Evaluation of solid phase microextraction for the analysis of hydrophilic compounds
Two commercially available solid phase microextraction (SPME) fibers, polyacrylate and carboxen/polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS), were evaluated for their ability to extract hydrophilic compounds from drinking water. Conditions, such as desorption time, desorption temperature, sample temperature, sample...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of Exposure Analysis and Environmental Epidemiology 1999-05, Vol.9 (3), p.181-191 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 191 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | 181 |
| container_title | Journal of Exposure Analysis and Environmental Epidemiology |
| container_volume | 9 |
| creator | SHOEMAKER, JODY A MUNCH, JEAN W BEHYMER, THOMAS D |
| description | Two commercially available solid phase microextraction (SPME) fibers, polyacrylate and carboxen/polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS), were evaluated for their ability to extract hydrophilic compounds from drinking water. Conditions, such as desorption time, desorption temperature, sample temperature, sample stirring, methanol concentration in the sample, and ionic strength of the sample, were optimized for 12 hydrophilic compounds (e.g., amines and alcohols) with both fibers. Accuracy, precision, and method detection limits (MDLs) were determined for the target analytes with both fibers. In general, both fibers exhibited excellent accuracy and precision in the range of 91–110% and 1.0–13%, respectively. The carboxen/PDMS fiber extracted these hydrophilic compounds from water with 10 to 100 times lower MDLs (0.10 to 15 μg/l) than the polyacrylate fiber (1.5 to 80 μg/l). The MDLs of the carboxen/PDMS fiber demonstrate that SPME is a feasible approach for extracting hydrophilic compounds from drinking water. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1038/sj.jea.7500018 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2640574693</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2640574693</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c421t-96ccd346053e34f0e9e2df0464a19980745c34e221b501146021574b9846d20c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kElPwzAQhS0EoqVw5QayxDmp9yRHVJVFQuIAnC3XcUiiJA52gui_xyVluXCakd43b2YeAOcYxRjRdOnruDYqTjhCCKcHYI5ZIiJOU3wYesRpxAjjM3DifR0IliT8GMwwYpgIkczB0_pdNaMaKttBW0BvmyqHfam8gW2lnTUfg1P6Sy6sg0NpoOpUs_WV3_HlNne2L6um0lDbtrdjl_tTcFSoxpuzfV2Al5v18-oueni8vV9dP0SaETxEmdA6p0yEIw1lBTKZIXmBmGAKZ1mKEsY1ZYYQvOEI4wASzBO2yVImcoI0XYCrybd39m00fpC1HV24zksiGAqsyGig4okK33jvTCF7V7XKbSVGcpeh9LUMGcp9hmHgcm87blqT_8Gn0AKwnAAfpO7VuN-9_1peTBOdGkZnfiy_9U9vv4Yd</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2640574693</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of solid phase microextraction for the analysis of hydrophilic compounds</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Journals</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Free Content</source><source>SpringerLink</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>SHOEMAKER, JODY A ; MUNCH, JEAN W ; BEHYMER, THOMAS D</creator><creatorcontrib>SHOEMAKER, JODY A ; MUNCH, JEAN W ; BEHYMER, THOMAS D</creatorcontrib><description>Two commercially available solid phase microextraction (SPME) fibers, polyacrylate and carboxen/polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS), were evaluated for their ability to extract hydrophilic compounds from drinking water. Conditions, such as desorption time, desorption temperature, sample temperature, sample stirring, methanol concentration in the sample, and ionic strength of the sample, were optimized for 12 hydrophilic compounds (e.g., amines and alcohols) with both fibers. Accuracy, precision, and method detection limits (MDLs) were determined for the target analytes with both fibers. In general, both fibers exhibited excellent accuracy and precision in the range of 91–110% and 1.0–13%, respectively. The carboxen/PDMS fiber extracted these hydrophilic compounds from water with 10 to 100 times lower MDLs (0.10 to 15 μg/l) than the polyacrylate fiber (1.5 to 80 μg/l). The MDLs of the carboxen/PDMS fiber demonstrate that SPME is a feasible approach for extracting hydrophilic compounds from drinking water.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1053-4245</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1559-0631</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1476-5381</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1559-064X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1038/sj.jea.7500018</identifier><identifier>PMID: 10412667</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Nature Publishing Group US</publisher><subject>Acrylic resins ; Alcohols ; Amines ; Analytical chemistry ; Desorption ; Detection limits ; Drinking behavior ; Drinking water ; Environmental Monitoring - methods ; Epidemiology ; Fibers ; Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry ; Humans ; Hydrophilicity ; Ionic strength ; Ions ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; original-article ; Polyacrylate ; Polydimethylsiloxane ; Public Health ; Solid phase methods ; Solid phases ; Water Pollution, Chemical - analysis ; Water Supply - standards</subject><ispartof>Journal of Exposure Analysis and Environmental Epidemiology, 1999-05, Vol.9 (3), p.181-191</ispartof><rights>Springer Nature America, Inc. 1999</rights><rights>Nature Publishing Group 1999.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c421t-96ccd346053e34f0e9e2df0464a19980745c34e221b501146021574b9846d20c3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1038/sj.jea.7500018$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1038/sj.jea.7500018$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27915,27916,41479,42548,51310</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10412667$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>SHOEMAKER, JODY A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MUNCH, JEAN W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BEHYMER, THOMAS D</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of solid phase microextraction for the analysis of hydrophilic compounds</title><title>Journal of Exposure Analysis and Environmental Epidemiology</title><addtitle>J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol</addtitle><addtitle>J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol</addtitle><description>Two commercially available solid phase microextraction (SPME) fibers, polyacrylate and carboxen/polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS), were evaluated for their ability to extract hydrophilic compounds from drinking water. Conditions, such as desorption time, desorption temperature, sample temperature, sample stirring, methanol concentration in the sample, and ionic strength of the sample, were optimized for 12 hydrophilic compounds (e.g., amines and alcohols) with both fibers. Accuracy, precision, and method detection limits (MDLs) were determined for the target analytes with both fibers. In general, both fibers exhibited excellent accuracy and precision in the range of 91–110% and 1.0–13%, respectively. The carboxen/PDMS fiber extracted these hydrophilic compounds from water with 10 to 100 times lower MDLs (0.10 to 15 μg/l) than the polyacrylate fiber (1.5 to 80 μg/l). The MDLs of the carboxen/PDMS fiber demonstrate that SPME is a feasible approach for extracting hydrophilic compounds from drinking water.</description><subject>Acrylic resins</subject><subject>Alcohols</subject><subject>Amines</subject><subject>Analytical chemistry</subject><subject>Desorption</subject><subject>Detection limits</subject><subject>Drinking behavior</subject><subject>Drinking water</subject><subject>Environmental Monitoring - methods</subject><subject>Epidemiology</subject><subject>Fibers</subject><subject>Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hydrophilicity</subject><subject>Ionic strength</subject><subject>Ions</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>original-article</subject><subject>Polyacrylate</subject><subject>Polydimethylsiloxane</subject><subject>Public Health</subject><subject>Solid phase methods</subject><subject>Solid phases</subject><subject>Water Pollution, Chemical - analysis</subject><subject>Water Supply - standards</subject><issn>1053-4245</issn><issn>1559-0631</issn><issn>1476-5381</issn><issn>1559-064X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1999</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kElPwzAQhS0EoqVw5QayxDmp9yRHVJVFQuIAnC3XcUiiJA52gui_xyVluXCakd43b2YeAOcYxRjRdOnruDYqTjhCCKcHYI5ZIiJOU3wYesRpxAjjM3DifR0IliT8GMwwYpgIkczB0_pdNaMaKttBW0BvmyqHfam8gW2lnTUfg1P6Sy6sg0NpoOpUs_WV3_HlNne2L6um0lDbtrdjl_tTcFSoxpuzfV2Al5v18-oueni8vV9dP0SaETxEmdA6p0yEIw1lBTKZIXmBmGAKZ1mKEsY1ZYYQvOEI4wASzBO2yVImcoI0XYCrybd39m00fpC1HV24zksiGAqsyGig4okK33jvTCF7V7XKbSVGcpeh9LUMGcp9hmHgcm87blqT_8Gn0AKwnAAfpO7VuN-9_1peTBOdGkZnfiy_9U9vv4Yd</recordid><startdate>19990501</startdate><enddate>19990501</enddate><creator>SHOEMAKER, JODY A</creator><creator>MUNCH, JEAN W</creator><creator>BEHYMER, THOMAS D</creator><general>Nature Publishing Group US</general><general>Nature Publishing Group</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19990501</creationdate><title>Evaluation of solid phase microextraction for the analysis of hydrophilic compounds</title><author>SHOEMAKER, JODY A ; MUNCH, JEAN W ; BEHYMER, THOMAS D</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c421t-96ccd346053e34f0e9e2df0464a19980745c34e221b501146021574b9846d20c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1999</creationdate><topic>Acrylic resins</topic><topic>Alcohols</topic><topic>Amines</topic><topic>Analytical chemistry</topic><topic>Desorption</topic><topic>Detection limits</topic><topic>Drinking behavior</topic><topic>Drinking water</topic><topic>Environmental Monitoring - methods</topic><topic>Epidemiology</topic><topic>Fibers</topic><topic>Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hydrophilicity</topic><topic>Ionic strength</topic><topic>Ions</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>original-article</topic><topic>Polyacrylate</topic><topic>Polydimethylsiloxane</topic><topic>Public Health</topic><topic>Solid phase methods</topic><topic>Solid phases</topic><topic>Water Pollution, Chemical - analysis</topic><topic>Water Supply - standards</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>SHOEMAKER, JODY A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MUNCH, JEAN W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BEHYMER, THOMAS D</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of Exposure Analysis and Environmental Epidemiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>SHOEMAKER, JODY A</au><au>MUNCH, JEAN W</au><au>BEHYMER, THOMAS D</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of solid phase microextraction for the analysis of hydrophilic compounds</atitle><jtitle>Journal of Exposure Analysis and Environmental Epidemiology</jtitle><stitle>J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol</stitle><addtitle>J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol</addtitle><date>1999-05-01</date><risdate>1999</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>181</spage><epage>191</epage><pages>181-191</pages><issn>1053-4245</issn><issn>1559-0631</issn><eissn>1476-5381</eissn><eissn>1559-064X</eissn><abstract>Two commercially available solid phase microextraction (SPME) fibers, polyacrylate and carboxen/polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS), were evaluated for their ability to extract hydrophilic compounds from drinking water. Conditions, such as desorption time, desorption temperature, sample temperature, sample stirring, methanol concentration in the sample, and ionic strength of the sample, were optimized for 12 hydrophilic compounds (e.g., amines and alcohols) with both fibers. Accuracy, precision, and method detection limits (MDLs) were determined for the target analytes with both fibers. In general, both fibers exhibited excellent accuracy and precision in the range of 91–110% and 1.0–13%, respectively. The carboxen/PDMS fiber extracted these hydrophilic compounds from water with 10 to 100 times lower MDLs (0.10 to 15 μg/l) than the polyacrylate fiber (1.5 to 80 μg/l). The MDLs of the carboxen/PDMS fiber demonstrate that SPME is a feasible approach for extracting hydrophilic compounds from drinking water.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Nature Publishing Group US</pub><pmid>10412667</pmid><doi>10.1038/sj.jea.7500018</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1053-4245 |
| ispartof | Journal of Exposure Analysis and Environmental Epidemiology, 1999-05, Vol.9 (3), p.181-191 |
| issn | 1053-4245 1559-0631 1476-5381 1559-064X |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2640574693 |
| source | Wiley-Blackwell Journals; MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Free Content; SpringerLink; PubMed Central; Alma/SFX Local Collection; EZB Electronic Journals Library |
| subjects | Acrylic resins Alcohols Amines Analytical chemistry Desorption Detection limits Drinking behavior Drinking water Environmental Monitoring - methods Epidemiology Fibers Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry Humans Hydrophilicity Ionic strength Ions Medicine Medicine & Public Health original-article Polyacrylate Polydimethylsiloxane Public Health Solid phase methods Solid phases Water Pollution, Chemical - analysis Water Supply - standards |
| title | Evaluation of solid phase microextraction for the analysis of hydrophilic compounds |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T19%3A51%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20solid%20phase%20microextraction%20for%20the%20analysis%20of%20hydrophilic%20compounds&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20Exposure%20Analysis%20and%20Environmental%20Epidemiology&rft.au=SHOEMAKER,%20JODY%20A&rft.date=1999-05-01&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=181&rft.epage=191&rft.pages=181-191&rft.issn=1053-4245&rft.eissn=1476-5381&rft_id=info:doi/10.1038/sj.jea.7500018&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2640574693%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2640574693&rft_id=info:pmid/10412667&rfr_iscdi=true |