Study on Influencing Factors and Control Strategies of Surgical Smoke Concentration Distribution
Paroxysmal fumes during surgical operations endanger the health of medical staff. Special measures for removing surgical smoke are lacking. Article Real-time monitoring of particulate matter concentrations in surgical smoke at different locations under different surgical conditions were explored, an...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Aerosol and Air Quality Research 2020-12, Vol.20 (12), p.2941-2952 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 2952 |
---|---|
container_issue | 12 |
container_start_page | 2941 |
container_title | Aerosol and Air Quality Research |
container_volume | 20 |
creator | Wu, Jun Shen, Henggen Zhan, Xiafei Zhu, Yingjian |
description | Paroxysmal fumes during surgical operations endanger the health of medical staff. Special measures for removing surgical smoke are lacking. Article Real-time monitoring of particulate matter concentrations in surgical smoke at different locations under different surgical conditions were explored, and a particulate matter purification control strategy was proposed. The PM_(2.5) and PM_(10) concentrations in the operating and respiratory zones near the operating table were about 3.0 times more than the specified value, but both surgical procedures met the requirements of PM concentration in the public zone. Therefore, a clean operating room is not clean for medical staff. The smoke produced by the three scalpels resulted in particle sizes of 0.30-2.50 μm in the respiratory zone, and calculate apparent density of powders to be 1.21g cm^(-3). The surgical smoke produced by the ultrasound scalpel resulted in the highest median PM_(10) concentration in the operating area. The results show that the smoke produced by different surgical conditions is mainly ultra-fine particles, which are more likely to harm the health of medical staff. A small surgical smoke circulation purification and dust removal system was designed, which could effectively suppress the spread of surgical smoke and reduce the occupational hazards of medical staff. The optimized control plan could significantly reduce the PM_(2.5) concentration value at measurement point a when the electric knife was turned on by approximately 200.0%. The PM_(2.5) concentration of breathing zone was close to 75.0 μg m^(-3), which basically met the occupational health requirements. The decrease in the PM_(2.5) concentration of operating zone was about 50.0%, but it still exceeded the limit. It had a reference value for the occupational health protection of the first-line medical staff of existing epidemics. |
doi_str_mv | 10.4209/aaqr.2020.05.0190 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2645234969</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><airiti_id>16808584_202012_202012140006_202012140006_2941_2952</airiti_id><sourcerecordid>2645234969</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a383t-e7ca163ecfc1c98c210589e3e54d385ea175ac1493d0eb3ad486083692f64c803</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkE1PAyEQhonRxEb9Ad428bx1-Fw4mvpVY-KhekZk2QZtlwrswX8vWBMTOTAZ8sw75EHoHMOcEVCXxnzGOQECc-BzwAoO0IxAh1vMQB2iGRYSWsklO0ZnKb1DOUIy0eEZel3lqf9qwtgsx2EzudH6cd3cGptDTI0Z-2YRxhzDplnlaLJbe5eaMDSrKa69NeV5Gz5chawbK-FL1LVPOfq3qTan6Ggwm-TOfusJerm9eV7ct49Pd8vF1WNrqKS5dZ01WFBnB4utkpZg4FI56jjrqeTO4I4bi5miPbg3anomBUgqFBkEsxLoCbrY5-5i-Jxcyvo9THEsKzURjBPKlFCFwnvKxpBSdIPeRb818Utj0NWlri51damB6-qyzDzsZ4yPPvu_3Kq1Wv3BMfktxXnR-69RDJer_OIbFaN8RA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2645234969</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Study on Influencing Factors and Control Strategies of Surgical Smoke Concentration Distribution</title><source>Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>EZB*</source><creator>Wu, Jun ; Shen, Henggen ; Zhan, Xiafei ; Zhu, Yingjian</creator><creatorcontrib>Wu, Jun ; Shen, Henggen ; Zhan, Xiafei ; Zhu, Yingjian</creatorcontrib><description>Paroxysmal fumes during surgical operations endanger the health of medical staff. Special measures for removing surgical smoke are lacking. Article Real-time monitoring of particulate matter concentrations in surgical smoke at different locations under different surgical conditions were explored, and a particulate matter purification control strategy was proposed. The PM_(2.5) and PM_(10) concentrations in the operating and respiratory zones near the operating table were about 3.0 times more than the specified value, but both surgical procedures met the requirements of PM concentration in the public zone. Therefore, a clean operating room is not clean for medical staff. The smoke produced by the three scalpels resulted in particle sizes of 0.30-2.50 μm in the respiratory zone, and calculate apparent density of powders to be 1.21g cm^(-3). The surgical smoke produced by the ultrasound scalpel resulted in the highest median PM_(10) concentration in the operating area. The results show that the smoke produced by different surgical conditions is mainly ultra-fine particles, which are more likely to harm the health of medical staff. A small surgical smoke circulation purification and dust removal system was designed, which could effectively suppress the spread of surgical smoke and reduce the occupational hazards of medical staff. The optimized control plan could significantly reduce the PM_(2.5) concentration value at measurement point a when the electric knife was turned on by approximately 200.0%. The PM_(2.5) concentration of breathing zone was close to 75.0 μg m^(-3), which basically met the occupational health requirements. The decrease in the PM_(2.5) concentration of operating zone was about 50.0%, but it still exceeded the limit. It had a reference value for the occupational health protection of the first-line medical staff of existing epidemics.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1680-8584</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2071-1409</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.4209/aaqr.2020.05.0190</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Taoyuan City: 社團法人台灣氣膠研究學會</publisher><subject>Aerosols ; Air pollution ; Bulk density ; Cancer ; Design ; Epidemics ; Fumes ; Humidity ; Masks ; Medical equipment ; Medical personnel ; Occupational hazards ; Occupational health ; Occupational safety ; Operating zones ; Particulate emissions ; Particulate matter ; Pollutants ; Prostate ; Purification ; Smoke ; Surgery ; Surgical instruments ; Thyroid gland ; Ventilation</subject><ispartof>Aerosol and Air Quality Research, 2020-12, Vol.20 (12), p.2941-2952</ispartof><rights>2020. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a383t-e7ca163ecfc1c98c210589e3e54d385ea175ac1493d0eb3ad486083692f64c803</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,860,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wu, Jun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shen, Henggen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhan, Xiafei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhu, Yingjian</creatorcontrib><title>Study on Influencing Factors and Control Strategies of Surgical Smoke Concentration Distribution</title><title>Aerosol and Air Quality Research</title><description>Paroxysmal fumes during surgical operations endanger the health of medical staff. Special measures for removing surgical smoke are lacking. Article Real-time monitoring of particulate matter concentrations in surgical smoke at different locations under different surgical conditions were explored, and a particulate matter purification control strategy was proposed. The PM_(2.5) and PM_(10) concentrations in the operating and respiratory zones near the operating table were about 3.0 times more than the specified value, but both surgical procedures met the requirements of PM concentration in the public zone. Therefore, a clean operating room is not clean for medical staff. The smoke produced by the three scalpels resulted in particle sizes of 0.30-2.50 μm in the respiratory zone, and calculate apparent density of powders to be 1.21g cm^(-3). The surgical smoke produced by the ultrasound scalpel resulted in the highest median PM_(10) concentration in the operating area. The results show that the smoke produced by different surgical conditions is mainly ultra-fine particles, which are more likely to harm the health of medical staff. A small surgical smoke circulation purification and dust removal system was designed, which could effectively suppress the spread of surgical smoke and reduce the occupational hazards of medical staff. The optimized control plan could significantly reduce the PM_(2.5) concentration value at measurement point a when the electric knife was turned on by approximately 200.0%. The PM_(2.5) concentration of breathing zone was close to 75.0 μg m^(-3), which basically met the occupational health requirements. The decrease in the PM_(2.5) concentration of operating zone was about 50.0%, but it still exceeded the limit. It had a reference value for the occupational health protection of the first-line medical staff of existing epidemics.</description><subject>Aerosols</subject><subject>Air pollution</subject><subject>Bulk density</subject><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Design</subject><subject>Epidemics</subject><subject>Fumes</subject><subject>Humidity</subject><subject>Masks</subject><subject>Medical equipment</subject><subject>Medical personnel</subject><subject>Occupational hazards</subject><subject>Occupational health</subject><subject>Occupational safety</subject><subject>Operating zones</subject><subject>Particulate emissions</subject><subject>Particulate matter</subject><subject>Pollutants</subject><subject>Prostate</subject><subject>Purification</subject><subject>Smoke</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Surgical instruments</subject><subject>Thyroid gland</subject><subject>Ventilation</subject><issn>1680-8584</issn><issn>2071-1409</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkE1PAyEQhonRxEb9Ad428bx1-Fw4mvpVY-KhekZk2QZtlwrswX8vWBMTOTAZ8sw75EHoHMOcEVCXxnzGOQECc-BzwAoO0IxAh1vMQB2iGRYSWsklO0ZnKb1DOUIy0eEZel3lqf9qwtgsx2EzudH6cd3cGptDTI0Z-2YRxhzDplnlaLJbe5eaMDSrKa69NeV5Gz5chawbK-FL1LVPOfq3qTan6Ggwm-TOfusJerm9eV7ct49Pd8vF1WNrqKS5dZ01WFBnB4utkpZg4FI56jjrqeTO4I4bi5miPbg3anomBUgqFBkEsxLoCbrY5-5i-Jxcyvo9THEsKzURjBPKlFCFwnvKxpBSdIPeRb818Utj0NWlri51damB6-qyzDzsZ4yPPvu_3Kq1Wv3BMfktxXnR-69RDJer_OIbFaN8RA</recordid><startdate>20201201</startdate><enddate>20201201</enddate><creator>Wu, Jun</creator><creator>Shen, Henggen</creator><creator>Zhan, Xiafei</creator><creator>Zhu, Yingjian</creator><general>社團法人台灣氣膠研究學會</general><general>Taiwan Association of Aerosol Research</general><scope>188</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20201201</creationdate><title>Study on Influencing Factors and Control Strategies of Surgical Smoke Concentration Distribution</title><author>Wu, Jun ; Shen, Henggen ; Zhan, Xiafei ; Zhu, Yingjian</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a383t-e7ca163ecfc1c98c210589e3e54d385ea175ac1493d0eb3ad486083692f64c803</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Aerosols</topic><topic>Air pollution</topic><topic>Bulk density</topic><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Design</topic><topic>Epidemics</topic><topic>Fumes</topic><topic>Humidity</topic><topic>Masks</topic><topic>Medical equipment</topic><topic>Medical personnel</topic><topic>Occupational hazards</topic><topic>Occupational health</topic><topic>Occupational safety</topic><topic>Operating zones</topic><topic>Particulate emissions</topic><topic>Particulate matter</topic><topic>Pollutants</topic><topic>Prostate</topic><topic>Purification</topic><topic>Smoke</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Surgical instruments</topic><topic>Thyroid gland</topic><topic>Ventilation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wu, Jun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shen, Henggen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhan, Xiafei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhu, Yingjian</creatorcontrib><collection>Airiti Library</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><jtitle>Aerosol and Air Quality Research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wu, Jun</au><au>Shen, Henggen</au><au>Zhan, Xiafei</au><au>Zhu, Yingjian</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Study on Influencing Factors and Control Strategies of Surgical Smoke Concentration Distribution</atitle><jtitle>Aerosol and Air Quality Research</jtitle><date>2020-12-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>2941</spage><epage>2952</epage><pages>2941-2952</pages><issn>1680-8584</issn><eissn>2071-1409</eissn><abstract>Paroxysmal fumes during surgical operations endanger the health of medical staff. Special measures for removing surgical smoke are lacking. Article Real-time monitoring of particulate matter concentrations in surgical smoke at different locations under different surgical conditions were explored, and a particulate matter purification control strategy was proposed. The PM_(2.5) and PM_(10) concentrations in the operating and respiratory zones near the operating table were about 3.0 times more than the specified value, but both surgical procedures met the requirements of PM concentration in the public zone. Therefore, a clean operating room is not clean for medical staff. The smoke produced by the three scalpels resulted in particle sizes of 0.30-2.50 μm in the respiratory zone, and calculate apparent density of powders to be 1.21g cm^(-3). The surgical smoke produced by the ultrasound scalpel resulted in the highest median PM_(10) concentration in the operating area. The results show that the smoke produced by different surgical conditions is mainly ultra-fine particles, which are more likely to harm the health of medical staff. A small surgical smoke circulation purification and dust removal system was designed, which could effectively suppress the spread of surgical smoke and reduce the occupational hazards of medical staff. The optimized control plan could significantly reduce the PM_(2.5) concentration value at measurement point a when the electric knife was turned on by approximately 200.0%. The PM_(2.5) concentration of breathing zone was close to 75.0 μg m^(-3), which basically met the occupational health requirements. The decrease in the PM_(2.5) concentration of operating zone was about 50.0%, but it still exceeded the limit. It had a reference value for the occupational health protection of the first-line medical staff of existing epidemics.</abstract><cop>Taoyuan City</cop><pub>社團法人台灣氣膠研究學會</pub><doi>10.4209/aaqr.2020.05.0190</doi><tpages>12</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1680-8584 |
ispartof | Aerosol and Air Quality Research, 2020-12, Vol.20 (12), p.2941-2952 |
issn | 1680-8584 2071-1409 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2645234969 |
source | Directory of Open Access Journals; EZB* |
subjects | Aerosols Air pollution Bulk density Cancer Design Epidemics Fumes Humidity Masks Medical equipment Medical personnel Occupational hazards Occupational health Occupational safety Operating zones Particulate emissions Particulate matter Pollutants Prostate Purification Smoke Surgery Surgical instruments Thyroid gland Ventilation |
title | Study on Influencing Factors and Control Strategies of Surgical Smoke Concentration Distribution |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-11T19%3A38%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Study%20on%20Influencing%20Factors%20and%20Control%20Strategies%20of%20Surgical%20Smoke%20Concentration%20Distribution&rft.jtitle=Aerosol%20and%20Air%20Quality%20Research&rft.au=Wu,%20Jun&rft.date=2020-12-01&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=2941&rft.epage=2952&rft.pages=2941-2952&rft.issn=1680-8584&rft.eissn=2071-1409&rft_id=info:doi/10.4209/aaqr.2020.05.0190&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2645234969%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2645234969&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_airiti_id=16808584_202012_202012140006_202012140006_2941_2952&rfr_iscdi=true |