Long-Term Carbon Sequestration in Pine Forests under Different Silvicultural and Climatic Regimes in Spain

Proactive silviculture treatments (e.g., thinning) may increase C sequestration contributing to climate change mitigation, although, there are still questions about this effect in Mediterranean pine forests. The aim of this research was to quantify the storage of biomass and soil organic carbon in P...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Forests 2022-03, Vol.13 (3), p.450
Hauptverfasser: Navarro-Cerrillo, Rafael M., Ruiz-Gómez, Francisco J., Camarero, Jesús J., Castillo, Víctor, Barberá, Gonzalo G., Palacios-Rodríguez, Guillermo, Navarro, Francisco B., Blanco, Juan A., Imbert, Juan B., Cachinero-Vivar, Antonio M., Molina, Antonio J., del Campo, Antonio D.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 3
container_start_page 450
container_title Forests
container_volume 13
creator Navarro-Cerrillo, Rafael M.
Ruiz-Gómez, Francisco J.
Camarero, Jesús J.
Castillo, Víctor
Barberá, Gonzalo G.
Palacios-Rodríguez, Guillermo
Navarro, Francisco B.
Blanco, Juan A.
Imbert, Juan B.
Cachinero-Vivar, Antonio M.
Molina, Antonio J.
del Campo, Antonio D.
description Proactive silviculture treatments (e.g., thinning) may increase C sequestration contributing to climate change mitigation, although, there are still questions about this effect in Mediterranean pine forests. The aim of this research was to quantify the storage of biomass and soil organic carbon in Pinus forests along a climatic gradient from North to South of the Iberian Peninsula. Nine experimental Pinus spp trials were selected along a latitudinal gradient from the pre-Pyrenees to southern Spain. At each location, a homogeneous area was used as the operational scale, and three thinning intensity treatments: unthinned or control (C), intermediate thinning (LT, removal of 30–40% of the initial basal area) and heavy thinning (HT, removal of 50–60%) were conducted. Growth per unit area (e.g., expressed as basal area increment-BAI), biomass, and Soil Organic Carbon (SOC) were measured as well as three sets of environmental variables (climate, soil water availability and soil chemical and physical characteristics). One-way ANOVA and Structural Equation Modelling (SEM) were used to study the effect of thinning and environmental variables on C sequestration. Biomass and growth per unit area were higher in the control than in the thinning treatments, although differences were only significant for P. halepensis. Radial growth recovered after thinning in all species, but it was faster in the HT treatments. Soil organic carbon (SOC10, 0–10 cm depth) was higher in the HT treatments for P. halepensis and P. sylvestris, but not for P. nigra. SEM showed that Pinus stands of the studied species were beneficed by HT thinning, recovering their growth quickly. The resulting model explained 72% of the variation in SOC10 content, and 89% of the variation in silvicultural condition (basal area and density) after thinning. SOC10 was better related to climate than to silvicultural treatments. On the other hand, soil chemical and physical characteristics did not show significant influence over SOC10- Soil water availability was the latent variable with the highest influence over SOC10. This work is a new contribution that shows the need for forest managers to integrate silviculture and C sequestration in Mediterranean pine plantations.
doi_str_mv 10.3390/f13030450
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2642443599</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2642443599</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c292t-bcaf2a090d2e8d0dc293d411e9d1e53bea380ab5bbe0ba99cd199018f3d6f133</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNUE1LAzEQDaJgqT34DwKePKxOPrbdHGX9hIJie1-SzaSkbLM12RX896ZWxLnMzGPmzbxHyCWDGyEU3DomQIAs4YRMmFKqkAoWp__qczJLaQs5ykWluJyQ7bIPm2KNcUdrHU0f6Ao_RkxD1IPPnQ_0zQekj33MYKJjsBjpvXcOI4aBrnz36duxG8aoO6qDpXXnd3m3pe-48TtMB4rVXvtwQc6c7hLOfvOUrB8f1vVzsXx9eqnvlkXLFR8K02rHNSiwHCsLNqPCSsZQWYalMKhFBdqUxiAYrVRrszxglRN2ng0QU3J1pN3H_kdJs-3HGPLFhs8ll1KUSuWp6-NUG_uUIrpmH_Pf8ath0BzMbP7MFN9rpWd_</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2642443599</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Long-Term Carbon Sequestration in Pine Forests under Different Silvicultural and Climatic Regimes in Spain</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><creator>Navarro-Cerrillo, Rafael M. ; Ruiz-Gómez, Francisco J. ; Camarero, Jesús J. ; Castillo, Víctor ; Barberá, Gonzalo G. ; Palacios-Rodríguez, Guillermo ; Navarro, Francisco B. ; Blanco, Juan A. ; Imbert, Juan B. ; Cachinero-Vivar, Antonio M. ; Molina, Antonio J. ; del Campo, Antonio D.</creator><creatorcontrib>Navarro-Cerrillo, Rafael M. ; Ruiz-Gómez, Francisco J. ; Camarero, Jesús J. ; Castillo, Víctor ; Barberá, Gonzalo G. ; Palacios-Rodríguez, Guillermo ; Navarro, Francisco B. ; Blanco, Juan A. ; Imbert, Juan B. ; Cachinero-Vivar, Antonio M. ; Molina, Antonio J. ; del Campo, Antonio D.</creatorcontrib><description>Proactive silviculture treatments (e.g., thinning) may increase C sequestration contributing to climate change mitigation, although, there are still questions about this effect in Mediterranean pine forests. The aim of this research was to quantify the storage of biomass and soil organic carbon in Pinus forests along a climatic gradient from North to South of the Iberian Peninsula. Nine experimental Pinus spp trials were selected along a latitudinal gradient from the pre-Pyrenees to southern Spain. At each location, a homogeneous area was used as the operational scale, and three thinning intensity treatments: unthinned or control (C), intermediate thinning (LT, removal of 30–40% of the initial basal area) and heavy thinning (HT, removal of 50–60%) were conducted. Growth per unit area (e.g., expressed as basal area increment-BAI), biomass, and Soil Organic Carbon (SOC) were measured as well as three sets of environmental variables (climate, soil water availability and soil chemical and physical characteristics). One-way ANOVA and Structural Equation Modelling (SEM) were used to study the effect of thinning and environmental variables on C sequestration. Biomass and growth per unit area were higher in the control than in the thinning treatments, although differences were only significant for P. halepensis. Radial growth recovered after thinning in all species, but it was faster in the HT treatments. Soil organic carbon (SOC10, 0–10 cm depth) was higher in the HT treatments for P. halepensis and P. sylvestris, but not for P. nigra. SEM showed that Pinus stands of the studied species were beneficed by HT thinning, recovering their growth quickly. The resulting model explained 72% of the variation in SOC10 content, and 89% of the variation in silvicultural condition (basal area and density) after thinning. SOC10 was better related to climate than to silvicultural treatments. On the other hand, soil chemical and physical characteristics did not show significant influence over SOC10- Soil water availability was the latent variable with the highest influence over SOC10. This work is a new contribution that shows the need for forest managers to integrate silviculture and C sequestration in Mediterranean pine plantations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1999-4907</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1999-4907</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/f13030450</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Biomass ; Carbon ; Carbon sequestration ; Climate change ; Climate change mitigation ; Coniferous forests ; Drought ; Environmental policy ; Forest management ; Hypotheses ; International agreements ; Mathematical models ; Moisture content ; Multivariate statistical analysis ; Organic carbon ; Organic soils ; Physical characteristics ; Physical properties ; Pine ; Pine trees ; Pinus ; Pinus halepensis ; Rain ; Silviculture ; Soil chemistry ; Soil water ; Soil water storage ; Structural equation modeling ; Thinning ; Timber ; Trees ; Variance analysis ; Water availability</subject><ispartof>Forests, 2022-03, Vol.13 (3), p.450</ispartof><rights>2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c292t-bcaf2a090d2e8d0dc293d411e9d1e53bea380ab5bbe0ba99cd199018f3d6f133</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c292t-bcaf2a090d2e8d0dc293d411e9d1e53bea380ab5bbe0ba99cd199018f3d6f133</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3470-8640 ; 0000-0002-6524-4335 ; 0000-0003-2436-2922 ; 0000-0002-1999-3415 ; 0000-0001-8786-0211 ; 0000-0002-1294-2148 ; 0000-0002-5279-4215 ; 0000-0001-8782-6873 ; 0000-0003-2166-0633</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Navarro-Cerrillo, Rafael M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ruiz-Gómez, Francisco J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Camarero, Jesús J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Castillo, Víctor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barberá, Gonzalo G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Palacios-Rodríguez, Guillermo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Navarro, Francisco B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blanco, Juan A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Imbert, Juan B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cachinero-Vivar, Antonio M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Molina, Antonio J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>del Campo, Antonio D.</creatorcontrib><title>Long-Term Carbon Sequestration in Pine Forests under Different Silvicultural and Climatic Regimes in Spain</title><title>Forests</title><description>Proactive silviculture treatments (e.g., thinning) may increase C sequestration contributing to climate change mitigation, although, there are still questions about this effect in Mediterranean pine forests. The aim of this research was to quantify the storage of biomass and soil organic carbon in Pinus forests along a climatic gradient from North to South of the Iberian Peninsula. Nine experimental Pinus spp trials were selected along a latitudinal gradient from the pre-Pyrenees to southern Spain. At each location, a homogeneous area was used as the operational scale, and three thinning intensity treatments: unthinned or control (C), intermediate thinning (LT, removal of 30–40% of the initial basal area) and heavy thinning (HT, removal of 50–60%) were conducted. Growth per unit area (e.g., expressed as basal area increment-BAI), biomass, and Soil Organic Carbon (SOC) were measured as well as three sets of environmental variables (climate, soil water availability and soil chemical and physical characteristics). One-way ANOVA and Structural Equation Modelling (SEM) were used to study the effect of thinning and environmental variables on C sequestration. Biomass and growth per unit area were higher in the control than in the thinning treatments, although differences were only significant for P. halepensis. Radial growth recovered after thinning in all species, but it was faster in the HT treatments. Soil organic carbon (SOC10, 0–10 cm depth) was higher in the HT treatments for P. halepensis and P. sylvestris, but not for P. nigra. SEM showed that Pinus stands of the studied species were beneficed by HT thinning, recovering their growth quickly. The resulting model explained 72% of the variation in SOC10 content, and 89% of the variation in silvicultural condition (basal area and density) after thinning. SOC10 was better related to climate than to silvicultural treatments. On the other hand, soil chemical and physical characteristics did not show significant influence over SOC10- Soil water availability was the latent variable with the highest influence over SOC10. This work is a new contribution that shows the need for forest managers to integrate silviculture and C sequestration in Mediterranean pine plantations.</description><subject>Biomass</subject><subject>Carbon</subject><subject>Carbon sequestration</subject><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>Climate change mitigation</subject><subject>Coniferous forests</subject><subject>Drought</subject><subject>Environmental policy</subject><subject>Forest management</subject><subject>Hypotheses</subject><subject>International agreements</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Moisture content</subject><subject>Multivariate statistical analysis</subject><subject>Organic carbon</subject><subject>Organic soils</subject><subject>Physical characteristics</subject><subject>Physical properties</subject><subject>Pine</subject><subject>Pine trees</subject><subject>Pinus</subject><subject>Pinus halepensis</subject><subject>Rain</subject><subject>Silviculture</subject><subject>Soil chemistry</subject><subject>Soil water</subject><subject>Soil water storage</subject><subject>Structural equation modeling</subject><subject>Thinning</subject><subject>Timber</subject><subject>Trees</subject><subject>Variance analysis</subject><subject>Water availability</subject><issn>1999-4907</issn><issn>1999-4907</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNpNUE1LAzEQDaJgqT34DwKePKxOPrbdHGX9hIJie1-SzaSkbLM12RX896ZWxLnMzGPmzbxHyCWDGyEU3DomQIAs4YRMmFKqkAoWp__qczJLaQs5ykWluJyQ7bIPm2KNcUdrHU0f6Ao_RkxD1IPPnQ_0zQekj33MYKJjsBjpvXcOI4aBrnz36duxG8aoO6qDpXXnd3m3pe-48TtMB4rVXvtwQc6c7hLOfvOUrB8f1vVzsXx9eqnvlkXLFR8K02rHNSiwHCsLNqPCSsZQWYalMKhFBdqUxiAYrVRrszxglRN2ng0QU3J1pN3H_kdJs-3HGPLFhs8ll1KUSuWp6-NUG_uUIrpmH_Pf8ath0BzMbP7MFN9rpWd_</recordid><startdate>20220301</startdate><enddate>20220301</enddate><creator>Navarro-Cerrillo, Rafael M.</creator><creator>Ruiz-Gómez, Francisco J.</creator><creator>Camarero, Jesús J.</creator><creator>Castillo, Víctor</creator><creator>Barberá, Gonzalo G.</creator><creator>Palacios-Rodríguez, Guillermo</creator><creator>Navarro, Francisco B.</creator><creator>Blanco, Juan A.</creator><creator>Imbert, Juan B.</creator><creator>Cachinero-Vivar, Antonio M.</creator><creator>Molina, Antonio J.</creator><creator>del Campo, Antonio D.</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3470-8640</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6524-4335</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2436-2922</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1999-3415</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8786-0211</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1294-2148</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5279-4215</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8782-6873</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2166-0633</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220301</creationdate><title>Long-Term Carbon Sequestration in Pine Forests under Different Silvicultural and Climatic Regimes in Spain</title><author>Navarro-Cerrillo, Rafael M. ; Ruiz-Gómez, Francisco J. ; Camarero, Jesús J. ; Castillo, Víctor ; Barberá, Gonzalo G. ; Palacios-Rodríguez, Guillermo ; Navarro, Francisco B. ; Blanco, Juan A. ; Imbert, Juan B. ; Cachinero-Vivar, Antonio M. ; Molina, Antonio J. ; del Campo, Antonio D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c292t-bcaf2a090d2e8d0dc293d411e9d1e53bea380ab5bbe0ba99cd199018f3d6f133</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Biomass</topic><topic>Carbon</topic><topic>Carbon sequestration</topic><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>Climate change mitigation</topic><topic>Coniferous forests</topic><topic>Drought</topic><topic>Environmental policy</topic><topic>Forest management</topic><topic>Hypotheses</topic><topic>International agreements</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Moisture content</topic><topic>Multivariate statistical analysis</topic><topic>Organic carbon</topic><topic>Organic soils</topic><topic>Physical characteristics</topic><topic>Physical properties</topic><topic>Pine</topic><topic>Pine trees</topic><topic>Pinus</topic><topic>Pinus halepensis</topic><topic>Rain</topic><topic>Silviculture</topic><topic>Soil chemistry</topic><topic>Soil water</topic><topic>Soil water storage</topic><topic>Structural equation modeling</topic><topic>Thinning</topic><topic>Timber</topic><topic>Trees</topic><topic>Variance analysis</topic><topic>Water availability</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Navarro-Cerrillo, Rafael M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ruiz-Gómez, Francisco J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Camarero, Jesús J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Castillo, Víctor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barberá, Gonzalo G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Palacios-Rodríguez, Guillermo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Navarro, Francisco B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blanco, Juan A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Imbert, Juan B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cachinero-Vivar, Antonio M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Molina, Antonio J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>del Campo, Antonio D.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><jtitle>Forests</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Navarro-Cerrillo, Rafael M.</au><au>Ruiz-Gómez, Francisco J.</au><au>Camarero, Jesús J.</au><au>Castillo, Víctor</au><au>Barberá, Gonzalo G.</au><au>Palacios-Rodríguez, Guillermo</au><au>Navarro, Francisco B.</au><au>Blanco, Juan A.</au><au>Imbert, Juan B.</au><au>Cachinero-Vivar, Antonio M.</au><au>Molina, Antonio J.</au><au>del Campo, Antonio D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Long-Term Carbon Sequestration in Pine Forests under Different Silvicultural and Climatic Regimes in Spain</atitle><jtitle>Forests</jtitle><date>2022-03-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>450</spage><pages>450-</pages><issn>1999-4907</issn><eissn>1999-4907</eissn><abstract>Proactive silviculture treatments (e.g., thinning) may increase C sequestration contributing to climate change mitigation, although, there are still questions about this effect in Mediterranean pine forests. The aim of this research was to quantify the storage of biomass and soil organic carbon in Pinus forests along a climatic gradient from North to South of the Iberian Peninsula. Nine experimental Pinus spp trials were selected along a latitudinal gradient from the pre-Pyrenees to southern Spain. At each location, a homogeneous area was used as the operational scale, and three thinning intensity treatments: unthinned or control (C), intermediate thinning (LT, removal of 30–40% of the initial basal area) and heavy thinning (HT, removal of 50–60%) were conducted. Growth per unit area (e.g., expressed as basal area increment-BAI), biomass, and Soil Organic Carbon (SOC) were measured as well as three sets of environmental variables (climate, soil water availability and soil chemical and physical characteristics). One-way ANOVA and Structural Equation Modelling (SEM) were used to study the effect of thinning and environmental variables on C sequestration. Biomass and growth per unit area were higher in the control than in the thinning treatments, although differences were only significant for P. halepensis. Radial growth recovered after thinning in all species, but it was faster in the HT treatments. Soil organic carbon (SOC10, 0–10 cm depth) was higher in the HT treatments for P. halepensis and P. sylvestris, but not for P. nigra. SEM showed that Pinus stands of the studied species were beneficed by HT thinning, recovering their growth quickly. The resulting model explained 72% of the variation in SOC10 content, and 89% of the variation in silvicultural condition (basal area and density) after thinning. SOC10 was better related to climate than to silvicultural treatments. On the other hand, soil chemical and physical characteristics did not show significant influence over SOC10- Soil water availability was the latent variable with the highest influence over SOC10. This work is a new contribution that shows the need for forest managers to integrate silviculture and C sequestration in Mediterranean pine plantations.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><doi>10.3390/f13030450</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3470-8640</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6524-4335</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2436-2922</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1999-3415</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8786-0211</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1294-2148</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5279-4215</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8782-6873</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2166-0633</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1999-4907
ispartof Forests, 2022-03, Vol.13 (3), p.450
issn 1999-4907
1999-4907
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2642443599
source Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute
subjects Biomass
Carbon
Carbon sequestration
Climate change
Climate change mitigation
Coniferous forests
Drought
Environmental policy
Forest management
Hypotheses
International agreements
Mathematical models
Moisture content
Multivariate statistical analysis
Organic carbon
Organic soils
Physical characteristics
Physical properties
Pine
Pine trees
Pinus
Pinus halepensis
Rain
Silviculture
Soil chemistry
Soil water
Soil water storage
Structural equation modeling
Thinning
Timber
Trees
Variance analysis
Water availability
title Long-Term Carbon Sequestration in Pine Forests under Different Silvicultural and Climatic Regimes in Spain
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-26T23%3A58%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Long-Term%20Carbon%20Sequestration%20in%20Pine%20Forests%20under%20Different%20Silvicultural%20and%20Climatic%20Regimes%20in%20Spain&rft.jtitle=Forests&rft.au=Navarro-Cerrillo,%20Rafael%20M.&rft.date=2022-03-01&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=450&rft.pages=450-&rft.issn=1999-4907&rft.eissn=1999-4907&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/f13030450&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2642443599%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2642443599&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true