Computational Assessment of Transonic Airfoil-Gust Aeroelastic Response
This study assesses the aeroelastic response that could arise from a periodic vertical gust of different frequencies encountering an airfoil which consists of a trailing-edge control surface (typically used for transonic aileron-buzz studies) and an airfoil undergoing pitching and plunging aeroelast...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | AIAA journal 2022-04, Vol.60 (4), p.2597-2614 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 2614 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 2597 |
container_title | AIAA journal |
container_volume | 60 |
creator | Halder, Rahul Damodaran, Murali Cheong Khoo, Boo |
description | This study assesses the aeroelastic response that could arise from a periodic vertical gust of different frequencies encountering an airfoil which consists of a trailing-edge control surface (typically used for transonic aileron-buzz studies) and an airfoil undergoing pitching and plunging aeroelastic motion in transonic flow. The flutter phenomena and limit cycle oscillation correspond to two different types of self-induced instabilities, which happen at a Mach number, freestream velocity, and angle of attack combination for which the airfoil or control surface attains a stable oscillation. Gust acts as an external force to an aerostructural system. The airfoil shows a beating pattern under a periodic gust when the gust frequency coincides with the flutter frequency. However, this pattern evident at flutter velocity is absent when the periodic gust encounters an aeroelastic system at limit cycle oscillation velocity. The present work also shows the impact of periodic gust front on the shock/boundary-layer interaction modifying the coefficient of pressure and coefficient of skin friction distribution and leading to a multiple-frequency and multiple-amplitude aeroelastic motion. Fast Fourier transform is applied to the structural response to explore the frequency content corresponding to the structural response and dominant fluid modes for different flow Mach number regimes under the influence of the periodic gust. These frequency characteristics of the structural responses and flowfield in inviscid and viscous flowfield are distinct for different test cases and reveal the underlying physics of several multiple-frequency and multiple-amplitude aeroelastic motions, frequency coalescence, generation of a new frequency, and so on, as shown in this study. |
doi_str_mv | 10.2514/1.J060344 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2645209557</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2645209557</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a248t-4aef14fa2238d113c984d181f8526cd58d072c8a851b0487bc1daf964b2b28c53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNplkE9Lw0AUxBdRsFYPfoOAIHhI3bd_ku0xFK1KQZAK3pbNZhdS0mzctzn47U1pwYOnx_B-DDNDyC3QBZMgHmHxRgvKhTgjM5Cc51zJr3Myo5RCDkKyS3KFuJsUKxXMyHoV9sOYTGpDb7qsQnSIe9enLPhsG02PoW9tVrXRh7bL1yOmrHIxuM5gmh4fDofQo7smF9506G5Od04-n5-2q5d8875-XVWb3DChUi6M8yC8YYyrBoDbpRINKPBKssI2UjW0ZFYZJaGmQpW1hcb4ZSFqVjNlJZ-Tu6PvEMP36DDpXRjjFB01K6Z6dCllOVEPR8rGgBid10Ns9yb-aKD6sJMGfdppYu-PrGmN-XP7D_4C2C1lYQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2645209557</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Computational Assessment of Transonic Airfoil-Gust Aeroelastic Response</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Halder, Rahul ; Damodaran, Murali ; Cheong Khoo, Boo</creator><creatorcontrib>Halder, Rahul ; Damodaran, Murali ; Cheong Khoo, Boo</creatorcontrib><description>This study assesses the aeroelastic response that could arise from a periodic vertical gust of different frequencies encountering an airfoil which consists of a trailing-edge control surface (typically used for transonic aileron-buzz studies) and an airfoil undergoing pitching and plunging aeroelastic motion in transonic flow. The flutter phenomena and limit cycle oscillation correspond to two different types of self-induced instabilities, which happen at a Mach number, freestream velocity, and angle of attack combination for which the airfoil or control surface attains a stable oscillation. Gust acts as an external force to an aerostructural system. The airfoil shows a beating pattern under a periodic gust when the gust frequency coincides with the flutter frequency. However, this pattern evident at flutter velocity is absent when the periodic gust encounters an aeroelastic system at limit cycle oscillation velocity. The present work also shows the impact of periodic gust front on the shock/boundary-layer interaction modifying the coefficient of pressure and coefficient of skin friction distribution and leading to a multiple-frequency and multiple-amplitude aeroelastic motion. Fast Fourier transform is applied to the structural response to explore the frequency content corresponding to the structural response and dominant fluid modes for different flow Mach number regimes under the influence of the periodic gust. These frequency characteristics of the structural responses and flowfield in inviscid and viscous flowfield are distinct for different test cases and reveal the underlying physics of several multiple-frequency and multiple-amplitude aeroelastic motions, frequency coalescence, generation of a new frequency, and so on, as shown in this study.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0001-1452</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1533-385X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2514/1.J060344</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Virginia: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics</publisher><subject>Aeroelasticity ; Airfoils ; Amplitudes ; Angle of attack ; Boundary layer interaction ; Coalescing ; Control surfaces ; Fast Fourier transformations ; Flutter ; Fourier transforms ; Limit cycle oscillations ; Mach number ; Skin friction ; Stable oscillations ; Structural response ; Transonic flow ; Vibration</subject><ispartof>AIAA journal, 2022-04, Vol.60 (4), p.2597-2614</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2022 by the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Inc. All rights reserved. All requests for copying and permission to reprint should be submitted to CCC at ; employ the eISSN to initiate your request. See also AIAA Rights and Permissions .</rights><rights>Copyright © 2022 by the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Inc. All rights reserved. All requests for copying and permission to reprint should be submitted to CCC at www.copyright.com; employ the eISSN 1533-385X to initiate your request. See also AIAA Rights and Permissions www.aiaa.org/randp.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a248t-4aef14fa2238d113c984d181f8526cd58d072c8a851b0487bc1daf964b2b28c53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Halder, Rahul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Damodaran, Murali</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cheong Khoo, Boo</creatorcontrib><title>Computational Assessment of Transonic Airfoil-Gust Aeroelastic Response</title><title>AIAA journal</title><description>This study assesses the aeroelastic response that could arise from a periodic vertical gust of different frequencies encountering an airfoil which consists of a trailing-edge control surface (typically used for transonic aileron-buzz studies) and an airfoil undergoing pitching and plunging aeroelastic motion in transonic flow. The flutter phenomena and limit cycle oscillation correspond to two different types of self-induced instabilities, which happen at a Mach number, freestream velocity, and angle of attack combination for which the airfoil or control surface attains a stable oscillation. Gust acts as an external force to an aerostructural system. The airfoil shows a beating pattern under a periodic gust when the gust frequency coincides with the flutter frequency. However, this pattern evident at flutter velocity is absent when the periodic gust encounters an aeroelastic system at limit cycle oscillation velocity. The present work also shows the impact of periodic gust front on the shock/boundary-layer interaction modifying the coefficient of pressure and coefficient of skin friction distribution and leading to a multiple-frequency and multiple-amplitude aeroelastic motion. Fast Fourier transform is applied to the structural response to explore the frequency content corresponding to the structural response and dominant fluid modes for different flow Mach number regimes under the influence of the periodic gust. These frequency characteristics of the structural responses and flowfield in inviscid and viscous flowfield are distinct for different test cases and reveal the underlying physics of several multiple-frequency and multiple-amplitude aeroelastic motions, frequency coalescence, generation of a new frequency, and so on, as shown in this study.</description><subject>Aeroelasticity</subject><subject>Airfoils</subject><subject>Amplitudes</subject><subject>Angle of attack</subject><subject>Boundary layer interaction</subject><subject>Coalescing</subject><subject>Control surfaces</subject><subject>Fast Fourier transformations</subject><subject>Flutter</subject><subject>Fourier transforms</subject><subject>Limit cycle oscillations</subject><subject>Mach number</subject><subject>Skin friction</subject><subject>Stable oscillations</subject><subject>Structural response</subject><subject>Transonic flow</subject><subject>Vibration</subject><issn>0001-1452</issn><issn>1533-385X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNplkE9Lw0AUxBdRsFYPfoOAIHhI3bd_ku0xFK1KQZAK3pbNZhdS0mzctzn47U1pwYOnx_B-DDNDyC3QBZMgHmHxRgvKhTgjM5Cc51zJr3Myo5RCDkKyS3KFuJsUKxXMyHoV9sOYTGpDb7qsQnSIe9enLPhsG02PoW9tVrXRh7bL1yOmrHIxuM5gmh4fDofQo7smF9506G5Od04-n5-2q5d8875-XVWb3DChUi6M8yC8YYyrBoDbpRINKPBKssI2UjW0ZFYZJaGmQpW1hcb4ZSFqVjNlJZ-Tu6PvEMP36DDpXRjjFB01K6Z6dCllOVEPR8rGgBid10Ns9yb-aKD6sJMGfdppYu-PrGmN-XP7D_4C2C1lYQ</recordid><startdate>20220401</startdate><enddate>20220401</enddate><creator>Halder, Rahul</creator><creator>Damodaran, Murali</creator><creator>Cheong Khoo, Boo</creator><general>American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>L7M</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220401</creationdate><title>Computational Assessment of Transonic Airfoil-Gust Aeroelastic Response</title><author>Halder, Rahul ; Damodaran, Murali ; Cheong Khoo, Boo</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a248t-4aef14fa2238d113c984d181f8526cd58d072c8a851b0487bc1daf964b2b28c53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Aeroelasticity</topic><topic>Airfoils</topic><topic>Amplitudes</topic><topic>Angle of attack</topic><topic>Boundary layer interaction</topic><topic>Coalescing</topic><topic>Control surfaces</topic><topic>Fast Fourier transformations</topic><topic>Flutter</topic><topic>Fourier transforms</topic><topic>Limit cycle oscillations</topic><topic>Mach number</topic><topic>Skin friction</topic><topic>Stable oscillations</topic><topic>Structural response</topic><topic>Transonic flow</topic><topic>Vibration</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Halder, Rahul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Damodaran, Murali</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cheong Khoo, Boo</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>AIAA journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Halder, Rahul</au><au>Damodaran, Murali</au><au>Cheong Khoo, Boo</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Computational Assessment of Transonic Airfoil-Gust Aeroelastic Response</atitle><jtitle>AIAA journal</jtitle><date>2022-04-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>60</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>2597</spage><epage>2614</epage><pages>2597-2614</pages><issn>0001-1452</issn><eissn>1533-385X</eissn><abstract>This study assesses the aeroelastic response that could arise from a periodic vertical gust of different frequencies encountering an airfoil which consists of a trailing-edge control surface (typically used for transonic aileron-buzz studies) and an airfoil undergoing pitching and plunging aeroelastic motion in transonic flow. The flutter phenomena and limit cycle oscillation correspond to two different types of self-induced instabilities, which happen at a Mach number, freestream velocity, and angle of attack combination for which the airfoil or control surface attains a stable oscillation. Gust acts as an external force to an aerostructural system. The airfoil shows a beating pattern under a periodic gust when the gust frequency coincides with the flutter frequency. However, this pattern evident at flutter velocity is absent when the periodic gust encounters an aeroelastic system at limit cycle oscillation velocity. The present work also shows the impact of periodic gust front on the shock/boundary-layer interaction modifying the coefficient of pressure and coefficient of skin friction distribution and leading to a multiple-frequency and multiple-amplitude aeroelastic motion. Fast Fourier transform is applied to the structural response to explore the frequency content corresponding to the structural response and dominant fluid modes for different flow Mach number regimes under the influence of the periodic gust. These frequency characteristics of the structural responses and flowfield in inviscid and viscous flowfield are distinct for different test cases and reveal the underlying physics of several multiple-frequency and multiple-amplitude aeroelastic motions, frequency coalescence, generation of a new frequency, and so on, as shown in this study.</abstract><cop>Virginia</cop><pub>American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics</pub><doi>10.2514/1.J060344</doi><tpages>18</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0001-1452 |
ispartof | AIAA journal, 2022-04, Vol.60 (4), p.2597-2614 |
issn | 0001-1452 1533-385X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2645209557 |
source | Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Aeroelasticity Airfoils Amplitudes Angle of attack Boundary layer interaction Coalescing Control surfaces Fast Fourier transformations Flutter Fourier transforms Limit cycle oscillations Mach number Skin friction Stable oscillations Structural response Transonic flow Vibration |
title | Computational Assessment of Transonic Airfoil-Gust Aeroelastic Response |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T16%3A10%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Computational%20Assessment%20of%20Transonic%20Airfoil-Gust%20Aeroelastic%20Response&rft.jtitle=AIAA%20journal&rft.au=Halder,%20Rahul&rft.date=2022-04-01&rft.volume=60&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=2597&rft.epage=2614&rft.pages=2597-2614&rft.issn=0001-1452&rft.eissn=1533-385X&rft_id=info:doi/10.2514/1.J060344&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2645209557%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2645209557&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |