Incidentally Detected Gastrointestinal Wall Thickness on Abdominal Computed Tomography; What Does it Mean for Endoscopy?

Background: The clinical significance of gastrointestinal wall thickening (GWT) on abdominal computed tomography (CT) is not certain, yet. Despite the need for clinical guidelines describing the importance and evaluation of GWT on a CT scan, there have been few studies evaluating these incidental im...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Archives of Iranian medicine 2021-04, Vol.24 (4), p.296-300
Hauptverfasser: Somuncu, Erkan, Topal, Ümmihan, Sönmez, Süleyman, Kara, Yasin, Bozdağ, Emre, Özcan, Adem, Başaran, Ceren, Özkan, Cenk, Tatlıdil, Yunus Emre, Kalaycı, Mustafa Uygar
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 300
container_issue 4
container_start_page 296
container_title Archives of Iranian medicine
container_volume 24
creator Somuncu, Erkan
Topal, Ümmihan
Sönmez, Süleyman
Kara, Yasin
Bozdağ, Emre
Özcan, Adem
Başaran, Ceren
Özkan, Cenk
Tatlıdil, Yunus Emre
Kalaycı, Mustafa Uygar
description Background: The clinical significance of gastrointestinal wall thickening (GWT) on abdominal computed tomography (CT) is not certain, yet. Despite the need for clinical guidelines describing the importance and evaluation of GWT on a CT scan, there have been few studies evaluating these incidental imaging abnormalities. The aim of this study is to endoscopically evaluate certain etiologies that cause incidental GWT found on CT. Methods: This retrospective cohort study was carried out with patients who had incidentally detected GWT on a CT scan at the Kanuni Sultan Süleyman Training and Research Hospital between February 2016 and December 2018. Results: A total of 129 patients (62 males and 67 females; mean age 57.5 years, range: 26-87 years) were included in the study. Abnormalities observed during endoscopy at the exact site of the GWT noted on a CT image were found in 114 patients (99%): upper endoscopy revealed malignancy in 33 (29%), gastritis in 63 (52%), hiatal hernia in 19 (16%), a gastric ulcer in 7 (6%), and alkaline gastritis in 3 (2%). Colonoscopy revealed malignancy in 4 (33%), benign polyps in 5 (35%), colonic ulcer in 2 (16%), and 2 patients (16%) had normal findings. Malignancy was detected more frequently in the cardioesophageal region compared with the antrum (P=0.020). Conclusion: In this study, detection of GWT on CT often indicated pathologies which were subsequently confirmed endoscopically. Pathological findings were detected in 83% of these patients, with approximately 30% determined to be malignant. Endoscopic evaluation is recommended when GWT is reported on a CT scan.
doi_str_mv 10.34172/aim.2021.41
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2642356189</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2642356189</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c291t-a7d69eb57b646b5941288877c5a849cd5b6fe272dd4d365b15a9b897e56961603</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotkF9LwzAUxYMoOKdvfoCAr3Y2_xt8kLHNOZj4MtljSJvUdbZNTTKw395u8-keOOce7v0BcI_SCaFI4CddNROcYjSh6AKMkCAsIZKKy0GnWCZYCnENbkLYpyklDJER-F21RWVsG3Vd93Buoy2iNXCpQ_SuaqMNsWp1DbeDDze7qvhubQjQtXCaG9ecvJlrusNxa-Ma9-V1t-uf4XanI5w7G2AV4bvVLSydh4vWuFC4rn-5BVelroO9-59j8Pm62MzekvXHcjWbrpMCSxQTLQyXNmci55TnTFKEsywTomA6o7IwLOelxQIbQw3hLEdMyzyTwjIuOeIpGYOHc2_n3c9heEft3cEPZweFOcWEcZTJIfV4ThXeheBtqTpfNdr3CqXqxFYNbNWRraKI_AHNYW06</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2642356189</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Incidentally Detected Gastrointestinal Wall Thickness on Abdominal Computed Tomography; What Does it Mean for Endoscopy?</title><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Somuncu, Erkan ; Topal, Ümmihan ; Sönmez, Süleyman ; Kara, Yasin ; Bozdağ, Emre ; Özcan, Adem ; Başaran, Ceren ; Özkan, Cenk ; Tatlıdil, Yunus Emre ; Kalaycı, Mustafa Uygar</creator><creatorcontrib>Somuncu, Erkan ; Topal, Ümmihan ; Sönmez, Süleyman ; Kara, Yasin ; Bozdağ, Emre ; Özcan, Adem ; Başaran, Ceren ; Özkan, Cenk ; Tatlıdil, Yunus Emre ; Kalaycı, Mustafa Uygar</creatorcontrib><description>Background: The clinical significance of gastrointestinal wall thickening (GWT) on abdominal computed tomography (CT) is not certain, yet. Despite the need for clinical guidelines describing the importance and evaluation of GWT on a CT scan, there have been few studies evaluating these incidental imaging abnormalities. The aim of this study is to endoscopically evaluate certain etiologies that cause incidental GWT found on CT. Methods: This retrospective cohort study was carried out with patients who had incidentally detected GWT on a CT scan at the Kanuni Sultan Süleyman Training and Research Hospital between February 2016 and December 2018. Results: A total of 129 patients (62 males and 67 females; mean age 57.5 years, range: 26-87 years) were included in the study. Abnormalities observed during endoscopy at the exact site of the GWT noted on a CT image were found in 114 patients (99%): upper endoscopy revealed malignancy in 33 (29%), gastritis in 63 (52%), hiatal hernia in 19 (16%), a gastric ulcer in 7 (6%), and alkaline gastritis in 3 (2%). Colonoscopy revealed malignancy in 4 (33%), benign polyps in 5 (35%), colonic ulcer in 2 (16%), and 2 patients (16%) had normal findings. Malignancy was detected more frequently in the cardioesophageal region compared with the antrum (P=0.020). Conclusion: In this study, detection of GWT on CT often indicated pathologies which were subsequently confirmed endoscopically. Pathological findings were detected in 83% of these patients, with approximately 30% determined to be malignant. Endoscopic evaluation is recommended when GWT is reported on a CT scan.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1029-2977</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1735-3947</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.34172/aim.2021.41</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Tehran: Academy of Medical Sciences of I.R. Iran</publisher><subject>Biomarkers ; Clinical practice guidelines ; Endoscopy ; Medical diagnosis ; Medical imaging ; Tomography ; Ulcers</subject><ispartof>Archives of Iranian medicine, 2021-04, Vol.24 (4), p.296-300</ispartof><rights>2021. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Somuncu, Erkan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Topal, Ümmihan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sönmez, Süleyman</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kara, Yasin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bozdağ, Emre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Özcan, Adem</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Başaran, Ceren</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Özkan, Cenk</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tatlıdil, Yunus Emre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kalaycı, Mustafa Uygar</creatorcontrib><title>Incidentally Detected Gastrointestinal Wall Thickness on Abdominal Computed Tomography; What Does it Mean for Endoscopy?</title><title>Archives of Iranian medicine</title><description>Background: The clinical significance of gastrointestinal wall thickening (GWT) on abdominal computed tomography (CT) is not certain, yet. Despite the need for clinical guidelines describing the importance and evaluation of GWT on a CT scan, there have been few studies evaluating these incidental imaging abnormalities. The aim of this study is to endoscopically evaluate certain etiologies that cause incidental GWT found on CT. Methods: This retrospective cohort study was carried out with patients who had incidentally detected GWT on a CT scan at the Kanuni Sultan Süleyman Training and Research Hospital between February 2016 and December 2018. Results: A total of 129 patients (62 males and 67 females; mean age 57.5 years, range: 26-87 years) were included in the study. Abnormalities observed during endoscopy at the exact site of the GWT noted on a CT image were found in 114 patients (99%): upper endoscopy revealed malignancy in 33 (29%), gastritis in 63 (52%), hiatal hernia in 19 (16%), a gastric ulcer in 7 (6%), and alkaline gastritis in 3 (2%). Colonoscopy revealed malignancy in 4 (33%), benign polyps in 5 (35%), colonic ulcer in 2 (16%), and 2 patients (16%) had normal findings. Malignancy was detected more frequently in the cardioesophageal region compared with the antrum (P=0.020). Conclusion: In this study, detection of GWT on CT often indicated pathologies which were subsequently confirmed endoscopically. Pathological findings were detected in 83% of these patients, with approximately 30% determined to be malignant. Endoscopic evaluation is recommended when GWT is reported on a CT scan.</description><subject>Biomarkers</subject><subject>Clinical practice guidelines</subject><subject>Endoscopy</subject><subject>Medical diagnosis</subject><subject>Medical imaging</subject><subject>Tomography</subject><subject>Ulcers</subject><issn>1029-2977</issn><issn>1735-3947</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNotkF9LwzAUxYMoOKdvfoCAr3Y2_xt8kLHNOZj4MtljSJvUdbZNTTKw395u8-keOOce7v0BcI_SCaFI4CddNROcYjSh6AKMkCAsIZKKy0GnWCZYCnENbkLYpyklDJER-F21RWVsG3Vd93Buoy2iNXCpQ_SuaqMNsWp1DbeDDze7qvhubQjQtXCaG9ecvJlrusNxa-Ma9-V1t-uf4XanI5w7G2AV4bvVLSydh4vWuFC4rn-5BVelroO9-59j8Pm62MzekvXHcjWbrpMCSxQTLQyXNmci55TnTFKEsywTomA6o7IwLOelxQIbQw3hLEdMyzyTwjIuOeIpGYOHc2_n3c9heEft3cEPZweFOcWEcZTJIfV4ThXeheBtqTpfNdr3CqXqxFYNbNWRraKI_AHNYW06</recordid><startdate>20210401</startdate><enddate>20210401</enddate><creator>Somuncu, Erkan</creator><creator>Topal, Ümmihan</creator><creator>Sönmez, Süleyman</creator><creator>Kara, Yasin</creator><creator>Bozdağ, Emre</creator><creator>Özcan, Adem</creator><creator>Başaran, Ceren</creator><creator>Özkan, Cenk</creator><creator>Tatlıdil, Yunus Emre</creator><creator>Kalaycı, Mustafa Uygar</creator><general>Academy of Medical Sciences of I.R. Iran</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CWDGH</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210401</creationdate><title>Incidentally Detected Gastrointestinal Wall Thickness on Abdominal Computed Tomography; What Does it Mean for Endoscopy?</title><author>Somuncu, Erkan ; Topal, Ümmihan ; Sönmez, Süleyman ; Kara, Yasin ; Bozdağ, Emre ; Özcan, Adem ; Başaran, Ceren ; Özkan, Cenk ; Tatlıdil, Yunus Emre ; Kalaycı, Mustafa Uygar</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c291t-a7d69eb57b646b5941288877c5a849cd5b6fe272dd4d365b15a9b897e56961603</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Biomarkers</topic><topic>Clinical practice guidelines</topic><topic>Endoscopy</topic><topic>Medical diagnosis</topic><topic>Medical imaging</topic><topic>Tomography</topic><topic>Ulcers</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Somuncu, Erkan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Topal, Ümmihan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sönmez, Süleyman</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kara, Yasin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bozdağ, Emre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Özcan, Adem</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Başaran, Ceren</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Özkan, Cenk</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tatlıdil, Yunus Emre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kalaycı, Mustafa Uygar</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Middle East &amp; Africa Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Archives of Iranian medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Somuncu, Erkan</au><au>Topal, Ümmihan</au><au>Sönmez, Süleyman</au><au>Kara, Yasin</au><au>Bozdağ, Emre</au><au>Özcan, Adem</au><au>Başaran, Ceren</au><au>Özkan, Cenk</au><au>Tatlıdil, Yunus Emre</au><au>Kalaycı, Mustafa Uygar</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Incidentally Detected Gastrointestinal Wall Thickness on Abdominal Computed Tomography; What Does it Mean for Endoscopy?</atitle><jtitle>Archives of Iranian medicine</jtitle><date>2021-04-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>296</spage><epage>300</epage><pages>296-300</pages><issn>1029-2977</issn><eissn>1735-3947</eissn><abstract>Background: The clinical significance of gastrointestinal wall thickening (GWT) on abdominal computed tomography (CT) is not certain, yet. Despite the need for clinical guidelines describing the importance and evaluation of GWT on a CT scan, there have been few studies evaluating these incidental imaging abnormalities. The aim of this study is to endoscopically evaluate certain etiologies that cause incidental GWT found on CT. Methods: This retrospective cohort study was carried out with patients who had incidentally detected GWT on a CT scan at the Kanuni Sultan Süleyman Training and Research Hospital between February 2016 and December 2018. Results: A total of 129 patients (62 males and 67 females; mean age 57.5 years, range: 26-87 years) were included in the study. Abnormalities observed during endoscopy at the exact site of the GWT noted on a CT image were found in 114 patients (99%): upper endoscopy revealed malignancy in 33 (29%), gastritis in 63 (52%), hiatal hernia in 19 (16%), a gastric ulcer in 7 (6%), and alkaline gastritis in 3 (2%). Colonoscopy revealed malignancy in 4 (33%), benign polyps in 5 (35%), colonic ulcer in 2 (16%), and 2 patients (16%) had normal findings. Malignancy was detected more frequently in the cardioesophageal region compared with the antrum (P=0.020). Conclusion: In this study, detection of GWT on CT often indicated pathologies which were subsequently confirmed endoscopically. Pathological findings were detected in 83% of these patients, with approximately 30% determined to be malignant. Endoscopic evaluation is recommended when GWT is reported on a CT scan.</abstract><cop>Tehran</cop><pub>Academy of Medical Sciences of I.R. Iran</pub><doi>10.34172/aim.2021.41</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1029-2977
ispartof Archives of Iranian medicine, 2021-04, Vol.24 (4), p.296-300
issn 1029-2977
1735-3947
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2642356189
source EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Biomarkers
Clinical practice guidelines
Endoscopy
Medical diagnosis
Medical imaging
Tomography
Ulcers
title Incidentally Detected Gastrointestinal Wall Thickness on Abdominal Computed Tomography; What Does it Mean for Endoscopy?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T08%3A23%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Incidentally%20Detected%20Gastrointestinal%20Wall%20Thickness%20on%20Abdominal%20Computed%20Tomography;%20What%20Does%20it%20Mean%20for%20Endoscopy?&rft.jtitle=Archives%20of%20Iranian%20medicine&rft.au=Somuncu,%20Erkan&rft.date=2021-04-01&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=296&rft.epage=300&rft.pages=296-300&rft.issn=1029-2977&rft.eissn=1735-3947&rft_id=info:doi/10.34172/aim.2021.41&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2642356189%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2642356189&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true