Study of alternative locations for the SPS Beam Dump Facility

As part of the main focus of the BDF Working Group in 2021, this document reports on the study of alternative locations and possible optimisation that may accompany the reuse of existing facilities with the aim of significantly reducing the costs of the facility. Building on the BDF/SHiP Comprehensi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:arXiv.org 2022-04
Hauptverfasser: Aberle, Oliver, Ahdida, Claudia, Arrutia, Pablo, Kincso Balazs, Bernhard, Johannes, Brugger, Markus, Calviani, Marco, Dutheil, Yann, Ximenes, Rui Franqueira, Fraser, Matthew, Galleazzi, Frederic, Gilardoni, Simone, Jean-Louis Grenard, Griesemer, Tina, Jacobsson, Richard, Kain, Verena, Lafarge, Damien, Marsh, Simon, Martin Ruiz, Jose Maria, Mena Andrade, Ramiro Francisco, Muttoni, Yvon, Angel Navascues Cornago, Ninin, Pierre, Osborne, John, Ramjiawan, Rebecca, Pablo Santos Diaz, Francisco Sanchez Galan, Vincke, Heinz, Vojtyla, Pavol
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title arXiv.org
container_volume
creator Aberle, Oliver
Ahdida, Claudia
Arrutia, Pablo
Kincso Balazs
Bernhard, Johannes
Brugger, Markus
Calviani, Marco
Dutheil, Yann
Ximenes, Rui Franqueira
Fraser, Matthew
Galleazzi, Frederic
Gilardoni, Simone
Jean-Louis Grenard
Griesemer, Tina
Jacobsson, Richard
Kain, Verena
Lafarge, Damien
Marsh, Simon
Martin Ruiz, Jose Maria
Mena Andrade, Ramiro Francisco
Muttoni, Yvon
Angel Navascues Cornago
Ninin, Pierre
Osborne, John
Ramjiawan, Rebecca
Pablo Santos Diaz
Francisco Sanchez Galan
Vincke, Heinz
Vojtyla, Pavol
description As part of the main focus of the BDF Working Group in 2021, this document reports on the study of alternative locations and possible optimisation that may accompany the reuse of existing facilities with the aim of significantly reducing the costs of the facility. Building on the BDF/SHiP Comprehensive Design Study (CDS), the assessment rests on the generic requirements and constraints that allow preserving the physics reach of the facility by making use of the \(4\times 10^{19}\) protons per year at 400\,GeV that are currently not exploited at the SPS and for which no existing facility is compatible. The options considered involve the underground areas TCC4, TNC, and ECN3. Recent improvements of the BDF design at the current location (referred to as `TT90-TCC9-ECN4') are also mentioned together with ideas for yet further improvements. The assessments of the alternative locations compiled the large amount of information that is already available together with a set of conceptual studies that were performed during 2021. The document concludes with a qualitative comparison of the options, summarising the associated benefits and challenges of each option, such that a recommendation can be made about which location is to be pursued. The most critical location-specific studies required to specify the implementation and cost for each option are identified so that the detailed investigation of the retained option can be completed before the end of 2022.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2648328449</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2648328449</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_26483284493</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpjYuA0MjY21LUwMTLiYOAtLs4yMDAwMjM3MjU15mSwDS4pTalUyE9TSMwpSS3KSyzJLEtVyMlPBjLy84oV0vKLFEoyUhWCA4IVnFITcxVcSnMLFNwSkzNzMksqeRhY0xJzilN5oTQ3g7Kba4izh25BUX5haWpxSXxWfinQ0JzieCMzEwtjIwsTE0tj4lQBADtNN10</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2648328449</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Study of alternative locations for the SPS Beam Dump Facility</title><source>Free E- Journals</source><creator>Aberle, Oliver ; Ahdida, Claudia ; Arrutia, Pablo ; Kincso Balazs ; Bernhard, Johannes ; Brugger, Markus ; Calviani, Marco ; Dutheil, Yann ; Ximenes, Rui Franqueira ; Fraser, Matthew ; Galleazzi, Frederic ; Gilardoni, Simone ; Jean-Louis Grenard ; Griesemer, Tina ; Jacobsson, Richard ; Kain, Verena ; Lafarge, Damien ; Marsh, Simon ; Martin Ruiz, Jose Maria ; Mena Andrade, Ramiro Francisco ; Muttoni, Yvon ; Angel Navascues Cornago ; Ninin, Pierre ; Osborne, John ; Ramjiawan, Rebecca ; Pablo Santos Diaz ; Francisco Sanchez Galan ; Vincke, Heinz ; Vojtyla, Pavol</creator><creatorcontrib>Aberle, Oliver ; Ahdida, Claudia ; Arrutia, Pablo ; Kincso Balazs ; Bernhard, Johannes ; Brugger, Markus ; Calviani, Marco ; Dutheil, Yann ; Ximenes, Rui Franqueira ; Fraser, Matthew ; Galleazzi, Frederic ; Gilardoni, Simone ; Jean-Louis Grenard ; Griesemer, Tina ; Jacobsson, Richard ; Kain, Verena ; Lafarge, Damien ; Marsh, Simon ; Martin Ruiz, Jose Maria ; Mena Andrade, Ramiro Francisco ; Muttoni, Yvon ; Angel Navascues Cornago ; Ninin, Pierre ; Osborne, John ; Ramjiawan, Rebecca ; Pablo Santos Diaz ; Francisco Sanchez Galan ; Vincke, Heinz ; Vojtyla, Pavol</creatorcontrib><description>As part of the main focus of the BDF Working Group in 2021, this document reports on the study of alternative locations and possible optimisation that may accompany the reuse of existing facilities with the aim of significantly reducing the costs of the facility. Building on the BDF/SHiP Comprehensive Design Study (CDS), the assessment rests on the generic requirements and constraints that allow preserving the physics reach of the facility by making use of the \(4\times 10^{19}\) protons per year at 400\,GeV that are currently not exploited at the SPS and for which no existing facility is compatible. The options considered involve the underground areas TCC4, TNC, and ECN3. Recent improvements of the BDF design at the current location (referred to as `TT90-TCC9-ECN4') are also mentioned together with ideas for yet further improvements. The assessments of the alternative locations compiled the large amount of information that is already available together with a set of conceptual studies that were performed during 2021. The document concludes with a qualitative comparison of the options, summarising the associated benefits and challenges of each option, such that a recommendation can be made about which location is to be pursued. The most critical location-specific studies required to specify the implementation and cost for each option are identified so that the detailed investigation of the retained option can be completed before the end of 2022.</description><identifier>EISSN: 2331-8422</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ithaca: Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</publisher><subject>Documents ; Optimization</subject><ispartof>arXiv.org, 2022-04</ispartof><rights>2022. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>776,780</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Aberle, Oliver</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ahdida, Claudia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arrutia, Pablo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kincso Balazs</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bernhard, Johannes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brugger, Markus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Calviani, Marco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dutheil, Yann</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ximenes, Rui Franqueira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fraser, Matthew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Galleazzi, Frederic</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gilardoni, Simone</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jean-Louis Grenard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Griesemer, Tina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jacobsson, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kain, Verena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lafarge, Damien</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marsh, Simon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martin Ruiz, Jose Maria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mena Andrade, Ramiro Francisco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muttoni, Yvon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Angel Navascues Cornago</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ninin, Pierre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Osborne, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramjiawan, Rebecca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pablo Santos Diaz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Francisco Sanchez Galan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vincke, Heinz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vojtyla, Pavol</creatorcontrib><title>Study of alternative locations for the SPS Beam Dump Facility</title><title>arXiv.org</title><description>As part of the main focus of the BDF Working Group in 2021, this document reports on the study of alternative locations and possible optimisation that may accompany the reuse of existing facilities with the aim of significantly reducing the costs of the facility. Building on the BDF/SHiP Comprehensive Design Study (CDS), the assessment rests on the generic requirements and constraints that allow preserving the physics reach of the facility by making use of the \(4\times 10^{19}\) protons per year at 400\,GeV that are currently not exploited at the SPS and for which no existing facility is compatible. The options considered involve the underground areas TCC4, TNC, and ECN3. Recent improvements of the BDF design at the current location (referred to as `TT90-TCC9-ECN4') are also mentioned together with ideas for yet further improvements. The assessments of the alternative locations compiled the large amount of information that is already available together with a set of conceptual studies that were performed during 2021. The document concludes with a qualitative comparison of the options, summarising the associated benefits and challenges of each option, such that a recommendation can be made about which location is to be pursued. The most critical location-specific studies required to specify the implementation and cost for each option are identified so that the detailed investigation of the retained option can be completed before the end of 2022.</description><subject>Documents</subject><subject>Optimization</subject><issn>2331-8422</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNpjYuA0MjY21LUwMTLiYOAtLs4yMDAwMjM3MjU15mSwDS4pTalUyE9TSMwpSS3KSyzJLEtVyMlPBjLy84oV0vKLFEoyUhWCA4IVnFITcxVcSnMLFNwSkzNzMksqeRhY0xJzilN5oTQ3g7Kba4izh25BUX5haWpxSXxWfinQ0JzieCMzEwtjIwsTE0tj4lQBADtNN10</recordid><startdate>20220407</startdate><enddate>20220407</enddate><creator>Aberle, Oliver</creator><creator>Ahdida, Claudia</creator><creator>Arrutia, Pablo</creator><creator>Kincso Balazs</creator><creator>Bernhard, Johannes</creator><creator>Brugger, Markus</creator><creator>Calviani, Marco</creator><creator>Dutheil, Yann</creator><creator>Ximenes, Rui Franqueira</creator><creator>Fraser, Matthew</creator><creator>Galleazzi, Frederic</creator><creator>Gilardoni, Simone</creator><creator>Jean-Louis Grenard</creator><creator>Griesemer, Tina</creator><creator>Jacobsson, Richard</creator><creator>Kain, Verena</creator><creator>Lafarge, Damien</creator><creator>Marsh, Simon</creator><creator>Martin Ruiz, Jose Maria</creator><creator>Mena Andrade, Ramiro Francisco</creator><creator>Muttoni, Yvon</creator><creator>Angel Navascues Cornago</creator><creator>Ninin, Pierre</creator><creator>Osborne, John</creator><creator>Ramjiawan, Rebecca</creator><creator>Pablo Santos Diaz</creator><creator>Francisco Sanchez Galan</creator><creator>Vincke, Heinz</creator><creator>Vojtyla, Pavol</creator><general>Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</general><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PHGZM</scope><scope>PHGZT</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PKEHL</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQGLB</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220407</creationdate><title>Study of alternative locations for the SPS Beam Dump Facility</title><author>Aberle, Oliver ; Ahdida, Claudia ; Arrutia, Pablo ; Kincso Balazs ; Bernhard, Johannes ; Brugger, Markus ; Calviani, Marco ; Dutheil, Yann ; Ximenes, Rui Franqueira ; Fraser, Matthew ; Galleazzi, Frederic ; Gilardoni, Simone ; Jean-Louis Grenard ; Griesemer, Tina ; Jacobsson, Richard ; Kain, Verena ; Lafarge, Damien ; Marsh, Simon ; Martin Ruiz, Jose Maria ; Mena Andrade, Ramiro Francisco ; Muttoni, Yvon ; Angel Navascues Cornago ; Ninin, Pierre ; Osborne, John ; Ramjiawan, Rebecca ; Pablo Santos Diaz ; Francisco Sanchez Galan ; Vincke, Heinz ; Vojtyla, Pavol</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_26483284493</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Documents</topic><topic>Optimization</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Aberle, Oliver</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ahdida, Claudia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arrutia, Pablo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kincso Balazs</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bernhard, Johannes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brugger, Markus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Calviani, Marco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dutheil, Yann</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ximenes, Rui Franqueira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fraser, Matthew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Galleazzi, Frederic</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gilardoni, Simone</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jean-Louis Grenard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Griesemer, Tina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jacobsson, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kain, Verena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lafarge, Damien</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marsh, Simon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martin Ruiz, Jose Maria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mena Andrade, Ramiro Francisco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muttoni, Yvon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Angel Navascues Cornago</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ninin, Pierre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Osborne, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramjiawan, Rebecca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pablo Santos Diaz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Francisco Sanchez Galan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vincke, Heinz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vojtyla, Pavol</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic (New)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Applied &amp; Life Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Aberle, Oliver</au><au>Ahdida, Claudia</au><au>Arrutia, Pablo</au><au>Kincso Balazs</au><au>Bernhard, Johannes</au><au>Brugger, Markus</au><au>Calviani, Marco</au><au>Dutheil, Yann</au><au>Ximenes, Rui Franqueira</au><au>Fraser, Matthew</au><au>Galleazzi, Frederic</au><au>Gilardoni, Simone</au><au>Jean-Louis Grenard</au><au>Griesemer, Tina</au><au>Jacobsson, Richard</au><au>Kain, Verena</au><au>Lafarge, Damien</au><au>Marsh, Simon</au><au>Martin Ruiz, Jose Maria</au><au>Mena Andrade, Ramiro Francisco</au><au>Muttoni, Yvon</au><au>Angel Navascues Cornago</au><au>Ninin, Pierre</au><au>Osborne, John</au><au>Ramjiawan, Rebecca</au><au>Pablo Santos Diaz</au><au>Francisco Sanchez Galan</au><au>Vincke, Heinz</au><au>Vojtyla, Pavol</au><format>book</format><genre>document</genre><ristype>GEN</ristype><atitle>Study of alternative locations for the SPS Beam Dump Facility</atitle><jtitle>arXiv.org</jtitle><date>2022-04-07</date><risdate>2022</risdate><eissn>2331-8422</eissn><abstract>As part of the main focus of the BDF Working Group in 2021, this document reports on the study of alternative locations and possible optimisation that may accompany the reuse of existing facilities with the aim of significantly reducing the costs of the facility. Building on the BDF/SHiP Comprehensive Design Study (CDS), the assessment rests on the generic requirements and constraints that allow preserving the physics reach of the facility by making use of the \(4\times 10^{19}\) protons per year at 400\,GeV that are currently not exploited at the SPS and for which no existing facility is compatible. The options considered involve the underground areas TCC4, TNC, and ECN3. Recent improvements of the BDF design at the current location (referred to as `TT90-TCC9-ECN4') are also mentioned together with ideas for yet further improvements. The assessments of the alternative locations compiled the large amount of information that is already available together with a set of conceptual studies that were performed during 2021. The document concludes with a qualitative comparison of the options, summarising the associated benefits and challenges of each option, such that a recommendation can be made about which location is to be pursued. The most critical location-specific studies required to specify the implementation and cost for each option are identified so that the detailed investigation of the retained option can be completed before the end of 2022.</abstract><cop>Ithaca</cop><pub>Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</pub><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier EISSN: 2331-8422
ispartof arXiv.org, 2022-04
issn 2331-8422
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2648328449
source Free E- Journals
subjects Documents
Optimization
title Study of alternative locations for the SPS Beam Dump Facility
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-21T22%3A31%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=document&rft.atitle=Study%20of%20alternative%20locations%20for%20the%20SPS%20Beam%20Dump%20Facility&rft.jtitle=arXiv.org&rft.au=Aberle,%20Oliver&rft.date=2022-04-07&rft.eissn=2331-8422&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2648328449%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2648328449&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true