THE POTENTIAL FOR CONSTITUTIONAL DEVOLUTION IN SOUTH AFRICA
The African National Congress (ANC) today rules South Africa, formally a federation, as though it were a unitary state. There has been increasing agitation in recent years for the secession of the Western Cape province, which since South Africa ended apartheid in 1994 has never returned a majority v...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Cato journal 2021-10, Vol.41 (3), p.691-710 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 710 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 691 |
container_title | The Cato journal |
container_volume | 41 |
creator | van Staden, Martin |
description | The African National Congress (ANC) today rules South Africa, formally a federation, as though it were a unitary state. There has been increasing agitation in recent years for the secession of the Western Cape province, which since South Africa ended apartheid in 1994 has never returned a majority vote in favor of the ANC.Room exists in South Africa's Constitution, adopted in 1996, for substantive political devolution, which, it is argued, must be attempted before blood is spilled in the name of national independence. However, calls for more autonomy-whether secession or devolution-are routinely derided as merely attempts to entrench the interests of right-wing whites. Yet the facts reveal that such calls are increasingly supported by representatives of all racial groups, united around disillusionment with the central government in Pretoria.The ANC, which controls the central government and eight of the nine provinces of South Africa, does not allow the various governments it controls to pursue policies incompatible with the party's political program. This, among other factors, has led to calls for secession, particularly of the Western Cape province, which has never returned a majority vote for the party ruling nationally. |
doi_str_mv | 10.36009/CJ.41.3.11 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2640585393</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2640585393</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_26405853933</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNiksKwjAARIMoWD8rLxBwbcyvP1yVmNJISaRN3RYXdVHEamPvbxEP4GrmzRsANgQjFmAc78UJcYIYImQCPBJztmM8iKbAwzQcOw7pHCycazEm1CfMAwebSXg2VmqrkhympoDC6NIqW1ll9Dgd5cXkX4BKw9JUNoNJWiiRrMDsdr27Zv3LJdim0ops9-y719C4d912Q_8YVU0Djv3IZzFj_70-Q3c2qQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2640585393</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>THE POTENTIAL FOR CONSTITUTIONAL DEVOLUTION IN SOUTH AFRICA</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Columbia International Affairs Online Journals</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><source>Political Science Complete</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>van Staden, Martin</creator><creatorcontrib>van Staden, Martin</creatorcontrib><description>The African National Congress (ANC) today rules South Africa, formally a federation, as though it were a unitary state. There has been increasing agitation in recent years for the secession of the Western Cape province, which since South Africa ended apartheid in 1994 has never returned a majority vote in favor of the ANC.Room exists in South Africa's Constitution, adopted in 1996, for substantive political devolution, which, it is argued, must be attempted before blood is spilled in the name of national independence. However, calls for more autonomy-whether secession or devolution-are routinely derided as merely attempts to entrench the interests of right-wing whites. Yet the facts reveal that such calls are increasingly supported by representatives of all racial groups, united around disillusionment with the central government in Pretoria.The ANC, which controls the central government and eight of the nine provinces of South Africa, does not allow the various governments it controls to pursue policies incompatible with the party's political program. This, among other factors, has led to calls for secession, particularly of the Western Cape province, which has never returned a majority vote for the party ruling nationally.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0273-3072</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1943-3468</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.36009/CJ.41.3.11</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: Cato Institute</publisher><subject>Agitation ; Apartheid ; Autonomy ; Central government ; Constitutional law ; Constitutions ; Decentralization ; Federal government ; Federalism ; Legislatures ; National independence ; Political majority ; Political parties ; Proposals ; Provinces ; Racial groups ; Regional government ; Right wing politics ; Secession ; Voting</subject><ispartof>The Cato journal, 2021-10, Vol.41 (3), p.691-710</ispartof><rights>2021. This work is published under https://www.cato.org/archives/type/serial_issue/category/9401 (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,12843,27864,27922,27923</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>van Staden, Martin</creatorcontrib><title>THE POTENTIAL FOR CONSTITUTIONAL DEVOLUTION IN SOUTH AFRICA</title><title>The Cato journal</title><description>The African National Congress (ANC) today rules South Africa, formally a federation, as though it were a unitary state. There has been increasing agitation in recent years for the secession of the Western Cape province, which since South Africa ended apartheid in 1994 has never returned a majority vote in favor of the ANC.Room exists in South Africa's Constitution, adopted in 1996, for substantive political devolution, which, it is argued, must be attempted before blood is spilled in the name of national independence. However, calls for more autonomy-whether secession or devolution-are routinely derided as merely attempts to entrench the interests of right-wing whites. Yet the facts reveal that such calls are increasingly supported by representatives of all racial groups, united around disillusionment with the central government in Pretoria.The ANC, which controls the central government and eight of the nine provinces of South Africa, does not allow the various governments it controls to pursue policies incompatible with the party's political program. This, among other factors, has led to calls for secession, particularly of the Western Cape province, which has never returned a majority vote for the party ruling nationally.</description><subject>Agitation</subject><subject>Apartheid</subject><subject>Autonomy</subject><subject>Central government</subject><subject>Constitutional law</subject><subject>Constitutions</subject><subject>Decentralization</subject><subject>Federal government</subject><subject>Federalism</subject><subject>Legislatures</subject><subject>National independence</subject><subject>Political majority</subject><subject>Political parties</subject><subject>Proposals</subject><subject>Provinces</subject><subject>Racial groups</subject><subject>Regional government</subject><subject>Right wing politics</subject><subject>Secession</subject><subject>Voting</subject><issn>0273-3072</issn><issn>1943-3468</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqNiksKwjAARIMoWD8rLxBwbcyvP1yVmNJISaRN3RYXdVHEamPvbxEP4GrmzRsANgQjFmAc78UJcYIYImQCPBJztmM8iKbAwzQcOw7pHCycazEm1CfMAwebSXg2VmqrkhympoDC6NIqW1ll9Dgd5cXkX4BKw9JUNoNJWiiRrMDsdr27Zv3LJdim0ops9-y719C4d912Q_8YVU0Djv3IZzFj_70-Q3c2qQ</recordid><startdate>20211001</startdate><enddate>20211001</enddate><creator>van Staden, Martin</creator><general>Cato Institute</general><scope>0-V</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4S-</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20211001</creationdate><title>THE POTENTIAL FOR CONSTITUTIONAL DEVOLUTION IN SOUTH AFRICA</title><author>van Staden, Martin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_26405853933</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Agitation</topic><topic>Apartheid</topic><topic>Autonomy</topic><topic>Central government</topic><topic>Constitutional law</topic><topic>Constitutions</topic><topic>Decentralization</topic><topic>Federal government</topic><topic>Federalism</topic><topic>Legislatures</topic><topic>National independence</topic><topic>Political majority</topic><topic>Political parties</topic><topic>Proposals</topic><topic>Provinces</topic><topic>Racial groups</topic><topic>Regional government</topic><topic>Right wing politics</topic><topic>Secession</topic><topic>Voting</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>van Staden, Martin</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>Global News & ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>BPIR.com Limited</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>The Cato journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>van Staden, Martin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>THE POTENTIAL FOR CONSTITUTIONAL DEVOLUTION IN SOUTH AFRICA</atitle><jtitle>The Cato journal</jtitle><date>2021-10-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>41</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>691</spage><epage>710</epage><pages>691-710</pages><issn>0273-3072</issn><eissn>1943-3468</eissn><abstract>The African National Congress (ANC) today rules South Africa, formally a federation, as though it were a unitary state. There has been increasing agitation in recent years for the secession of the Western Cape province, which since South Africa ended apartheid in 1994 has never returned a majority vote in favor of the ANC.Room exists in South Africa's Constitution, adopted in 1996, for substantive political devolution, which, it is argued, must be attempted before blood is spilled in the name of national independence. However, calls for more autonomy-whether secession or devolution-are routinely derided as merely attempts to entrench the interests of right-wing whites. Yet the facts reveal that such calls are increasingly supported by representatives of all racial groups, united around disillusionment with the central government in Pretoria.The ANC, which controls the central government and eight of the nine provinces of South Africa, does not allow the various governments it controls to pursue policies incompatible with the party's political program. This, among other factors, has led to calls for secession, particularly of the Western Cape province, which has never returned a majority vote for the party ruling nationally.</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>Cato Institute</pub><doi>10.36009/CJ.41.3.11</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0273-3072 |
ispartof | The Cato journal, 2021-10, Vol.41 (3), p.691-710 |
issn | 0273-3072 1943-3468 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2640585393 |
source | PAIS Index; Columbia International Affairs Online Journals; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; HeinOnline Law Journal Library; Political Science Complete; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
subjects | Agitation Apartheid Autonomy Central government Constitutional law Constitutions Decentralization Federal government Federalism Legislatures National independence Political majority Political parties Proposals Provinces Racial groups Regional government Right wing politics Secession Voting |
title | THE POTENTIAL FOR CONSTITUTIONAL DEVOLUTION IN SOUTH AFRICA |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T15%3A03%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=THE%20POTENTIAL%20FOR%20CONSTITUTIONAL%20DEVOLUTION%20IN%20SOUTH%20AFRICA&rft.jtitle=The%20Cato%20journal&rft.au=van%20Staden,%20Martin&rft.date=2021-10-01&rft.volume=41&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=691&rft.epage=710&rft.pages=691-710&rft.issn=0273-3072&rft.eissn=1943-3468&rft_id=info:doi/10.36009/CJ.41.3.11&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2640585393%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2640585393&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |