A Methodology to Qualitatively Select Upcycled Building Materials from Urban and Industrial Waste

The rising concern about climate change and other challenges faced by the planet led society to look for different design solutions and approaches towards a more balanced relationship between the built and natural environment. The circular economy is an effective alternative to the linear economic m...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Sustainability 2022-03, Vol.14 (6), p.3430
Hauptverfasser: Parece, Sara, Rato, Vasco, Resende, Ricardo, Pinto, Pedro, Stellacci, Stefania
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 6
container_start_page 3430
container_title Sustainability
container_volume 14
creator Parece, Sara
Rato, Vasco
Resende, Ricardo
Pinto, Pedro
Stellacci, Stefania
description The rising concern about climate change and other challenges faced by the planet led society to look for different design solutions and approaches towards a more balanced relationship between the built and natural environment. The circular economy is an effective alternative to the linear economic model inspired by natural metabolisms and the circular use of resources. This research explores how innovative strategies can be integrated for evaluating local urban and industrial wastes into sustainable building materials. A literature review is conducted focusing on circular design strategies, re-use, recycle, and waste transformation processes. Then, a methodology for the selection of upcycled and re-used building materials is developed based on Ashby’s method. A total of thirty-five types of partition walls, which include plastic, wood, paper, steel, aluminium, and agricultural wastes, are evaluated using a multi-criteria decision aid (M-MACBETH). Among these solutions, ten types of walls show high-performance thermal and sound isolation, fourteen types are effective for coating, and two exhibit structural reliability. Regardless of their functional limitations, the proposed solutions based on waste materials bear great potential within the construction industry.
doi_str_mv 10.3390/su14063430
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2642670657</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2642670657</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c321t-edf0d0345b0367c4616e3b883bc2df64666c5a04e9354581686479a4eb2543563</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkF1LwzAUhoMoOOZu_AUB74Rq0pOctpdz-DGYiOjwsqRJOju6Ziap0H9vxwQ9N--B9-EceAi55OwGoGC3oeeCIQhgJ2SSsownnEl2-m8_J7MQtmwcAF5wnBA1p882fjrjWrcZaHT0tVdtE1Vsvm070DfbWh3peq8H3VpD7_qmNU23oc8qWt-oNtDaux1d-0p1VHWGLjvTh3io6IcK0V6Qs3rE7Ow3p2T9cP--eEpWL4_LxXyVaEh5TKypmWEgZMUAMy2Qo4Uqz6HSqalRIKKWiglbgBQy55ijyAolbJVKARJhSq6Od_feffU2xHLret-NL8sURYoZQ5mN1PWR0t6F4G1d7n2zU34oOSsPFss_i_ADrWdjWg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2642670657</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Methodology to Qualitatively Select Upcycled Building Materials from Urban and Industrial Waste</title><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Parece, Sara ; Rato, Vasco ; Resende, Ricardo ; Pinto, Pedro ; Stellacci, Stefania</creator><creatorcontrib>Parece, Sara ; Rato, Vasco ; Resende, Ricardo ; Pinto, Pedro ; Stellacci, Stefania</creatorcontrib><description>The rising concern about climate change and other challenges faced by the planet led society to look for different design solutions and approaches towards a more balanced relationship between the built and natural environment. The circular economy is an effective alternative to the linear economic model inspired by natural metabolisms and the circular use of resources. This research explores how innovative strategies can be integrated for evaluating local urban and industrial wastes into sustainable building materials. A literature review is conducted focusing on circular design strategies, re-use, recycle, and waste transformation processes. Then, a methodology for the selection of upcycled and re-used building materials is developed based on Ashby’s method. A total of thirty-five types of partition walls, which include plastic, wood, paper, steel, aluminium, and agricultural wastes, are evaluated using a multi-criteria decision aid (M-MACBETH). Among these solutions, ten types of walls show high-performance thermal and sound isolation, fourteen types are effective for coating, and two exhibit structural reliability. Regardless of their functional limitations, the proposed solutions based on waste materials bear great potential within the construction industry.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2071-1050</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2071-1050</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/su14063430</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Agricultural wastes ; Aluminum ; Architecture ; Building construction ; Building materials ; Business models ; By products ; Case studies ; Climate change ; Construction industry ; Construction materials ; Consumption ; Decision making ; Design ; Design for recycling ; Designers ; Diachronic analysis ; Efficiency ; Green buildings ; Industrial wastes ; Inventory ; Literature reviews ; Materials selection ; Multiple criterion ; Recycling ; Reliability engineering ; Structural reliability ; Supply chains ; Sustainable materials ; Value chain ; Waste materials ; Wood waste</subject><ispartof>Sustainability, 2022-03, Vol.14 (6), p.3430</ispartof><rights>2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c321t-edf0d0345b0367c4616e3b883bc2df64666c5a04e9354581686479a4eb2543563</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c321t-edf0d0345b0367c4616e3b883bc2df64666c5a04e9354581686479a4eb2543563</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2155-5625 ; 0000-0002-5097-8248 ; 0000-0001-8864-7391 ; 0000-0002-0235-9792</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Parece, Sara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rato, Vasco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Resende, Ricardo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pinto, Pedro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stellacci, Stefania</creatorcontrib><title>A Methodology to Qualitatively Select Upcycled Building Materials from Urban and Industrial Waste</title><title>Sustainability</title><description>The rising concern about climate change and other challenges faced by the planet led society to look for different design solutions and approaches towards a more balanced relationship between the built and natural environment. The circular economy is an effective alternative to the linear economic model inspired by natural metabolisms and the circular use of resources. This research explores how innovative strategies can be integrated for evaluating local urban and industrial wastes into sustainable building materials. A literature review is conducted focusing on circular design strategies, re-use, recycle, and waste transformation processes. Then, a methodology for the selection of upcycled and re-used building materials is developed based on Ashby’s method. A total of thirty-five types of partition walls, which include plastic, wood, paper, steel, aluminium, and agricultural wastes, are evaluated using a multi-criteria decision aid (M-MACBETH). Among these solutions, ten types of walls show high-performance thermal and sound isolation, fourteen types are effective for coating, and two exhibit structural reliability. Regardless of their functional limitations, the proposed solutions based on waste materials bear great potential within the construction industry.</description><subject>Agricultural wastes</subject><subject>Aluminum</subject><subject>Architecture</subject><subject>Building construction</subject><subject>Building materials</subject><subject>Business models</subject><subject>By products</subject><subject>Case studies</subject><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>Construction industry</subject><subject>Construction materials</subject><subject>Consumption</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Design</subject><subject>Design for recycling</subject><subject>Designers</subject><subject>Diachronic analysis</subject><subject>Efficiency</subject><subject>Green buildings</subject><subject>Industrial wastes</subject><subject>Inventory</subject><subject>Literature reviews</subject><subject>Materials selection</subject><subject>Multiple criterion</subject><subject>Recycling</subject><subject>Reliability engineering</subject><subject>Structural reliability</subject><subject>Supply chains</subject><subject>Sustainable materials</subject><subject>Value chain</subject><subject>Waste materials</subject><subject>Wood waste</subject><issn>2071-1050</issn><issn>2071-1050</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkF1LwzAUhoMoOOZu_AUB74Rq0pOctpdz-DGYiOjwsqRJOju6Ziap0H9vxwQ9N--B9-EceAi55OwGoGC3oeeCIQhgJ2SSsownnEl2-m8_J7MQtmwcAF5wnBA1p882fjrjWrcZaHT0tVdtE1Vsvm070DfbWh3peq8H3VpD7_qmNU23oc8qWt-oNtDaux1d-0p1VHWGLjvTh3io6IcK0V6Qs3rE7Ow3p2T9cP--eEpWL4_LxXyVaEh5TKypmWEgZMUAMy2Qo4Uqz6HSqalRIKKWiglbgBQy55ijyAolbJVKARJhSq6Od_feffU2xHLret-NL8sURYoZQ5mN1PWR0t6F4G1d7n2zU34oOSsPFss_i_ADrWdjWg</recordid><startdate>20220301</startdate><enddate>20220301</enddate><creator>Parece, Sara</creator><creator>Rato, Vasco</creator><creator>Resende, Ricardo</creator><creator>Pinto, Pedro</creator><creator>Stellacci, Stefania</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2155-5625</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5097-8248</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8864-7391</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0235-9792</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220301</creationdate><title>A Methodology to Qualitatively Select Upcycled Building Materials from Urban and Industrial Waste</title><author>Parece, Sara ; Rato, Vasco ; Resende, Ricardo ; Pinto, Pedro ; Stellacci, Stefania</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c321t-edf0d0345b0367c4616e3b883bc2df64666c5a04e9354581686479a4eb2543563</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Agricultural wastes</topic><topic>Aluminum</topic><topic>Architecture</topic><topic>Building construction</topic><topic>Building materials</topic><topic>Business models</topic><topic>By products</topic><topic>Case studies</topic><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>Construction industry</topic><topic>Construction materials</topic><topic>Consumption</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Design</topic><topic>Design for recycling</topic><topic>Designers</topic><topic>Diachronic analysis</topic><topic>Efficiency</topic><topic>Green buildings</topic><topic>Industrial wastes</topic><topic>Inventory</topic><topic>Literature reviews</topic><topic>Materials selection</topic><topic>Multiple criterion</topic><topic>Recycling</topic><topic>Reliability engineering</topic><topic>Structural reliability</topic><topic>Supply chains</topic><topic>Sustainable materials</topic><topic>Value chain</topic><topic>Waste materials</topic><topic>Wood waste</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Parece, Sara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rato, Vasco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Resende, Ricardo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pinto, Pedro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stellacci, Stefania</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><jtitle>Sustainability</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Parece, Sara</au><au>Rato, Vasco</au><au>Resende, Ricardo</au><au>Pinto, Pedro</au><au>Stellacci, Stefania</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Methodology to Qualitatively Select Upcycled Building Materials from Urban and Industrial Waste</atitle><jtitle>Sustainability</jtitle><date>2022-03-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>3430</spage><pages>3430-</pages><issn>2071-1050</issn><eissn>2071-1050</eissn><abstract>The rising concern about climate change and other challenges faced by the planet led society to look for different design solutions and approaches towards a more balanced relationship between the built and natural environment. The circular economy is an effective alternative to the linear economic model inspired by natural metabolisms and the circular use of resources. This research explores how innovative strategies can be integrated for evaluating local urban and industrial wastes into sustainable building materials. A literature review is conducted focusing on circular design strategies, re-use, recycle, and waste transformation processes. Then, a methodology for the selection of upcycled and re-used building materials is developed based on Ashby’s method. A total of thirty-five types of partition walls, which include plastic, wood, paper, steel, aluminium, and agricultural wastes, are evaluated using a multi-criteria decision aid (M-MACBETH). Among these solutions, ten types of walls show high-performance thermal and sound isolation, fourteen types are effective for coating, and two exhibit structural reliability. Regardless of their functional limitations, the proposed solutions based on waste materials bear great potential within the construction industry.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><doi>10.3390/su14063430</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2155-5625</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5097-8248</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8864-7391</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0235-9792</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2071-1050
ispartof Sustainability, 2022-03, Vol.14 (6), p.3430
issn 2071-1050
2071-1050
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2642670657
source MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Agricultural wastes
Aluminum
Architecture
Building construction
Building materials
Business models
By products
Case studies
Climate change
Construction industry
Construction materials
Consumption
Decision making
Design
Design for recycling
Designers
Diachronic analysis
Efficiency
Green buildings
Industrial wastes
Inventory
Literature reviews
Materials selection
Multiple criterion
Recycling
Reliability engineering
Structural reliability
Supply chains
Sustainable materials
Value chain
Waste materials
Wood waste
title A Methodology to Qualitatively Select Upcycled Building Materials from Urban and Industrial Waste
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T18%3A59%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Methodology%20to%20Qualitatively%20Select%20Upcycled%20Building%20Materials%20from%20Urban%20and%20Industrial%20Waste&rft.jtitle=Sustainability&rft.au=Parece,%20Sara&rft.date=2022-03-01&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=3430&rft.pages=3430-&rft.issn=2071-1050&rft.eissn=2071-1050&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/su14063430&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2642670657%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2642670657&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true