How Do We Prepare to Teach? Exploring Science Lecturers’ Authentic Approaches to Teaching in Higher Education
In this paper, science lecturers’ perspectives on how they authentically prepare to teach are explored, to establish how academic development practices can better support them. Science lecturers in higher education do not always feel comfortable engaging with pedagogical training initiatives, often...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Research in science education (Australasian Science Education Research Association) 2022-04, Vol.52 (2), p.635-653 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 653 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 635 |
container_title | Research in science education (Australasian Science Education Research Association) |
container_volume | 52 |
creator | Chadha, Deesha |
description | In this paper, science lecturers’ perspectives on how they authentically prepare to teach are explored, to establish how academic development practices can better support them. Science lecturers in higher education do not always feel comfortable engaging with pedagogical training initiatives, often finding the ideas presented confusing, non-transferable and of little benefit to them. Models of pedagogical training suit institutional requirements and the generic principles of teaching in higher education. However, it is more useful to establish science lecturers’ authentic preparation techniques and build academic practice models around these. At a research-intensive higher education institution (HEI) in the UK, a total of 64 science lecturers completed a 28-item survey about the authentic values, beliefs, and the practices that inform and support their preparation as teachers. The collated survey responses were analysed through a statistical package for social sciences (SPSS), and a linear regression model was produced for self-reported confidence (used as a proxy for preparedness). Initial results pointed to the importance of enjoyment, being innovative and experimental, and demonstrating a good grasp of content for developing confidence. Receiving advice from education-based experts was a negative contributor to the confidence model as was pedagogical training unless it was part of a wider offering. However informal, supportive, peer-to-peer dialogue is deemed beneficial, highlighting the significant role communities of practice play in authentic preparation. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11165-020-09972-4 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2640793838</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1330237</ericid><sourcerecordid>2640793838</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-8b1ae8a93212f2a30b9ee2ff560bb65feeb87985ef3d16818d8fe785a17d9cda3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1Kw0AQgBdRsFZfQBAWPEf3J8nunqRotUpBwYrels1m0qbUbNxNUG--hq_nk5gaqTeZwzDMfDPDh9AhJSeUEHEaKKVpEhFGIqKUYFG8hQY0ETyiUsltNCBdEbE4ftpFeyEsCeE0FXyA3MS94guHHwHfeaiNB9w4PANjF2d4_FavnC-rOb63JVQW8BRs03rw4evjE4_aZgFVU1o8qmvvOgTChl5TZYUn5XwBHo_z1pqmdNU-2inMKsDBbx6ih8vx7HwSTW-vrs9H08hymTSRzKgBaRRnlBXMcJIpAFYUSUqyLE0KgEwKJRMoeE5TSWUuCxAyMVTkyuaGD9Fxv7d77KWF0Oila33VndQsjYlQXHYxRKyfst6F4KHQtS-fjX_XlOi1WN2L1Z1Y_SNWxx101EPgS7sBxjeUc8K46Pq874d67Q783-l_tn4DfyiGYA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2640793838</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>How Do We Prepare to Teach? Exploring Science Lecturers’ Authentic Approaches to Teaching in Higher Education</title><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><source>Education Source</source><creator>Chadha, Deesha</creator><creatorcontrib>Chadha, Deesha</creatorcontrib><description>In this paper, science lecturers’ perspectives on how they authentically prepare to teach are explored, to establish how academic development practices can better support them. Science lecturers in higher education do not always feel comfortable engaging with pedagogical training initiatives, often finding the ideas presented confusing, non-transferable and of little benefit to them. Models of pedagogical training suit institutional requirements and the generic principles of teaching in higher education. However, it is more useful to establish science lecturers’ authentic preparation techniques and build academic practice models around these. At a research-intensive higher education institution (HEI) in the UK, a total of 64 science lecturers completed a 28-item survey about the authentic values, beliefs, and the practices that inform and support their preparation as teachers. The collated survey responses were analysed through a statistical package for social sciences (SPSS), and a linear regression model was produced for self-reported confidence (used as a proxy for preparedness). Initial results pointed to the importance of enjoyment, being innovative and experimental, and demonstrating a good grasp of content for developing confidence. Receiving advice from education-based experts was a negative contributor to the confidence model as was pedagogical training unless it was part of a wider offering. However informal, supportive, peer-to-peer dialogue is deemed beneficial, highlighting the significant role communities of practice play in authentic preparation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0157-244X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-1898</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11165-020-09972-4</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Authentic Learning ; Beliefs ; College Faculty ; College Science ; Communities of Practice ; Education ; Higher education ; Higher education institutions ; Pedagogical Content Knowledge ; Pedagogy ; Polls & surveys ; Program Content ; Program Effectiveness ; Psychological Patterns ; Regression models ; Science ; Science Education ; Science Teachers ; Social sciences ; Statistical analysis ; Teacher Attitudes ; Teacher Education Programs ; Teaching ; Training ; Values</subject><ispartof>Research in science education (Australasian Science Education Research Association), 2022-04, Vol.52 (2), p.635-653</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2020</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2020. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-8b1ae8a93212f2a30b9ee2ff560bb65feeb87985ef3d16818d8fe785a17d9cda3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-8b1ae8a93212f2a30b9ee2ff560bb65feeb87985ef3d16818d8fe785a17d9cda3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-8812-884X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11165-020-09972-4$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11165-020-09972-4$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1330237$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chadha, Deesha</creatorcontrib><title>How Do We Prepare to Teach? Exploring Science Lecturers’ Authentic Approaches to Teaching in Higher Education</title><title>Research in science education (Australasian Science Education Research Association)</title><addtitle>Res Sci Educ</addtitle><description>In this paper, science lecturers’ perspectives on how they authentically prepare to teach are explored, to establish how academic development practices can better support them. Science lecturers in higher education do not always feel comfortable engaging with pedagogical training initiatives, often finding the ideas presented confusing, non-transferable and of little benefit to them. Models of pedagogical training suit institutional requirements and the generic principles of teaching in higher education. However, it is more useful to establish science lecturers’ authentic preparation techniques and build academic practice models around these. At a research-intensive higher education institution (HEI) in the UK, a total of 64 science lecturers completed a 28-item survey about the authentic values, beliefs, and the practices that inform and support their preparation as teachers. The collated survey responses were analysed through a statistical package for social sciences (SPSS), and a linear regression model was produced for self-reported confidence (used as a proxy for preparedness). Initial results pointed to the importance of enjoyment, being innovative and experimental, and demonstrating a good grasp of content for developing confidence. Receiving advice from education-based experts was a negative contributor to the confidence model as was pedagogical training unless it was part of a wider offering. However informal, supportive, peer-to-peer dialogue is deemed beneficial, highlighting the significant role communities of practice play in authentic preparation.</description><subject>Authentic Learning</subject><subject>Beliefs</subject><subject>College Faculty</subject><subject>College Science</subject><subject>Communities of Practice</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Higher education</subject><subject>Higher education institutions</subject><subject>Pedagogical Content Knowledge</subject><subject>Pedagogy</subject><subject>Polls & surveys</subject><subject>Program Content</subject><subject>Program Effectiveness</subject><subject>Psychological Patterns</subject><subject>Regression models</subject><subject>Science</subject><subject>Science Education</subject><subject>Science Teachers</subject><subject>Social sciences</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Teacher Attitudes</subject><subject>Teacher Education Programs</subject><subject>Teaching</subject><subject>Training</subject><subject>Values</subject><issn>0157-244X</issn><issn>1573-1898</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kM1Kw0AQgBdRsFZfQBAWPEf3J8nunqRotUpBwYrels1m0qbUbNxNUG--hq_nk5gaqTeZwzDMfDPDh9AhJSeUEHEaKKVpEhFGIqKUYFG8hQY0ETyiUsltNCBdEbE4ftpFeyEsCeE0FXyA3MS94guHHwHfeaiNB9w4PANjF2d4_FavnC-rOb63JVQW8BRs03rw4evjE4_aZgFVU1o8qmvvOgTChl5TZYUn5XwBHo_z1pqmdNU-2inMKsDBbx6ih8vx7HwSTW-vrs9H08hymTSRzKgBaRRnlBXMcJIpAFYUSUqyLE0KgEwKJRMoeE5TSWUuCxAyMVTkyuaGD9Fxv7d77KWF0Oila33VndQsjYlQXHYxRKyfst6F4KHQtS-fjX_XlOi1WN2L1Z1Y_SNWxx101EPgS7sBxjeUc8K46Pq874d67Q783-l_tn4DfyiGYA</recordid><startdate>20220401</startdate><enddate>20220401</enddate><creator>Chadha, Deesha</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8812-884X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220401</creationdate><title>How Do We Prepare to Teach? Exploring Science Lecturers’ Authentic Approaches to Teaching in Higher Education</title><author>Chadha, Deesha</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-8b1ae8a93212f2a30b9ee2ff560bb65feeb87985ef3d16818d8fe785a17d9cda3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Authentic Learning</topic><topic>Beliefs</topic><topic>College Faculty</topic><topic>College Science</topic><topic>Communities of Practice</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Higher education</topic><topic>Higher education institutions</topic><topic>Pedagogical Content Knowledge</topic><topic>Pedagogy</topic><topic>Polls & surveys</topic><topic>Program Content</topic><topic>Program Effectiveness</topic><topic>Psychological Patterns</topic><topic>Regression models</topic><topic>Science</topic><topic>Science Education</topic><topic>Science Teachers</topic><topic>Social sciences</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Teacher Attitudes</topic><topic>Teacher Education Programs</topic><topic>Teaching</topic><topic>Training</topic><topic>Values</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chadha, Deesha</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Research in science education (Australasian Science Education Research Association)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chadha, Deesha</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1330237</ericid><atitle>How Do We Prepare to Teach? Exploring Science Lecturers’ Authentic Approaches to Teaching in Higher Education</atitle><jtitle>Research in science education (Australasian Science Education Research Association)</jtitle><stitle>Res Sci Educ</stitle><date>2022-04-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>52</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>635</spage><epage>653</epage><pages>635-653</pages><issn>0157-244X</issn><eissn>1573-1898</eissn><abstract>In this paper, science lecturers’ perspectives on how they authentically prepare to teach are explored, to establish how academic development practices can better support them. Science lecturers in higher education do not always feel comfortable engaging with pedagogical training initiatives, often finding the ideas presented confusing, non-transferable and of little benefit to them. Models of pedagogical training suit institutional requirements and the generic principles of teaching in higher education. However, it is more useful to establish science lecturers’ authentic preparation techniques and build academic practice models around these. At a research-intensive higher education institution (HEI) in the UK, a total of 64 science lecturers completed a 28-item survey about the authentic values, beliefs, and the practices that inform and support their preparation as teachers. The collated survey responses were analysed through a statistical package for social sciences (SPSS), and a linear regression model was produced for self-reported confidence (used as a proxy for preparedness). Initial results pointed to the importance of enjoyment, being innovative and experimental, and demonstrating a good grasp of content for developing confidence. Receiving advice from education-based experts was a negative contributor to the confidence model as was pedagogical training unless it was part of a wider offering. However informal, supportive, peer-to-peer dialogue is deemed beneficial, highlighting the significant role communities of practice play in authentic preparation.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s11165-020-09972-4</doi><tpages>19</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8812-884X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0157-244X |
ispartof | Research in science education (Australasian Science Education Research Association), 2022-04, Vol.52 (2), p.635-653 |
issn | 0157-244X 1573-1898 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2640793838 |
source | SpringerNature Journals; Education Source |
subjects | Authentic Learning Beliefs College Faculty College Science Communities of Practice Education Higher education Higher education institutions Pedagogical Content Knowledge Pedagogy Polls & surveys Program Content Program Effectiveness Psychological Patterns Regression models Science Science Education Science Teachers Social sciences Statistical analysis Teacher Attitudes Teacher Education Programs Teaching Training Values |
title | How Do We Prepare to Teach? Exploring Science Lecturers’ Authentic Approaches to Teaching in Higher Education |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-22T09%3A46%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=How%20Do%20We%20Prepare%20to%20Teach?%20Exploring%20Science%20Lecturers%E2%80%99%20Authentic%20Approaches%20to%20Teaching%20in%20Higher%20Education&rft.jtitle=Research%20in%20science%20education%20(Australasian%20Science%20Education%20Research%20Association)&rft.au=Chadha,%20Deesha&rft.date=2022-04-01&rft.volume=52&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=635&rft.epage=653&rft.pages=635-653&rft.issn=0157-244X&rft.eissn=1573-1898&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11165-020-09972-4&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2640793838%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2640793838&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1330237&rfr_iscdi=true |