How do organizations learn from information system incidents?: a synthesis of the past, present, and future
We review the literature on how organizations learn from information system (IS) incidents. We identify three modes of learning depending on the practices that constitute the learning process, the specific actors who play roles in learning, the temporal orientation of the learning practices, and the...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | MIS quarterly 2022-03, Vol.46 (1), p.531-590 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 590 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 531 |
container_title | MIS quarterly |
container_volume | 46 |
creator | Rezazade Mehrizi, Mohammad H |
description | We review the literature on how organizations learn from information system (IS) incidents. We identify three modes of learning depending on the practices that constitute the learning process, the specific actors who play roles in learning, the temporal orientation of the learning practices, and the specific contextual focus of the learning. The literature focuses primarily on learning from past experience to draw lessons for future incidents (reflective learning mode). Yet, a growing stream of literature stresses the importance of learning through engagement with present incidents (embedded learning mode), and a few studies suggest that organizations can learn prospectively to prepare for future incidents (prospective learning mode). We argue that although these three learning modes are effective, they do not adequately explain how organizations learn from IS incidents when used in isolation. Since IS incidents unfold increasingly as sets of interacting events across information systems and organizational settings, organizational learning needs to be theorized as an iterative process among these learning modes. We synthesize these three learning modes into an integrative framework and theorize about their supportive and inhibiting relations. We suggest some opportunities for future research, which would advance our understanding of how organizations learn from IS incidents. |
doi_str_mv | 10.25300/MISQ/2022/14305 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2642938925</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2642938925</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c370t-5c995678d06813c5779cabe71af30e7032f7eb4128cbdaef101bbdce31f9e79a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkEFLAzEQRoMoWKt3jwue104y3Z3NQUSKtYWKiHoO2WwiW9qkJluk_nq3rSAMDHx8bwYeY9ccbkWBAKPn-dvrSIAQIz5GKE7YQPBS5JIQTtkABJU5UYXn7CKlJQBw4jRgd7PwnTUhC_FT-_ZHd23wKVtZHX3mYlhnrXchrg95lnaps_vItI31Xbq_ZGdOr5K9-ttD9jF9fJ_M8sXL03zysMgNEnR5YaQsSqoaKCuOpiCSRteWuHYIlgCFI1uPuahM3WjrOPC6boxF7qQlqXHIbo53NzF8bW3q1DJso-9fKlGOhcRK9hKGDI4tE0NK0Tq1ie1ax53ioA6S1F6S2ktSB0k9kh0Ra4Jv0z9Q8X6wkIi_MjZkpA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2642938925</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>How do organizations learn from information system incidents?: a synthesis of the past, present, and future</title><source>Business Source Complete</source><creator>Rezazade Mehrizi, Mohammad H</creator><creatorcontrib>Rezazade Mehrizi, Mohammad H ; University of Warwick ; Universitat Ramon Llull ; Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam</creatorcontrib><description>We review the literature on how organizations learn from information system (IS) incidents. We identify three modes of learning depending on the practices that constitute the learning process, the specific actors who play roles in learning, the temporal orientation of the learning practices, and the specific contextual focus of the learning. The literature focuses primarily on learning from past experience to draw lessons for future incidents (reflective learning mode). Yet, a growing stream of literature stresses the importance of learning through engagement with present incidents (embedded learning mode), and a few studies suggest that organizations can learn prospectively to prepare for future incidents (prospective learning mode). We argue that although these three learning modes are effective, they do not adequately explain how organizations learn from IS incidents when used in isolation. Since IS incidents unfold increasingly as sets of interacting events across information systems and organizational settings, organizational learning needs to be theorized as an iterative process among these learning modes. We synthesize these three learning modes into an integrative framework and theorize about their supportive and inhibiting relations. We suggest some opportunities for future research, which would advance our understanding of how organizations learn from IS incidents.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0276-7783</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2162-9730</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.25300/MISQ/2022/14305</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, MIS Research Center</publisher><subject>Information systems ; Learning ; Literature ; Literature reviews ; Organizational learning ; Organizations ; Reflective teaching</subject><ispartof>MIS quarterly, 2022-03, Vol.46 (1), p.531-590</ispartof><rights>Copyright University of Minnesota, MIS Research Center Mar 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c370t-5c995678d06813c5779cabe71af30e7032f7eb4128cbdaef101bbdce31f9e79a3</citedby><orcidid>0000-0002-8385-5869 ; 0000-0002-8322-8849 ; 0000-0003-0068-2446</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rezazade Mehrizi, Mohammad H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>University of Warwick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Universitat Ramon Llull</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam</creatorcontrib><title>How do organizations learn from information system incidents?: a synthesis of the past, present, and future</title><title>MIS quarterly</title><description>We review the literature on how organizations learn from information system (IS) incidents. We identify three modes of learning depending on the practices that constitute the learning process, the specific actors who play roles in learning, the temporal orientation of the learning practices, and the specific contextual focus of the learning. The literature focuses primarily on learning from past experience to draw lessons for future incidents (reflective learning mode). Yet, a growing stream of literature stresses the importance of learning through engagement with present incidents (embedded learning mode), and a few studies suggest that organizations can learn prospectively to prepare for future incidents (prospective learning mode). We argue that although these three learning modes are effective, they do not adequately explain how organizations learn from IS incidents when used in isolation. Since IS incidents unfold increasingly as sets of interacting events across information systems and organizational settings, organizational learning needs to be theorized as an iterative process among these learning modes. We synthesize these three learning modes into an integrative framework and theorize about their supportive and inhibiting relations. We suggest some opportunities for future research, which would advance our understanding of how organizations learn from IS incidents.</description><subject>Information systems</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Literature</subject><subject>Literature reviews</subject><subject>Organizational learning</subject><subject>Organizations</subject><subject>Reflective teaching</subject><issn>0276-7783</issn><issn>2162-9730</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpFkEFLAzEQRoMoWKt3jwue104y3Z3NQUSKtYWKiHoO2WwiW9qkJluk_nq3rSAMDHx8bwYeY9ccbkWBAKPn-dvrSIAQIz5GKE7YQPBS5JIQTtkABJU5UYXn7CKlJQBw4jRgd7PwnTUhC_FT-_ZHd23wKVtZHX3mYlhnrXchrg95lnaps_vItI31Xbq_ZGdOr5K9-ttD9jF9fJ_M8sXL03zysMgNEnR5YaQsSqoaKCuOpiCSRteWuHYIlgCFI1uPuahM3WjrOPC6boxF7qQlqXHIbo53NzF8bW3q1DJso-9fKlGOhcRK9hKGDI4tE0NK0Tq1ie1ax53ioA6S1F6S2ktSB0k9kh0Ra4Jv0z9Q8X6wkIi_MjZkpA</recordid><startdate>20220301</startdate><enddate>20220301</enddate><creator>Rezazade Mehrizi, Mohammad H</creator><general>University of Minnesota, MIS Research Center</general><scope>OQ6</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8385-5869</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8322-8849</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0068-2446</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220301</creationdate><title>How do organizations learn from information system incidents?</title><author>Rezazade Mehrizi, Mohammad H</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c370t-5c995678d06813c5779cabe71af30e7032f7eb4128cbdaef101bbdce31f9e79a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Information systems</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Literature</topic><topic>Literature reviews</topic><topic>Organizational learning</topic><topic>Organizations</topic><topic>Reflective teaching</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rezazade Mehrizi, Mohammad H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>University of Warwick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Universitat Ramon Llull</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam</creatorcontrib><collection>ECONIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><jtitle>MIS quarterly</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rezazade Mehrizi, Mohammad H</au><aucorp>University of Warwick</aucorp><aucorp>Universitat Ramon Llull</aucorp><aucorp>Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>How do organizations learn from information system incidents?: a synthesis of the past, present, and future</atitle><jtitle>MIS quarterly</jtitle><date>2022-03-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>46</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>531</spage><epage>590</epage><pages>531-590</pages><issn>0276-7783</issn><eissn>2162-9730</eissn><abstract>We review the literature on how organizations learn from information system (IS) incidents. We identify three modes of learning depending on the practices that constitute the learning process, the specific actors who play roles in learning, the temporal orientation of the learning practices, and the specific contextual focus of the learning. The literature focuses primarily on learning from past experience to draw lessons for future incidents (reflective learning mode). Yet, a growing stream of literature stresses the importance of learning through engagement with present incidents (embedded learning mode), and a few studies suggest that organizations can learn prospectively to prepare for future incidents (prospective learning mode). We argue that although these three learning modes are effective, they do not adequately explain how organizations learn from IS incidents when used in isolation. Since IS incidents unfold increasingly as sets of interacting events across information systems and organizational settings, organizational learning needs to be theorized as an iterative process among these learning modes. We synthesize these three learning modes into an integrative framework and theorize about their supportive and inhibiting relations. We suggest some opportunities for future research, which would advance our understanding of how organizations learn from IS incidents.</abstract><cop>Minneapolis</cop><pub>University of Minnesota, MIS Research Center</pub><doi>10.25300/MISQ/2022/14305</doi><tpages>60</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8385-5869</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8322-8849</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0068-2446</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0276-7783 |
ispartof | MIS quarterly, 2022-03, Vol.46 (1), p.531-590 |
issn | 0276-7783 2162-9730 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2642938925 |
source | Business Source Complete |
subjects | Information systems Learning Literature Literature reviews Organizational learning Organizations Reflective teaching |
title | How do organizations learn from information system incidents?: a synthesis of the past, present, and future |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-18T05%3A54%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=How%20do%20organizations%20learn%20from%20information%20system%20incidents?:%20a%20synthesis%20of%20the%20past,%20present,%20and%20future&rft.jtitle=MIS%20quarterly&rft.au=Rezazade%20Mehrizi,%20Mohammad%20H&rft.aucorp=University%20of%20Warwick&rft.date=2022-03-01&rft.volume=46&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=531&rft.epage=590&rft.pages=531-590&rft.issn=0276-7783&rft.eissn=2162-9730&rft_id=info:doi/10.25300/MISQ/2022/14305&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2642938925%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2642938925&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |