KZP9_AcrHM3yZQuRoW8zL58Zn72mzjBThr1Daa0e8dgteHyaKYJrOXx6cinyWaUtwlGSaaCZMiyQ2TdJVSiQlBVHKpyQqvDBc9IIQyJK0zhqk2aa9EiNaYp1TQIbg6-u6Cf9-b2FUbvw-uj6xIxiTKsEQH1vjIWqutqaxrfBeU7rc2rdXemcb2eM4lJZnknPWC66NABx9jME21C7ZV4avCqDr0XP31TL8BPWZqOQ</recordid><startdate>20220401</startdate><enddate>20220401</enddate><creator>Favaretto, Chiara</creator><creator>Martinelli, Luca</creator><creator>Vigneron, Emma M. Philippine</creator><creator>Ruol, Piero</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0910-8443</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1848-8764</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5238-4136</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220401</creationdate><title>Wave Hindcast in Enclosed Basins: Comparison among SWAN, STWAVE and CMS-Wave Models</title><author>Favaretto, Chiara ; Martinelli, Luca ; Vigneron, Emma M. Philippine ; Ruol, Piero</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-612c48e5097e493b53912203979c2b1be7891288ae25d6413ce5c33003d175383</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Basins</topic><topic>Calibration</topic><topic>Coasts</topic><topic>Lagoons</topic><topic>Lake basins</topic><topic>Lakes</topic><topic>Propagation</topic><topic>R&D</topic><topic>Research & development</topic><topic>Wind</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Favaretto, Chiara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martinelli, Luca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vigneron, Emma M. Philippine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ruol, Piero</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Water (Basel)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Favaretto, Chiara</au><au>Martinelli, Luca</au><au>Vigneron, Emma M. Philippine</au><au>Ruol, Piero</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Wave Hindcast in Enclosed Basins: Comparison among SWAN, STWAVE and CMS-Wave Models</atitle><jtitle>Water (Basel)</jtitle><date>2022-04-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>1087</spage><pages>1087-</pages><issn>2073-4441</issn><eissn>2073-4441</eissn><abstract>This paper highlights the issue of the model consistency for wave hindcasts in enclosed basins, such as lakes and lagoons. For these applications, the wind input mechanism is essential and the differences in the model approaches and available settings make it critical and difficult for the users to comprehensively understand each of the model’s capabilities and limitations. Therefore, three freely accessible regional scale spectral wave models (SWAN, STWAVE, and CMS-Wave), using the Half and Full plane modes where available, are used for wave hindcast purposes in two locations of the Garda Lake (IT). Results achieved with default settings are compared and discussed. Significant differences are found showing that, unfortunately, specific calibration, which is, however, not possible in many practical cases, is essential for applications in enclosed basins.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><doi>10.3390/w14071087</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0910-8443</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1848-8764</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5238-4136</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 2073-4441 |
| ispartof | Water (Basel), 2022-04, Vol.14 (7), p.1087 |
| issn | 2073-4441 2073-4441 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2649061908 |
| source | Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute |
| subjects | Basins Calibration Coasts Lagoons Lake basins Lakes Propagation R&D Research & development Wind |
| title | Wave Hindcast in Enclosed Basins: Comparison among SWAN, STWAVE and CMS-Wave Models |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T11%3A58%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Wave%20Hindcast%20in%20Enclosed%20Basins:%20Comparison%20among%20SWAN,%20STWAVE%20and%20CMS-Wave%20Models&rft.jtitle=Water%20(Basel)&rft.au=Favaretto,%20Chiara&rft.date=2022-04-01&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=1087&rft.pages=1087-&rft.issn=2073-4441&rft.eissn=2073-4441&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/w14071087&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA793269774%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2649061908&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A793269774&rfr_iscdi=true |