Optimization of ZVAl based oxidation and reduction process conditions: Selection of the most suitable process by multiple-criteria decision-making approach

The use of zero valent aluminum (ZVAl) has attracted attention as an effective agent in the oxidation and reduction of pollutants due to its electron donor nature. In this study, the removal of the target pollutant Sunfix red S3B (SR-S3B) azo dye with ZVAl based processes was investigated. For maxim...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Process safety and environmental protection 2022-03, Vol.159, p.605-615
Hauptverfasser: Genç, Nevim, Pişkin, Elif Durna, Aydın, Şeyda
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 615
container_issue
container_start_page 605
container_title Process safety and environmental protection
container_volume 159
creator Genç, Nevim
Pişkin, Elif Durna
Aydın, Şeyda
description The use of zero valent aluminum (ZVAl) has attracted attention as an effective agent in the oxidation and reduction of pollutants due to its electron donor nature. In this study, the removal of the target pollutant Sunfix red S3B (SR-S3B) azo dye with ZVAl based processes was investigated. For maximum dye removal efficiency, the operating conditions of the processes are optimized with Box Behnken Design. With the optimum conditions of the (PS+ZVAl) oxidation process (PS dose of 12.5 g anion/L, duration of 134 min, pH of 2, ZVAl dose of 3.5 g/L) 94.95% dye removal, and with the optimum conditions of the (H2O2+ZVAl) oxidation process (H2O2 dose of 0.20 M, duration of 180 min, pH of 2, ZVAl dose of 1.44 g/L) 55% dye removal efficiency was obtained. In the (O2 status+ZVAl) reduction process, 77.27% dye removal efficiency was obtained under optimum conditions (anaerobic conditions, duration of 14.8 min, pH of 2, ZVAl dose of 1.43 g/L). With the Pareto analysis of (PS+ZVAl), (O2 status+ZVAl) and (H2O2+ZVAl) processes, the parameters with the highest effect were determined as (ZVAl dose)2 (37.42%), O2 status (29.56%), and (H2O2xpH) (28.38%) respectively. The optimized processes were evaluated by the PROMETHEE method, taking into account the criteria of dye removal efficiency, operating cost and possible residues of oxidizing/reducing agents. The preference ranking of the processes was determined as (O2 status+ZVAl)> (PS+ZVAl)> (H2O2+ZVAl). [Display omitted]
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.psep.2022.01.038
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2648264094</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0957582022000489</els_id><sourcerecordid>2648264094</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c328t-8afb1c5dc0fb1059c1dd001b2d03e4089b35081215152c7582508b6edf46b6df3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kclOxDAMhiMEEsPyApwicW5x0mVaxAUhNgmJA8uBS5QmLmRom5KkCHgVXpYMAxw5RJat_7Md_4TsMUgZsPJgkY4ex5QD5ymwFLJqjczYPM-TrKirdTKDupgnRcVhk2x5vwAAxudsRj6vx2B68yGDsQO1LX24P-5oIz1qat-MXtXloKlDPanvbHRWofdU2UGbZcUf0hvsUP32CE9Ie-sD9ZMJsunwD2neaT91wYwdJsqZgM5IqlEZH9Gkl89meKRyjHKpnnbIRis7j7s_cZvcnZ3enlwkV9fnlyfHV4nKeBWSSrYNU4VWECMUtWJax-81XEOGOVR1kxVQMc4KVnA1j0eIaVOibvOyKXWbbZP9Vd849mVCH8TCTm6IIwUv8yo-qPOo4iuVctZ7h60YnemlexcMxNIEsRBLE8TSBAFMRBMidLSCMO7_atAJrwwOCrVx8V5CW_Mf_gXkCJPn</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2648264094</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Optimization of ZVAl based oxidation and reduction process conditions: Selection of the most suitable process by multiple-criteria decision-making approach</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Genç, Nevim ; Pişkin, Elif Durna ; Aydın, Şeyda</creator><creatorcontrib>Genç, Nevim ; Pişkin, Elif Durna ; Aydın, Şeyda</creatorcontrib><description>The use of zero valent aluminum (ZVAl) has attracted attention as an effective agent in the oxidation and reduction of pollutants due to its electron donor nature. In this study, the removal of the target pollutant Sunfix red S3B (SR-S3B) azo dye with ZVAl based processes was investigated. For maximum dye removal efficiency, the operating conditions of the processes are optimized with Box Behnken Design. With the optimum conditions of the (PS+ZVAl) oxidation process (PS dose of 12.5 g anion/L, duration of 134 min, pH of 2, ZVAl dose of 3.5 g/L) 94.95% dye removal, and with the optimum conditions of the (H2O2+ZVAl) oxidation process (H2O2 dose of 0.20 M, duration of 180 min, pH of 2, ZVAl dose of 1.44 g/L) 55% dye removal efficiency was obtained. In the (O2 status+ZVAl) reduction process, 77.27% dye removal efficiency was obtained under optimum conditions (anaerobic conditions, duration of 14.8 min, pH of 2, ZVAl dose of 1.43 g/L). With the Pareto analysis of (PS+ZVAl), (O2 status+ZVAl) and (H2O2+ZVAl) processes, the parameters with the highest effect were determined as (ZVAl dose)2 (37.42%), O2 status (29.56%), and (H2O2xpH) (28.38%) respectively. The optimized processes were evaluated by the PROMETHEE method, taking into account the criteria of dye removal efficiency, operating cost and possible residues of oxidizing/reducing agents. The preference ranking of the processes was determined as (O2 status+ZVAl)&gt; (PS+ZVAl)&gt; (H2O2+ZVAl). [Display omitted]</description><identifier>ISSN: 0957-5820</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1744-3598</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.psep.2022.01.038</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Rugby: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Aluminum ; Anaerobic conditions ; Anaerobic processes ; Azo dyes ; Color removal ; Decision making ; Design optimization ; Dyes ; Efficiency ; Hydrogen peroxide ; Multiple criterion ; Operating costs ; Oxidation ; Oxidation process ; Pareto analysis ; pH effects ; Pollutant removal ; Pollutants ; Pollution control ; Process optimization ; Process parameters ; PROMETHEE ; Reducing agents ; Reduction ; Zero valent aluminum</subject><ispartof>Process safety and environmental protection, 2022-03, Vol.159, p.605-615</ispartof><rights>2022 The Institution of Chemical Engineers</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Mar 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c328t-8afb1c5dc0fb1059c1dd001b2d03e4089b35081215152c7582508b6edf46b6df3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c328t-8afb1c5dc0fb1059c1dd001b2d03e4089b35081215152c7582508b6edf46b6df3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2022.01.038$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Genç, Nevim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pişkin, Elif Durna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aydın, Şeyda</creatorcontrib><title>Optimization of ZVAl based oxidation and reduction process conditions: Selection of the most suitable process by multiple-criteria decision-making approach</title><title>Process safety and environmental protection</title><description>The use of zero valent aluminum (ZVAl) has attracted attention as an effective agent in the oxidation and reduction of pollutants due to its electron donor nature. In this study, the removal of the target pollutant Sunfix red S3B (SR-S3B) azo dye with ZVAl based processes was investigated. For maximum dye removal efficiency, the operating conditions of the processes are optimized with Box Behnken Design. With the optimum conditions of the (PS+ZVAl) oxidation process (PS dose of 12.5 g anion/L, duration of 134 min, pH of 2, ZVAl dose of 3.5 g/L) 94.95% dye removal, and with the optimum conditions of the (H2O2+ZVAl) oxidation process (H2O2 dose of 0.20 M, duration of 180 min, pH of 2, ZVAl dose of 1.44 g/L) 55% dye removal efficiency was obtained. In the (O2 status+ZVAl) reduction process, 77.27% dye removal efficiency was obtained under optimum conditions (anaerobic conditions, duration of 14.8 min, pH of 2, ZVAl dose of 1.43 g/L). With the Pareto analysis of (PS+ZVAl), (O2 status+ZVAl) and (H2O2+ZVAl) processes, the parameters with the highest effect were determined as (ZVAl dose)2 (37.42%), O2 status (29.56%), and (H2O2xpH) (28.38%) respectively. The optimized processes were evaluated by the PROMETHEE method, taking into account the criteria of dye removal efficiency, operating cost and possible residues of oxidizing/reducing agents. The preference ranking of the processes was determined as (O2 status+ZVAl)&gt; (PS+ZVAl)&gt; (H2O2+ZVAl). [Display omitted]</description><subject>Aluminum</subject><subject>Anaerobic conditions</subject><subject>Anaerobic processes</subject><subject>Azo dyes</subject><subject>Color removal</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Design optimization</subject><subject>Dyes</subject><subject>Efficiency</subject><subject>Hydrogen peroxide</subject><subject>Multiple criterion</subject><subject>Operating costs</subject><subject>Oxidation</subject><subject>Oxidation process</subject><subject>Pareto analysis</subject><subject>pH effects</subject><subject>Pollutant removal</subject><subject>Pollutants</subject><subject>Pollution control</subject><subject>Process optimization</subject><subject>Process parameters</subject><subject>PROMETHEE</subject><subject>Reducing agents</subject><subject>Reduction</subject><subject>Zero valent aluminum</subject><issn>0957-5820</issn><issn>1744-3598</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kclOxDAMhiMEEsPyApwicW5x0mVaxAUhNgmJA8uBS5QmLmRom5KkCHgVXpYMAxw5RJat_7Md_4TsMUgZsPJgkY4ex5QD5ymwFLJqjczYPM-TrKirdTKDupgnRcVhk2x5vwAAxudsRj6vx2B68yGDsQO1LX24P-5oIz1qat-MXtXloKlDPanvbHRWofdU2UGbZcUf0hvsUP32CE9Ie-sD9ZMJsunwD2neaT91wYwdJsqZgM5IqlEZH9Gkl89meKRyjHKpnnbIRis7j7s_cZvcnZ3enlwkV9fnlyfHV4nKeBWSSrYNU4VWECMUtWJax-81XEOGOVR1kxVQMc4KVnA1j0eIaVOibvOyKXWbbZP9Vd849mVCH8TCTm6IIwUv8yo-qPOo4iuVctZ7h60YnemlexcMxNIEsRBLE8TSBAFMRBMidLSCMO7_atAJrwwOCrVx8V5CW_Mf_gXkCJPn</recordid><startdate>202203</startdate><enddate>202203</enddate><creator>Genç, Nevim</creator><creator>Pişkin, Elif Durna</creator><creator>Aydın, Şeyda</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202203</creationdate><title>Optimization of ZVAl based oxidation and reduction process conditions: Selection of the most suitable process by multiple-criteria decision-making approach</title><author>Genç, Nevim ; Pişkin, Elif Durna ; Aydın, Şeyda</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c328t-8afb1c5dc0fb1059c1dd001b2d03e4089b35081215152c7582508b6edf46b6df3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Aluminum</topic><topic>Anaerobic conditions</topic><topic>Anaerobic processes</topic><topic>Azo dyes</topic><topic>Color removal</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Design optimization</topic><topic>Dyes</topic><topic>Efficiency</topic><topic>Hydrogen peroxide</topic><topic>Multiple criterion</topic><topic>Operating costs</topic><topic>Oxidation</topic><topic>Oxidation process</topic><topic>Pareto analysis</topic><topic>pH effects</topic><topic>Pollutant removal</topic><topic>Pollutants</topic><topic>Pollution control</topic><topic>Process optimization</topic><topic>Process parameters</topic><topic>PROMETHEE</topic><topic>Reducing agents</topic><topic>Reduction</topic><topic>Zero valent aluminum</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Genç, Nevim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pişkin, Elif Durna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aydın, Şeyda</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Process safety and environmental protection</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Genç, Nevim</au><au>Pişkin, Elif Durna</au><au>Aydın, Şeyda</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Optimization of ZVAl based oxidation and reduction process conditions: Selection of the most suitable process by multiple-criteria decision-making approach</atitle><jtitle>Process safety and environmental protection</jtitle><date>2022-03</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>159</volume><spage>605</spage><epage>615</epage><pages>605-615</pages><issn>0957-5820</issn><eissn>1744-3598</eissn><abstract>The use of zero valent aluminum (ZVAl) has attracted attention as an effective agent in the oxidation and reduction of pollutants due to its electron donor nature. In this study, the removal of the target pollutant Sunfix red S3B (SR-S3B) azo dye with ZVAl based processes was investigated. For maximum dye removal efficiency, the operating conditions of the processes are optimized with Box Behnken Design. With the optimum conditions of the (PS+ZVAl) oxidation process (PS dose of 12.5 g anion/L, duration of 134 min, pH of 2, ZVAl dose of 3.5 g/L) 94.95% dye removal, and with the optimum conditions of the (H2O2+ZVAl) oxidation process (H2O2 dose of 0.20 M, duration of 180 min, pH of 2, ZVAl dose of 1.44 g/L) 55% dye removal efficiency was obtained. In the (O2 status+ZVAl) reduction process, 77.27% dye removal efficiency was obtained under optimum conditions (anaerobic conditions, duration of 14.8 min, pH of 2, ZVAl dose of 1.43 g/L). With the Pareto analysis of (PS+ZVAl), (O2 status+ZVAl) and (H2O2+ZVAl) processes, the parameters with the highest effect were determined as (ZVAl dose)2 (37.42%), O2 status (29.56%), and (H2O2xpH) (28.38%) respectively. The optimized processes were evaluated by the PROMETHEE method, taking into account the criteria of dye removal efficiency, operating cost and possible residues of oxidizing/reducing agents. The preference ranking of the processes was determined as (O2 status+ZVAl)&gt; (PS+ZVAl)&gt; (H2O2+ZVAl). [Display omitted]</abstract><cop>Rugby</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.psep.2022.01.038</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0957-5820
ispartof Process safety and environmental protection, 2022-03, Vol.159, p.605-615
issn 0957-5820
1744-3598
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2648264094
source ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects Aluminum
Anaerobic conditions
Anaerobic processes
Azo dyes
Color removal
Decision making
Design optimization
Dyes
Efficiency
Hydrogen peroxide
Multiple criterion
Operating costs
Oxidation
Oxidation process
Pareto analysis
pH effects
Pollutant removal
Pollutants
Pollution control
Process optimization
Process parameters
PROMETHEE
Reducing agents
Reduction
Zero valent aluminum
title Optimization of ZVAl based oxidation and reduction process conditions: Selection of the most suitable process by multiple-criteria decision-making approach
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T11%3A23%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Optimization%20of%20ZVAl%20based%20oxidation%20and%20reduction%20process%20conditions:%20Selection%20of%20the%20most%20suitable%20process%20by%20multiple-criteria%20decision-making%20approach&rft.jtitle=Process%20safety%20and%20environmental%20protection&rft.au=Gen%C3%A7,%20Nevim&rft.date=2022-03&rft.volume=159&rft.spage=605&rft.epage=615&rft.pages=605-615&rft.issn=0957-5820&rft.eissn=1744-3598&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.psep.2022.01.038&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2648264094%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2648264094&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0957582022000489&rfr_iscdi=true