Retrofitting of Existing Bar Racks with Electrodes for Fish Protection—An Experimental Study Assessing the Effectiveness for a Pilot Site
Downstream-migrating fish in rivers tend to follow the main current, and are in danger of swimming through the turbines at run-of-river hydropower plants, possibly causing high mortality rates. To avoid these losses, fish must be prevented from entering the turbines. Most existing vertical bar rack...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Water (Basel) 2022-03, Vol.14 (6), p.850 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 850 |
container_title | Water (Basel) |
container_volume | 14 |
creator | Haug, Jonas Auer, Stefan Frees, Calvin Brinkmeier, Barbara Tutzer, Ruben Hayes, Daniel S. Aufleger, Markus |
description | Downstream-migrating fish in rivers tend to follow the main current, and are in danger of swimming through the turbines at run-of-river hydropower plants, possibly causing high mortality rates. To avoid these losses, fish must be prevented from entering the turbines. Most existing vertical bar rack systems (used for turbine protection) however usually do not ensure proper fish protection due to large bar spacings. FishProtector technology enables the retrofitting of existing bar racks (i.e., the mechanical barrier) with additional electrodes to create a hybrid barrier. The induced electric field in the water aims to create a behavioral barrier to prevent fish passage through the bar rack. In this study, ethohydraulic experiments to investigate the effect of such a behavioral barrier on fish were performed. In detail, the fish-protection rate at a bar rack with a bar spacing of 30 mm was tested in five different scenarios: (i) a bar rack without electrodes (reference), and four electrified setups with electrode spacings of (ii) 80 mm, (iii) 120 mm, (iv) 160 mm, and (v) 200 mm. A flow velocity of 0.23 m/s was chosen to replicate the situation at a planned pilot site. The study was conducted in an outdoor laboratory flume using small fish of several local riverine species, mostly cyprinids and minnows. The results show that the mean fish-protection rate in the experiments could be increased from 62% in the reference setup up to 96% in the electrified setups. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3390/w14060850 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2642682383</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A793269542</galeid><sourcerecordid>A793269542</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-d6a922137afbe7c1fb12de9bd2a4dc2a6eec9c8051c7416f366f4ef402144f3e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkc9OAjEQxjdGEwly8A2aePIA9h_d3SMSUBMSCeh5U7pTKC5bbIvIzbtXn9AnsYAxdg6dfPl93yQzSXJJcIexHN9sCccCZ118kjQoTlmbc05O__XnScv7JY6P51nkGsnnBIKz2oRg6jmyGg3ejT_0t9KhiVQvHm1NWKBBBSqSJXikrUND4xdo7GyIqrH198dXr47eNTizgjrICk3Dptyhnvfg_T4vLAANtN7zb1BH8ZAj0dhUNqCpCXCRnGlZeWj9_s3keTh46t-3R493D_3eqK0YI6FdCplTSlgq9QxSRfSM0BLyWUklLxWVAkDlKsNdolJOhGZCaA6aY0o41wxYM7k65q6dfd2AD8XSblwdRxZUcCoyyjIWqc6RmssKClNrG5xUsUpYGWVr0CbqvTRnVORdTqPh-mhQznrvQBfruAzpdgXBxf4-xd992A8bToSw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2642682383</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Retrofitting of Existing Bar Racks with Electrodes for Fish Protection—An Experimental Study Assessing the Effectiveness for a Pilot Site</title><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Haug, Jonas ; Auer, Stefan ; Frees, Calvin ; Brinkmeier, Barbara ; Tutzer, Ruben ; Hayes, Daniel S. ; Aufleger, Markus</creator><creatorcontrib>Haug, Jonas ; Auer, Stefan ; Frees, Calvin ; Brinkmeier, Barbara ; Tutzer, Ruben ; Hayes, Daniel S. ; Aufleger, Markus</creatorcontrib><description>Downstream-migrating fish in rivers tend to follow the main current, and are in danger of swimming through the turbines at run-of-river hydropower plants, possibly causing high mortality rates. To avoid these losses, fish must be prevented from entering the turbines. Most existing vertical bar rack systems (used for turbine protection) however usually do not ensure proper fish protection due to large bar spacings. FishProtector technology enables the retrofitting of existing bar racks (i.e., the mechanical barrier) with additional electrodes to create a hybrid barrier. The induced electric field in the water aims to create a behavioral barrier to prevent fish passage through the bar rack. In this study, ethohydraulic experiments to investigate the effect of such a behavioral barrier on fish were performed. In detail, the fish-protection rate at a bar rack with a bar spacing of 30 mm was tested in five different scenarios: (i) a bar rack without electrodes (reference), and four electrified setups with electrode spacings of (ii) 80 mm, (iii) 120 mm, (iv) 160 mm, and (v) 200 mm. A flow velocity of 0.23 m/s was chosen to replicate the situation at a planned pilot site. The study was conducted in an outdoor laboratory flume using small fish of several local riverine species, mostly cyprinids and minnows. The results show that the mean fish-protection rate in the experiments could be increased from 62% in the reference setup up to 96% in the electrified setups.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2073-4441</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2073-4441</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/w14060850</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Animal behavior ; Barriers ; Behavior ; Electric fields ; Electrodes ; Fish barriers ; Fish ladders ; Fish migration ; Fishes ; Fishways ; Flow velocity ; Health aspects ; Hydraulics ; Hydroelectric plants ; Hydroelectric power ; Hydroelectric power plants ; Mortality ; Protection and preservation ; Racks ; Retrofitting ; Rivers ; Swimming ; Turbines ; Water-power</subject><ispartof>Water (Basel), 2022-03, Vol.14 (6), p.850</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2022 MDPI AG</rights><rights>2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-d6a922137afbe7c1fb12de9bd2a4dc2a6eec9c8051c7416f366f4ef402144f3e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-d6a922137afbe7c1fb12de9bd2a4dc2a6eec9c8051c7416f366f4ef402144f3e3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4993-4539 ; 0000-0003-1422-1050 ; 0000-0003-3709-8630</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Haug, Jonas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Auer, Stefan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frees, Calvin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brinkmeier, Barbara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tutzer, Ruben</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hayes, Daniel S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aufleger, Markus</creatorcontrib><title>Retrofitting of Existing Bar Racks with Electrodes for Fish Protection—An Experimental Study Assessing the Effectiveness for a Pilot Site</title><title>Water (Basel)</title><description>Downstream-migrating fish in rivers tend to follow the main current, and are in danger of swimming through the turbines at run-of-river hydropower plants, possibly causing high mortality rates. To avoid these losses, fish must be prevented from entering the turbines. Most existing vertical bar rack systems (used for turbine protection) however usually do not ensure proper fish protection due to large bar spacings. FishProtector technology enables the retrofitting of existing bar racks (i.e., the mechanical barrier) with additional electrodes to create a hybrid barrier. The induced electric field in the water aims to create a behavioral barrier to prevent fish passage through the bar rack. In this study, ethohydraulic experiments to investigate the effect of such a behavioral barrier on fish were performed. In detail, the fish-protection rate at a bar rack with a bar spacing of 30 mm was tested in five different scenarios: (i) a bar rack without electrodes (reference), and four electrified setups with electrode spacings of (ii) 80 mm, (iii) 120 mm, (iv) 160 mm, and (v) 200 mm. A flow velocity of 0.23 m/s was chosen to replicate the situation at a planned pilot site. The study was conducted in an outdoor laboratory flume using small fish of several local riverine species, mostly cyprinids and minnows. The results show that the mean fish-protection rate in the experiments could be increased from 62% in the reference setup up to 96% in the electrified setups.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Animal behavior</subject><subject>Barriers</subject><subject>Behavior</subject><subject>Electric fields</subject><subject>Electrodes</subject><subject>Fish barriers</subject><subject>Fish ladders</subject><subject>Fish migration</subject><subject>Fishes</subject><subject>Fishways</subject><subject>Flow velocity</subject><subject>Health aspects</subject><subject>Hydraulics</subject><subject>Hydroelectric plants</subject><subject>Hydroelectric power</subject><subject>Hydroelectric power plants</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>Protection and preservation</subject><subject>Racks</subject><subject>Retrofitting</subject><subject>Rivers</subject><subject>Swimming</subject><subject>Turbines</subject><subject>Water-power</subject><issn>2073-4441</issn><issn>2073-4441</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkc9OAjEQxjdGEwly8A2aePIA9h_d3SMSUBMSCeh5U7pTKC5bbIvIzbtXn9AnsYAxdg6dfPl93yQzSXJJcIexHN9sCccCZ118kjQoTlmbc05O__XnScv7JY6P51nkGsnnBIKz2oRg6jmyGg3ejT_0t9KhiVQvHm1NWKBBBSqSJXikrUND4xdo7GyIqrH198dXr47eNTizgjrICk3Dptyhnvfg_T4vLAANtN7zb1BH8ZAj0dhUNqCpCXCRnGlZeWj9_s3keTh46t-3R493D_3eqK0YI6FdCplTSlgq9QxSRfSM0BLyWUklLxWVAkDlKsNdolJOhGZCaA6aY0o41wxYM7k65q6dfd2AD8XSblwdRxZUcCoyyjIWqc6RmssKClNrG5xUsUpYGWVr0CbqvTRnVORdTqPh-mhQznrvQBfruAzpdgXBxf4-xd992A8bToSw</recordid><startdate>20220301</startdate><enddate>20220301</enddate><creator>Haug, Jonas</creator><creator>Auer, Stefan</creator><creator>Frees, Calvin</creator><creator>Brinkmeier, Barbara</creator><creator>Tutzer, Ruben</creator><creator>Hayes, Daniel S.</creator><creator>Aufleger, Markus</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4993-4539</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1422-1050</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3709-8630</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220301</creationdate><title>Retrofitting of Existing Bar Racks with Electrodes for Fish Protection—An Experimental Study Assessing the Effectiveness for a Pilot Site</title><author>Haug, Jonas ; Auer, Stefan ; Frees, Calvin ; Brinkmeier, Barbara ; Tutzer, Ruben ; Hayes, Daniel S. ; Aufleger, Markus</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-d6a922137afbe7c1fb12de9bd2a4dc2a6eec9c8051c7416f366f4ef402144f3e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Animal behavior</topic><topic>Barriers</topic><topic>Behavior</topic><topic>Electric fields</topic><topic>Electrodes</topic><topic>Fish barriers</topic><topic>Fish ladders</topic><topic>Fish migration</topic><topic>Fishes</topic><topic>Fishways</topic><topic>Flow velocity</topic><topic>Health aspects</topic><topic>Hydraulics</topic><topic>Hydroelectric plants</topic><topic>Hydroelectric power</topic><topic>Hydroelectric power plants</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>Protection and preservation</topic><topic>Racks</topic><topic>Retrofitting</topic><topic>Rivers</topic><topic>Swimming</topic><topic>Turbines</topic><topic>Water-power</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Haug, Jonas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Auer, Stefan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frees, Calvin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brinkmeier, Barbara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tutzer, Ruben</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hayes, Daniel S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aufleger, Markus</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Access via ProQuest (Open Access)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Water (Basel)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Haug, Jonas</au><au>Auer, Stefan</au><au>Frees, Calvin</au><au>Brinkmeier, Barbara</au><au>Tutzer, Ruben</au><au>Hayes, Daniel S.</au><au>Aufleger, Markus</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Retrofitting of Existing Bar Racks with Electrodes for Fish Protection—An Experimental Study Assessing the Effectiveness for a Pilot Site</atitle><jtitle>Water (Basel)</jtitle><date>2022-03-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>850</spage><pages>850-</pages><issn>2073-4441</issn><eissn>2073-4441</eissn><abstract>Downstream-migrating fish in rivers tend to follow the main current, and are in danger of swimming through the turbines at run-of-river hydropower plants, possibly causing high mortality rates. To avoid these losses, fish must be prevented from entering the turbines. Most existing vertical bar rack systems (used for turbine protection) however usually do not ensure proper fish protection due to large bar spacings. FishProtector technology enables the retrofitting of existing bar racks (i.e., the mechanical barrier) with additional electrodes to create a hybrid barrier. The induced electric field in the water aims to create a behavioral barrier to prevent fish passage through the bar rack. In this study, ethohydraulic experiments to investigate the effect of such a behavioral barrier on fish were performed. In detail, the fish-protection rate at a bar rack with a bar spacing of 30 mm was tested in five different scenarios: (i) a bar rack without electrodes (reference), and four electrified setups with electrode spacings of (ii) 80 mm, (iii) 120 mm, (iv) 160 mm, and (v) 200 mm. A flow velocity of 0.23 m/s was chosen to replicate the situation at a planned pilot site. The study was conducted in an outdoor laboratory flume using small fish of several local riverine species, mostly cyprinids and minnows. The results show that the mean fish-protection rate in the experiments could be increased from 62% in the reference setup up to 96% in the electrified setups.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><doi>10.3390/w14060850</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4993-4539</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1422-1050</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3709-8630</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2073-4441 |
ispartof | Water (Basel), 2022-03, Vol.14 (6), p.850 |
issn | 2073-4441 2073-4441 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2642682383 |
source | MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
subjects | Analysis Animal behavior Barriers Behavior Electric fields Electrodes Fish barriers Fish ladders Fish migration Fishes Fishways Flow velocity Health aspects Hydraulics Hydroelectric plants Hydroelectric power Hydroelectric power plants Mortality Protection and preservation Racks Retrofitting Rivers Swimming Turbines Water-power |
title | Retrofitting of Existing Bar Racks with Electrodes for Fish Protection—An Experimental Study Assessing the Effectiveness for a Pilot Site |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T08%3A58%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Retrofitting%20of%20Existing%20Bar%20Racks%20with%20Electrodes%20for%20Fish%20Protection%E2%80%94An%20Experimental%20Study%20Assessing%20the%20Effectiveness%20for%20a%20Pilot%20Site&rft.jtitle=Water%20(Basel)&rft.au=Haug,%20Jonas&rft.date=2022-03-01&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=850&rft.pages=850-&rft.issn=2073-4441&rft.eissn=2073-4441&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/w14060850&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA793269542%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2642682383&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A793269542&rfr_iscdi=true |