Glyphosate residues alter the microbiota of a perennial weed with a minimal indirect impact on plant performance

Purpose In cold climates, glyphosate residues may linger in soils, with effects on plant–microbe interactions and, consequently, plant performance. Here, we explore the influence of glyphosate residues on the endophytic microbiota (bacteria and fungi) and performance of the perennial nitrogen-fixing...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Plant and soil 2022-03, Vol.472 (1-2), p.161-174
Hauptverfasser: Ramula, S., Mathew, S. A., Kalske, A., Nissinen, R., Saikkonen, K., Helander, M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 174
container_issue 1-2
container_start_page 161
container_title Plant and soil
container_volume 472
creator Ramula, S.
Mathew, S. A.
Kalske, A.
Nissinen, R.
Saikkonen, K.
Helander, M.
description Purpose In cold climates, glyphosate residues may linger in soils, with effects on plant–microbe interactions and, consequently, plant performance. Here, we explore the influence of glyphosate residues on the endophytic microbiota (bacteria and fungi) and performance of the perennial nitrogen-fixing weed Lupinus polyphyllus . Methods In a common garden, we grew plants from six populations of L. polyphyllus in glyphosate-treated or untreated control soils, with or without additional phosphorus. We sampled plant microbiota (leaves, roots, nodules) and assessed plant performance based on six traits: height, retrogression probability (i.e. shrinkage), biomass, root:shoot ratio, nodule number, and nodule viability. Results The richness of plant endophytic microbial communities was determined by soil phosphorus level rather than by glyphosate treatment. However, for bacteria, the composition of these communities differed between glyphosate-treated and control soils across plant tissue types; no difference was observed for fungi. The plant bacterial communities in both soil types were dominated by potential nitrogen-fixing bacteria belonging to family Bradyrhizobiaceae, and particularly so in glyphosate-treated soils. Overall, though, these changes in plant bacterial communities had a minor effect on plant performance: the only difference we detected was that the probability of retrogression was occasionally higher in glyphosate-treated soils than in control soils. Conclusion Our findings indicate that glyphosate-based herbicides, when applied at the recommended frequency and concentration, may not have critical effects on the growth of short-lived weeds after the safety period has passed; however, the endophytic microbiota of such weeds may experience longer-lasting shifts in community structure.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s11104-021-05196-1
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2640587316</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A697105448</galeid><sourcerecordid>A697105448</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c402t-e1bcdec74d417f03d74843a4891aab2724b56265fa3258ae5c4e62f31ab2077c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU9rHSEUxSW0kNe0XyAroetJvf6dtwyhTQuBbFroTnzONc8wo1M1hHz7-jKF7oKLi8f7u3o8hFwCuwLGzJcKAEwOjMPAFOz1AGdkB8qIQTGh35EdY4IPzOx_n5MPtT6y0x70jqy388t6zNU1pAVrnJ6wUjc3LLQdkS7Rl3yIuTmaA3V0xYIpRTfTZ8SJPsd27OoSU1y6FtMUC_pG47K6XnKi6-xSO2Ehl8Uljx_J--Dmip_-1Qvy69vXnzffh7v72x8313eDl4y3AeHgJ_RGThJMYGIycpTCyXEPzh244fKgNNcqOMHV6FB5iZoHAf2QGePFBfm8zV1L_tNNNfuYn0rqV1quJVOjEaB719XW9eBmtDGF3IrzfU3YreeEIXb9Wu8NMCXl2AG-Af1fai0Y7Fq69_JigdlTFHaLwvYo7GsUFjokNqj25vSA5f9b3qD-AhxXjL0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2640587316</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Glyphosate residues alter the microbiota of a perennial weed with a minimal indirect impact on plant performance</title><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>Ramula, S. ; Mathew, S. A. ; Kalske, A. ; Nissinen, R. ; Saikkonen, K. ; Helander, M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Ramula, S. ; Mathew, S. A. ; Kalske, A. ; Nissinen, R. ; Saikkonen, K. ; Helander, M.</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose In cold climates, glyphosate residues may linger in soils, with effects on plant–microbe interactions and, consequently, plant performance. Here, we explore the influence of glyphosate residues on the endophytic microbiota (bacteria and fungi) and performance of the perennial nitrogen-fixing weed Lupinus polyphyllus . Methods In a common garden, we grew plants from six populations of L. polyphyllus in glyphosate-treated or untreated control soils, with or without additional phosphorus. We sampled plant microbiota (leaves, roots, nodules) and assessed plant performance based on six traits: height, retrogression probability (i.e. shrinkage), biomass, root:shoot ratio, nodule number, and nodule viability. Results The richness of plant endophytic microbial communities was determined by soil phosphorus level rather than by glyphosate treatment. However, for bacteria, the composition of these communities differed between glyphosate-treated and control soils across plant tissue types; no difference was observed for fungi. The plant bacterial communities in both soil types were dominated by potential nitrogen-fixing bacteria belonging to family Bradyrhizobiaceae, and particularly so in glyphosate-treated soils. Overall, though, these changes in plant bacterial communities had a minor effect on plant performance: the only difference we detected was that the probability of retrogression was occasionally higher in glyphosate-treated soils than in control soils. Conclusion Our findings indicate that glyphosate-based herbicides, when applied at the recommended frequency and concentration, may not have critical effects on the growth of short-lived weeds after the safety period has passed; however, the endophytic microbiota of such weeds may experience longer-lasting shifts in community structure.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0032-079X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-5036</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11104-021-05196-1</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer International Publishing</publisher><subject>Agriculture ; Analysis ; Bacteria ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Cold weather ; Community structure ; Ecology ; Endophytes ; Fungi ; Glyphosate ; Herbicides ; Life Sciences ; Microbial activity ; Microbiota ; Microbiota (Symbiotic organisms) ; Microorganisms ; Nitrogen fixation ; Nitrogen-fixing bacteria ; Nitrogenation ; Nodules ; Phosphorus ; Plant communities ; Plant Physiology ; Plant Sciences ; Plant tissues ; Regular Article ; Residues ; Soil microbiology ; Soil Science &amp; Conservation ; Soil treatment ; Soil types ; Soils ; Weeds</subject><ispartof>Plant and soil, 2022-03, Vol.472 (1-2), p.161-174</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2021. corrected publication 2022</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2022 Springer</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2021. corrected publication 2022. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c402t-e1bcdec74d417f03d74843a4891aab2724b56265fa3258ae5c4e62f31ab2077c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c402t-e1bcdec74d417f03d74843a4891aab2724b56265fa3258ae5c4e62f31ab2077c3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0517-6673 ; 0000-0001-5203-9984 ; 0000-0001-7795-0352 ; 0000-0002-4604-6050 ; 0000-0003-3850-8996 ; 0000-0002-9759-4321</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11104-021-05196-1$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11104-021-05196-1$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906,41469,42538,51300</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ramula, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mathew, S. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kalske, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nissinen, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saikkonen, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Helander, M.</creatorcontrib><title>Glyphosate residues alter the microbiota of a perennial weed with a minimal indirect impact on plant performance</title><title>Plant and soil</title><addtitle>Plant Soil</addtitle><description>Purpose In cold climates, glyphosate residues may linger in soils, with effects on plant–microbe interactions and, consequently, plant performance. Here, we explore the influence of glyphosate residues on the endophytic microbiota (bacteria and fungi) and performance of the perennial nitrogen-fixing weed Lupinus polyphyllus . Methods In a common garden, we grew plants from six populations of L. polyphyllus in glyphosate-treated or untreated control soils, with or without additional phosphorus. We sampled plant microbiota (leaves, roots, nodules) and assessed plant performance based on six traits: height, retrogression probability (i.e. shrinkage), biomass, root:shoot ratio, nodule number, and nodule viability. Results The richness of plant endophytic microbial communities was determined by soil phosphorus level rather than by glyphosate treatment. However, for bacteria, the composition of these communities differed between glyphosate-treated and control soils across plant tissue types; no difference was observed for fungi. The plant bacterial communities in both soil types were dominated by potential nitrogen-fixing bacteria belonging to family Bradyrhizobiaceae, and particularly so in glyphosate-treated soils. Overall, though, these changes in plant bacterial communities had a minor effect on plant performance: the only difference we detected was that the probability of retrogression was occasionally higher in glyphosate-treated soils than in control soils. Conclusion Our findings indicate that glyphosate-based herbicides, when applied at the recommended frequency and concentration, may not have critical effects on the growth of short-lived weeds after the safety period has passed; however, the endophytic microbiota of such weeds may experience longer-lasting shifts in community structure.</description><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Bacteria</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Cold weather</subject><subject>Community structure</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Endophytes</subject><subject>Fungi</subject><subject>Glyphosate</subject><subject>Herbicides</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Microbial activity</subject><subject>Microbiota</subject><subject>Microbiota (Symbiotic organisms)</subject><subject>Microorganisms</subject><subject>Nitrogen fixation</subject><subject>Nitrogen-fixing bacteria</subject><subject>Nitrogenation</subject><subject>Nodules</subject><subject>Phosphorus</subject><subject>Plant communities</subject><subject>Plant Physiology</subject><subject>Plant Sciences</subject><subject>Plant tissues</subject><subject>Regular Article</subject><subject>Residues</subject><subject>Soil microbiology</subject><subject>Soil Science &amp; Conservation</subject><subject>Soil treatment</subject><subject>Soil types</subject><subject>Soils</subject><subject>Weeds</subject><issn>0032-079X</issn><issn>1573-5036</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU9rHSEUxSW0kNe0XyAroetJvf6dtwyhTQuBbFroTnzONc8wo1M1hHz7-jKF7oKLi8f7u3o8hFwCuwLGzJcKAEwOjMPAFOz1AGdkB8qIQTGh35EdY4IPzOx_n5MPtT6y0x70jqy388t6zNU1pAVrnJ6wUjc3LLQdkS7Rl3yIuTmaA3V0xYIpRTfTZ8SJPsd27OoSU1y6FtMUC_pG47K6XnKi6-xSO2Ehl8Uljx_J--Dmip_-1Qvy69vXnzffh7v72x8313eDl4y3AeHgJ_RGThJMYGIycpTCyXEPzh244fKgNNcqOMHV6FB5iZoHAf2QGePFBfm8zV1L_tNNNfuYn0rqV1quJVOjEaB719XW9eBmtDGF3IrzfU3YreeEIXb9Wu8NMCXl2AG-Af1fai0Y7Fq69_JigdlTFHaLwvYo7GsUFjokNqj25vSA5f9b3qD-AhxXjL0</recordid><startdate>20220301</startdate><enddate>20220301</enddate><creator>Ramula, S.</creator><creator>Mathew, S. A.</creator><creator>Kalske, A.</creator><creator>Nissinen, R.</creator><creator>Saikkonen, K.</creator><creator>Helander, M.</creator><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0517-6673</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5203-9984</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7795-0352</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4604-6050</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3850-8996</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9759-4321</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220301</creationdate><title>Glyphosate residues alter the microbiota of a perennial weed with a minimal indirect impact on plant performance</title><author>Ramula, S. ; Mathew, S. A. ; Kalske, A. ; Nissinen, R. ; Saikkonen, K. ; Helander, M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c402t-e1bcdec74d417f03d74843a4891aab2724b56265fa3258ae5c4e62f31ab2077c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Bacteria</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Cold weather</topic><topic>Community structure</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Endophytes</topic><topic>Fungi</topic><topic>Glyphosate</topic><topic>Herbicides</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Microbial activity</topic><topic>Microbiota</topic><topic>Microbiota (Symbiotic organisms)</topic><topic>Microorganisms</topic><topic>Nitrogen fixation</topic><topic>Nitrogen-fixing bacteria</topic><topic>Nitrogenation</topic><topic>Nodules</topic><topic>Phosphorus</topic><topic>Plant communities</topic><topic>Plant Physiology</topic><topic>Plant Sciences</topic><topic>Plant tissues</topic><topic>Regular Article</topic><topic>Residues</topic><topic>Soil microbiology</topic><topic>Soil Science &amp; Conservation</topic><topic>Soil treatment</topic><topic>Soil types</topic><topic>Soils</topic><topic>Weeds</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ramula, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mathew, S. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kalske, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nissinen, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saikkonen, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Helander, M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Plant and soil</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ramula, S.</au><au>Mathew, S. A.</au><au>Kalske, A.</au><au>Nissinen, R.</au><au>Saikkonen, K.</au><au>Helander, M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Glyphosate residues alter the microbiota of a perennial weed with a minimal indirect impact on plant performance</atitle><jtitle>Plant and soil</jtitle><stitle>Plant Soil</stitle><date>2022-03-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>472</volume><issue>1-2</issue><spage>161</spage><epage>174</epage><pages>161-174</pages><issn>0032-079X</issn><eissn>1573-5036</eissn><abstract>Purpose In cold climates, glyphosate residues may linger in soils, with effects on plant–microbe interactions and, consequently, plant performance. Here, we explore the influence of glyphosate residues on the endophytic microbiota (bacteria and fungi) and performance of the perennial nitrogen-fixing weed Lupinus polyphyllus . Methods In a common garden, we grew plants from six populations of L. polyphyllus in glyphosate-treated or untreated control soils, with or without additional phosphorus. We sampled plant microbiota (leaves, roots, nodules) and assessed plant performance based on six traits: height, retrogression probability (i.e. shrinkage), biomass, root:shoot ratio, nodule number, and nodule viability. Results The richness of plant endophytic microbial communities was determined by soil phosphorus level rather than by glyphosate treatment. However, for bacteria, the composition of these communities differed between glyphosate-treated and control soils across plant tissue types; no difference was observed for fungi. The plant bacterial communities in both soil types were dominated by potential nitrogen-fixing bacteria belonging to family Bradyrhizobiaceae, and particularly so in glyphosate-treated soils. Overall, though, these changes in plant bacterial communities had a minor effect on plant performance: the only difference we detected was that the probability of retrogression was occasionally higher in glyphosate-treated soils than in control soils. Conclusion Our findings indicate that glyphosate-based herbicides, when applied at the recommended frequency and concentration, may not have critical effects on the growth of short-lived weeds after the safety period has passed; however, the endophytic microbiota of such weeds may experience longer-lasting shifts in community structure.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer International Publishing</pub><doi>10.1007/s11104-021-05196-1</doi><tpages>14</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0517-6673</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5203-9984</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7795-0352</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4604-6050</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3850-8996</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9759-4321</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0032-079X
ispartof Plant and soil, 2022-03, Vol.472 (1-2), p.161-174
issn 0032-079X
1573-5036
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2640587316
source SpringerLink Journals
subjects Agriculture
Analysis
Bacteria
Biomedical and Life Sciences
Cold weather
Community structure
Ecology
Endophytes
Fungi
Glyphosate
Herbicides
Life Sciences
Microbial activity
Microbiota
Microbiota (Symbiotic organisms)
Microorganisms
Nitrogen fixation
Nitrogen-fixing bacteria
Nitrogenation
Nodules
Phosphorus
Plant communities
Plant Physiology
Plant Sciences
Plant tissues
Regular Article
Residues
Soil microbiology
Soil Science & Conservation
Soil treatment
Soil types
Soils
Weeds
title Glyphosate residues alter the microbiota of a perennial weed with a minimal indirect impact on plant performance
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T10%3A00%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Glyphosate%20residues%20alter%20the%20microbiota%20of%20a%20perennial%20weed%20with%20a%20minimal%20indirect%20impact%20on%20plant%20performance&rft.jtitle=Plant%20and%20soil&rft.au=Ramula,%20S.&rft.date=2022-03-01&rft.volume=472&rft.issue=1-2&rft.spage=161&rft.epage=174&rft.pages=161-174&rft.issn=0032-079X&rft.eissn=1573-5036&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11104-021-05196-1&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA697105448%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2640587316&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A697105448&rfr_iscdi=true