How do organizations learn from information system incidents?: a synthesis of the past, present, and future

We review the literature on how organizations learn from information system (IS) incidents. We identify three modes of learning depending on the practices that constitute the learning process, the specific actors who play roles in learning, the temporal orientation of the learning practices, and the...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:MIS quarterly 2022-03, Vol.46 (1), p.531-590
1. Verfasser: Rezazade Mehrizi, Mohammad H
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 590
container_issue 1
container_start_page 531
container_title MIS quarterly
container_volume 46
creator Rezazade Mehrizi, Mohammad H
description We review the literature on how organizations learn from information system (IS) incidents. We identify three modes of learning depending on the practices that constitute the learning process, the specific actors who play roles in learning, the temporal orientation of the learning practices, and the specific contextual focus of the learning. The literature focuses primarily on learning from past experience to draw lessons for future incidents (reflective learning mode). Yet, a growing stream of literature stresses the importance of learning through engagement with present incidents (embedded learning mode), and a few studies suggest that organizations can learn prospectively to prepare for future incidents (prospective learning mode). We argue that although these three learning modes are effective, they do not adequately explain how organizations learn from IS incidents when used in isolation. Since IS incidents unfold increasingly as sets of interacting events across information systems and organizational settings, organizational learning needs to be theorized as an iterative process among these learning modes. We synthesize these three learning modes into an integrative framework and theorize about their supportive and inhibiting relations. We suggest some opportunities for future research, which would advance our understanding of how organizations learn from IS incidents.
doi_str_mv 10.25300/MISQ/2022/14305
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2642938925</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2642938925</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c370t-5c995678d06813c5779cabe71af30e7032f7eb4128cbdaef101bbdce31f9e79a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkEFLAzEQRoMoWKt3jwue104y3Z3NQUSKtYWKiHoO2WwiW9qkJluk_nq3rSAMDHx8bwYeY9ccbkWBAKPn-dvrSIAQIz5GKE7YQPBS5JIQTtkABJU5UYXn7CKlJQBw4jRgd7PwnTUhC_FT-_ZHd23wKVtZHX3mYlhnrXchrg95lnaps_vItI31Xbq_ZGdOr5K9-ttD9jF9fJ_M8sXL03zysMgNEnR5YaQsSqoaKCuOpiCSRteWuHYIlgCFI1uPuahM3WjrOPC6boxF7qQlqXHIbo53NzF8bW3q1DJso-9fKlGOhcRK9hKGDI4tE0NK0Tq1ie1ax53ioA6S1F6S2ktSB0k9kh0Ra4Jv0z9Q8X6wkIi_MjZkpA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2642938925</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>How do organizations learn from information system incidents?: a synthesis of the past, present, and future</title><source>Business Source Complete</source><creator>Rezazade Mehrizi, Mohammad H</creator><creatorcontrib>Rezazade Mehrizi, Mohammad H ; University of Warwick ; Universitat Ramon Llull ; Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam</creatorcontrib><description>We review the literature on how organizations learn from information system (IS) incidents. We identify three modes of learning depending on the practices that constitute the learning process, the specific actors who play roles in learning, the temporal orientation of the learning practices, and the specific contextual focus of the learning. The literature focuses primarily on learning from past experience to draw lessons for future incidents (reflective learning mode). Yet, a growing stream of literature stresses the importance of learning through engagement with present incidents (embedded learning mode), and a few studies suggest that organizations can learn prospectively to prepare for future incidents (prospective learning mode). We argue that although these three learning modes are effective, they do not adequately explain how organizations learn from IS incidents when used in isolation. Since IS incidents unfold increasingly as sets of interacting events across information systems and organizational settings, organizational learning needs to be theorized as an iterative process among these learning modes. We synthesize these three learning modes into an integrative framework and theorize about their supportive and inhibiting relations. We suggest some opportunities for future research, which would advance our understanding of how organizations learn from IS incidents.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0276-7783</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2162-9730</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.25300/MISQ/2022/14305</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, MIS Research Center</publisher><subject>Information systems ; Learning ; Literature ; Literature reviews ; Organizational learning ; Organizations ; Reflective teaching</subject><ispartof>MIS quarterly, 2022-03, Vol.46 (1), p.531-590</ispartof><rights>Copyright University of Minnesota, MIS Research Center Mar 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c370t-5c995678d06813c5779cabe71af30e7032f7eb4128cbdaef101bbdce31f9e79a3</citedby><orcidid>0000-0002-8385-5869 ; 0000-0002-8322-8849 ; 0000-0003-0068-2446</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rezazade Mehrizi, Mohammad H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>University of Warwick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Universitat Ramon Llull</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam</creatorcontrib><title>How do organizations learn from information system incidents?: a synthesis of the past, present, and future</title><title>MIS quarterly</title><description>We review the literature on how organizations learn from information system (IS) incidents. We identify three modes of learning depending on the practices that constitute the learning process, the specific actors who play roles in learning, the temporal orientation of the learning practices, and the specific contextual focus of the learning. The literature focuses primarily on learning from past experience to draw lessons for future incidents (reflective learning mode). Yet, a growing stream of literature stresses the importance of learning through engagement with present incidents (embedded learning mode), and a few studies suggest that organizations can learn prospectively to prepare for future incidents (prospective learning mode). We argue that although these three learning modes are effective, they do not adequately explain how organizations learn from IS incidents when used in isolation. Since IS incidents unfold increasingly as sets of interacting events across information systems and organizational settings, organizational learning needs to be theorized as an iterative process among these learning modes. We synthesize these three learning modes into an integrative framework and theorize about their supportive and inhibiting relations. We suggest some opportunities for future research, which would advance our understanding of how organizations learn from IS incidents.</description><subject>Information systems</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Literature</subject><subject>Literature reviews</subject><subject>Organizational learning</subject><subject>Organizations</subject><subject>Reflective teaching</subject><issn>0276-7783</issn><issn>2162-9730</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpFkEFLAzEQRoMoWKt3jwue104y3Z3NQUSKtYWKiHoO2WwiW9qkJluk_nq3rSAMDHx8bwYeY9ccbkWBAKPn-dvrSIAQIz5GKE7YQPBS5JIQTtkABJU5UYXn7CKlJQBw4jRgd7PwnTUhC_FT-_ZHd23wKVtZHX3mYlhnrXchrg95lnaps_vItI31Xbq_ZGdOr5K9-ttD9jF9fJ_M8sXL03zysMgNEnR5YaQsSqoaKCuOpiCSRteWuHYIlgCFI1uPuahM3WjrOPC6boxF7qQlqXHIbo53NzF8bW3q1DJso-9fKlGOhcRK9hKGDI4tE0NK0Tq1ie1ax53ioA6S1F6S2ktSB0k9kh0Ra4Jv0z9Q8X6wkIi_MjZkpA</recordid><startdate>20220301</startdate><enddate>20220301</enddate><creator>Rezazade Mehrizi, Mohammad H</creator><general>University of Minnesota, MIS Research Center</general><scope>OQ6</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8385-5869</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8322-8849</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0068-2446</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220301</creationdate><title>How do organizations learn from information system incidents?</title><author>Rezazade Mehrizi, Mohammad H</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c370t-5c995678d06813c5779cabe71af30e7032f7eb4128cbdaef101bbdce31f9e79a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Information systems</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Literature</topic><topic>Literature reviews</topic><topic>Organizational learning</topic><topic>Organizations</topic><topic>Reflective teaching</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rezazade Mehrizi, Mohammad H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>University of Warwick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Universitat Ramon Llull</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam</creatorcontrib><collection>ECONIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><jtitle>MIS quarterly</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rezazade Mehrizi, Mohammad H</au><aucorp>University of Warwick</aucorp><aucorp>Universitat Ramon Llull</aucorp><aucorp>Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>How do organizations learn from information system incidents?: a synthesis of the past, present, and future</atitle><jtitle>MIS quarterly</jtitle><date>2022-03-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>46</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>531</spage><epage>590</epage><pages>531-590</pages><issn>0276-7783</issn><eissn>2162-9730</eissn><abstract>We review the literature on how organizations learn from information system (IS) incidents. We identify three modes of learning depending on the practices that constitute the learning process, the specific actors who play roles in learning, the temporal orientation of the learning practices, and the specific contextual focus of the learning. The literature focuses primarily on learning from past experience to draw lessons for future incidents (reflective learning mode). Yet, a growing stream of literature stresses the importance of learning through engagement with present incidents (embedded learning mode), and a few studies suggest that organizations can learn prospectively to prepare for future incidents (prospective learning mode). We argue that although these three learning modes are effective, they do not adequately explain how organizations learn from IS incidents when used in isolation. Since IS incidents unfold increasingly as sets of interacting events across information systems and organizational settings, organizational learning needs to be theorized as an iterative process among these learning modes. We synthesize these three learning modes into an integrative framework and theorize about their supportive and inhibiting relations. We suggest some opportunities for future research, which would advance our understanding of how organizations learn from IS incidents.</abstract><cop>Minneapolis</cop><pub>University of Minnesota, MIS Research Center</pub><doi>10.25300/MISQ/2022/14305</doi><tpages>60</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8385-5869</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8322-8849</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0068-2446</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0276-7783
ispartof MIS quarterly, 2022-03, Vol.46 (1), p.531-590
issn 0276-7783
2162-9730
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2642938925
source Business Source Complete
subjects Information systems
Learning
Literature
Literature reviews
Organizational learning
Organizations
Reflective teaching
title How do organizations learn from information system incidents?: a synthesis of the past, present, and future
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-18T05%3A54%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=How%20do%20organizations%20learn%20from%20information%20system%20incidents?:%20a%20synthesis%20of%20the%20past,%20present,%20and%20future&rft.jtitle=MIS%20quarterly&rft.au=Rezazade%20Mehrizi,%20Mohammad%20H&rft.aucorp=University%20of%20Warwick&rft.date=2022-03-01&rft.volume=46&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=531&rft.epage=590&rft.pages=531-590&rft.issn=0276-7783&rft.eissn=2162-9730&rft_id=info:doi/10.25300/MISQ/2022/14305&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2642938925%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2642938925&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true