Use of Behavior Dynamics to Improve Early Detection of At-risk Students in Online Courses

Online learning has developed rapidly, but the success rate is very low. Hence, it is of great significance to construct a learning result predicting model, and to quickly and accurately identify students at risk of failing their course. In order to mine the dynamic features of learning behaviors an...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Mobile networks and applications 2022-02, Vol.27 (1), p.441-452
Hauptverfasser: Huang, Huan, Yuan, Shuai, He, Tingting, Hou, Rui
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 452
container_issue 1
container_start_page 441
container_title Mobile networks and applications
container_volume 27
creator Huang, Huan
Yuan, Shuai
He, Tingting
Hou, Rui
description Online learning has developed rapidly, but the success rate is very low. Hence, it is of great significance to construct a learning result predicting model, and to quickly and accurately identify students at risk of failing their course. In order to mine the dynamic features of learning behaviors and use them to improve the accuracy of detection of at-risk students, we propose a long-short term memory (LSTM) network based approach to identify at-risk students. To validate the performance of this approach, we first extracted the behavior data of one course from a public dataset, and generate two types of datasets, the aggregated datasets and the sequential datasets. After that, we used eight classic machine learning methods to train predicting model on these datasets and explored whether the models trained on sequential datasets are more accurate than the models trained on aggregated datasets. The results show that the models trained on sequential datasets are more accurate when naïve Bayes, Classification and Regression Tree, Random Forest (RF), Iterative Dichotomiser 3 and Multilayer Perception are used. Finally, we used the LSTM to train predicting models on sequential datasets, and compared them with the best models trained by RF. The results show that the models trained by the LSTM are more accurate, which proves the effectiveness of the proposed approach at certain extent.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s11036-021-01844-z
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2642624563</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2642624563</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-d1a19c7a97cb608a34b1fcedc10d8a3e929b81ed6d206befbcaffdc0cb5a56a93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1OwzAQhC0EEqXwApwscTb4J3GSY2kLVKrUA1SCk-U4G0hpnWI7ldqnxyVI3DjtrvTN7GgQumb0llGa3XnGqJCEckYoy5OEHE7QgKUZJzlLxWncRS5IIovXc3Th_YpSmqZ5MkBvSw-4rfE9fOhd0zo82Vu9aYzHocWzzda1O8BT7dZ7PIEAJjStPfKjQFzjP_Fz6CqwwePG4oVdNxbwuO2cB3-Jzmq99nD1O4do-TB9GT-R-eJxNh7NiRGsCKRimhUm00VmSklzLZKS1QYqw2gVLyh4UeYMKllxKkuoS6PrujLUlKlOpS7EEN30vjHrVwc-qFUMYONLxWXCJU9SKSLFe8q41nsHtdq6ZqPdXjGqjhWqvkIVK1Q_FapDFIle5CNs38H9Wf-j-gaNWnX8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2642624563</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Use of Behavior Dynamics to Improve Early Detection of At-risk Students in Online Courses</title><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Huang, Huan ; Yuan, Shuai ; He, Tingting ; Hou, Rui</creator><creatorcontrib>Huang, Huan ; Yuan, Shuai ; He, Tingting ; Hou, Rui</creatorcontrib><description>Online learning has developed rapidly, but the success rate is very low. Hence, it is of great significance to construct a learning result predicting model, and to quickly and accurately identify students at risk of failing their course. In order to mine the dynamic features of learning behaviors and use them to improve the accuracy of detection of at-risk students, we propose a long-short term memory (LSTM) network based approach to identify at-risk students. To validate the performance of this approach, we first extracted the behavior data of one course from a public dataset, and generate two types of datasets, the aggregated datasets and the sequential datasets. After that, we used eight classic machine learning methods to train predicting model on these datasets and explored whether the models trained on sequential datasets are more accurate than the models trained on aggregated datasets. The results show that the models trained on sequential datasets are more accurate when naïve Bayes, Classification and Regression Tree, Random Forest (RF), Iterative Dichotomiser 3 and Multilayer Perception are used. Finally, we used the LSTM to train predicting models on sequential datasets, and compared them with the best models trained by RF. The results show that the models trained by the LSTM are more accurate, which proves the effectiveness of the proposed approach at certain extent.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1383-469X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1572-8153</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11036-021-01844-z</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>At risk students ; Communications Engineering ; Computer Communication Networks ; Datasets ; Distance learning ; Electrical Engineering ; Engineering ; IT in Business ; Iterative methods ; Machine learning ; Multilayers ; Networks ; Online instruction ; Regression analysis ; Students</subject><ispartof>Mobile networks and applications, 2022-02, Vol.27 (1), p.441-452</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2021</rights><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2021.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-d1a19c7a97cb608a34b1fcedc10d8a3e929b81ed6d206befbcaffdc0cb5a56a93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-d1a19c7a97cb608a34b1fcedc10d8a3e929b81ed6d206befbcaffdc0cb5a56a93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11036-021-01844-z$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11036-021-01844-z$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Huang, Huan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yuan, Shuai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>He, Tingting</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hou, Rui</creatorcontrib><title>Use of Behavior Dynamics to Improve Early Detection of At-risk Students in Online Courses</title><title>Mobile networks and applications</title><addtitle>Mobile Netw Appl</addtitle><description>Online learning has developed rapidly, but the success rate is very low. Hence, it is of great significance to construct a learning result predicting model, and to quickly and accurately identify students at risk of failing their course. In order to mine the dynamic features of learning behaviors and use them to improve the accuracy of detection of at-risk students, we propose a long-short term memory (LSTM) network based approach to identify at-risk students. To validate the performance of this approach, we first extracted the behavior data of one course from a public dataset, and generate two types of datasets, the aggregated datasets and the sequential datasets. After that, we used eight classic machine learning methods to train predicting model on these datasets and explored whether the models trained on sequential datasets are more accurate than the models trained on aggregated datasets. The results show that the models trained on sequential datasets are more accurate when naïve Bayes, Classification and Regression Tree, Random Forest (RF), Iterative Dichotomiser 3 and Multilayer Perception are used. Finally, we used the LSTM to train predicting models on sequential datasets, and compared them with the best models trained by RF. The results show that the models trained by the LSTM are more accurate, which proves the effectiveness of the proposed approach at certain extent.</description><subject>At risk students</subject><subject>Communications Engineering</subject><subject>Computer Communication Networks</subject><subject>Datasets</subject><subject>Distance learning</subject><subject>Electrical Engineering</subject><subject>Engineering</subject><subject>IT in Business</subject><subject>Iterative methods</subject><subject>Machine learning</subject><subject>Multilayers</subject><subject>Networks</subject><subject>Online instruction</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>Students</subject><issn>1383-469X</issn><issn>1572-8153</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kM1OwzAQhC0EEqXwApwscTb4J3GSY2kLVKrUA1SCk-U4G0hpnWI7ldqnxyVI3DjtrvTN7GgQumb0llGa3XnGqJCEckYoy5OEHE7QgKUZJzlLxWncRS5IIovXc3Th_YpSmqZ5MkBvSw-4rfE9fOhd0zo82Vu9aYzHocWzzda1O8BT7dZ7PIEAJjStPfKjQFzjP_Fz6CqwwePG4oVdNxbwuO2cB3-Jzmq99nD1O4do-TB9GT-R-eJxNh7NiRGsCKRimhUm00VmSklzLZKS1QYqw2gVLyh4UeYMKllxKkuoS6PrujLUlKlOpS7EEN30vjHrVwc-qFUMYONLxWXCJU9SKSLFe8q41nsHtdq6ZqPdXjGqjhWqvkIVK1Q_FapDFIle5CNs38H9Wf-j-gaNWnX8</recordid><startdate>20220201</startdate><enddate>20220201</enddate><creator>Huang, Huan</creator><creator>Yuan, Shuai</creator><creator>He, Tingting</creator><creator>Hou, Rui</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8AL</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K7-</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0N</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220201</creationdate><title>Use of Behavior Dynamics to Improve Early Detection of At-risk Students in Online Courses</title><author>Huang, Huan ; Yuan, Shuai ; He, Tingting ; Hou, Rui</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-d1a19c7a97cb608a34b1fcedc10d8a3e929b81ed6d206befbcaffdc0cb5a56a93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>At risk students</topic><topic>Communications Engineering</topic><topic>Computer Communication Networks</topic><topic>Datasets</topic><topic>Distance learning</topic><topic>Electrical Engineering</topic><topic>Engineering</topic><topic>IT in Business</topic><topic>Iterative methods</topic><topic>Machine learning</topic><topic>Multilayers</topic><topic>Networks</topic><topic>Online instruction</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>Students</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Huang, Huan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yuan, Shuai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>He, Tingting</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hou, Rui</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics &amp; Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Computing Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Technology Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>Computer Science Database</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Computing Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Mobile networks and applications</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Huang, Huan</au><au>Yuan, Shuai</au><au>He, Tingting</au><au>Hou, Rui</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Use of Behavior Dynamics to Improve Early Detection of At-risk Students in Online Courses</atitle><jtitle>Mobile networks and applications</jtitle><stitle>Mobile Netw Appl</stitle><date>2022-02-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>441</spage><epage>452</epage><pages>441-452</pages><issn>1383-469X</issn><eissn>1572-8153</eissn><abstract>Online learning has developed rapidly, but the success rate is very low. Hence, it is of great significance to construct a learning result predicting model, and to quickly and accurately identify students at risk of failing their course. In order to mine the dynamic features of learning behaviors and use them to improve the accuracy of detection of at-risk students, we propose a long-short term memory (LSTM) network based approach to identify at-risk students. To validate the performance of this approach, we first extracted the behavior data of one course from a public dataset, and generate two types of datasets, the aggregated datasets and the sequential datasets. After that, we used eight classic machine learning methods to train predicting model on these datasets and explored whether the models trained on sequential datasets are more accurate than the models trained on aggregated datasets. The results show that the models trained on sequential datasets are more accurate when naïve Bayes, Classification and Regression Tree, Random Forest (RF), Iterative Dichotomiser 3 and Multilayer Perception are used. Finally, we used the LSTM to train predicting models on sequential datasets, and compared them with the best models trained by RF. The results show that the models trained by the LSTM are more accurate, which proves the effectiveness of the proposed approach at certain extent.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><doi>10.1007/s11036-021-01844-z</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1383-469X
ispartof Mobile networks and applications, 2022-02, Vol.27 (1), p.441-452
issn 1383-469X
1572-8153
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2642624563
source Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals
subjects At risk students
Communications Engineering
Computer Communication Networks
Datasets
Distance learning
Electrical Engineering
Engineering
IT in Business
Iterative methods
Machine learning
Multilayers
Networks
Online instruction
Regression analysis
Students
title Use of Behavior Dynamics to Improve Early Detection of At-risk Students in Online Courses
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T13%3A03%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Use%20of%20Behavior%20Dynamics%20to%20Improve%20Early%20Detection%20of%20At-risk%20Students%20in%20Online%20Courses&rft.jtitle=Mobile%20networks%20and%20applications&rft.au=Huang,%20Huan&rft.date=2022-02-01&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=441&rft.epage=452&rft.pages=441-452&rft.issn=1383-469X&rft.eissn=1572-8153&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11036-021-01844-z&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2642624563%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2642624563&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true