Toward an Overarching Framework for Systematizing Research Perspectives on Diagnostic Thinking and Practice

Assessing students’ learning processes and products is considered a core requirement of effective teaching. As such, it is an object of research in several disciplines and research areas. To structure the various corresponding research perspectives and provide a broader, yet still systematic view of...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal für Mathematik-Didaktik (Internet) 2022-03, Vol.43 (1), p.13-38
Hauptverfasser: Leuders, Timo, Loibl, Katharina, Sommerhoff, Daniel, Herppich, Stephanie, Praetorius, Anna-Katharina
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 38
container_issue 1
container_start_page 13
container_title Journal für Mathematik-Didaktik (Internet)
container_volume 43
creator Leuders, Timo
Loibl, Katharina
Sommerhoff, Daniel
Herppich, Stephanie
Praetorius, Anna-Katharina
description Assessing students’ learning processes and products is considered a core requirement of effective teaching. As such, it is an object of research in several disciplines and research areas. To structure the various corresponding research perspectives and provide a broader, yet still systematic view of the field, we propose an overarching framework that allows for systematizing foci of interest, goals, methodologies, and theoretical premises as four integral aspects of conducting research in this area. We demonstrate the benefits of the overarching framework by using it as a tool to analyze and systematize previous research from four different research perspectives. Based on this framework, we discuss the strengths and limitations of existing studies and, in particular, highlight theoretical premises that are rarely explicitly addressed but become more obvious by using the overarching framework. In addition, we provide directions for future research by drawing connections within and between research perspectives. Our analyses illustrate how the overarching framework can provide a foundation for research synthesis and inform future studies.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s13138-022-00199-6
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2645182939</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2645182939</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-448c0047cb8ced2459f45281e3b88228fad84b487223d888a97100c2d8011cde3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMFKAzEURYMoWGp_wFXAdTR5ycwkS6lWhUKL1nXIZDJ1rJ3UZNpSv96MFdy5eot77n1wELpk9JpRWtxExhmXhAIQSplSJD9BAyZzRSBX6hQNKCs4yTjAORrF2JQUBGMCFBug1cLvTaiwafFs54IJ9q1pl3gSzNrtfVjh2gf8coidW5uu-eqzZxddz-G5C3HjbNfsXMS-xXeNWbY-do3Fi7Sy6mHTVngeTIKsu0BntfmIbvR7h-h1cr8YP5Lp7OFpfDsllue8I0JIS6kobCmtq0BkqhYZSOZ4KSWArE0lRSlkAcArKaVRRdJgoZKUMVs5PkRXx91N8J9bFzv97rehTS815CJjEhRXiYIjZYOPMbhab0KzNuGgGdW9V330qpNX_eNV56nEj6WY4Hbpwt_0P61vHhB7dw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2645182939</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Toward an Overarching Framework for Systematizing Research Perspectives on Diagnostic Thinking and Practice</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Leuders, Timo ; Loibl, Katharina ; Sommerhoff, Daniel ; Herppich, Stephanie ; Praetorius, Anna-Katharina</creator><creatorcontrib>Leuders, Timo ; Loibl, Katharina ; Sommerhoff, Daniel ; Herppich, Stephanie ; Praetorius, Anna-Katharina</creatorcontrib><description>Assessing students’ learning processes and products is considered a core requirement of effective teaching. As such, it is an object of research in several disciplines and research areas. To structure the various corresponding research perspectives and provide a broader, yet still systematic view of the field, we propose an overarching framework that allows for systematizing foci of interest, goals, methodologies, and theoretical premises as four integral aspects of conducting research in this area. We demonstrate the benefits of the overarching framework by using it as a tool to analyze and systematize previous research from four different research perspectives. Based on this framework, we discuss the strengths and limitations of existing studies and, in particular, highlight theoretical premises that are rarely explicitly addressed but become more obvious by using the overarching framework. In addition, we provide directions for future research by drawing connections within and between research perspectives. Our analyses illustrate how the overarching framework can provide a foundation for research synthesis and inform future studies.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0173-5322</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1869-2699</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s13138-022-00199-6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer International Publishing</publisher><subject>Education ; Educational evaluation ; History of Mathematical Sciences ; Instructional Effectiveness ; Learning ; Learning Processes ; Mathematics ; Mathematics Education ; Originalarbeit/Original Article ; Pedagogy ; Research Methodology ; Science Education ; Student Evaluation ; Teacher Effectiveness</subject><ispartof>Journal für Mathematik-Didaktik (Internet), 2022-03, Vol.43 (1), p.13-38</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2022</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2022. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-448c0047cb8ced2459f45281e3b88228fad84b487223d888a97100c2d8011cde3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-448c0047cb8ced2459f45281e3b88228fad84b487223d888a97100c2d8011cde3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-7621-7826 ; 0000-0002-1773-1913 ; 0000-0002-0559-7120 ; 0000-0001-7581-367X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s13138-022-00199-6$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s13138-022-00199-6$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Leuders, Timo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Loibl, Katharina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sommerhoff, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Herppich, Stephanie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Praetorius, Anna-Katharina</creatorcontrib><title>Toward an Overarching Framework for Systematizing Research Perspectives on Diagnostic Thinking and Practice</title><title>Journal für Mathematik-Didaktik (Internet)</title><addtitle>J Math Didakt</addtitle><description>Assessing students’ learning processes and products is considered a core requirement of effective teaching. As such, it is an object of research in several disciplines and research areas. To structure the various corresponding research perspectives and provide a broader, yet still systematic view of the field, we propose an overarching framework that allows for systematizing foci of interest, goals, methodologies, and theoretical premises as four integral aspects of conducting research in this area. We demonstrate the benefits of the overarching framework by using it as a tool to analyze and systematize previous research from four different research perspectives. Based on this framework, we discuss the strengths and limitations of existing studies and, in particular, highlight theoretical premises that are rarely explicitly addressed but become more obvious by using the overarching framework. In addition, we provide directions for future research by drawing connections within and between research perspectives. Our analyses illustrate how the overarching framework can provide a foundation for research synthesis and inform future studies.</description><subject>Education</subject><subject>Educational evaluation</subject><subject>History of Mathematical Sciences</subject><subject>Instructional Effectiveness</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Learning Processes</subject><subject>Mathematics</subject><subject>Mathematics Education</subject><subject>Originalarbeit/Original Article</subject><subject>Pedagogy</subject><subject>Research Methodology</subject><subject>Science Education</subject><subject>Student Evaluation</subject><subject>Teacher Effectiveness</subject><issn>0173-5322</issn><issn>1869-2699</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kMFKAzEURYMoWGp_wFXAdTR5ycwkS6lWhUKL1nXIZDJ1rJ3UZNpSv96MFdy5eot77n1wELpk9JpRWtxExhmXhAIQSplSJD9BAyZzRSBX6hQNKCs4yTjAORrF2JQUBGMCFBug1cLvTaiwafFs54IJ9q1pl3gSzNrtfVjh2gf8coidW5uu-eqzZxddz-G5C3HjbNfsXMS-xXeNWbY-do3Fi7Sy6mHTVngeTIKsu0BntfmIbvR7h-h1cr8YP5Lp7OFpfDsllue8I0JIS6kobCmtq0BkqhYZSOZ4KSWArE0lRSlkAcArKaVRRdJgoZKUMVs5PkRXx91N8J9bFzv97rehTS815CJjEhRXiYIjZYOPMbhab0KzNuGgGdW9V330qpNX_eNV56nEj6WY4Hbpwt_0P61vHhB7dw</recordid><startdate>20220301</startdate><enddate>20220301</enddate><creator>Leuders, Timo</creator><creator>Loibl, Katharina</creator><creator>Sommerhoff, Daniel</creator><creator>Herppich, Stephanie</creator><creator>Praetorius, Anna-Katharina</creator><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7621-7826</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1773-1913</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0559-7120</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7581-367X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220301</creationdate><title>Toward an Overarching Framework for Systematizing Research Perspectives on Diagnostic Thinking and Practice</title><author>Leuders, Timo ; Loibl, Katharina ; Sommerhoff, Daniel ; Herppich, Stephanie ; Praetorius, Anna-Katharina</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-448c0047cb8ced2459f45281e3b88228fad84b487223d888a97100c2d8011cde3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Education</topic><topic>Educational evaluation</topic><topic>History of Mathematical Sciences</topic><topic>Instructional Effectiveness</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Learning Processes</topic><topic>Mathematics</topic><topic>Mathematics Education</topic><topic>Originalarbeit/Original Article</topic><topic>Pedagogy</topic><topic>Research Methodology</topic><topic>Science Education</topic><topic>Student Evaluation</topic><topic>Teacher Effectiveness</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Leuders, Timo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Loibl, Katharina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sommerhoff, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Herppich, Stephanie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Praetorius, Anna-Katharina</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Journal für Mathematik-Didaktik (Internet)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Leuders, Timo</au><au>Loibl, Katharina</au><au>Sommerhoff, Daniel</au><au>Herppich, Stephanie</au><au>Praetorius, Anna-Katharina</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Toward an Overarching Framework for Systematizing Research Perspectives on Diagnostic Thinking and Practice</atitle><jtitle>Journal für Mathematik-Didaktik (Internet)</jtitle><stitle>J Math Didakt</stitle><date>2022-03-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>43</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>13</spage><epage>38</epage><pages>13-38</pages><issn>0173-5322</issn><eissn>1869-2699</eissn><abstract>Assessing students’ learning processes and products is considered a core requirement of effective teaching. As such, it is an object of research in several disciplines and research areas. To structure the various corresponding research perspectives and provide a broader, yet still systematic view of the field, we propose an overarching framework that allows for systematizing foci of interest, goals, methodologies, and theoretical premises as four integral aspects of conducting research in this area. We demonstrate the benefits of the overarching framework by using it as a tool to analyze and systematize previous research from four different research perspectives. Based on this framework, we discuss the strengths and limitations of existing studies and, in particular, highlight theoretical premises that are rarely explicitly addressed but become more obvious by using the overarching framework. In addition, we provide directions for future research by drawing connections within and between research perspectives. Our analyses illustrate how the overarching framework can provide a foundation for research synthesis and inform future studies.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer International Publishing</pub><doi>10.1007/s13138-022-00199-6</doi><tpages>26</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7621-7826</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1773-1913</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0559-7120</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7581-367X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0173-5322
ispartof Journal für Mathematik-Didaktik (Internet), 2022-03, Vol.43 (1), p.13-38
issn 0173-5322
1869-2699
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2645182939
source SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Education
Educational evaluation
History of Mathematical Sciences
Instructional Effectiveness
Learning
Learning Processes
Mathematics
Mathematics Education
Originalarbeit/Original Article
Pedagogy
Research Methodology
Science Education
Student Evaluation
Teacher Effectiveness
title Toward an Overarching Framework for Systematizing Research Perspectives on Diagnostic Thinking and Practice
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T22%3A03%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Toward%20an%20Overarching%20Framework%20for%20Systematizing%20Research%20Perspectives%20on%20Diagnostic%20Thinking%20and%20Practice&rft.jtitle=Journal%20f%C3%BCr%20Mathematik-Didaktik%20(Internet)&rft.au=Leuders,%20Timo&rft.date=2022-03-01&rft.volume=43&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=13&rft.epage=38&rft.pages=13-38&rft.issn=0173-5322&rft.eissn=1869-2699&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s13138-022-00199-6&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2645182939%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2645182939&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true