Building Research Infrastructures to Study Digital Technology and Politics: Lessons from Switzerland

The relationship between digital technology and politics is an important phenomenon that remains poorly understood due to several structural problems. A key issue is the lack of adequate research infrastructures or the lack of access. This article discusses the challenges many social scientists face...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:PS, political science & politics political science & politics, 2022-04, Vol.55 (2), p.354-359
Hauptverfasser: Gilardi, Fabrizio, Baumgartner, Lucien, Dermont, Clau, Donnay, Karsten, Gessler, Theresa, Kubli, Maël, Leemann, Lucas, Müller, Stefan
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 359
container_issue 2
container_start_page 354
container_title PS, political science & politics
container_volume 55
creator Gilardi, Fabrizio
Baumgartner, Lucien
Dermont, Clau
Donnay, Karsten
Gessler, Theresa
Kubli, Maël
Leemann, Lucas
Müller, Stefan
description The relationship between digital technology and politics is an important phenomenon that remains poorly understood due to several structural problems. A key issue is the lack of adequate research infrastructures or the lack of access. This article discusses the challenges many social scientists face and presents the infrastructure we built in Switzerland to overcome them, using COVID-19 as an example. We conclude by discussing seven lessons we learned: automatization is key; avoid data hoarding; outsource some parts of the infrastructure but not others; focus on substantive questions; share data in the context of collaborations; engage in targeted public outreach; and collaboration is more promising than competition. We hope that our experience is helpful to other researchers pursuing similar goals.
doi_str_mv 10.1017/S1049096521000895
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2645381375</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S1049096521000895</cupid><sourcerecordid>2645381375</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-d0b417bc5845c0a9db50d9db289361ef55b7c072969c72a3bc9cf7ef12cb2e483</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kF9LwzAUxYMoOKcfwLeAz9Wbpmka33T-GwwUN59LmqRdRtfMJEXmp7djAx_El3svnN85Fw5ClwSuCRB-MyeQCRA5SwkAFIIdoRFhlCdMUHY83IOc7PRTdBbCCnYQgxHS971tte0a_G6CkV4t8bSrvQzR9yr23gQcHZ7HXm_xg21slC1eGLXsXOuaLZadxm-utdGqcItnJgTXBVx7t8bzLxu_jW8H5Byd1LIN5uKwx-jj6XExeUlmr8_Tyd0sUTSHmGioMsIrxYqMKZBCVwz0MNNC0JyYmrGKK-CpyIXiqaSVEqrmpiapqlKTFXSMrva5G-8-exNiuXK974aXZZpnjBaEcjZQZE8p70Lwpi433q6l35YEyl2Z5Z8yBw89eOS68lY35jf6f9cPq093kw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2645381375</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Building Research Infrastructures to Study Digital Technology and Politics: Lessons from Switzerland</title><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Cambridge Journals</source><creator>Gilardi, Fabrizio ; Baumgartner, Lucien ; Dermont, Clau ; Donnay, Karsten ; Gessler, Theresa ; Kubli, Maël ; Leemann, Lucas ; Müller, Stefan</creator><creatorcontrib>Gilardi, Fabrizio ; Baumgartner, Lucien ; Dermont, Clau ; Donnay, Karsten ; Gessler, Theresa ; Kubli, Maël ; Leemann, Lucas ; Müller, Stefan</creatorcontrib><description>The relationship between digital technology and politics is an important phenomenon that remains poorly understood due to several structural problems. A key issue is the lack of adequate research infrastructures or the lack of access. This article discusses the challenges many social scientists face and presents the infrastructure we built in Switzerland to overcome them, using COVID-19 as an example. We conclude by discussing seven lessons we learned: automatization is key; avoid data hoarding; outsource some parts of the infrastructure but not others; focus on substantive questions; share data in the context of collaborations; engage in targeted public outreach; and collaboration is more promising than competition. We hope that our experience is helpful to other researchers pursuing similar goals.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1049-0965</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1537-5935</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S1049096521000895</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, USA: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Citizen Participation ; Coronaviruses ; COVID-19 ; Data analysis ; Data collection ; Data Processing ; Digital technology ; False information ; General Data Protection Regulation ; Government (Administrative Body) ; Hoarding ; Infrastructure ; Medical research ; Methods Courses ; Multilingualism ; Official Languages ; Outsourcing ; Politics ; Researchers ; Science ; Scripts ; Social Media ; Social networks ; Social sciences ; Social scientists ; The Profession</subject><ispartof>PS, political science &amp; politics, 2022-04, Vol.55 (2), p.354-359</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the American Political Science Association</rights><rights>The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the American Political Science Association. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-d0b417bc5845c0a9db50d9db289361ef55b7c072969c72a3bc9cf7ef12cb2e483</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-d0b417bc5845c0a9db50d9db289361ef55b7c072969c72a3bc9cf7ef12cb2e483</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5201-869X ; 0000-0001-5456-8935 ; 0000-0002-9080-6539 ; 0000-0002-0635-3048 ; 0000-0003-2339-6266 ; 0000-0002-6315-4125</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1049096521000895/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,315,781,785,12850,27929,27930,55633</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gilardi, Fabrizio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baumgartner, Lucien</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dermont, Clau</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Donnay, Karsten</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gessler, Theresa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kubli, Maël</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leemann, Lucas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Müller, Stefan</creatorcontrib><title>Building Research Infrastructures to Study Digital Technology and Politics: Lessons from Switzerland</title><title>PS, political science &amp; politics</title><addtitle>APSC</addtitle><description>The relationship between digital technology and politics is an important phenomenon that remains poorly understood due to several structural problems. A key issue is the lack of adequate research infrastructures or the lack of access. This article discusses the challenges many social scientists face and presents the infrastructure we built in Switzerland to overcome them, using COVID-19 as an example. We conclude by discussing seven lessons we learned: automatization is key; avoid data hoarding; outsource some parts of the infrastructure but not others; focus on substantive questions; share data in the context of collaborations; engage in targeted public outreach; and collaboration is more promising than competition. We hope that our experience is helpful to other researchers pursuing similar goals.</description><subject>Citizen Participation</subject><subject>Coronaviruses</subject><subject>COVID-19</subject><subject>Data analysis</subject><subject>Data collection</subject><subject>Data Processing</subject><subject>Digital technology</subject><subject>False information</subject><subject>General Data Protection Regulation</subject><subject>Government (Administrative Body)</subject><subject>Hoarding</subject><subject>Infrastructure</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>Methods Courses</subject><subject>Multilingualism</subject><subject>Official Languages</subject><subject>Outsourcing</subject><subject>Politics</subject><subject>Researchers</subject><subject>Science</subject><subject>Scripts</subject><subject>Social Media</subject><subject>Social networks</subject><subject>Social sciences</subject><subject>Social scientists</subject><subject>The Profession</subject><issn>1049-0965</issn><issn>1537-5935</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>IKXGN</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kF9LwzAUxYMoOKcfwLeAz9Wbpmka33T-GwwUN59LmqRdRtfMJEXmp7djAx_El3svnN85Fw5ClwSuCRB-MyeQCRA5SwkAFIIdoRFhlCdMUHY83IOc7PRTdBbCCnYQgxHS971tte0a_G6CkV4t8bSrvQzR9yr23gQcHZ7HXm_xg21slC1eGLXsXOuaLZadxm-utdGqcItnJgTXBVx7t8bzLxu_jW8H5Byd1LIN5uKwx-jj6XExeUlmr8_Tyd0sUTSHmGioMsIrxYqMKZBCVwz0MNNC0JyYmrGKK-CpyIXiqaSVEqrmpiapqlKTFXSMrva5G-8-exNiuXK974aXZZpnjBaEcjZQZE8p70Lwpi433q6l35YEyl2Z5Z8yBw89eOS68lY35jf6f9cPq093kw</recordid><startdate>202204</startdate><enddate>202204</enddate><creator>Gilardi, Fabrizio</creator><creator>Baumgartner, Lucien</creator><creator>Dermont, Clau</creator><creator>Donnay, Karsten</creator><creator>Gessler, Theresa</creator><creator>Kubli, Maël</creator><creator>Leemann, Lucas</creator><creator>Müller, Stefan</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>IKXGN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88F</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M1Q</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5201-869X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5456-8935</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9080-6539</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0635-3048</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2339-6266</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6315-4125</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202204</creationdate><title>Building Research Infrastructures to Study Digital Technology and Politics: Lessons from Switzerland</title><author>Gilardi, Fabrizio ; Baumgartner, Lucien ; Dermont, Clau ; Donnay, Karsten ; Gessler, Theresa ; Kubli, Maël ; Leemann, Lucas ; Müller, Stefan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-d0b417bc5845c0a9db50d9db289361ef55b7c072969c72a3bc9cf7ef12cb2e483</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Citizen Participation</topic><topic>Coronaviruses</topic><topic>COVID-19</topic><topic>Data analysis</topic><topic>Data collection</topic><topic>Data Processing</topic><topic>Digital technology</topic><topic>False information</topic><topic>General Data Protection Regulation</topic><topic>Government (Administrative Body)</topic><topic>Hoarding</topic><topic>Infrastructure</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>Methods Courses</topic><topic>Multilingualism</topic><topic>Official Languages</topic><topic>Outsourcing</topic><topic>Politics</topic><topic>Researchers</topic><topic>Science</topic><topic>Scripts</topic><topic>Social Media</topic><topic>Social networks</topic><topic>Social sciences</topic><topic>Social scientists</topic><topic>The Profession</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gilardi, Fabrizio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baumgartner, Lucien</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dermont, Clau</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Donnay, Karsten</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gessler, Theresa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kubli, Maël</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leemann, Lucas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Müller, Stefan</creatorcontrib><collection>Cambridge Journals Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Military Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Military Database</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>PS, political science &amp; politics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gilardi, Fabrizio</au><au>Baumgartner, Lucien</au><au>Dermont, Clau</au><au>Donnay, Karsten</au><au>Gessler, Theresa</au><au>Kubli, Maël</au><au>Leemann, Lucas</au><au>Müller, Stefan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Building Research Infrastructures to Study Digital Technology and Politics: Lessons from Switzerland</atitle><jtitle>PS, political science &amp; politics</jtitle><addtitle>APSC</addtitle><date>2022-04</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>55</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>354</spage><epage>359</epage><pages>354-359</pages><issn>1049-0965</issn><eissn>1537-5935</eissn><abstract>The relationship between digital technology and politics is an important phenomenon that remains poorly understood due to several structural problems. A key issue is the lack of adequate research infrastructures or the lack of access. This article discusses the challenges many social scientists face and presents the infrastructure we built in Switzerland to overcome them, using COVID-19 as an example. We conclude by discussing seven lessons we learned: automatization is key; avoid data hoarding; outsource some parts of the infrastructure but not others; focus on substantive questions; share data in the context of collaborations; engage in targeted public outreach; and collaboration is more promising than competition. We hope that our experience is helpful to other researchers pursuing similar goals.</abstract><cop>New York, USA</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/S1049096521000895</doi><tpages>6</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5201-869X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5456-8935</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9080-6539</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0635-3048</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2339-6266</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6315-4125</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1049-0965
ispartof PS, political science & politics, 2022-04, Vol.55 (2), p.354-359
issn 1049-0965
1537-5935
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2645381375
source Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Cambridge Journals
subjects Citizen Participation
Coronaviruses
COVID-19
Data analysis
Data collection
Data Processing
Digital technology
False information
General Data Protection Regulation
Government (Administrative Body)
Hoarding
Infrastructure
Medical research
Methods Courses
Multilingualism
Official Languages
Outsourcing
Politics
Researchers
Science
Scripts
Social Media
Social networks
Social sciences
Social scientists
The Profession
title Building Research Infrastructures to Study Digital Technology and Politics: Lessons from Switzerland
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-15T11%3A40%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Building%20Research%20Infrastructures%20to%20Study%20Digital%20Technology%20and%20Politics:%20Lessons%20from%20Switzerland&rft.jtitle=PS,%20political%20science%20&%20politics&rft.au=Gilardi,%20Fabrizio&rft.date=2022-04&rft.volume=55&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=354&rft.epage=359&rft.pages=354-359&rft.issn=1049-0965&rft.eissn=1537-5935&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S1049096521000895&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2645381375%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2645381375&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_S1049096521000895&rfr_iscdi=true