THE POTENTIAL FOR CONSTITUTIONAL DEVOLUTION IN SOUTH AFRICA

The African National Congress (ANC) today rules South Africa, formally a federation, as though it were a unitary state. There has been increasing agitation in recent years for the secession of the Western Cape province, which since South Africa ended apartheid in 1994 has never returned a majority v...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Cato journal 2021-10, Vol.41 (3), p.691-710
1. Verfasser: van Staden, Martin
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 710
container_issue 3
container_start_page 691
container_title The Cato journal
container_volume 41
creator van Staden, Martin
description The African National Congress (ANC) today rules South Africa, formally a federation, as though it were a unitary state. There has been increasing agitation in recent years for the secession of the Western Cape province, which since South Africa ended apartheid in 1994 has never returned a majority vote in favor of the ANC.Room exists in South Africa's Constitution, adopted in 1996, for substantive political devolution, which, it is argued, must be attempted before blood is spilled in the name of national independence. However, calls for more autonomy-whether secession or devolution-are routinely derided as merely attempts to entrench the interests of right-wing whites. Yet the facts reveal that such calls are increasingly supported by representatives of all racial groups, united around disillusionment with the central government in Pretoria.The ANC, which controls the central government and eight of the nine provinces of South Africa, does not allow the various governments it controls to pursue policies incompatible with the party's political program. This, among other factors, has led to calls for secession, particularly of the Western Cape province, which has never returned a majority vote for the party ruling nationally.
doi_str_mv 10.36009/CJ.41.3.11
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2640585393</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2640585393</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_26405853933</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNiksKwjAARIMoWD8rLxBwbcyvP1yVmNJISaRN3RYXdVHEamPvbxEP4GrmzRsANgQjFmAc78UJcYIYImQCPBJztmM8iKbAwzQcOw7pHCycazEm1CfMAwebSXg2VmqrkhympoDC6NIqW1ll9Dgd5cXkX4BKw9JUNoNJWiiRrMDsdr27Zv3LJdim0ops9-y719C4d912Q_8YVU0Djv3IZzFj_70-Q3c2qQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2640585393</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>THE POTENTIAL FOR CONSTITUTIONAL DEVOLUTION IN SOUTH AFRICA</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Columbia International Affairs Online Journals</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><source>Political Science Complete</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>van Staden, Martin</creator><creatorcontrib>van Staden, Martin</creatorcontrib><description>The African National Congress (ANC) today rules South Africa, formally a federation, as though it were a unitary state. There has been increasing agitation in recent years for the secession of the Western Cape province, which since South Africa ended apartheid in 1994 has never returned a majority vote in favor of the ANC.Room exists in South Africa's Constitution, adopted in 1996, for substantive political devolution, which, it is argued, must be attempted before blood is spilled in the name of national independence. However, calls for more autonomy-whether secession or devolution-are routinely derided as merely attempts to entrench the interests of right-wing whites. Yet the facts reveal that such calls are increasingly supported by representatives of all racial groups, united around disillusionment with the central government in Pretoria.The ANC, which controls the central government and eight of the nine provinces of South Africa, does not allow the various governments it controls to pursue policies incompatible with the party's political program. This, among other factors, has led to calls for secession, particularly of the Western Cape province, which has never returned a majority vote for the party ruling nationally.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0273-3072</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1943-3468</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.36009/CJ.41.3.11</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: Cato Institute</publisher><subject>Agitation ; Apartheid ; Autonomy ; Central government ; Constitutional law ; Constitutions ; Decentralization ; Federal government ; Federalism ; Legislatures ; National independence ; Political majority ; Political parties ; Proposals ; Provinces ; Racial groups ; Regional government ; Right wing politics ; Secession ; Voting</subject><ispartof>The Cato journal, 2021-10, Vol.41 (3), p.691-710</ispartof><rights>2021. This work is published under https://www.cato.org/archives/type/serial_issue/category/9401 (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,12843,27864,27922,27923</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>van Staden, Martin</creatorcontrib><title>THE POTENTIAL FOR CONSTITUTIONAL DEVOLUTION IN SOUTH AFRICA</title><title>The Cato journal</title><description>The African National Congress (ANC) today rules South Africa, formally a federation, as though it were a unitary state. There has been increasing agitation in recent years for the secession of the Western Cape province, which since South Africa ended apartheid in 1994 has never returned a majority vote in favor of the ANC.Room exists in South Africa's Constitution, adopted in 1996, for substantive political devolution, which, it is argued, must be attempted before blood is spilled in the name of national independence. However, calls for more autonomy-whether secession or devolution-are routinely derided as merely attempts to entrench the interests of right-wing whites. Yet the facts reveal that such calls are increasingly supported by representatives of all racial groups, united around disillusionment with the central government in Pretoria.The ANC, which controls the central government and eight of the nine provinces of South Africa, does not allow the various governments it controls to pursue policies incompatible with the party's political program. This, among other factors, has led to calls for secession, particularly of the Western Cape province, which has never returned a majority vote for the party ruling nationally.</description><subject>Agitation</subject><subject>Apartheid</subject><subject>Autonomy</subject><subject>Central government</subject><subject>Constitutional law</subject><subject>Constitutions</subject><subject>Decentralization</subject><subject>Federal government</subject><subject>Federalism</subject><subject>Legislatures</subject><subject>National independence</subject><subject>Political majority</subject><subject>Political parties</subject><subject>Proposals</subject><subject>Provinces</subject><subject>Racial groups</subject><subject>Regional government</subject><subject>Right wing politics</subject><subject>Secession</subject><subject>Voting</subject><issn>0273-3072</issn><issn>1943-3468</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqNiksKwjAARIMoWD8rLxBwbcyvP1yVmNJISaRN3RYXdVHEamPvbxEP4GrmzRsANgQjFmAc78UJcYIYImQCPBJztmM8iKbAwzQcOw7pHCycazEm1CfMAwebSXg2VmqrkhympoDC6NIqW1ll9Dgd5cXkX4BKw9JUNoNJWiiRrMDsdr27Zv3LJdim0ops9-y719C4d912Q_8YVU0Djv3IZzFj_70-Q3c2qQ</recordid><startdate>20211001</startdate><enddate>20211001</enddate><creator>van Staden, Martin</creator><general>Cato Institute</general><scope>0-V</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4S-</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20211001</creationdate><title>THE POTENTIAL FOR CONSTITUTIONAL DEVOLUTION IN SOUTH AFRICA</title><author>van Staden, Martin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_26405853933</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Agitation</topic><topic>Apartheid</topic><topic>Autonomy</topic><topic>Central government</topic><topic>Constitutional law</topic><topic>Constitutions</topic><topic>Decentralization</topic><topic>Federal government</topic><topic>Federalism</topic><topic>Legislatures</topic><topic>National independence</topic><topic>Political majority</topic><topic>Political parties</topic><topic>Proposals</topic><topic>Provinces</topic><topic>Racial groups</topic><topic>Regional government</topic><topic>Right wing politics</topic><topic>Secession</topic><topic>Voting</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>van Staden, Martin</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>Global News &amp; ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>BPIR.com Limited</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>The Cato journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>van Staden, Martin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>THE POTENTIAL FOR CONSTITUTIONAL DEVOLUTION IN SOUTH AFRICA</atitle><jtitle>The Cato journal</jtitle><date>2021-10-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>41</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>691</spage><epage>710</epage><pages>691-710</pages><issn>0273-3072</issn><eissn>1943-3468</eissn><abstract>The African National Congress (ANC) today rules South Africa, formally a federation, as though it were a unitary state. There has been increasing agitation in recent years for the secession of the Western Cape province, which since South Africa ended apartheid in 1994 has never returned a majority vote in favor of the ANC.Room exists in South Africa's Constitution, adopted in 1996, for substantive political devolution, which, it is argued, must be attempted before blood is spilled in the name of national independence. However, calls for more autonomy-whether secession or devolution-are routinely derided as merely attempts to entrench the interests of right-wing whites. Yet the facts reveal that such calls are increasingly supported by representatives of all racial groups, united around disillusionment with the central government in Pretoria.The ANC, which controls the central government and eight of the nine provinces of South Africa, does not allow the various governments it controls to pursue policies incompatible with the party's political program. This, among other factors, has led to calls for secession, particularly of the Western Cape province, which has never returned a majority vote for the party ruling nationally.</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>Cato Institute</pub><doi>10.36009/CJ.41.3.11</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0273-3072
ispartof The Cato journal, 2021-10, Vol.41 (3), p.691-710
issn 0273-3072
1943-3468
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2640585393
source PAIS Index; Columbia International Affairs Online Journals; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; HeinOnline Law Journal Library; Political Science Complete; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Agitation
Apartheid
Autonomy
Central government
Constitutional law
Constitutions
Decentralization
Federal government
Federalism
Legislatures
National independence
Political majority
Political parties
Proposals
Provinces
Racial groups
Regional government
Right wing politics
Secession
Voting
title THE POTENTIAL FOR CONSTITUTIONAL DEVOLUTION IN SOUTH AFRICA
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T15%3A03%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=THE%20POTENTIAL%20FOR%20CONSTITUTIONAL%20DEVOLUTION%20IN%20SOUTH%20AFRICA&rft.jtitle=The%20Cato%20journal&rft.au=van%20Staden,%20Martin&rft.date=2021-10-01&rft.volume=41&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=691&rft.epage=710&rft.pages=691-710&rft.issn=0273-3072&rft.eissn=1943-3468&rft_id=info:doi/10.36009/CJ.41.3.11&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2640585393%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2640585393&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true