Toward an Overarching Framework for Systematizing Research Perspectives on Diagnostic Thinking and Practice
Assessing students’ learning processes and products is considered a core requirement of effective teaching. As such, it is an object of research in several disciplines and research areas. To structure the various corresponding research perspectives and provide a broader, yet still systematic view of...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal für Mathematik-Didaktik (Internet) 2022-03, Vol.43 (1), p.13-38 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 38 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 13 |
container_title | Journal für Mathematik-Didaktik (Internet) |
container_volume | 43 |
creator | Leuders, Timo Loibl, Katharina Sommerhoff, Daniel Herppich, Stephanie Praetorius, Anna-Katharina |
description | Assessing students’ learning processes and products is considered a core requirement of effective teaching. As such, it is an object of research in several disciplines and research areas. To structure the various corresponding research perspectives and provide a broader, yet still systematic view of the field, we propose an overarching framework that allows for systematizing foci of interest, goals, methodologies, and theoretical premises as four integral aspects of conducting research in this area. We demonstrate the benefits of the overarching framework by using it as a tool to analyze and systematize previous research from four different research perspectives. Based on this framework, we discuss the strengths and limitations of existing studies and, in particular, highlight theoretical premises that are rarely explicitly addressed but become more obvious by using the overarching framework. In addition, we provide directions for future research by drawing connections within and between research perspectives. Our analyses illustrate how the overarching framework can provide a foundation for research synthesis and inform future studies. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s13138-022-00199-6 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2645182939</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2645182939</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-448c0047cb8ced2459f45281e3b88228fad84b487223d888a97100c2d8011cde3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMFKAzEURYMoWGp_wFXAdTR5ycwkS6lWhUKL1nXIZDJ1rJ3UZNpSv96MFdy5eot77n1wELpk9JpRWtxExhmXhAIQSplSJD9BAyZzRSBX6hQNKCs4yTjAORrF2JQUBGMCFBug1cLvTaiwafFs54IJ9q1pl3gSzNrtfVjh2gf8coidW5uu-eqzZxddz-G5C3HjbNfsXMS-xXeNWbY-do3Fi7Sy6mHTVngeTIKsu0BntfmIbvR7h-h1cr8YP5Lp7OFpfDsllue8I0JIS6kobCmtq0BkqhYZSOZ4KSWArE0lRSlkAcArKaVRRdJgoZKUMVs5PkRXx91N8J9bFzv97rehTS815CJjEhRXiYIjZYOPMbhab0KzNuGgGdW9V330qpNX_eNV56nEj6WY4Hbpwt_0P61vHhB7dw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2645182939</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Toward an Overarching Framework for Systematizing Research Perspectives on Diagnostic Thinking and Practice</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Leuders, Timo ; Loibl, Katharina ; Sommerhoff, Daniel ; Herppich, Stephanie ; Praetorius, Anna-Katharina</creator><creatorcontrib>Leuders, Timo ; Loibl, Katharina ; Sommerhoff, Daniel ; Herppich, Stephanie ; Praetorius, Anna-Katharina</creatorcontrib><description>Assessing students’ learning processes and products is considered a core requirement of effective teaching. As such, it is an object of research in several disciplines and research areas. To structure the various corresponding research perspectives and provide a broader, yet still systematic view of the field, we propose an overarching framework that allows for systematizing foci of interest, goals, methodologies, and theoretical premises as four integral aspects of conducting research in this area. We demonstrate the benefits of the overarching framework by using it as a tool to analyze and systematize previous research from four different research perspectives. Based on this framework, we discuss the strengths and limitations of existing studies and, in particular, highlight theoretical premises that are rarely explicitly addressed but become more obvious by using the overarching framework. In addition, we provide directions for future research by drawing connections within and between research perspectives. Our analyses illustrate how the overarching framework can provide a foundation for research synthesis and inform future studies.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0173-5322</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1869-2699</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s13138-022-00199-6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer International Publishing</publisher><subject>Education ; Educational evaluation ; History of Mathematical Sciences ; Instructional Effectiveness ; Learning ; Learning Processes ; Mathematics ; Mathematics Education ; Originalarbeit/Original Article ; Pedagogy ; Research Methodology ; Science Education ; Student Evaluation ; Teacher Effectiveness</subject><ispartof>Journal für Mathematik-Didaktik (Internet), 2022-03, Vol.43 (1), p.13-38</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2022</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2022. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-448c0047cb8ced2459f45281e3b88228fad84b487223d888a97100c2d8011cde3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-448c0047cb8ced2459f45281e3b88228fad84b487223d888a97100c2d8011cde3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-7621-7826 ; 0000-0002-1773-1913 ; 0000-0002-0559-7120 ; 0000-0001-7581-367X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s13138-022-00199-6$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s13138-022-00199-6$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Leuders, Timo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Loibl, Katharina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sommerhoff, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Herppich, Stephanie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Praetorius, Anna-Katharina</creatorcontrib><title>Toward an Overarching Framework for Systematizing Research Perspectives on Diagnostic Thinking and Practice</title><title>Journal für Mathematik-Didaktik (Internet)</title><addtitle>J Math Didakt</addtitle><description>Assessing students’ learning processes and products is considered a core requirement of effective teaching. As such, it is an object of research in several disciplines and research areas. To structure the various corresponding research perspectives and provide a broader, yet still systematic view of the field, we propose an overarching framework that allows for systematizing foci of interest, goals, methodologies, and theoretical premises as four integral aspects of conducting research in this area. We demonstrate the benefits of the overarching framework by using it as a tool to analyze and systematize previous research from four different research perspectives. Based on this framework, we discuss the strengths and limitations of existing studies and, in particular, highlight theoretical premises that are rarely explicitly addressed but become more obvious by using the overarching framework. In addition, we provide directions for future research by drawing connections within and between research perspectives. Our analyses illustrate how the overarching framework can provide a foundation for research synthesis and inform future studies.</description><subject>Education</subject><subject>Educational evaluation</subject><subject>History of Mathematical Sciences</subject><subject>Instructional Effectiveness</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Learning Processes</subject><subject>Mathematics</subject><subject>Mathematics Education</subject><subject>Originalarbeit/Original Article</subject><subject>Pedagogy</subject><subject>Research Methodology</subject><subject>Science Education</subject><subject>Student Evaluation</subject><subject>Teacher Effectiveness</subject><issn>0173-5322</issn><issn>1869-2699</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kMFKAzEURYMoWGp_wFXAdTR5ycwkS6lWhUKL1nXIZDJ1rJ3UZNpSv96MFdy5eot77n1wELpk9JpRWtxExhmXhAIQSplSJD9BAyZzRSBX6hQNKCs4yTjAORrF2JQUBGMCFBug1cLvTaiwafFs54IJ9q1pl3gSzNrtfVjh2gf8coidW5uu-eqzZxddz-G5C3HjbNfsXMS-xXeNWbY-do3Fi7Sy6mHTVngeTIKsu0BntfmIbvR7h-h1cr8YP5Lp7OFpfDsllue8I0JIS6kobCmtq0BkqhYZSOZ4KSWArE0lRSlkAcArKaVRRdJgoZKUMVs5PkRXx91N8J9bFzv97rehTS815CJjEhRXiYIjZYOPMbhab0KzNuGgGdW9V330qpNX_eNV56nEj6WY4Hbpwt_0P61vHhB7dw</recordid><startdate>20220301</startdate><enddate>20220301</enddate><creator>Leuders, Timo</creator><creator>Loibl, Katharina</creator><creator>Sommerhoff, Daniel</creator><creator>Herppich, Stephanie</creator><creator>Praetorius, Anna-Katharina</creator><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7621-7826</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1773-1913</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0559-7120</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7581-367X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220301</creationdate><title>Toward an Overarching Framework for Systematizing Research Perspectives on Diagnostic Thinking and Practice</title><author>Leuders, Timo ; Loibl, Katharina ; Sommerhoff, Daniel ; Herppich, Stephanie ; Praetorius, Anna-Katharina</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-448c0047cb8ced2459f45281e3b88228fad84b487223d888a97100c2d8011cde3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Education</topic><topic>Educational evaluation</topic><topic>History of Mathematical Sciences</topic><topic>Instructional Effectiveness</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Learning Processes</topic><topic>Mathematics</topic><topic>Mathematics Education</topic><topic>Originalarbeit/Original Article</topic><topic>Pedagogy</topic><topic>Research Methodology</topic><topic>Science Education</topic><topic>Student Evaluation</topic><topic>Teacher Effectiveness</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Leuders, Timo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Loibl, Katharina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sommerhoff, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Herppich, Stephanie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Praetorius, Anna-Katharina</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Journal für Mathematik-Didaktik (Internet)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Leuders, Timo</au><au>Loibl, Katharina</au><au>Sommerhoff, Daniel</au><au>Herppich, Stephanie</au><au>Praetorius, Anna-Katharina</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Toward an Overarching Framework for Systematizing Research Perspectives on Diagnostic Thinking and Practice</atitle><jtitle>Journal für Mathematik-Didaktik (Internet)</jtitle><stitle>J Math Didakt</stitle><date>2022-03-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>43</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>13</spage><epage>38</epage><pages>13-38</pages><issn>0173-5322</issn><eissn>1869-2699</eissn><abstract>Assessing students’ learning processes and products is considered a core requirement of effective teaching. As such, it is an object of research in several disciplines and research areas. To structure the various corresponding research perspectives and provide a broader, yet still systematic view of the field, we propose an overarching framework that allows for systematizing foci of interest, goals, methodologies, and theoretical premises as four integral aspects of conducting research in this area. We demonstrate the benefits of the overarching framework by using it as a tool to analyze and systematize previous research from four different research perspectives. Based on this framework, we discuss the strengths and limitations of existing studies and, in particular, highlight theoretical premises that are rarely explicitly addressed but become more obvious by using the overarching framework. In addition, we provide directions for future research by drawing connections within and between research perspectives. Our analyses illustrate how the overarching framework can provide a foundation for research synthesis and inform future studies.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer International Publishing</pub><doi>10.1007/s13138-022-00199-6</doi><tpages>26</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7621-7826</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1773-1913</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0559-7120</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7581-367X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0173-5322 |
ispartof | Journal für Mathematik-Didaktik (Internet), 2022-03, Vol.43 (1), p.13-38 |
issn | 0173-5322 1869-2699 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2645182939 |
source | SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Education Educational evaluation History of Mathematical Sciences Instructional Effectiveness Learning Learning Processes Mathematics Mathematics Education Originalarbeit/Original Article Pedagogy Research Methodology Science Education Student Evaluation Teacher Effectiveness |
title | Toward an Overarching Framework for Systematizing Research Perspectives on Diagnostic Thinking and Practice |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T22%3A03%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Toward%20an%20Overarching%20Framework%20for%20Systematizing%20Research%20Perspectives%20on%20Diagnostic%20Thinking%20and%20Practice&rft.jtitle=Journal%20f%C3%BCr%20Mathematik-Didaktik%20(Internet)&rft.au=Leuders,%20Timo&rft.date=2022-03-01&rft.volume=43&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=13&rft.epage=38&rft.pages=13-38&rft.issn=0173-5322&rft.eissn=1869-2699&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s13138-022-00199-6&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2645182939%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2645182939&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |