How Do We Prepare to Teach? Exploring Science Lecturers’ Authentic Approaches to Teaching in Higher Education

In this paper, science lecturers’ perspectives on how they authentically prepare to teach are explored, to establish how academic development practices can better support them. Science lecturers in higher education do not always feel comfortable engaging with pedagogical training initiatives, often...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Research in science education (Australasian Science Education Research Association) 2022-04, Vol.52 (2), p.635-653
1. Verfasser: Chadha, Deesha
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 653
container_issue 2
container_start_page 635
container_title Research in science education (Australasian Science Education Research Association)
container_volume 52
creator Chadha, Deesha
description In this paper, science lecturers’ perspectives on how they authentically prepare to teach are explored, to establish how academic development practices can better support them. Science lecturers in higher education do not always feel comfortable engaging with pedagogical training initiatives, often finding the ideas presented confusing, non-transferable and of little benefit to them. Models of pedagogical training suit institutional requirements and the generic principles of teaching in higher education. However, it is more useful to establish science lecturers’ authentic preparation techniques and build academic practice models around these. At a research-intensive higher education institution (HEI) in the UK, a total of 64 science lecturers completed a 28-item survey about the authentic values, beliefs, and the practices that inform and support their preparation as teachers. The collated survey responses were analysed through a statistical package for social sciences (SPSS), and a linear regression model was produced for self-reported confidence (used as a proxy for preparedness). Initial results pointed to the importance of enjoyment, being innovative and experimental, and demonstrating a good grasp of content for developing confidence. Receiving advice from education-based experts was a negative contributor to the confidence model as was pedagogical training unless it was part of a wider offering. However informal, supportive, peer-to-peer dialogue is deemed beneficial, highlighting the significant role communities of practice play in authentic preparation.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s11165-020-09972-4
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2640793838</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1330237</ericid><sourcerecordid>2640793838</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-8b1ae8a93212f2a30b9ee2ff560bb65feeb87985ef3d16818d8fe785a17d9cda3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1Kw0AQgBdRsFZfQBAWPEf3J8nunqRotUpBwYrels1m0qbUbNxNUG--hq_nk5gaqTeZwzDMfDPDh9AhJSeUEHEaKKVpEhFGIqKUYFG8hQY0ETyiUsltNCBdEbE4ftpFeyEsCeE0FXyA3MS94guHHwHfeaiNB9w4PANjF2d4_FavnC-rOb63JVQW8BRs03rw4evjE4_aZgFVU1o8qmvvOgTChl5TZYUn5XwBHo_z1pqmdNU-2inMKsDBbx6ih8vx7HwSTW-vrs9H08hymTSRzKgBaRRnlBXMcJIpAFYUSUqyLE0KgEwKJRMoeE5TSWUuCxAyMVTkyuaGD9Fxv7d77KWF0Oila33VndQsjYlQXHYxRKyfst6F4KHQtS-fjX_XlOi1WN2L1Z1Y_SNWxx101EPgS7sBxjeUc8K46Pq874d67Q783-l_tn4DfyiGYA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2640793838</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>How Do We Prepare to Teach? Exploring Science Lecturers’ Authentic Approaches to Teaching in Higher Education</title><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><source>Education Source</source><creator>Chadha, Deesha</creator><creatorcontrib>Chadha, Deesha</creatorcontrib><description>In this paper, science lecturers’ perspectives on how they authentically prepare to teach are explored, to establish how academic development practices can better support them. Science lecturers in higher education do not always feel comfortable engaging with pedagogical training initiatives, often finding the ideas presented confusing, non-transferable and of little benefit to them. Models of pedagogical training suit institutional requirements and the generic principles of teaching in higher education. However, it is more useful to establish science lecturers’ authentic preparation techniques and build academic practice models around these. At a research-intensive higher education institution (HEI) in the UK, a total of 64 science lecturers completed a 28-item survey about the authentic values, beliefs, and the practices that inform and support their preparation as teachers. The collated survey responses were analysed through a statistical package for social sciences (SPSS), and a linear regression model was produced for self-reported confidence (used as a proxy for preparedness). Initial results pointed to the importance of enjoyment, being innovative and experimental, and demonstrating a good grasp of content for developing confidence. Receiving advice from education-based experts was a negative contributor to the confidence model as was pedagogical training unless it was part of a wider offering. However informal, supportive, peer-to-peer dialogue is deemed beneficial, highlighting the significant role communities of practice play in authentic preparation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0157-244X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-1898</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11165-020-09972-4</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Authentic Learning ; Beliefs ; College Faculty ; College Science ; Communities of Practice ; Education ; Higher education ; Higher education institutions ; Pedagogical Content Knowledge ; Pedagogy ; Polls &amp; surveys ; Program Content ; Program Effectiveness ; Psychological Patterns ; Regression models ; Science ; Science Education ; Science Teachers ; Social sciences ; Statistical analysis ; Teacher Attitudes ; Teacher Education Programs ; Teaching ; Training ; Values</subject><ispartof>Research in science education (Australasian Science Education Research Association), 2022-04, Vol.52 (2), p.635-653</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2020</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2020. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-8b1ae8a93212f2a30b9ee2ff560bb65feeb87985ef3d16818d8fe785a17d9cda3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-8b1ae8a93212f2a30b9ee2ff560bb65feeb87985ef3d16818d8fe785a17d9cda3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-8812-884X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11165-020-09972-4$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11165-020-09972-4$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1330237$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chadha, Deesha</creatorcontrib><title>How Do We Prepare to Teach? Exploring Science Lecturers’ Authentic Approaches to Teaching in Higher Education</title><title>Research in science education (Australasian Science Education Research Association)</title><addtitle>Res Sci Educ</addtitle><description>In this paper, science lecturers’ perspectives on how they authentically prepare to teach are explored, to establish how academic development practices can better support them. Science lecturers in higher education do not always feel comfortable engaging with pedagogical training initiatives, often finding the ideas presented confusing, non-transferable and of little benefit to them. Models of pedagogical training suit institutional requirements and the generic principles of teaching in higher education. However, it is more useful to establish science lecturers’ authentic preparation techniques and build academic practice models around these. At a research-intensive higher education institution (HEI) in the UK, a total of 64 science lecturers completed a 28-item survey about the authentic values, beliefs, and the practices that inform and support their preparation as teachers. The collated survey responses were analysed through a statistical package for social sciences (SPSS), and a linear regression model was produced for self-reported confidence (used as a proxy for preparedness). Initial results pointed to the importance of enjoyment, being innovative and experimental, and demonstrating a good grasp of content for developing confidence. Receiving advice from education-based experts was a negative contributor to the confidence model as was pedagogical training unless it was part of a wider offering. However informal, supportive, peer-to-peer dialogue is deemed beneficial, highlighting the significant role communities of practice play in authentic preparation.</description><subject>Authentic Learning</subject><subject>Beliefs</subject><subject>College Faculty</subject><subject>College Science</subject><subject>Communities of Practice</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Higher education</subject><subject>Higher education institutions</subject><subject>Pedagogical Content Knowledge</subject><subject>Pedagogy</subject><subject>Polls &amp; surveys</subject><subject>Program Content</subject><subject>Program Effectiveness</subject><subject>Psychological Patterns</subject><subject>Regression models</subject><subject>Science</subject><subject>Science Education</subject><subject>Science Teachers</subject><subject>Social sciences</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Teacher Attitudes</subject><subject>Teacher Education Programs</subject><subject>Teaching</subject><subject>Training</subject><subject>Values</subject><issn>0157-244X</issn><issn>1573-1898</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kM1Kw0AQgBdRsFZfQBAWPEf3J8nunqRotUpBwYrels1m0qbUbNxNUG--hq_nk5gaqTeZwzDMfDPDh9AhJSeUEHEaKKVpEhFGIqKUYFG8hQY0ETyiUsltNCBdEbE4ftpFeyEsCeE0FXyA3MS94guHHwHfeaiNB9w4PANjF2d4_FavnC-rOb63JVQW8BRs03rw4evjE4_aZgFVU1o8qmvvOgTChl5TZYUn5XwBHo_z1pqmdNU-2inMKsDBbx6ih8vx7HwSTW-vrs9H08hymTSRzKgBaRRnlBXMcJIpAFYUSUqyLE0KgEwKJRMoeE5TSWUuCxAyMVTkyuaGD9Fxv7d77KWF0Oila33VndQsjYlQXHYxRKyfst6F4KHQtS-fjX_XlOi1WN2L1Z1Y_SNWxx101EPgS7sBxjeUc8K46Pq874d67Q783-l_tn4DfyiGYA</recordid><startdate>20220401</startdate><enddate>20220401</enddate><creator>Chadha, Deesha</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8812-884X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220401</creationdate><title>How Do We Prepare to Teach? Exploring Science Lecturers’ Authentic Approaches to Teaching in Higher Education</title><author>Chadha, Deesha</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-8b1ae8a93212f2a30b9ee2ff560bb65feeb87985ef3d16818d8fe785a17d9cda3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Authentic Learning</topic><topic>Beliefs</topic><topic>College Faculty</topic><topic>College Science</topic><topic>Communities of Practice</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Higher education</topic><topic>Higher education institutions</topic><topic>Pedagogical Content Knowledge</topic><topic>Pedagogy</topic><topic>Polls &amp; surveys</topic><topic>Program Content</topic><topic>Program Effectiveness</topic><topic>Psychological Patterns</topic><topic>Regression models</topic><topic>Science</topic><topic>Science Education</topic><topic>Science Teachers</topic><topic>Social sciences</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Teacher Attitudes</topic><topic>Teacher Education Programs</topic><topic>Teaching</topic><topic>Training</topic><topic>Values</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chadha, Deesha</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Research in science education (Australasian Science Education Research Association)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chadha, Deesha</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1330237</ericid><atitle>How Do We Prepare to Teach? Exploring Science Lecturers’ Authentic Approaches to Teaching in Higher Education</atitle><jtitle>Research in science education (Australasian Science Education Research Association)</jtitle><stitle>Res Sci Educ</stitle><date>2022-04-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>52</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>635</spage><epage>653</epage><pages>635-653</pages><issn>0157-244X</issn><eissn>1573-1898</eissn><abstract>In this paper, science lecturers’ perspectives on how they authentically prepare to teach are explored, to establish how academic development practices can better support them. Science lecturers in higher education do not always feel comfortable engaging with pedagogical training initiatives, often finding the ideas presented confusing, non-transferable and of little benefit to them. Models of pedagogical training suit institutional requirements and the generic principles of teaching in higher education. However, it is more useful to establish science lecturers’ authentic preparation techniques and build academic practice models around these. At a research-intensive higher education institution (HEI) in the UK, a total of 64 science lecturers completed a 28-item survey about the authentic values, beliefs, and the practices that inform and support their preparation as teachers. The collated survey responses were analysed through a statistical package for social sciences (SPSS), and a linear regression model was produced for self-reported confidence (used as a proxy for preparedness). Initial results pointed to the importance of enjoyment, being innovative and experimental, and demonstrating a good grasp of content for developing confidence. Receiving advice from education-based experts was a negative contributor to the confidence model as was pedagogical training unless it was part of a wider offering. However informal, supportive, peer-to-peer dialogue is deemed beneficial, highlighting the significant role communities of practice play in authentic preparation.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s11165-020-09972-4</doi><tpages>19</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8812-884X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0157-244X
ispartof Research in science education (Australasian Science Education Research Association), 2022-04, Vol.52 (2), p.635-653
issn 0157-244X
1573-1898
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2640793838
source SpringerNature Journals; Education Source
subjects Authentic Learning
Beliefs
College Faculty
College Science
Communities of Practice
Education
Higher education
Higher education institutions
Pedagogical Content Knowledge
Pedagogy
Polls & surveys
Program Content
Program Effectiveness
Psychological Patterns
Regression models
Science
Science Education
Science Teachers
Social sciences
Statistical analysis
Teacher Attitudes
Teacher Education Programs
Teaching
Training
Values
title How Do We Prepare to Teach? Exploring Science Lecturers’ Authentic Approaches to Teaching in Higher Education
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-22T09%3A46%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=How%20Do%20We%20Prepare%20to%20Teach?%20Exploring%20Science%20Lecturers%E2%80%99%20Authentic%20Approaches%20to%20Teaching%20in%20Higher%20Education&rft.jtitle=Research%20in%20science%20education%20(Australasian%20Science%20Education%20Research%20Association)&rft.au=Chadha,%20Deesha&rft.date=2022-04-01&rft.volume=52&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=635&rft.epage=653&rft.pages=635-653&rft.issn=0157-244X&rft.eissn=1573-1898&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11165-020-09972-4&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2640793838%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2640793838&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1330237&rfr_iscdi=true