Glyphosate residues alter the microbiota of a perennial weed with a minimal indirect impact on plant performance
Purpose In cold climates, glyphosate residues may linger in soils, with effects on plant–microbe interactions and, consequently, plant performance. Here, we explore the influence of glyphosate residues on the endophytic microbiota (bacteria and fungi) and performance of the perennial nitrogen-fixing...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Plant and soil 2022-03, Vol.472 (1-2), p.161-174 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 174 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1-2 |
container_start_page | 161 |
container_title | Plant and soil |
container_volume | 472 |
creator | Ramula, S. Mathew, S. A. Kalske, A. Nissinen, R. Saikkonen, K. Helander, M. |
description | Purpose
In cold climates, glyphosate residues may linger in soils, with effects on plant–microbe interactions and, consequently, plant performance. Here, we explore the influence of glyphosate residues on the endophytic microbiota (bacteria and fungi) and performance of the perennial nitrogen-fixing weed
Lupinus polyphyllus
.
Methods
In a common garden, we grew plants from six populations of
L. polyphyllus
in glyphosate-treated or untreated control soils, with or without additional phosphorus. We sampled plant microbiota (leaves, roots, nodules) and assessed plant performance based on six traits: height, retrogression probability (i.e. shrinkage), biomass, root:shoot ratio, nodule number, and nodule viability.
Results
The richness of plant endophytic microbial communities was determined by soil phosphorus level rather than by glyphosate treatment. However, for bacteria, the composition of these communities differed between glyphosate-treated and control soils across plant tissue types; no difference was observed for fungi. The plant bacterial communities in both soil types were dominated by potential nitrogen-fixing bacteria belonging to family Bradyrhizobiaceae, and particularly so in glyphosate-treated soils. Overall, though, these changes in plant bacterial communities had a minor effect on plant performance: the only difference we detected was that the probability of retrogression was occasionally higher in glyphosate-treated soils than in control soils.
Conclusion
Our findings indicate that glyphosate-based herbicides, when applied at the recommended frequency and concentration, may not have critical effects on the growth of short-lived weeds after the safety period has passed; however, the endophytic microbiota of such weeds may experience longer-lasting shifts in community structure. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11104-021-05196-1 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2640587316</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A697105448</galeid><sourcerecordid>A697105448</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c402t-e1bcdec74d417f03d74843a4891aab2724b56265fa3258ae5c4e62f31ab2077c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU9rHSEUxSW0kNe0XyAroetJvf6dtwyhTQuBbFroTnzONc8wo1M1hHz7-jKF7oKLi8f7u3o8hFwCuwLGzJcKAEwOjMPAFOz1AGdkB8qIQTGh35EdY4IPzOx_n5MPtT6y0x70jqy388t6zNU1pAVrnJ6wUjc3LLQdkS7Rl3yIuTmaA3V0xYIpRTfTZ8SJPsd27OoSU1y6FtMUC_pG47K6XnKi6-xSO2Ehl8Uljx_J--Dmip_-1Qvy69vXnzffh7v72x8313eDl4y3AeHgJ_RGThJMYGIycpTCyXEPzh244fKgNNcqOMHV6FB5iZoHAf2QGePFBfm8zV1L_tNNNfuYn0rqV1quJVOjEaB719XW9eBmtDGF3IrzfU3YreeEIXb9Wu8NMCXl2AG-Af1fai0Y7Fq69_JigdlTFHaLwvYo7GsUFjokNqj25vSA5f9b3qD-AhxXjL0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2640587316</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Glyphosate residues alter the microbiota of a perennial weed with a minimal indirect impact on plant performance</title><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>Ramula, S. ; Mathew, S. A. ; Kalske, A. ; Nissinen, R. ; Saikkonen, K. ; Helander, M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Ramula, S. ; Mathew, S. A. ; Kalske, A. ; Nissinen, R. ; Saikkonen, K. ; Helander, M.</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose
In cold climates, glyphosate residues may linger in soils, with effects on plant–microbe interactions and, consequently, plant performance. Here, we explore the influence of glyphosate residues on the endophytic microbiota (bacteria and fungi) and performance of the perennial nitrogen-fixing weed
Lupinus polyphyllus
.
Methods
In a common garden, we grew plants from six populations of
L. polyphyllus
in glyphosate-treated or untreated control soils, with or without additional phosphorus. We sampled plant microbiota (leaves, roots, nodules) and assessed plant performance based on six traits: height, retrogression probability (i.e. shrinkage), biomass, root:shoot ratio, nodule number, and nodule viability.
Results
The richness of plant endophytic microbial communities was determined by soil phosphorus level rather than by glyphosate treatment. However, for bacteria, the composition of these communities differed between glyphosate-treated and control soils across plant tissue types; no difference was observed for fungi. The plant bacterial communities in both soil types were dominated by potential nitrogen-fixing bacteria belonging to family Bradyrhizobiaceae, and particularly so in glyphosate-treated soils. Overall, though, these changes in plant bacterial communities had a minor effect on plant performance: the only difference we detected was that the probability of retrogression was occasionally higher in glyphosate-treated soils than in control soils.
Conclusion
Our findings indicate that glyphosate-based herbicides, when applied at the recommended frequency and concentration, may not have critical effects on the growth of short-lived weeds after the safety period has passed; however, the endophytic microbiota of such weeds may experience longer-lasting shifts in community structure.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0032-079X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-5036</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11104-021-05196-1</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer International Publishing</publisher><subject>Agriculture ; Analysis ; Bacteria ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Cold weather ; Community structure ; Ecology ; Endophytes ; Fungi ; Glyphosate ; Herbicides ; Life Sciences ; Microbial activity ; Microbiota ; Microbiota (Symbiotic organisms) ; Microorganisms ; Nitrogen fixation ; Nitrogen-fixing bacteria ; Nitrogenation ; Nodules ; Phosphorus ; Plant communities ; Plant Physiology ; Plant Sciences ; Plant tissues ; Regular Article ; Residues ; Soil microbiology ; Soil Science & Conservation ; Soil treatment ; Soil types ; Soils ; Weeds</subject><ispartof>Plant and soil, 2022-03, Vol.472 (1-2), p.161-174</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2021. corrected publication 2022</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2022 Springer</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2021. corrected publication 2022. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c402t-e1bcdec74d417f03d74843a4891aab2724b56265fa3258ae5c4e62f31ab2077c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c402t-e1bcdec74d417f03d74843a4891aab2724b56265fa3258ae5c4e62f31ab2077c3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0517-6673 ; 0000-0001-5203-9984 ; 0000-0001-7795-0352 ; 0000-0002-4604-6050 ; 0000-0003-3850-8996 ; 0000-0002-9759-4321</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11104-021-05196-1$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11104-021-05196-1$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906,41469,42538,51300</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ramula, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mathew, S. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kalske, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nissinen, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saikkonen, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Helander, M.</creatorcontrib><title>Glyphosate residues alter the microbiota of a perennial weed with a minimal indirect impact on plant performance</title><title>Plant and soil</title><addtitle>Plant Soil</addtitle><description>Purpose
In cold climates, glyphosate residues may linger in soils, with effects on plant–microbe interactions and, consequently, plant performance. Here, we explore the influence of glyphosate residues on the endophytic microbiota (bacteria and fungi) and performance of the perennial nitrogen-fixing weed
Lupinus polyphyllus
.
Methods
In a common garden, we grew plants from six populations of
L. polyphyllus
in glyphosate-treated or untreated control soils, with or without additional phosphorus. We sampled plant microbiota (leaves, roots, nodules) and assessed plant performance based on six traits: height, retrogression probability (i.e. shrinkage), biomass, root:shoot ratio, nodule number, and nodule viability.
Results
The richness of plant endophytic microbial communities was determined by soil phosphorus level rather than by glyphosate treatment. However, for bacteria, the composition of these communities differed between glyphosate-treated and control soils across plant tissue types; no difference was observed for fungi. The plant bacterial communities in both soil types were dominated by potential nitrogen-fixing bacteria belonging to family Bradyrhizobiaceae, and particularly so in glyphosate-treated soils. Overall, though, these changes in plant bacterial communities had a minor effect on plant performance: the only difference we detected was that the probability of retrogression was occasionally higher in glyphosate-treated soils than in control soils.
Conclusion
Our findings indicate that glyphosate-based herbicides, when applied at the recommended frequency and concentration, may not have critical effects on the growth of short-lived weeds after the safety period has passed; however, the endophytic microbiota of such weeds may experience longer-lasting shifts in community structure.</description><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Bacteria</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Cold weather</subject><subject>Community structure</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Endophytes</subject><subject>Fungi</subject><subject>Glyphosate</subject><subject>Herbicides</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Microbial activity</subject><subject>Microbiota</subject><subject>Microbiota (Symbiotic organisms)</subject><subject>Microorganisms</subject><subject>Nitrogen fixation</subject><subject>Nitrogen-fixing bacteria</subject><subject>Nitrogenation</subject><subject>Nodules</subject><subject>Phosphorus</subject><subject>Plant communities</subject><subject>Plant Physiology</subject><subject>Plant Sciences</subject><subject>Plant tissues</subject><subject>Regular Article</subject><subject>Residues</subject><subject>Soil microbiology</subject><subject>Soil Science & Conservation</subject><subject>Soil treatment</subject><subject>Soil types</subject><subject>Soils</subject><subject>Weeds</subject><issn>0032-079X</issn><issn>1573-5036</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU9rHSEUxSW0kNe0XyAroetJvf6dtwyhTQuBbFroTnzONc8wo1M1hHz7-jKF7oKLi8f7u3o8hFwCuwLGzJcKAEwOjMPAFOz1AGdkB8qIQTGh35EdY4IPzOx_n5MPtT6y0x70jqy388t6zNU1pAVrnJ6wUjc3LLQdkS7Rl3yIuTmaA3V0xYIpRTfTZ8SJPsd27OoSU1y6FtMUC_pG47K6XnKi6-xSO2Ehl8Uljx_J--Dmip_-1Qvy69vXnzffh7v72x8313eDl4y3AeHgJ_RGThJMYGIycpTCyXEPzh244fKgNNcqOMHV6FB5iZoHAf2QGePFBfm8zV1L_tNNNfuYn0rqV1quJVOjEaB719XW9eBmtDGF3IrzfU3YreeEIXb9Wu8NMCXl2AG-Af1fai0Y7Fq69_JigdlTFHaLwvYo7GsUFjokNqj25vSA5f9b3qD-AhxXjL0</recordid><startdate>20220301</startdate><enddate>20220301</enddate><creator>Ramula, S.</creator><creator>Mathew, S. A.</creator><creator>Kalske, A.</creator><creator>Nissinen, R.</creator><creator>Saikkonen, K.</creator><creator>Helander, M.</creator><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0517-6673</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5203-9984</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7795-0352</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4604-6050</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3850-8996</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9759-4321</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220301</creationdate><title>Glyphosate residues alter the microbiota of a perennial weed with a minimal indirect impact on plant performance</title><author>Ramula, S. ; Mathew, S. A. ; Kalske, A. ; Nissinen, R. ; Saikkonen, K. ; Helander, M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c402t-e1bcdec74d417f03d74843a4891aab2724b56265fa3258ae5c4e62f31ab2077c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Bacteria</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Cold weather</topic><topic>Community structure</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Endophytes</topic><topic>Fungi</topic><topic>Glyphosate</topic><topic>Herbicides</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Microbial activity</topic><topic>Microbiota</topic><topic>Microbiota (Symbiotic organisms)</topic><topic>Microorganisms</topic><topic>Nitrogen fixation</topic><topic>Nitrogen-fixing bacteria</topic><topic>Nitrogenation</topic><topic>Nodules</topic><topic>Phosphorus</topic><topic>Plant communities</topic><topic>Plant Physiology</topic><topic>Plant Sciences</topic><topic>Plant tissues</topic><topic>Regular Article</topic><topic>Residues</topic><topic>Soil microbiology</topic><topic>Soil Science & Conservation</topic><topic>Soil treatment</topic><topic>Soil types</topic><topic>Soils</topic><topic>Weeds</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ramula, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mathew, S. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kalske, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nissinen, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saikkonen, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Helander, M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Plant and soil</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ramula, S.</au><au>Mathew, S. A.</au><au>Kalske, A.</au><au>Nissinen, R.</au><au>Saikkonen, K.</au><au>Helander, M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Glyphosate residues alter the microbiota of a perennial weed with a minimal indirect impact on plant performance</atitle><jtitle>Plant and soil</jtitle><stitle>Plant Soil</stitle><date>2022-03-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>472</volume><issue>1-2</issue><spage>161</spage><epage>174</epage><pages>161-174</pages><issn>0032-079X</issn><eissn>1573-5036</eissn><abstract>Purpose
In cold climates, glyphosate residues may linger in soils, with effects on plant–microbe interactions and, consequently, plant performance. Here, we explore the influence of glyphosate residues on the endophytic microbiota (bacteria and fungi) and performance of the perennial nitrogen-fixing weed
Lupinus polyphyllus
.
Methods
In a common garden, we grew plants from six populations of
L. polyphyllus
in glyphosate-treated or untreated control soils, with or without additional phosphorus. We sampled plant microbiota (leaves, roots, nodules) and assessed plant performance based on six traits: height, retrogression probability (i.e. shrinkage), biomass, root:shoot ratio, nodule number, and nodule viability.
Results
The richness of plant endophytic microbial communities was determined by soil phosphorus level rather than by glyphosate treatment. However, for bacteria, the composition of these communities differed between glyphosate-treated and control soils across plant tissue types; no difference was observed for fungi. The plant bacterial communities in both soil types were dominated by potential nitrogen-fixing bacteria belonging to family Bradyrhizobiaceae, and particularly so in glyphosate-treated soils. Overall, though, these changes in plant bacterial communities had a minor effect on plant performance: the only difference we detected was that the probability of retrogression was occasionally higher in glyphosate-treated soils than in control soils.
Conclusion
Our findings indicate that glyphosate-based herbicides, when applied at the recommended frequency and concentration, may not have critical effects on the growth of short-lived weeds after the safety period has passed; however, the endophytic microbiota of such weeds may experience longer-lasting shifts in community structure.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer International Publishing</pub><doi>10.1007/s11104-021-05196-1</doi><tpages>14</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0517-6673</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5203-9984</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7795-0352</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4604-6050</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3850-8996</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9759-4321</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0032-079X |
ispartof | Plant and soil, 2022-03, Vol.472 (1-2), p.161-174 |
issn | 0032-079X 1573-5036 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2640587316 |
source | SpringerLink Journals |
subjects | Agriculture Analysis Bacteria Biomedical and Life Sciences Cold weather Community structure Ecology Endophytes Fungi Glyphosate Herbicides Life Sciences Microbial activity Microbiota Microbiota (Symbiotic organisms) Microorganisms Nitrogen fixation Nitrogen-fixing bacteria Nitrogenation Nodules Phosphorus Plant communities Plant Physiology Plant Sciences Plant tissues Regular Article Residues Soil microbiology Soil Science & Conservation Soil treatment Soil types Soils Weeds |
title | Glyphosate residues alter the microbiota of a perennial weed with a minimal indirect impact on plant performance |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T10%3A00%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Glyphosate%20residues%20alter%20the%20microbiota%20of%20a%20perennial%20weed%20with%20a%20minimal%20indirect%20impact%20on%20plant%20performance&rft.jtitle=Plant%20and%20soil&rft.au=Ramula,%20S.&rft.date=2022-03-01&rft.volume=472&rft.issue=1-2&rft.spage=161&rft.epage=174&rft.pages=161-174&rft.issn=0032-079X&rft.eissn=1573-5036&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11104-021-05196-1&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA697105448%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2640587316&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A697105448&rfr_iscdi=true |