In situ detection of welding defects: a review

Weld defect detection is a crucial aspect for improving the productivity and quality of the welding process. Several non-destructive methods exist for the identification of defects post weld deposition. However, they only help assess the quality of the component and offer no inputs while the welding...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Welding in the world 2022-04, Vol.66 (4), p.611-628
Hauptverfasser: Madhvacharyula, Anirudh Sampath, Pavan, Araveeti V Sai, Gorthi, Subrahmanyam, Chitral, Srihari, Venkaiah, N, Kiran, Degala Venkata
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 628
container_issue 4
container_start_page 611
container_title Welding in the world
container_volume 66
creator Madhvacharyula, Anirudh Sampath
Pavan, Araveeti V Sai
Gorthi, Subrahmanyam
Chitral, Srihari
Venkaiah, N
Kiran, Degala Venkata
description Weld defect detection is a crucial aspect for improving the productivity and quality of the welding process. Several non-destructive methods exist for the identification of defects post weld deposition. However, they only help assess the quality of the component and offer no inputs while the welding process is being performed. Real-time or in situ weld defect detection aids in the detection of defects during the welding process, allowing to take corrective measures or halt the welding to avoid further wastage of time and material. The current paper provides a brief description of various types of weld defects and the commonly used non-destructive testing (NDT) techniques used for identifying weld defects. It then proceeds to provide a detailed review of various methods available for in situ weld defect detection, classifying them based on their input signals. It also classifies the methods based on the type of algorithm used, along with an intuitive explanation of the commonly used algorithms in weld defect detection. The methods covered in this manuscript make use of different input signals that include audio, welding current and voltage, and optical signals also highlighting methods that use a combination of the abovementioned signals for in situ prediction of weld defects. A critical analysis of the efficacy, advantages, and drawbacks of each method is presented. Further, this work highlights a few research gaps identifying avenues for future research in this area.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s40194-021-01229-6
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2642368129</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2642368129</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-2782e8ef15515b5cba1ddef69d1f73dbf4e98eaed7a9783bf13b86b40a77ae0a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtLxDAUhYMoOI7-AVcF19F7kzYPdzL4GBhwo-uQtjdDh7Edk46D_95oBXcuLgcO55wLH2OXCNcIoG9SCWhLDgI5oBCWqyM2Q6MNV0rZYzYDKCUXwphTdpbSBgBsvhm7XvZF6sZ90dJIzdgNfTGE4kDbtuvX2QzZTLeFLyJ9dHQ4ZyfBbxNd_OqcvT7cvyye-Or5cbm4W_FGoh250EaQoYBVhVVdNbXHNm8p22LQsq1DSdaQp1Z7q42sA8raqLoEr7Un8HLOrqbdXRze95RGtxn2sc8vnVClkMqgsDklplQTh5QiBbeL3ZuPnw7BfXNxExeXubgfLk7lkpxKKYf7NcW_6X9aXykmZNg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2642368129</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>In situ detection of welding defects: a review</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Madhvacharyula, Anirudh Sampath ; Pavan, Araveeti V Sai ; Gorthi, Subrahmanyam ; Chitral, Srihari ; Venkaiah, N ; Kiran, Degala Venkata</creator><creatorcontrib>Madhvacharyula, Anirudh Sampath ; Pavan, Araveeti V Sai ; Gorthi, Subrahmanyam ; Chitral, Srihari ; Venkaiah, N ; Kiran, Degala Venkata</creatorcontrib><description>Weld defect detection is a crucial aspect for improving the productivity and quality of the welding process. Several non-destructive methods exist for the identification of defects post weld deposition. However, they only help assess the quality of the component and offer no inputs while the welding process is being performed. Real-time or in situ weld defect detection aids in the detection of defects during the welding process, allowing to take corrective measures or halt the welding to avoid further wastage of time and material. The current paper provides a brief description of various types of weld defects and the commonly used non-destructive testing (NDT) techniques used for identifying weld defects. It then proceeds to provide a detailed review of various methods available for in situ weld defect detection, classifying them based on their input signals. It also classifies the methods based on the type of algorithm used, along with an intuitive explanation of the commonly used algorithms in weld defect detection. The methods covered in this manuscript make use of different input signals that include audio, welding current and voltage, and optical signals also highlighting methods that use a combination of the abovementioned signals for in situ prediction of weld defects. A critical analysis of the efficacy, advantages, and drawbacks of each method is presented. Further, this work highlights a few research gaps identifying avenues for future research in this area.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0043-2288</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1878-6669</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s40194-021-01229-6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Algorithms ; Chemistry and Materials Science ; Defects ; Materials Science ; Metallic Materials ; Nondestructive testing ; Optical communication ; Quality assessment ; Review Article ; Signal classification ; Solid Mechanics ; Theoretical and Applied Mechanics ; Weld defects ; Welding current</subject><ispartof>Welding in the world, 2022-04, Vol.66 (4), p.611-628</ispartof><rights>International Institute of Welding 2022</rights><rights>International Institute of Welding 2022.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-2782e8ef15515b5cba1ddef69d1f73dbf4e98eaed7a9783bf13b86b40a77ae0a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-2782e8ef15515b5cba1ddef69d1f73dbf4e98eaed7a9783bf13b86b40a77ae0a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s40194-021-01229-6$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40194-021-01229-6$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Madhvacharyula, Anirudh Sampath</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pavan, Araveeti V Sai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gorthi, Subrahmanyam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chitral, Srihari</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Venkaiah, N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kiran, Degala Venkata</creatorcontrib><title>In situ detection of welding defects: a review</title><title>Welding in the world</title><addtitle>Weld World</addtitle><description>Weld defect detection is a crucial aspect for improving the productivity and quality of the welding process. Several non-destructive methods exist for the identification of defects post weld deposition. However, they only help assess the quality of the component and offer no inputs while the welding process is being performed. Real-time or in situ weld defect detection aids in the detection of defects during the welding process, allowing to take corrective measures or halt the welding to avoid further wastage of time and material. The current paper provides a brief description of various types of weld defects and the commonly used non-destructive testing (NDT) techniques used for identifying weld defects. It then proceeds to provide a detailed review of various methods available for in situ weld defect detection, classifying them based on their input signals. It also classifies the methods based on the type of algorithm used, along with an intuitive explanation of the commonly used algorithms in weld defect detection. The methods covered in this manuscript make use of different input signals that include audio, welding current and voltage, and optical signals also highlighting methods that use a combination of the abovementioned signals for in situ prediction of weld defects. A critical analysis of the efficacy, advantages, and drawbacks of each method is presented. Further, this work highlights a few research gaps identifying avenues for future research in this area.</description><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Chemistry and Materials Science</subject><subject>Defects</subject><subject>Materials Science</subject><subject>Metallic Materials</subject><subject>Nondestructive testing</subject><subject>Optical communication</subject><subject>Quality assessment</subject><subject>Review Article</subject><subject>Signal classification</subject><subject>Solid Mechanics</subject><subject>Theoretical and Applied Mechanics</subject><subject>Weld defects</subject><subject>Welding current</subject><issn>0043-2288</issn><issn>1878-6669</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kEtLxDAUhYMoOI7-AVcF19F7kzYPdzL4GBhwo-uQtjdDh7Edk46D_95oBXcuLgcO55wLH2OXCNcIoG9SCWhLDgI5oBCWqyM2Q6MNV0rZYzYDKCUXwphTdpbSBgBsvhm7XvZF6sZ90dJIzdgNfTGE4kDbtuvX2QzZTLeFLyJ9dHQ4ZyfBbxNd_OqcvT7cvyye-Or5cbm4W_FGoh250EaQoYBVhVVdNbXHNm8p22LQsq1DSdaQp1Z7q42sA8raqLoEr7Un8HLOrqbdXRze95RGtxn2sc8vnVClkMqgsDklplQTh5QiBbeL3ZuPnw7BfXNxExeXubgfLk7lkpxKKYf7NcW_6X9aXykmZNg</recordid><startdate>20220401</startdate><enddate>20220401</enddate><creator>Madhvacharyula, Anirudh Sampath</creator><creator>Pavan, Araveeti V Sai</creator><creator>Gorthi, Subrahmanyam</creator><creator>Chitral, Srihari</creator><creator>Venkaiah, N</creator><creator>Kiran, Degala Venkata</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220401</creationdate><title>In situ detection of welding defects: a review</title><author>Madhvacharyula, Anirudh Sampath ; Pavan, Araveeti V Sai ; Gorthi, Subrahmanyam ; Chitral, Srihari ; Venkaiah, N ; Kiran, Degala Venkata</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-2782e8ef15515b5cba1ddef69d1f73dbf4e98eaed7a9783bf13b86b40a77ae0a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Chemistry and Materials Science</topic><topic>Defects</topic><topic>Materials Science</topic><topic>Metallic Materials</topic><topic>Nondestructive testing</topic><topic>Optical communication</topic><topic>Quality assessment</topic><topic>Review Article</topic><topic>Signal classification</topic><topic>Solid Mechanics</topic><topic>Theoretical and Applied Mechanics</topic><topic>Weld defects</topic><topic>Welding current</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Madhvacharyula, Anirudh Sampath</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pavan, Araveeti V Sai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gorthi, Subrahmanyam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chitral, Srihari</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Venkaiah, N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kiran, Degala Venkata</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Welding in the world</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Madhvacharyula, Anirudh Sampath</au><au>Pavan, Araveeti V Sai</au><au>Gorthi, Subrahmanyam</au><au>Chitral, Srihari</au><au>Venkaiah, N</au><au>Kiran, Degala Venkata</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>In situ detection of welding defects: a review</atitle><jtitle>Welding in the world</jtitle><stitle>Weld World</stitle><date>2022-04-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>66</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>611</spage><epage>628</epage><pages>611-628</pages><issn>0043-2288</issn><eissn>1878-6669</eissn><abstract>Weld defect detection is a crucial aspect for improving the productivity and quality of the welding process. Several non-destructive methods exist for the identification of defects post weld deposition. However, they only help assess the quality of the component and offer no inputs while the welding process is being performed. Real-time or in situ weld defect detection aids in the detection of defects during the welding process, allowing to take corrective measures or halt the welding to avoid further wastage of time and material. The current paper provides a brief description of various types of weld defects and the commonly used non-destructive testing (NDT) techniques used for identifying weld defects. It then proceeds to provide a detailed review of various methods available for in situ weld defect detection, classifying them based on their input signals. It also classifies the methods based on the type of algorithm used, along with an intuitive explanation of the commonly used algorithms in weld defect detection. The methods covered in this manuscript make use of different input signals that include audio, welding current and voltage, and optical signals also highlighting methods that use a combination of the abovementioned signals for in situ prediction of weld defects. A critical analysis of the efficacy, advantages, and drawbacks of each method is presented. Further, this work highlights a few research gaps identifying avenues for future research in this area.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><doi>10.1007/s40194-021-01229-6</doi><tpages>18</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0043-2288
ispartof Welding in the world, 2022-04, Vol.66 (4), p.611-628
issn 0043-2288
1878-6669
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2642368129
source SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Algorithms
Chemistry and Materials Science
Defects
Materials Science
Metallic Materials
Nondestructive testing
Optical communication
Quality assessment
Review Article
Signal classification
Solid Mechanics
Theoretical and Applied Mechanics
Weld defects
Welding current
title In situ detection of welding defects: a review
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T22%3A28%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=In%20situ%20detection%20of%20welding%20defects:%20a%20review&rft.jtitle=Welding%20in%20the%20world&rft.au=Madhvacharyula,%20Anirudh%20Sampath&rft.date=2022-04-01&rft.volume=66&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=611&rft.epage=628&rft.pages=611-628&rft.issn=0043-2288&rft.eissn=1878-6669&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s40194-021-01229-6&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2642368129%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2642368129&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true