Effects of different batteries and dispatch strategies on performance of standalone PV/WT/DG/battery system: A case study
The idea of integrated hybrid renewable energy systems (IHRES) is gaining attention for electrification of rural areas where on‐grid electricity supply is uneconomical. From this point of view, the technical and economic feasibility analysis is carried out for a standalone IHRES in a remote area of...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Energy storage (Hoboken, N.J. : 2019) N.J. : 2019), 2022-04, Vol.4 (2), p.n/a |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | n/a |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | |
container_title | Energy storage (Hoboken, N.J. : 2019) |
container_volume | 4 |
creator | Dhavala, R K Suresh, H N Rajanna, S Ramesh, M |
description | The idea of integrated hybrid renewable energy systems (IHRES) is gaining attention for electrification of rural areas where on‐grid electricity supply is uneconomical. From this point of view, the technical and economic feasibility analysis is carried out for a standalone IHRES in a remote area of Malnad region in Karnataka, India. Solar and wind energy are the prominent renewable resources available in the selected area for study. In the present study, lithium‐ion, lead‐acid and zinc‐bromide batteries effect on “PV‐WT‐DG‐Battery” system is examined and compared. The control strategies used in the study are “load following (LF)” and “predictive dispatch (PD).” The simulation results reveal that the “cost of energy (COE)” and “net present cost (NPC)” are found to be low in zinc‐bromide batterybased system with “PD control strategy.” The NPC and COE are found to be $55 262 and $0.35 per kWh for optimal system. Zinc‐bromide batteries are best suited for remote electrification with less load demand. The sensitivity analysis shows that there is a minimal effect on the performance of the planned IHRES upon variation in the “inflation rate,” “discount rate,” and “diesel price.” |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/est2.306 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2647533744</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2647533744</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2236-b8ddb980cba39ba5416c8899929a7005ca8f119c4956fc57dc848f5de5d6880c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10M9LwzAUB_AgCo458E8IePHSNU2TNPE25pyCoODUY0jzQzu2diYZ0v_elHrw4uk9Hp_3HnwBuCzQvEAI5zZEPC8ROwETTCueEc7w6Z_-HMxC2KJECyIYphPQr5yzOgbYOWia1HvbRlirGK1vbICqNWkeDirqTxiiV9F-DPOuhQfrXef3qtV22A4xWbXrWguf3_L3TX67zsc7PQx9iHZ_AxdQq2ATPZr-Apw5tQt29lun4PVutVneZ49P64fl4jHTGJcsq7kxteBI16oUtaKkYJpzIQQWqkKIasVdUQhNBGVO08poTrijxlLDeForp-BqvHvw3dcxJSS33dG36aXEjFS0LCtCkroelfZdCN46efDNXvleFkgO2cohW5myTTQb6Xezs_2_Tq5eNnjwPw-Nexg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2647533744</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effects of different batteries and dispatch strategies on performance of standalone PV/WT/DG/battery system: A case study</title><source>Wiley Journals</source><creator>Dhavala, R K ; Suresh, H N ; Rajanna, S ; Ramesh, M</creator><creatorcontrib>Dhavala, R K ; Suresh, H N ; Rajanna, S ; Ramesh, M</creatorcontrib><description>The idea of integrated hybrid renewable energy systems (IHRES) is gaining attention for electrification of rural areas where on‐grid electricity supply is uneconomical. From this point of view, the technical and economic feasibility analysis is carried out for a standalone IHRES in a remote area of Malnad region in Karnataka, India. Solar and wind energy are the prominent renewable resources available in the selected area for study. In the present study, lithium‐ion, lead‐acid and zinc‐bromide batteries effect on “PV‐WT‐DG‐Battery” system is examined and compared. The control strategies used in the study are “load following (LF)” and “predictive dispatch (PD).” The simulation results reveal that the “cost of energy (COE)” and “net present cost (NPC)” are found to be low in zinc‐bromide batterybased system with “PD control strategy.” The NPC and COE are found to be $55 262 and $0.35 per kWh for optimal system. Zinc‐bromide batteries are best suited for remote electrification with less load demand. The sensitivity analysis shows that there is a minimal effect on the performance of the planned IHRES upon variation in the “inflation rate,” “discount rate,” and “diesel price.”</description><identifier>ISSN: 2578-4862</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2578-4862</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/est2.306</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</publisher><subject>Control systems ; Demand analysis ; Economic analysis ; Electrical loads ; Electrification ; Feasibility studies ; HOMER ; Hybrid systems ; integrated hybrid renewable energy system ; Lithium ; load following ; Photovoltaic cells ; predictive dispatch ; Renewable resources ; Rural areas ; Sensitivity analysis ; Wind power ; Zinc ; zinc‐bromide battery</subject><ispartof>Energy storage (Hoboken, N.J. : 2019), 2022-04, Vol.4 (2), p.n/a</ispartof><rights>2021 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2022 John Wiley & Sons Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2236-b8ddb980cba39ba5416c8899929a7005ca8f119c4956fc57dc848f5de5d6880c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2236-b8ddb980cba39ba5416c8899929a7005ca8f119c4956fc57dc848f5de5d6880c3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3085-3517 ; 0000-0002-0345-1160 ; 0000-0003-3450-7179</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fest2.306$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fest2.306$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dhavala, R K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Suresh, H N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rajanna, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramesh, M</creatorcontrib><title>Effects of different batteries and dispatch strategies on performance of standalone PV/WT/DG/battery system: A case study</title><title>Energy storage (Hoboken, N.J. : 2019)</title><description>The idea of integrated hybrid renewable energy systems (IHRES) is gaining attention for electrification of rural areas where on‐grid electricity supply is uneconomical. From this point of view, the technical and economic feasibility analysis is carried out for a standalone IHRES in a remote area of Malnad region in Karnataka, India. Solar and wind energy are the prominent renewable resources available in the selected area for study. In the present study, lithium‐ion, lead‐acid and zinc‐bromide batteries effect on “PV‐WT‐DG‐Battery” system is examined and compared. The control strategies used in the study are “load following (LF)” and “predictive dispatch (PD).” The simulation results reveal that the “cost of energy (COE)” and “net present cost (NPC)” are found to be low in zinc‐bromide batterybased system with “PD control strategy.” The NPC and COE are found to be $55 262 and $0.35 per kWh for optimal system. Zinc‐bromide batteries are best suited for remote electrification with less load demand. The sensitivity analysis shows that there is a minimal effect on the performance of the planned IHRES upon variation in the “inflation rate,” “discount rate,” and “diesel price.”</description><subject>Control systems</subject><subject>Demand analysis</subject><subject>Economic analysis</subject><subject>Electrical loads</subject><subject>Electrification</subject><subject>Feasibility studies</subject><subject>HOMER</subject><subject>Hybrid systems</subject><subject>integrated hybrid renewable energy system</subject><subject>Lithium</subject><subject>load following</subject><subject>Photovoltaic cells</subject><subject>predictive dispatch</subject><subject>Renewable resources</subject><subject>Rural areas</subject><subject>Sensitivity analysis</subject><subject>Wind power</subject><subject>Zinc</subject><subject>zinc‐bromide battery</subject><issn>2578-4862</issn><issn>2578-4862</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp10M9LwzAUB_AgCo458E8IePHSNU2TNPE25pyCoODUY0jzQzu2diYZ0v_elHrw4uk9Hp_3HnwBuCzQvEAI5zZEPC8ROwETTCueEc7w6Z_-HMxC2KJECyIYphPQr5yzOgbYOWia1HvbRlirGK1vbICqNWkeDirqTxiiV9F-DPOuhQfrXef3qtV22A4xWbXrWguf3_L3TX67zsc7PQx9iHZ_AxdQq2ATPZr-Apw5tQt29lun4PVutVneZ49P64fl4jHTGJcsq7kxteBI16oUtaKkYJpzIQQWqkKIasVdUQhNBGVO08poTrijxlLDeForp-BqvHvw3dcxJSS33dG36aXEjFS0LCtCkroelfZdCN46efDNXvleFkgO2cohW5myTTQb6Xezs_2_Tq5eNnjwPw-Nexg</recordid><startdate>202204</startdate><enddate>202204</enddate><creator>Dhavala, R K</creator><creator>Suresh, H N</creator><creator>Rajanna, S</creator><creator>Ramesh, M</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7TC</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>JG9</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3085-3517</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0345-1160</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3450-7179</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202204</creationdate><title>Effects of different batteries and dispatch strategies on performance of standalone PV/WT/DG/battery system: A case study</title><author>Dhavala, R K ; Suresh, H N ; Rajanna, S ; Ramesh, M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2236-b8ddb980cba39ba5416c8899929a7005ca8f119c4956fc57dc848f5de5d6880c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Control systems</topic><topic>Demand analysis</topic><topic>Economic analysis</topic><topic>Electrical loads</topic><topic>Electrification</topic><topic>Feasibility studies</topic><topic>HOMER</topic><topic>Hybrid systems</topic><topic>integrated hybrid renewable energy system</topic><topic>Lithium</topic><topic>load following</topic><topic>Photovoltaic cells</topic><topic>predictive dispatch</topic><topic>Renewable resources</topic><topic>Rural areas</topic><topic>Sensitivity analysis</topic><topic>Wind power</topic><topic>Zinc</topic><topic>zinc‐bromide battery</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dhavala, R K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Suresh, H N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rajanna, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramesh, M</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology & Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><jtitle>Energy storage (Hoboken, N.J. : 2019)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dhavala, R K</au><au>Suresh, H N</au><au>Rajanna, S</au><au>Ramesh, M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effects of different batteries and dispatch strategies on performance of standalone PV/WT/DG/battery system: A case study</atitle><jtitle>Energy storage (Hoboken, N.J. : 2019)</jtitle><date>2022-04</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>4</volume><issue>2</issue><epage>n/a</epage><issn>2578-4862</issn><eissn>2578-4862</eissn><abstract>The idea of integrated hybrid renewable energy systems (IHRES) is gaining attention for electrification of rural areas where on‐grid electricity supply is uneconomical. From this point of view, the technical and economic feasibility analysis is carried out for a standalone IHRES in a remote area of Malnad region in Karnataka, India. Solar and wind energy are the prominent renewable resources available in the selected area for study. In the present study, lithium‐ion, lead‐acid and zinc‐bromide batteries effect on “PV‐WT‐DG‐Battery” system is examined and compared. The control strategies used in the study are “load following (LF)” and “predictive dispatch (PD).” The simulation results reveal that the “cost of energy (COE)” and “net present cost (NPC)” are found to be low in zinc‐bromide batterybased system with “PD control strategy.” The NPC and COE are found to be $55 262 and $0.35 per kWh for optimal system. Zinc‐bromide batteries are best suited for remote electrification with less load demand. The sensitivity analysis shows that there is a minimal effect on the performance of the planned IHRES upon variation in the “inflation rate,” “discount rate,” and “diesel price.”</abstract><cop>Chichester, UK</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</pub><doi>10.1002/est2.306</doi><tpages>19</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3085-3517</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0345-1160</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3450-7179</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2578-4862 |
ispartof | Energy storage (Hoboken, N.J. : 2019), 2022-04, Vol.4 (2), p.n/a |
issn | 2578-4862 2578-4862 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2647533744 |
source | Wiley Journals |
subjects | Control systems Demand analysis Economic analysis Electrical loads Electrification Feasibility studies HOMER Hybrid systems integrated hybrid renewable energy system Lithium load following Photovoltaic cells predictive dispatch Renewable resources Rural areas Sensitivity analysis Wind power Zinc zinc‐bromide battery |
title | Effects of different batteries and dispatch strategies on performance of standalone PV/WT/DG/battery system: A case study |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T07%3A49%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effects%20of%20different%20batteries%20and%20dispatch%20strategies%20on%20performance%20of%20standalone%20PV/WT/DG/battery%20system:%20A%20case%20study&rft.jtitle=Energy%20storage%20(Hoboken,%20N.J.%20:%202019)&rft.au=Dhavala,%20R%20K&rft.date=2022-04&rft.volume=4&rft.issue=2&rft.epage=n/a&rft.issn=2578-4862&rft.eissn=2578-4862&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/est2.306&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2647533744%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2647533744&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |