Using a Stakeholder-Engaged Approach to Understand and Address Bacterial Transport on Soft-Shell Clam Flats
Small-scale fisheries, which are often distributed over large spatial scales and occur in rural settings, tend to lack financial resources and capacity to conduct research on local issues. One approach to overcome this challenge is to use relatively inexpensive environmental monitoring methods with...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Estuaries and coasts 2022-05, Vol.45 (3), p.691-706 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 706 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 691 |
container_title | Estuaries and coasts |
container_volume | 45 |
creator | Hillyer, G.V. Liu, W. McGreavy, B. Melvin, G. Brady, D.C. |
description | Small-scale fisheries, which are often distributed over large spatial scales and occur in rural settings, tend to lack financial resources and capacity to conduct research on local issues. One approach to overcome this challenge is to use relatively inexpensive environmental monitoring methods with stakeholder engaged science and participatory modeling. Here, we present a case study focused on water pollution impacts and tidal circulation in a mid-coast Maine (USA) estuary to develop a simulation model and a partnership approach that can support soft-shell clamming communities to effectively address water quality, namely bacteriological closures of mudflats. We deployed multiple low-cost drifter buckets, Lagrangian flotation devices that measured surface current speeds and provided validation data for a hydrodynamic model based on finite volume community ocean model (FVCOM). The drifter buckets resolved the influence of wind, tidal currents, and bathymetry on surface water circulation patterns between the main channel and adjacent mudflats, highlighting the impact of cross-estuary winds during slack tides on potential bacterial transport. We calculated residence time using the validated FVCOM model: in the prohibited area (~ 2.5 days), and the conditional area (~ 0.5 days). This information has already influenced local management decisions and helped shape new conservation projects. In addition to contributing new understanding about tidal patterns in this coastal region, our novel methodology of combining field techniques, FVCOM modeling, and stakeholder engagement helps show how engaged research approaches can improve regulatory outcomes for small-scale fisheries while also protecting public health. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s12237-021-00997-0 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2641698567</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2641698567</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-4580a1f7e4a1983f7056b268bc3bc03a06269668b03ed71ba30779f4711563bc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UMtOwzAQjBBIlMIPcLLEObC2Yzs5lqoFpEoc2p6tTeKkj9Qptnvg73EJghuH1c5qZ2ZXkyT3FB4pgHrylDGuUmA0BSiKiC6SERWiSJni9PIXM36d3Hi_A8iEgGyU7Nd-a1uCZBlwbzZ9VxuXzmyLranJ5Hh0PVYbEnqytnHjA9qanGtS1854T56xCsZtsSMrh9YfexdIb8myb0K63JiuI9MOD2TeYfC3yVWDnTd3P32crOez1fQ1Xby_vE0ni7TitAhpJnJA2iiTIS1y3igQsmQyLyteVsARJJOFjDNwUytaIgeliiZTlAoZKXycPAy-8fuPk_FB7_qTs_GkZjKjssiFVJHFBlbleu-dafTRbQ_oPjUFfQ5VD6HqGKr-DlVDFPFB5CPZtsb9Wf-j-gL7BHj8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2641698567</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Using a Stakeholder-Engaged Approach to Understand and Address Bacterial Transport on Soft-Shell Clam Flats</title><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><creator>Hillyer, G.V. ; Liu, W. ; McGreavy, B. ; Melvin, G. ; Brady, D.C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Hillyer, G.V. ; Liu, W. ; McGreavy, B. ; Melvin, G. ; Brady, D.C.</creatorcontrib><description>Small-scale fisheries, which are often distributed over large spatial scales and occur in rural settings, tend to lack financial resources and capacity to conduct research on local issues. One approach to overcome this challenge is to use relatively inexpensive environmental monitoring methods with stakeholder engaged science and participatory modeling. Here, we present a case study focused on water pollution impacts and tidal circulation in a mid-coast Maine (USA) estuary to develop a simulation model and a partnership approach that can support soft-shell clamming communities to effectively address water quality, namely bacteriological closures of mudflats. We deployed multiple low-cost drifter buckets, Lagrangian flotation devices that measured surface current speeds and provided validation data for a hydrodynamic model based on finite volume community ocean model (FVCOM). The drifter buckets resolved the influence of wind, tidal currents, and bathymetry on surface water circulation patterns between the main channel and adjacent mudflats, highlighting the impact of cross-estuary winds during slack tides on potential bacterial transport. We calculated residence time using the validated FVCOM model: in the prohibited area (~ 2.5 days), and the conditional area (~ 0.5 days). This information has already influenced local management decisions and helped shape new conservation projects. In addition to contributing new understanding about tidal patterns in this coastal region, our novel methodology of combining field techniques, FVCOM modeling, and stakeholder engagement helps show how engaged research approaches can improve regulatory outcomes for small-scale fisheries while also protecting public health.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1559-2723</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1559-2731</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s12237-021-00997-0</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Bathymetry ; Buckets ; Clams ; Coastal Sciences ; Coastal zone ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Ecology ; Environment ; Environmental impact ; Environmental Management ; Environmental monitoring ; Estuaries ; Estuarine dynamics ; Financial resources ; Fisheries ; Flotation ; Freshwater & Marine Ecology ; Modelling ; Monitoring methods ; Mud flats ; Ocean models ; Public health ; Residence time ; Small-scale fisheries ; Surface water ; Tidal currents ; Transport ; Water and Health ; Water circulation ; Water pollution ; Water quality ; Wind effects ; Winds</subject><ispartof>Estuaries and coasts, 2022-05, Vol.45 (3), p.691-706</ispartof><rights>Coastal and Estuarine Research Federation 2021</rights><rights>Coastal and Estuarine Research Federation 2021.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-4580a1f7e4a1983f7056b268bc3bc03a06269668b03ed71ba30779f4711563bc3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-4580a1f7e4a1983f7056b268bc3bc03a06269668b03ed71ba30779f4711563bc3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7226-0563</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s12237-021-00997-0$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12237-021-00997-0$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hillyer, G.V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McGreavy, B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Melvin, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brady, D.C.</creatorcontrib><title>Using a Stakeholder-Engaged Approach to Understand and Address Bacterial Transport on Soft-Shell Clam Flats</title><title>Estuaries and coasts</title><addtitle>Estuaries and Coasts</addtitle><description>Small-scale fisheries, which are often distributed over large spatial scales and occur in rural settings, tend to lack financial resources and capacity to conduct research on local issues. One approach to overcome this challenge is to use relatively inexpensive environmental monitoring methods with stakeholder engaged science and participatory modeling. Here, we present a case study focused on water pollution impacts and tidal circulation in a mid-coast Maine (USA) estuary to develop a simulation model and a partnership approach that can support soft-shell clamming communities to effectively address water quality, namely bacteriological closures of mudflats. We deployed multiple low-cost drifter buckets, Lagrangian flotation devices that measured surface current speeds and provided validation data for a hydrodynamic model based on finite volume community ocean model (FVCOM). The drifter buckets resolved the influence of wind, tidal currents, and bathymetry on surface water circulation patterns between the main channel and adjacent mudflats, highlighting the impact of cross-estuary winds during slack tides on potential bacterial transport. We calculated residence time using the validated FVCOM model: in the prohibited area (~ 2.5 days), and the conditional area (~ 0.5 days). This information has already influenced local management decisions and helped shape new conservation projects. In addition to contributing new understanding about tidal patterns in this coastal region, our novel methodology of combining field techniques, FVCOM modeling, and stakeholder engagement helps show how engaged research approaches can improve regulatory outcomes for small-scale fisheries while also protecting public health.</description><subject>Bathymetry</subject><subject>Buckets</subject><subject>Clams</subject><subject>Coastal Sciences</subject><subject>Coastal zone</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Environment</subject><subject>Environmental impact</subject><subject>Environmental Management</subject><subject>Environmental monitoring</subject><subject>Estuaries</subject><subject>Estuarine dynamics</subject><subject>Financial resources</subject><subject>Fisheries</subject><subject>Flotation</subject><subject>Freshwater & Marine Ecology</subject><subject>Modelling</subject><subject>Monitoring methods</subject><subject>Mud flats</subject><subject>Ocean models</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>Residence time</subject><subject>Small-scale fisheries</subject><subject>Surface water</subject><subject>Tidal currents</subject><subject>Transport</subject><subject>Water and Health</subject><subject>Water circulation</subject><subject>Water pollution</subject><subject>Water quality</subject><subject>Wind effects</subject><subject>Winds</subject><issn>1559-2723</issn><issn>1559-2731</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9UMtOwzAQjBBIlMIPcLLEObC2Yzs5lqoFpEoc2p6tTeKkj9Qptnvg73EJghuH1c5qZ2ZXkyT3FB4pgHrylDGuUmA0BSiKiC6SERWiSJni9PIXM36d3Hi_A8iEgGyU7Nd-a1uCZBlwbzZ9VxuXzmyLranJ5Hh0PVYbEnqytnHjA9qanGtS1854T56xCsZtsSMrh9YfexdIb8myb0K63JiuI9MOD2TeYfC3yVWDnTd3P32crOez1fQ1Xby_vE0ni7TitAhpJnJA2iiTIS1y3igQsmQyLyteVsARJJOFjDNwUytaIgeliiZTlAoZKXycPAy-8fuPk_FB7_qTs_GkZjKjssiFVJHFBlbleu-dafTRbQ_oPjUFfQ5VD6HqGKr-DlVDFPFB5CPZtsb9Wf-j-gL7BHj8</recordid><startdate>20220501</startdate><enddate>20220501</enddate><creator>Hillyer, G.V.</creator><creator>Liu, W.</creator><creator>McGreavy, B.</creator><creator>Melvin, G.</creator><creator>Brady, D.C.</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7226-0563</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220501</creationdate><title>Using a Stakeholder-Engaged Approach to Understand and Address Bacterial Transport on Soft-Shell Clam Flats</title><author>Hillyer, G.V. ; Liu, W. ; McGreavy, B. ; Melvin, G. ; Brady, D.C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-4580a1f7e4a1983f7056b268bc3bc03a06269668b03ed71ba30779f4711563bc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Bathymetry</topic><topic>Buckets</topic><topic>Clams</topic><topic>Coastal Sciences</topic><topic>Coastal zone</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Environment</topic><topic>Environmental impact</topic><topic>Environmental Management</topic><topic>Environmental monitoring</topic><topic>Estuaries</topic><topic>Estuarine dynamics</topic><topic>Financial resources</topic><topic>Fisheries</topic><topic>Flotation</topic><topic>Freshwater & Marine Ecology</topic><topic>Modelling</topic><topic>Monitoring methods</topic><topic>Mud flats</topic><topic>Ocean models</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>Residence time</topic><topic>Small-scale fisheries</topic><topic>Surface water</topic><topic>Tidal currents</topic><topic>Transport</topic><topic>Water and Health</topic><topic>Water circulation</topic><topic>Water pollution</topic><topic>Water quality</topic><topic>Wind effects</topic><topic>Winds</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hillyer, G.V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McGreavy, B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Melvin, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brady, D.C.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Estuaries and coasts</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hillyer, G.V.</au><au>Liu, W.</au><au>McGreavy, B.</au><au>Melvin, G.</au><au>Brady, D.C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Using a Stakeholder-Engaged Approach to Understand and Address Bacterial Transport on Soft-Shell Clam Flats</atitle><jtitle>Estuaries and coasts</jtitle><stitle>Estuaries and Coasts</stitle><date>2022-05-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>45</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>691</spage><epage>706</epage><pages>691-706</pages><issn>1559-2723</issn><eissn>1559-2731</eissn><abstract>Small-scale fisheries, which are often distributed over large spatial scales and occur in rural settings, tend to lack financial resources and capacity to conduct research on local issues. One approach to overcome this challenge is to use relatively inexpensive environmental monitoring methods with stakeholder engaged science and participatory modeling. Here, we present a case study focused on water pollution impacts and tidal circulation in a mid-coast Maine (USA) estuary to develop a simulation model and a partnership approach that can support soft-shell clamming communities to effectively address water quality, namely bacteriological closures of mudflats. We deployed multiple low-cost drifter buckets, Lagrangian flotation devices that measured surface current speeds and provided validation data for a hydrodynamic model based on finite volume community ocean model (FVCOM). The drifter buckets resolved the influence of wind, tidal currents, and bathymetry on surface water circulation patterns between the main channel and adjacent mudflats, highlighting the impact of cross-estuary winds during slack tides on potential bacterial transport. We calculated residence time using the validated FVCOM model: in the prohibited area (~ 2.5 days), and the conditional area (~ 0.5 days). This information has already influenced local management decisions and helped shape new conservation projects. In addition to contributing new understanding about tidal patterns in this coastal region, our novel methodology of combining field techniques, FVCOM modeling, and stakeholder engagement helps show how engaged research approaches can improve regulatory outcomes for small-scale fisheries while also protecting public health.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><doi>10.1007/s12237-021-00997-0</doi><tpages>16</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7226-0563</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1559-2723 |
ispartof | Estuaries and coasts, 2022-05, Vol.45 (3), p.691-706 |
issn | 1559-2723 1559-2731 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2641698567 |
source | SpringerNature Journals |
subjects | Bathymetry Buckets Clams Coastal Sciences Coastal zone Earth and Environmental Science Ecology Environment Environmental impact Environmental Management Environmental monitoring Estuaries Estuarine dynamics Financial resources Fisheries Flotation Freshwater & Marine Ecology Modelling Monitoring methods Mud flats Ocean models Public health Residence time Small-scale fisheries Surface water Tidal currents Transport Water and Health Water circulation Water pollution Water quality Wind effects Winds |
title | Using a Stakeholder-Engaged Approach to Understand and Address Bacterial Transport on Soft-Shell Clam Flats |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T22%3A40%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Using%20a%20Stakeholder-Engaged%20Approach%20to%20Understand%20and%20Address%20Bacterial%20Transport%20on%20Soft-Shell%20Clam%20Flats&rft.jtitle=Estuaries%20and%20coasts&rft.au=Hillyer,%20G.V.&rft.date=2022-05-01&rft.volume=45&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=691&rft.epage=706&rft.pages=691-706&rft.issn=1559-2723&rft.eissn=1559-2731&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s12237-021-00997-0&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2641698567%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2641698567&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |