Promoting Rehabilitation Among Youth on Probation: An Examination of Strengths as Specific Responsivity Factors
Despite calls for strength-focused approaches in juvenile justice, there is little research on the role of strengths in probation case management. This is one of the first studies to examine whether strengths function as specific responsivity factors as proposed by the risk–need–responsivity model,...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Criminal justice and behavior 2022-05, Vol.49 (5), p.745-760 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 760 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 745 |
container_title | Criminal justice and behavior |
container_volume | 49 |
creator | Finseth, Sonia Peterson-Badali, Michele Brown, Shelley L. Skilling, Tracey A. |
description | Despite calls for strength-focused approaches in juvenile justice, there is little research on the role of strengths in probation case management. This is one of the first studies to examine whether strengths function as specific responsivity factors as proposed by the risk–need–responsivity model, through mediating and moderating effects, and findings lend preliminary support to this conceptualization. In a sample of 261 justice-involved youth, the relationship between strengths and recidivism was found to be partially mediated by the service-to-needs match rate, even while controlling for risk—suggesting that strengths have an important indirect effect on recidivism through their impact on youth’s engagement in and completion of services. Strengths, however, did not moderate the relationship between service-to-needs match and reoffending, suggesting that appropriately matched services are essential irrespective of a youth’s strength profile. Research corroborating these findings and examining the feasibility of front-line use of strengths information is warranted. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/00938548211039881 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2646689381</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_00938548211039881</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2646689381</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c312t-3cc1ae5d7bec266a63d6c111162f2840505db25f8e71d3ec9709d5607c797c2c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1LAzEQhoMoWKs_wFvA82o-Nh_rrZRWhYJi9eBpyWazbUp3syap2H9v6goexLkMM_O878ALwCVG1xgLcYNQQSXLJcEY0UJKfARGmDGSUVbkx2B0uGcH4BSchbBBCOUMsxFwT961LtpuBZ_NWlV2a6OK1nVw0rq0fHO7uIZpTFz1fbiFkw7OPlVruwF0DVxGb7pVXAeoAlz2RtvG6mQYetcF-2HjHs6Vjs6Hc3DSqG0wFz99DF7ns5fpfbZ4vHuYThaZppjEjGqNlWG1qIwmnCtOa65xKk4aInPEEKsrwhppBK6p0YVARc04EloUQhNNx-Bq8O29e9-ZEMuN2_kuvSwJzzmXKS6cKDxQ2rsQvGnK3ttW-X2JUXnItfyTa9JcD5qgVubX9X_BF5GHeJY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2646689381</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Promoting Rehabilitation Among Youth on Probation: An Examination of Strengths as Specific Responsivity Factors</title><source>Access via SAGE</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><creator>Finseth, Sonia ; Peterson-Badali, Michele ; Brown, Shelley L. ; Skilling, Tracey A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Finseth, Sonia ; Peterson-Badali, Michele ; Brown, Shelley L. ; Skilling, Tracey A.</creatorcontrib><description>Despite calls for strength-focused approaches in juvenile justice, there is little research on the role of strengths in probation case management. This is one of the first studies to examine whether strengths function as specific responsivity factors as proposed by the risk–need–responsivity model, through mediating and moderating effects, and findings lend preliminary support to this conceptualization. In a sample of 261 justice-involved youth, the relationship between strengths and recidivism was found to be partially mediated by the service-to-needs match rate, even while controlling for risk—suggesting that strengths have an important indirect effect on recidivism through their impact on youth’s engagement in and completion of services. Strengths, however, did not moderate the relationship between service-to-needs match and reoffending, suggesting that appropriately matched services are essential irrespective of a youth’s strength profile. Research corroborating these findings and examining the feasibility of front-line use of strengths information is warranted.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0093-8548</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-3594</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/00938548211039881</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Case management ; Feasibility ; Juvenile justice ; Juvenile offenders ; Probation service ; Recidivism ; Rehabilitation ; Youth</subject><ispartof>Criminal justice and behavior, 2022-05, Vol.49 (5), p.745-760</ispartof><rights>2021 International Association for Correctional and Forensic Psychology</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c312t-3cc1ae5d7bec266a63d6c111162f2840505db25f8e71d3ec9709d5607c797c2c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c312t-3cc1ae5d7bec266a63d6c111162f2840505db25f8e71d3ec9709d5607c797c2c3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-9737-2155 ; 0000-0002-9372-407X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/00938548211039881$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/00938548211039881$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21819,27924,27925,30999,43621,43622</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Finseth, Sonia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peterson-Badali, Michele</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brown, Shelley L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Skilling, Tracey A.</creatorcontrib><title>Promoting Rehabilitation Among Youth on Probation: An Examination of Strengths as Specific Responsivity Factors</title><title>Criminal justice and behavior</title><description>Despite calls for strength-focused approaches in juvenile justice, there is little research on the role of strengths in probation case management. This is one of the first studies to examine whether strengths function as specific responsivity factors as proposed by the risk–need–responsivity model, through mediating and moderating effects, and findings lend preliminary support to this conceptualization. In a sample of 261 justice-involved youth, the relationship between strengths and recidivism was found to be partially mediated by the service-to-needs match rate, even while controlling for risk—suggesting that strengths have an important indirect effect on recidivism through their impact on youth’s engagement in and completion of services. Strengths, however, did not moderate the relationship between service-to-needs match and reoffending, suggesting that appropriately matched services are essential irrespective of a youth’s strength profile. Research corroborating these findings and examining the feasibility of front-line use of strengths information is warranted.</description><subject>Case management</subject><subject>Feasibility</subject><subject>Juvenile justice</subject><subject>Juvenile offenders</subject><subject>Probation service</subject><subject>Recidivism</subject><subject>Rehabilitation</subject><subject>Youth</subject><issn>0093-8548</issn><issn>1552-3594</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AFRWT</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kE1LAzEQhoMoWKs_wFvA82o-Nh_rrZRWhYJi9eBpyWazbUp3syap2H9v6goexLkMM_O878ALwCVG1xgLcYNQQSXLJcEY0UJKfARGmDGSUVbkx2B0uGcH4BSchbBBCOUMsxFwT961LtpuBZ_NWlV2a6OK1nVw0rq0fHO7uIZpTFz1fbiFkw7OPlVruwF0DVxGb7pVXAeoAlz2RtvG6mQYetcF-2HjHs6Vjs6Hc3DSqG0wFz99DF7ns5fpfbZ4vHuYThaZppjEjGqNlWG1qIwmnCtOa65xKk4aInPEEKsrwhppBK6p0YVARc04EloUQhNNx-Bq8O29e9-ZEMuN2_kuvSwJzzmXKS6cKDxQ2rsQvGnK3ttW-X2JUXnItfyTa9JcD5qgVubX9X_BF5GHeJY</recordid><startdate>202205</startdate><enddate>202205</enddate><creator>Finseth, Sonia</creator><creator>Peterson-Badali, Michele</creator><creator>Brown, Shelley L.</creator><creator>Skilling, Tracey A.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>AFRWT</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>K7.</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9737-2155</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9372-407X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202205</creationdate><title>Promoting Rehabilitation Among Youth on Probation: An Examination of Strengths as Specific Responsivity Factors</title><author>Finseth, Sonia ; Peterson-Badali, Michele ; Brown, Shelley L. ; Skilling, Tracey A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c312t-3cc1ae5d7bec266a63d6c111162f2840505db25f8e71d3ec9709d5607c797c2c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Case management</topic><topic>Feasibility</topic><topic>Juvenile justice</topic><topic>Juvenile offenders</topic><topic>Probation service</topic><topic>Recidivism</topic><topic>Rehabilitation</topic><topic>Youth</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Finseth, Sonia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peterson-Badali, Michele</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brown, Shelley L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Skilling, Tracey A.</creatorcontrib><collection>SAGE Journals</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>ProQuest Criminal Justice (Alumni)</collection><jtitle>Criminal justice and behavior</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Finseth, Sonia</au><au>Peterson-Badali, Michele</au><au>Brown, Shelley L.</au><au>Skilling, Tracey A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Promoting Rehabilitation Among Youth on Probation: An Examination of Strengths as Specific Responsivity Factors</atitle><jtitle>Criminal justice and behavior</jtitle><date>2022-05</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>49</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>745</spage><epage>760</epage><pages>745-760</pages><issn>0093-8548</issn><eissn>1552-3594</eissn><abstract>Despite calls for strength-focused approaches in juvenile justice, there is little research on the role of strengths in probation case management. This is one of the first studies to examine whether strengths function as specific responsivity factors as proposed by the risk–need–responsivity model, through mediating and moderating effects, and findings lend preliminary support to this conceptualization. In a sample of 261 justice-involved youth, the relationship between strengths and recidivism was found to be partially mediated by the service-to-needs match rate, even while controlling for risk—suggesting that strengths have an important indirect effect on recidivism through their impact on youth’s engagement in and completion of services. Strengths, however, did not moderate the relationship between service-to-needs match and reoffending, suggesting that appropriately matched services are essential irrespective of a youth’s strength profile. Research corroborating these findings and examining the feasibility of front-line use of strengths information is warranted.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/00938548211039881</doi><tpages>16</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9737-2155</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9372-407X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0093-8548 |
ispartof | Criminal justice and behavior, 2022-05, Vol.49 (5), p.745-760 |
issn | 0093-8548 1552-3594 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2646689381 |
source | Access via SAGE; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA) |
subjects | Case management Feasibility Juvenile justice Juvenile offenders Probation service Recidivism Rehabilitation Youth |
title | Promoting Rehabilitation Among Youth on Probation: An Examination of Strengths as Specific Responsivity Factors |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T20%3A02%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Promoting%20Rehabilitation%20Among%20Youth%20on%20Probation:%20An%20Examination%20of%20Strengths%20as%20Specific%20Responsivity%20Factors&rft.jtitle=Criminal%20justice%20and%20behavior&rft.au=Finseth,%20Sonia&rft.date=2022-05&rft.volume=49&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=745&rft.epage=760&rft.pages=745-760&rft.issn=0093-8548&rft.eissn=1552-3594&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/00938548211039881&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2646689381%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2646689381&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_00938548211039881&rfr_iscdi=true |