This City Is An Archive: Squatting History and Urban Authority
Since the archival turn, archives have been widely portrayed as “dominating” institutions, which has led to even community archives being defined as “anti-authority.” It is the contention of this paper that this approach misses (1) the way in which DIY archives provide territorial authority for marg...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of urban history 2022-05, Vol.48 (3), p.504-522 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 522 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | 504 |
| container_title | Journal of urban history |
| container_volume | 48 |
| creator | Burgum, Samuel |
| description | Since the archival turn, archives have been widely portrayed as “dominating” institutions, which has led to even community archives being defined as “anti-authority.” It is the contention of this paper that this approach misses (1) the way in which DIY archives provide territorial authority for marginalized communities, and (2) the radical potential of such counter-narratives in seeing the city itself as an archive. Outlining both the role of archival authority in community archives and the use of an archival imagination in approaching the city, the paper considers possibilities for urban movements and campaigns, bringing together examples from the Resistance Project, 56a Infoshop, Advisory Service for Squatters, Occupy London, and the Remembering Olive Collective. An approach is forwarded which, in light of the participatory turn in archival studies, reframes the city as an archive, to encourage attentiveness to authority and to produce a capacity to aspire. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1177/0096144220955165 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2648476470</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_0096144220955165</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2648476470</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-e5b50f6062b17b54305d54b7fdbad7f3805e1070f454e97637b19e39d3d987d23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kM9LAzEQhYMoWKt3jwHPqzObH9P1IJSitlDwYHtekibbbtHdNskK_e_dUkEQPM3hfd8beIzdItwjEj0AFBqlzHMolEKtztgAlcozTYTnbHCMs2N-ya5i3AIAahAD9rTY1JFP6nTgs8jHDR-H1ab-8o_8fd-ZlOpmzad1TG04cNM4vgzW9FCXNm3opWt2UZmP6G9-7pAtX54Xk2k2f3udTcbzbCUUpswrq6DSoHOLZJUUoJySlipnjaNKjEB5BIJKKukL0oIsFl4UTrhiRC4XQ3Z36t2Fdt_5mMpt24Wmf1nmWo4kaUnQU3CiVqGNMfiq3IX604RDiVAeVyr_rtQr2UmJZu1_S__lvwH7l2Qh</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2648476470</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>This City Is An Archive: Squatting History and Urban Authority</title><source>Access via SAGE</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Burgum, Samuel</creator><creatorcontrib>Burgum, Samuel</creatorcontrib><description>Since the archival turn, archives have been widely portrayed as “dominating” institutions, which has led to even community archives being defined as “anti-authority.” It is the contention of this paper that this approach misses (1) the way in which DIY archives provide territorial authority for marginalized communities, and (2) the radical potential of such counter-narratives in seeing the city itself as an archive. Outlining both the role of archival authority in community archives and the use of an archival imagination in approaching the city, the paper considers possibilities for urban movements and campaigns, bringing together examples from the Resistance Project, 56a Infoshop, Advisory Service for Squatters, Occupy London, and the Remembering Olive Collective. An approach is forwarded which, in light of the participatory turn in archival studies, reframes the city as an archive, to encourage attentiveness to authority and to produce a capacity to aspire.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0096-1442</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-6771</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0096144220955165</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Activists ; Advisory services ; Archives & records ; Authority ; Campaigns ; Cities ; Colonialism ; Community ; Imagination ; Local materials ; Marginality ; Resistance ; Squatters ; Urban areas</subject><ispartof>Journal of urban history, 2022-05, Vol.48 (3), p.504-522</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-e5b50f6062b17b54305d54b7fdbad7f3805e1070f454e97637b19e39d3d987d23</citedby><orcidid>0000-0002-4616-2094</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0096144220955165$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0096144220955165$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21819,27924,27925,33774,43621,43622</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Burgum, Samuel</creatorcontrib><title>This City Is An Archive: Squatting History and Urban Authority</title><title>Journal of urban history</title><description>Since the archival turn, archives have been widely portrayed as “dominating” institutions, which has led to even community archives being defined as “anti-authority.” It is the contention of this paper that this approach misses (1) the way in which DIY archives provide territorial authority for marginalized communities, and (2) the radical potential of such counter-narratives in seeing the city itself as an archive. Outlining both the role of archival authority in community archives and the use of an archival imagination in approaching the city, the paper considers possibilities for urban movements and campaigns, bringing together examples from the Resistance Project, 56a Infoshop, Advisory Service for Squatters, Occupy London, and the Remembering Olive Collective. An approach is forwarded which, in light of the participatory turn in archival studies, reframes the city as an archive, to encourage attentiveness to authority and to produce a capacity to aspire.</description><subject>Activists</subject><subject>Advisory services</subject><subject>Archives & records</subject><subject>Authority</subject><subject>Campaigns</subject><subject>Cities</subject><subject>Colonialism</subject><subject>Community</subject><subject>Imagination</subject><subject>Local materials</subject><subject>Marginality</subject><subject>Resistance</subject><subject>Squatters</subject><subject>Urban areas</subject><issn>0096-1442</issn><issn>1552-6771</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AFRWT</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kM9LAzEQhYMoWKt3jwHPqzObH9P1IJSitlDwYHtekibbbtHdNskK_e_dUkEQPM3hfd8beIzdItwjEj0AFBqlzHMolEKtztgAlcozTYTnbHCMs2N-ya5i3AIAahAD9rTY1JFP6nTgs8jHDR-H1ab-8o_8fd-ZlOpmzad1TG04cNM4vgzW9FCXNm3opWt2UZmP6G9-7pAtX54Xk2k2f3udTcbzbCUUpswrq6DSoHOLZJUUoJySlipnjaNKjEB5BIJKKukL0oIsFl4UTrhiRC4XQ3Z36t2Fdt_5mMpt24Wmf1nmWo4kaUnQU3CiVqGNMfiq3IX604RDiVAeVyr_rtQr2UmJZu1_S__lvwH7l2Qh</recordid><startdate>202205</startdate><enddate>202205</enddate><creator>Burgum, Samuel</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>AFRWT</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8XN</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>WZK</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4616-2094</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202205</creationdate><title>This City Is An Archive: Squatting History and Urban Authority</title><author>Burgum, Samuel</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-e5b50f6062b17b54305d54b7fdbad7f3805e1070f454e97637b19e39d3d987d23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Activists</topic><topic>Advisory services</topic><topic>Archives & records</topic><topic>Authority</topic><topic>Campaigns</topic><topic>Cities</topic><topic>Colonialism</topic><topic>Community</topic><topic>Imagination</topic><topic>Local materials</topic><topic>Marginality</topic><topic>Resistance</topic><topic>Squatters</topic><topic>Urban areas</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Burgum, Samuel</creatorcontrib><collection>SAGE Journals</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of Art (IBA)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Journal of urban history</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Burgum, Samuel</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>This City Is An Archive: Squatting History and Urban Authority</atitle><jtitle>Journal of urban history</jtitle><date>2022-05</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>48</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>504</spage><epage>522</epage><pages>504-522</pages><issn>0096-1442</issn><eissn>1552-6771</eissn><abstract>Since the archival turn, archives have been widely portrayed as “dominating” institutions, which has led to even community archives being defined as “anti-authority.” It is the contention of this paper that this approach misses (1) the way in which DIY archives provide territorial authority for marginalized communities, and (2) the radical potential of such counter-narratives in seeing the city itself as an archive. Outlining both the role of archival authority in community archives and the use of an archival imagination in approaching the city, the paper considers possibilities for urban movements and campaigns, bringing together examples from the Resistance Project, 56a Infoshop, Advisory Service for Squatters, Occupy London, and the Remembering Olive Collective. An approach is forwarded which, in light of the participatory turn in archival studies, reframes the city as an archive, to encourage attentiveness to authority and to produce a capacity to aspire.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/0096144220955165</doi><tpages>19</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4616-2094</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0096-1442 |
| ispartof | Journal of urban history, 2022-05, Vol.48 (3), p.504-522 |
| issn | 0096-1442 1552-6771 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2648476470 |
| source | Access via SAGE; Sociological Abstracts |
| subjects | Activists Advisory services Archives & records Authority Campaigns Cities Colonialism Community Imagination Local materials Marginality Resistance Squatters Urban areas |
| title | This City Is An Archive: Squatting History and Urban Authority |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T20%3A10%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=This%20City%20Is%20An%20Archive:%20Squatting%20History%20and%20Urban%20Authority&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20urban%20history&rft.au=Burgum,%20Samuel&rft.date=2022-05&rft.volume=48&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=504&rft.epage=522&rft.pages=504-522&rft.issn=0096-1442&rft.eissn=1552-6771&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0096144220955165&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2648476470%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2648476470&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0096144220955165&rfr_iscdi=true |