Computational Assessment of Transonic Airfoil-Gust Aeroelastic Response

This study assesses the aeroelastic response that could arise from a periodic vertical gust of different frequencies encountering an airfoil which consists of a trailing-edge control surface (typically used for transonic aileron-buzz studies) and an airfoil undergoing pitching and plunging aeroelast...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:AIAA journal 2022-04, Vol.60 (4), p.2597-2614
Hauptverfasser: Halder, Rahul, Damodaran, Murali, Cheong Khoo, Boo
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2614
container_issue 4
container_start_page 2597
container_title AIAA journal
container_volume 60
creator Halder, Rahul
Damodaran, Murali
Cheong Khoo, Boo
description This study assesses the aeroelastic response that could arise from a periodic vertical gust of different frequencies encountering an airfoil which consists of a trailing-edge control surface (typically used for transonic aileron-buzz studies) and an airfoil undergoing pitching and plunging aeroelastic motion in transonic flow. The flutter phenomena and limit cycle oscillation correspond to two different types of self-induced instabilities, which happen at a Mach number, freestream velocity, and angle of attack combination for which the airfoil or control surface attains a stable oscillation. Gust acts as an external force to an aerostructural system. The airfoil shows a beating pattern under a periodic gust when the gust frequency coincides with the flutter frequency. However, this pattern evident at flutter velocity is absent when the periodic gust encounters an aeroelastic system at limit cycle oscillation velocity. The present work also shows the impact of periodic gust front on the shock/boundary-layer interaction modifying the coefficient of pressure and coefficient of skin friction distribution and leading to a multiple-frequency and multiple-amplitude aeroelastic motion. Fast Fourier transform is applied to the structural response to explore the frequency content corresponding to the structural response and dominant fluid modes for different flow Mach number regimes under the influence of the periodic gust. These frequency characteristics of the structural responses and flowfield in inviscid and viscous flowfield are distinct for different test cases and reveal the underlying physics of several multiple-frequency and multiple-amplitude aeroelastic motions, frequency coalescence, generation of a new frequency, and so on, as shown in this study.
doi_str_mv 10.2514/1.J060344
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2645209557</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2645209557</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a248t-4aef14fa2238d113c984d181f8526cd58d072c8a851b0487bc1daf964b2b28c53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNplkE9Lw0AUxBdRsFYPfoOAIHhI3bd_ku0xFK1KQZAK3pbNZhdS0mzctzn47U1pwYOnx_B-DDNDyC3QBZMgHmHxRgvKhTgjM5Cc51zJr3Myo5RCDkKyS3KFuJsUKxXMyHoV9sOYTGpDb7qsQnSIe9enLPhsG02PoW9tVrXRh7bL1yOmrHIxuM5gmh4fDofQo7smF9506G5Od04-n5-2q5d8875-XVWb3DChUi6M8yC8YYyrBoDbpRINKPBKssI2UjW0ZFYZJaGmQpW1hcb4ZSFqVjNlJZ-Tu6PvEMP36DDpXRjjFB01K6Z6dCllOVEPR8rGgBid10Ns9yb-aKD6sJMGfdppYu-PrGmN-XP7D_4C2C1lYQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2645209557</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Computational Assessment of Transonic Airfoil-Gust Aeroelastic Response</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Halder, Rahul ; Damodaran, Murali ; Cheong Khoo, Boo</creator><creatorcontrib>Halder, Rahul ; Damodaran, Murali ; Cheong Khoo, Boo</creatorcontrib><description>This study assesses the aeroelastic response that could arise from a periodic vertical gust of different frequencies encountering an airfoil which consists of a trailing-edge control surface (typically used for transonic aileron-buzz studies) and an airfoil undergoing pitching and plunging aeroelastic motion in transonic flow. The flutter phenomena and limit cycle oscillation correspond to two different types of self-induced instabilities, which happen at a Mach number, freestream velocity, and angle of attack combination for which the airfoil or control surface attains a stable oscillation. Gust acts as an external force to an aerostructural system. The airfoil shows a beating pattern under a periodic gust when the gust frequency coincides with the flutter frequency. However, this pattern evident at flutter velocity is absent when the periodic gust encounters an aeroelastic system at limit cycle oscillation velocity. The present work also shows the impact of periodic gust front on the shock/boundary-layer interaction modifying the coefficient of pressure and coefficient of skin friction distribution and leading to a multiple-frequency and multiple-amplitude aeroelastic motion. Fast Fourier transform is applied to the structural response to explore the frequency content corresponding to the structural response and dominant fluid modes for different flow Mach number regimes under the influence of the periodic gust. These frequency characteristics of the structural responses and flowfield in inviscid and viscous flowfield are distinct for different test cases and reveal the underlying physics of several multiple-frequency and multiple-amplitude aeroelastic motions, frequency coalescence, generation of a new frequency, and so on, as shown in this study.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0001-1452</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1533-385X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2514/1.J060344</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Virginia: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics</publisher><subject>Aeroelasticity ; Airfoils ; Amplitudes ; Angle of attack ; Boundary layer interaction ; Coalescing ; Control surfaces ; Fast Fourier transformations ; Flutter ; Fourier transforms ; Limit cycle oscillations ; Mach number ; Skin friction ; Stable oscillations ; Structural response ; Transonic flow ; Vibration</subject><ispartof>AIAA journal, 2022-04, Vol.60 (4), p.2597-2614</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2022 by the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Inc. All rights reserved. All requests for copying and permission to reprint should be submitted to CCC at ; employ the eISSN to initiate your request. See also AIAA Rights and Permissions .</rights><rights>Copyright © 2022 by the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Inc. All rights reserved. All requests for copying and permission to reprint should be submitted to CCC at www.copyright.com; employ the eISSN 1533-385X to initiate your request. See also AIAA Rights and Permissions www.aiaa.org/randp.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a248t-4aef14fa2238d113c984d181f8526cd58d072c8a851b0487bc1daf964b2b28c53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Halder, Rahul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Damodaran, Murali</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cheong Khoo, Boo</creatorcontrib><title>Computational Assessment of Transonic Airfoil-Gust Aeroelastic Response</title><title>AIAA journal</title><description>This study assesses the aeroelastic response that could arise from a periodic vertical gust of different frequencies encountering an airfoil which consists of a trailing-edge control surface (typically used for transonic aileron-buzz studies) and an airfoil undergoing pitching and plunging aeroelastic motion in transonic flow. The flutter phenomena and limit cycle oscillation correspond to two different types of self-induced instabilities, which happen at a Mach number, freestream velocity, and angle of attack combination for which the airfoil or control surface attains a stable oscillation. Gust acts as an external force to an aerostructural system. The airfoil shows a beating pattern under a periodic gust when the gust frequency coincides with the flutter frequency. However, this pattern evident at flutter velocity is absent when the periodic gust encounters an aeroelastic system at limit cycle oscillation velocity. The present work also shows the impact of periodic gust front on the shock/boundary-layer interaction modifying the coefficient of pressure and coefficient of skin friction distribution and leading to a multiple-frequency and multiple-amplitude aeroelastic motion. Fast Fourier transform is applied to the structural response to explore the frequency content corresponding to the structural response and dominant fluid modes for different flow Mach number regimes under the influence of the periodic gust. These frequency characteristics of the structural responses and flowfield in inviscid and viscous flowfield are distinct for different test cases and reveal the underlying physics of several multiple-frequency and multiple-amplitude aeroelastic motions, frequency coalescence, generation of a new frequency, and so on, as shown in this study.</description><subject>Aeroelasticity</subject><subject>Airfoils</subject><subject>Amplitudes</subject><subject>Angle of attack</subject><subject>Boundary layer interaction</subject><subject>Coalescing</subject><subject>Control surfaces</subject><subject>Fast Fourier transformations</subject><subject>Flutter</subject><subject>Fourier transforms</subject><subject>Limit cycle oscillations</subject><subject>Mach number</subject><subject>Skin friction</subject><subject>Stable oscillations</subject><subject>Structural response</subject><subject>Transonic flow</subject><subject>Vibration</subject><issn>0001-1452</issn><issn>1533-385X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNplkE9Lw0AUxBdRsFYPfoOAIHhI3bd_ku0xFK1KQZAK3pbNZhdS0mzctzn47U1pwYOnx_B-DDNDyC3QBZMgHmHxRgvKhTgjM5Cc51zJr3Myo5RCDkKyS3KFuJsUKxXMyHoV9sOYTGpDb7qsQnSIe9enLPhsG02PoW9tVrXRh7bL1yOmrHIxuM5gmh4fDofQo7smF9506G5Od04-n5-2q5d8875-XVWb3DChUi6M8yC8YYyrBoDbpRINKPBKssI2UjW0ZFYZJaGmQpW1hcb4ZSFqVjNlJZ-Tu6PvEMP36DDpXRjjFB01K6Z6dCllOVEPR8rGgBid10Ns9yb-aKD6sJMGfdppYu-PrGmN-XP7D_4C2C1lYQ</recordid><startdate>20220401</startdate><enddate>20220401</enddate><creator>Halder, Rahul</creator><creator>Damodaran, Murali</creator><creator>Cheong Khoo, Boo</creator><general>American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>L7M</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220401</creationdate><title>Computational Assessment of Transonic Airfoil-Gust Aeroelastic Response</title><author>Halder, Rahul ; Damodaran, Murali ; Cheong Khoo, Boo</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a248t-4aef14fa2238d113c984d181f8526cd58d072c8a851b0487bc1daf964b2b28c53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Aeroelasticity</topic><topic>Airfoils</topic><topic>Amplitudes</topic><topic>Angle of attack</topic><topic>Boundary layer interaction</topic><topic>Coalescing</topic><topic>Control surfaces</topic><topic>Fast Fourier transformations</topic><topic>Flutter</topic><topic>Fourier transforms</topic><topic>Limit cycle oscillations</topic><topic>Mach number</topic><topic>Skin friction</topic><topic>Stable oscillations</topic><topic>Structural response</topic><topic>Transonic flow</topic><topic>Vibration</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Halder, Rahul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Damodaran, Murali</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cheong Khoo, Boo</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>AIAA journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Halder, Rahul</au><au>Damodaran, Murali</au><au>Cheong Khoo, Boo</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Computational Assessment of Transonic Airfoil-Gust Aeroelastic Response</atitle><jtitle>AIAA journal</jtitle><date>2022-04-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>60</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>2597</spage><epage>2614</epage><pages>2597-2614</pages><issn>0001-1452</issn><eissn>1533-385X</eissn><abstract>This study assesses the aeroelastic response that could arise from a periodic vertical gust of different frequencies encountering an airfoil which consists of a trailing-edge control surface (typically used for transonic aileron-buzz studies) and an airfoil undergoing pitching and plunging aeroelastic motion in transonic flow. The flutter phenomena and limit cycle oscillation correspond to two different types of self-induced instabilities, which happen at a Mach number, freestream velocity, and angle of attack combination for which the airfoil or control surface attains a stable oscillation. Gust acts as an external force to an aerostructural system. The airfoil shows a beating pattern under a periodic gust when the gust frequency coincides with the flutter frequency. However, this pattern evident at flutter velocity is absent when the periodic gust encounters an aeroelastic system at limit cycle oscillation velocity. The present work also shows the impact of periodic gust front on the shock/boundary-layer interaction modifying the coefficient of pressure and coefficient of skin friction distribution and leading to a multiple-frequency and multiple-amplitude aeroelastic motion. Fast Fourier transform is applied to the structural response to explore the frequency content corresponding to the structural response and dominant fluid modes for different flow Mach number regimes under the influence of the periodic gust. These frequency characteristics of the structural responses and flowfield in inviscid and viscous flowfield are distinct for different test cases and reveal the underlying physics of several multiple-frequency and multiple-amplitude aeroelastic motions, frequency coalescence, generation of a new frequency, and so on, as shown in this study.</abstract><cop>Virginia</cop><pub>American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics</pub><doi>10.2514/1.J060344</doi><tpages>18</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0001-1452
ispartof AIAA journal, 2022-04, Vol.60 (4), p.2597-2614
issn 0001-1452
1533-385X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2645209557
source Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Aeroelasticity
Airfoils
Amplitudes
Angle of attack
Boundary layer interaction
Coalescing
Control surfaces
Fast Fourier transformations
Flutter
Fourier transforms
Limit cycle oscillations
Mach number
Skin friction
Stable oscillations
Structural response
Transonic flow
Vibration
title Computational Assessment of Transonic Airfoil-Gust Aeroelastic Response
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T16%3A10%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Computational%20Assessment%20of%20Transonic%20Airfoil-Gust%20Aeroelastic%20Response&rft.jtitle=AIAA%20journal&rft.au=Halder,%20Rahul&rft.date=2022-04-01&rft.volume=60&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=2597&rft.epage=2614&rft.pages=2597-2614&rft.issn=0001-1452&rft.eissn=1533-385X&rft_id=info:doi/10.2514/1.J060344&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2645209557%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2645209557&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true