Different responses of soil nitrogen to combined addition of labile carbon sources with fresh versus decomposed litter

Background It is well known that litter releases dissolved organic carbon (DOC), which would impact the role of litter in soil nitrogen (N) transformation. Thus, this study aimed to explore the effect of litters decomposed at different levels on soil N dynamics in the presence of labile carbon. Meth...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of plant nutrition and soil science 2022-04, Vol.185 (2), p.232-242
Hauptverfasser: Ma, Hongliang, Tecimen, Hüseyin Barış, Ma, Fen, Imran, Shakeel, Gao, Ren, Yin, Yunfeng, Raza, Taqi, Sun, Jie
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 242
container_issue 2
container_start_page 232
container_title Journal of plant nutrition and soil science
container_volume 185
creator Ma, Hongliang
Tecimen, Hüseyin Barış
Ma, Fen
Imran, Shakeel
Gao, Ren
Yin, Yunfeng
Raza, Taqi
Sun, Jie
description Background It is well known that litter releases dissolved organic carbon (DOC), which would impact the role of litter in soil nitrogen (N) transformation. Thus, this study aimed to explore the effect of litters decomposed at different levels on soil N dynamics in the presence of labile carbon. Methods An incubation experiment was carried out with fresh litter (SF), partially decomposed litter (SP) or the combined addition of glucose and alanine in soils for 210 days. The influence of litter addition on soil was investigated by changes of soil soluble organic N, NH4+‐N, NO3−‐N and microbial biomass N (MBN). Results There was higher soil NH4+‐N and NO3−‐N in SF, nonetheless lower in SP than control. Litter addition decreased soil dissolved organic N (DON), but increased DOC compared to control. These results suggested that the effects of litter on soil N might change with the varying status of decomposed litter. Alanine addition increased each soil N form, which was more of DON and less of MBN in SP than SF. After adding amino acids, the priming amount of DON was computed positive at 0.5 day with the highest soil MBN, simultaneously. Moreover, the net N transformation rate preceded the gross rate. Glucose addition also improved soil NH4+‐N and DON more in SP than SF, while lessened MBN in SF than SP. These results indicated that the differential effect of labile C sources, alanine and glucose, on soil N might be related to the chemistry of the differently decomposed litter. As a labile C source, glucose had a lesser effect on soil N than alanine. Conclusions Our findings highlighted the coexistence of litters at varied decomposition status and C sources released from litters, which are contributed to the N dynamics in soil and are critical for the ecological functioning of the degraded litter.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/jpln.202100303
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2646640795</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2646640795</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3173-2604dd076a8dbcb622a25d93be02724204757dfc2711388f0a78fb34eaa8421d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkEtPAyEUhSdGE2t165rEdStcmGFmaeo7jbrQNWEGsDRTGIG26b-XpkaXru4j57uPUxSXBE8JxnC9HHo3BQy5oJgeFSNSAkygAnacc0arSc0pPi3OYlxijBlpYFRsbq0xOmiXUNBx8C7qiLxB0dseOZuC_9QOJY86v2qt0wpJpWyy3u1VvWxtr1EnQ5sb0a9Dl_GtTQtk8rgF2ugQ1xEpnfHBx4z3NiUdzosTI_uoL37iuPi4v3ufPU7mrw9Ps5v5pKOE03w8ZkphXslatV1bAUgoVUNbjYEDA8x4yZXpgBNC69pgyWvTUqalrBkQRcfF1WHuEPzXWscklvlIl1cKqFhVMcybMqumB1UXfIxBGzEEu5JhJwgWe2_F3lvx620GmgOwze_v_lGL57f5yx_7DT0Pf2o</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2646640795</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Different responses of soil nitrogen to combined addition of labile carbon sources with fresh versus decomposed litter</title><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Ma, Hongliang ; Tecimen, Hüseyin Barış ; Ma, Fen ; Imran, Shakeel ; Gao, Ren ; Yin, Yunfeng ; Raza, Taqi ; Sun, Jie</creator><creatorcontrib>Ma, Hongliang ; Tecimen, Hüseyin Barış ; Ma, Fen ; Imran, Shakeel ; Gao, Ren ; Yin, Yunfeng ; Raza, Taqi ; Sun, Jie</creatorcontrib><description>Background It is well known that litter releases dissolved organic carbon (DOC), which would impact the role of litter in soil nitrogen (N) transformation. Thus, this study aimed to explore the effect of litters decomposed at different levels on soil N dynamics in the presence of labile carbon. Methods An incubation experiment was carried out with fresh litter (SF), partially decomposed litter (SP) or the combined addition of glucose and alanine in soils for 210 days. The influence of litter addition on soil was investigated by changes of soil soluble organic N, NH4+‐N, NO3−‐N and microbial biomass N (MBN). Results There was higher soil NH4+‐N and NO3−‐N in SF, nonetheless lower in SP than control. Litter addition decreased soil dissolved organic N (DON), but increased DOC compared to control. These results suggested that the effects of litter on soil N might change with the varying status of decomposed litter. Alanine addition increased each soil N form, which was more of DON and less of MBN in SP than SF. After adding amino acids, the priming amount of DON was computed positive at 0.5 day with the highest soil MBN, simultaneously. Moreover, the net N transformation rate preceded the gross rate. Glucose addition also improved soil NH4+‐N and DON more in SP than SF, while lessened MBN in SF than SP. These results indicated that the differential effect of labile C sources, alanine and glucose, on soil N might be related to the chemistry of the differently decomposed litter. As a labile C source, glucose had a lesser effect on soil N than alanine. Conclusions Our findings highlighted the coexistence of litters at varied decomposition status and C sources released from litters, which are contributed to the N dynamics in soil and are critical for the ecological functioning of the degraded litter.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1436-8730</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1522-2624</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/jpln.202100303</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Weinheim: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Alanine ; Amino acids ; Carbon ; Carbon sources ; Coexistence ; coniferous forest soil ; Decomposition ; Dissolved organic carbon ; Ecological function ; fresh litter ; Glucose ; Litter ; Microorganisms ; Nitrogen ; Organic soils ; partially decomposed litter ; Priming ; Soil dynamics ; Soil improvement ; Soil investigations ; Soils ; soluble organic carbon and nitrogen</subject><ispartof>Journal of plant nutrition and soil science, 2022-04, Vol.185 (2), p.232-242</ispartof><rights>2022 Wiley‐VCH GmbH</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3173-2604dd076a8dbcb622a25d93be02724204757dfc2711388f0a78fb34eaa8421d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3173-2604dd076a8dbcb622a25d93be02724204757dfc2711388f0a78fb34eaa8421d3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4927-3363</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fjpln.202100303$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fjpln.202100303$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,1418,27929,27930,45579,45580</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ma, Hongliang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tecimen, Hüseyin Barış</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ma, Fen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Imran, Shakeel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gao, Ren</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yin, Yunfeng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raza, Taqi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sun, Jie</creatorcontrib><title>Different responses of soil nitrogen to combined addition of labile carbon sources with fresh versus decomposed litter</title><title>Journal of plant nutrition and soil science</title><description>Background It is well known that litter releases dissolved organic carbon (DOC), which would impact the role of litter in soil nitrogen (N) transformation. Thus, this study aimed to explore the effect of litters decomposed at different levels on soil N dynamics in the presence of labile carbon. Methods An incubation experiment was carried out with fresh litter (SF), partially decomposed litter (SP) or the combined addition of glucose and alanine in soils for 210 days. The influence of litter addition on soil was investigated by changes of soil soluble organic N, NH4+‐N, NO3−‐N and microbial biomass N (MBN). Results There was higher soil NH4+‐N and NO3−‐N in SF, nonetheless lower in SP than control. Litter addition decreased soil dissolved organic N (DON), but increased DOC compared to control. These results suggested that the effects of litter on soil N might change with the varying status of decomposed litter. Alanine addition increased each soil N form, which was more of DON and less of MBN in SP than SF. After adding amino acids, the priming amount of DON was computed positive at 0.5 day with the highest soil MBN, simultaneously. Moreover, the net N transformation rate preceded the gross rate. Glucose addition also improved soil NH4+‐N and DON more in SP than SF, while lessened MBN in SF than SP. These results indicated that the differential effect of labile C sources, alanine and glucose, on soil N might be related to the chemistry of the differently decomposed litter. As a labile C source, glucose had a lesser effect on soil N than alanine. Conclusions Our findings highlighted the coexistence of litters at varied decomposition status and C sources released from litters, which are contributed to the N dynamics in soil and are critical for the ecological functioning of the degraded litter.</description><subject>Alanine</subject><subject>Amino acids</subject><subject>Carbon</subject><subject>Carbon sources</subject><subject>Coexistence</subject><subject>coniferous forest soil</subject><subject>Decomposition</subject><subject>Dissolved organic carbon</subject><subject>Ecological function</subject><subject>fresh litter</subject><subject>Glucose</subject><subject>Litter</subject><subject>Microorganisms</subject><subject>Nitrogen</subject><subject>Organic soils</subject><subject>partially decomposed litter</subject><subject>Priming</subject><subject>Soil dynamics</subject><subject>Soil improvement</subject><subject>Soil investigations</subject><subject>Soils</subject><subject>soluble organic carbon and nitrogen</subject><issn>1436-8730</issn><issn>1522-2624</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkEtPAyEUhSdGE2t165rEdStcmGFmaeo7jbrQNWEGsDRTGIG26b-XpkaXru4j57uPUxSXBE8JxnC9HHo3BQy5oJgeFSNSAkygAnacc0arSc0pPi3OYlxijBlpYFRsbq0xOmiXUNBx8C7qiLxB0dseOZuC_9QOJY86v2qt0wpJpWyy3u1VvWxtr1EnQ5sb0a9Dl_GtTQtk8rgF2ugQ1xEpnfHBx4z3NiUdzosTI_uoL37iuPi4v3ufPU7mrw9Ps5v5pKOE03w8ZkphXslatV1bAUgoVUNbjYEDA8x4yZXpgBNC69pgyWvTUqalrBkQRcfF1WHuEPzXWscklvlIl1cKqFhVMcybMqumB1UXfIxBGzEEu5JhJwgWe2_F3lvx620GmgOwze_v_lGL57f5yx_7DT0Pf2o</recordid><startdate>202204</startdate><enddate>202204</enddate><creator>Ma, Hongliang</creator><creator>Tecimen, Hüseyin Barış</creator><creator>Ma, Fen</creator><creator>Imran, Shakeel</creator><creator>Gao, Ren</creator><creator>Yin, Yunfeng</creator><creator>Raza, Taqi</creator><creator>Sun, Jie</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4927-3363</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202204</creationdate><title>Different responses of soil nitrogen to combined addition of labile carbon sources with fresh versus decomposed litter</title><author>Ma, Hongliang ; Tecimen, Hüseyin Barış ; Ma, Fen ; Imran, Shakeel ; Gao, Ren ; Yin, Yunfeng ; Raza, Taqi ; Sun, Jie</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3173-2604dd076a8dbcb622a25d93be02724204757dfc2711388f0a78fb34eaa8421d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Alanine</topic><topic>Amino acids</topic><topic>Carbon</topic><topic>Carbon sources</topic><topic>Coexistence</topic><topic>coniferous forest soil</topic><topic>Decomposition</topic><topic>Dissolved organic carbon</topic><topic>Ecological function</topic><topic>fresh litter</topic><topic>Glucose</topic><topic>Litter</topic><topic>Microorganisms</topic><topic>Nitrogen</topic><topic>Organic soils</topic><topic>partially decomposed litter</topic><topic>Priming</topic><topic>Soil dynamics</topic><topic>Soil improvement</topic><topic>Soil investigations</topic><topic>Soils</topic><topic>soluble organic carbon and nitrogen</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ma, Hongliang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tecimen, Hüseyin Barış</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ma, Fen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Imran, Shakeel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gao, Ren</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yin, Yunfeng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raza, Taqi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sun, Jie</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of plant nutrition and soil science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ma, Hongliang</au><au>Tecimen, Hüseyin Barış</au><au>Ma, Fen</au><au>Imran, Shakeel</au><au>Gao, Ren</au><au>Yin, Yunfeng</au><au>Raza, Taqi</au><au>Sun, Jie</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Different responses of soil nitrogen to combined addition of labile carbon sources with fresh versus decomposed litter</atitle><jtitle>Journal of plant nutrition and soil science</jtitle><date>2022-04</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>185</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>232</spage><epage>242</epage><pages>232-242</pages><issn>1436-8730</issn><eissn>1522-2624</eissn><abstract>Background It is well known that litter releases dissolved organic carbon (DOC), which would impact the role of litter in soil nitrogen (N) transformation. Thus, this study aimed to explore the effect of litters decomposed at different levels on soil N dynamics in the presence of labile carbon. Methods An incubation experiment was carried out with fresh litter (SF), partially decomposed litter (SP) or the combined addition of glucose and alanine in soils for 210 days. The influence of litter addition on soil was investigated by changes of soil soluble organic N, NH4+‐N, NO3−‐N and microbial biomass N (MBN). Results There was higher soil NH4+‐N and NO3−‐N in SF, nonetheless lower in SP than control. Litter addition decreased soil dissolved organic N (DON), but increased DOC compared to control. These results suggested that the effects of litter on soil N might change with the varying status of decomposed litter. Alanine addition increased each soil N form, which was more of DON and less of MBN in SP than SF. After adding amino acids, the priming amount of DON was computed positive at 0.5 day with the highest soil MBN, simultaneously. Moreover, the net N transformation rate preceded the gross rate. Glucose addition also improved soil NH4+‐N and DON more in SP than SF, while lessened MBN in SF than SP. These results indicated that the differential effect of labile C sources, alanine and glucose, on soil N might be related to the chemistry of the differently decomposed litter. As a labile C source, glucose had a lesser effect on soil N than alanine. Conclusions Our findings highlighted the coexistence of litters at varied decomposition status and C sources released from litters, which are contributed to the N dynamics in soil and are critical for the ecological functioning of the degraded litter.</abstract><cop>Weinheim</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><doi>10.1002/jpln.202100303</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4927-3363</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1436-8730
ispartof Journal of plant nutrition and soil science, 2022-04, Vol.185 (2), p.232-242
issn 1436-8730
1522-2624
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2646640795
source Access via Wiley Online Library
subjects Alanine
Amino acids
Carbon
Carbon sources
Coexistence
coniferous forest soil
Decomposition
Dissolved organic carbon
Ecological function
fresh litter
Glucose
Litter
Microorganisms
Nitrogen
Organic soils
partially decomposed litter
Priming
Soil dynamics
Soil improvement
Soil investigations
Soils
soluble organic carbon and nitrogen
title Different responses of soil nitrogen to combined addition of labile carbon sources with fresh versus decomposed litter
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-12T14%3A56%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Different%20responses%20of%20soil%20nitrogen%20to%20combined%20addition%20of%20labile%20carbon%20sources%20with%20fresh%20versus%20decomposed%20litter&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20plant%20nutrition%20and%20soil%20science&rft.au=Ma,%20Hongliang&rft.date=2022-04&rft.volume=185&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=232&rft.epage=242&rft.pages=232-242&rft.issn=1436-8730&rft.eissn=1522-2624&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/jpln.202100303&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2646640795%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2646640795&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true