LGBT ‘Communities’ and the (Self-)regulation and Shaping of Intimacy

This article draws on UK research with over 600 lesbian, gay, bisexual, and trans (LGBT+) people, funded by the Arts and Humanities Research Council (grant AH/J011894/1), which explored understandings and experiences of LGBT ‘community’. I examine the ways in which intimacy is regulated and shaped b...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Sociological research online 2022-03, Vol.27 (1), p.8-26
1. Verfasser: Formby, Eleanor
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 26
container_issue 1
container_start_page 8
container_title Sociological research online
container_volume 27
creator Formby, Eleanor
description This article draws on UK research with over 600 lesbian, gay, bisexual, and trans (LGBT+) people, funded by the Arts and Humanities Research Council (grant AH/J011894/1), which explored understandings and experiences of LGBT ‘community’. I examine the ways in which intimacy is regulated and shaped by and within social interaction, which was apparent in three main ways. First, the research identified how for some people the very concept of ‘LGBT community’ was linked to intimacy. Second, there was strong evidence to suggest that some LGBT+ people self-regulate their practices of intimacy (such as holding hands or kissing in public) so as not to be recognised as enacting a same-gender relationship. This was understood as a form of self-protection or hate crime prevention, though degrees of habit and professed concern for other people’s feelings were also contributing factors. Third, experiences of intimate relations were shaped by intersectional dynamics, particularly relating to various forms of discrimination, including ageism, biphobia, classism, (dis)ableism, racism, and transphobia from and among LGBT+ people. Whilst LGBT ‘communities’ were thought to enable opportunities to seek sexual and/or intimate encounters, this is not without its complexities. Although there have been improvements in relation to legislation and wider social attitudes, there is, for some, persistent apprehension and self-regulation which, whether necessary or not, are significant. LGBT+ people’s experiences thus suggest that intimacy can be shaped by multiple inequalities both within and without LGBT ‘communities’.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/1360780420974031
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2640529917</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_1360780420974031</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2640529917</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-ac07332d570420ae26f99e2bd56bdfcfc03a165223914948a469bfe5ee04a7783</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1ULtOw0AQPCGQCIGe0hINFIa9ly9XQgRJpEgUCbV1tvcSR4kd7uwiXT4j_F6-BBsjgZCodjU7MzsaQq4p3FOq1APlEagBCAZaCeD0hPRaKGyx01_7ObnwfgXAqJK0R8bT0dM8OO4Pw3KzqYu8ytEf9x-BKbKgWmJwO8O1De8cLuq1qfKy-LrMlmabF4ugtMGkqPKNSXeX5Myatcer79knby_P8-E4nL6OJsPHaZhySavQpKA4Z5lUbVSDLLJaI0syGSWZTW0K3NBIMsY1FVoMjIh0YlEigjBKDXif3HS-W1e-1-ireFXWrmhexiwSIJnWVDUs6FipK713aOOta2K6XUwhbvuK__bVSMJO4s0Cf0z_5X8CzDVphg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2640529917</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>LGBT ‘Communities’ and the (Self-)regulation and Shaping of Intimacy</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><creator>Formby, Eleanor</creator><creatorcontrib>Formby, Eleanor</creatorcontrib><description>This article draws on UK research with over 600 lesbian, gay, bisexual, and trans (LGBT+) people, funded by the Arts and Humanities Research Council (grant AH/J011894/1), which explored understandings and experiences of LGBT ‘community’. I examine the ways in which intimacy is regulated and shaped by and within social interaction, which was apparent in three main ways. First, the research identified how for some people the very concept of ‘LGBT community’ was linked to intimacy. Second, there was strong evidence to suggest that some LGBT+ people self-regulate their practices of intimacy (such as holding hands or kissing in public) so as not to be recognised as enacting a same-gender relationship. This was understood as a form of self-protection or hate crime prevention, though degrees of habit and professed concern for other people’s feelings were also contributing factors. Third, experiences of intimate relations were shaped by intersectional dynamics, particularly relating to various forms of discrimination, including ageism, biphobia, classism, (dis)ableism, racism, and transphobia from and among LGBT+ people. Whilst LGBT ‘communities’ were thought to enable opportunities to seek sexual and/or intimate encounters, this is not without its complexities. Although there have been improvements in relation to legislation and wider social attitudes, there is, for some, persistent apprehension and self-regulation which, whether necessary or not, are significant. LGBT+ people’s experiences thus suggest that intimacy can be shaped by multiple inequalities both within and without LGBT ‘communities’.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1360-7804</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1360-7804</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/1360780420974031</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Age discrimination ; Anxiety ; Bisexuality ; Classism ; Community ; Crime prevention ; Discrimination ; Gender relations ; Hate crimes ; Humanities ; Inequality ; Intersectionality ; Intimacy ; Kissing ; Legislation ; Lesbianism ; LGBTQ people ; Racism ; Regulation ; Self control ; Self regulation ; Selfprotection ; Social attitudes ; Social interaction</subject><ispartof>Sociological research online, 2022-03, Vol.27 (1), p.8-26</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-ac07332d570420ae26f99e2bd56bdfcfc03a165223914948a469bfe5ee04a7783</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-ac07332d570420ae26f99e2bd56bdfcfc03a165223914948a469bfe5ee04a7783</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4137-6592</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1360780420974031$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1360780420974031$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,21806,27853,27911,27912,33761,43608,43609</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Formby, Eleanor</creatorcontrib><title>LGBT ‘Communities’ and the (Self-)regulation and Shaping of Intimacy</title><title>Sociological research online</title><description>This article draws on UK research with over 600 lesbian, gay, bisexual, and trans (LGBT+) people, funded by the Arts and Humanities Research Council (grant AH/J011894/1), which explored understandings and experiences of LGBT ‘community’. I examine the ways in which intimacy is regulated and shaped by and within social interaction, which was apparent in three main ways. First, the research identified how for some people the very concept of ‘LGBT community’ was linked to intimacy. Second, there was strong evidence to suggest that some LGBT+ people self-regulate their practices of intimacy (such as holding hands or kissing in public) so as not to be recognised as enacting a same-gender relationship. This was understood as a form of self-protection or hate crime prevention, though degrees of habit and professed concern for other people’s feelings were also contributing factors. Third, experiences of intimate relations were shaped by intersectional dynamics, particularly relating to various forms of discrimination, including ageism, biphobia, classism, (dis)ableism, racism, and transphobia from and among LGBT+ people. Whilst LGBT ‘communities’ were thought to enable opportunities to seek sexual and/or intimate encounters, this is not without its complexities. Although there have been improvements in relation to legislation and wider social attitudes, there is, for some, persistent apprehension and self-regulation which, whether necessary or not, are significant. LGBT+ people’s experiences thus suggest that intimacy can be shaped by multiple inequalities both within and without LGBT ‘communities’.</description><subject>Age discrimination</subject><subject>Anxiety</subject><subject>Bisexuality</subject><subject>Classism</subject><subject>Community</subject><subject>Crime prevention</subject><subject>Discrimination</subject><subject>Gender relations</subject><subject>Hate crimes</subject><subject>Humanities</subject><subject>Inequality</subject><subject>Intersectionality</subject><subject>Intimacy</subject><subject>Kissing</subject><subject>Legislation</subject><subject>Lesbianism</subject><subject>LGBTQ people</subject><subject>Racism</subject><subject>Regulation</subject><subject>Self control</subject><subject>Self regulation</subject><subject>Selfprotection</subject><subject>Social attitudes</subject><subject>Social interaction</subject><issn>1360-7804</issn><issn>1360-7804</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AFRWT</sourceid><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNp1ULtOw0AQPCGQCIGe0hINFIa9ly9XQgRJpEgUCbV1tvcSR4kd7uwiXT4j_F6-BBsjgZCodjU7MzsaQq4p3FOq1APlEagBCAZaCeD0hPRaKGyx01_7ObnwfgXAqJK0R8bT0dM8OO4Pw3KzqYu8ytEf9x-BKbKgWmJwO8O1De8cLuq1qfKy-LrMlmabF4ugtMGkqPKNSXeX5Myatcer79knby_P8-E4nL6OJsPHaZhySavQpKA4Z5lUbVSDLLJaI0syGSWZTW0K3NBIMsY1FVoMjIh0YlEigjBKDXif3HS-W1e-1-ireFXWrmhexiwSIJnWVDUs6FipK713aOOta2K6XUwhbvuK__bVSMJO4s0Cf0z_5X8CzDVphg</recordid><startdate>202203</startdate><enddate>202203</enddate><creator>Formby, Eleanor</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage Publications Ltd</general><scope>AFRWT</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>WZK</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4137-6592</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202203</creationdate><title>LGBT ‘Communities’ and the (Self-)regulation and Shaping of Intimacy</title><author>Formby, Eleanor</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-ac07332d570420ae26f99e2bd56bdfcfc03a165223914948a469bfe5ee04a7783</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Age discrimination</topic><topic>Anxiety</topic><topic>Bisexuality</topic><topic>Classism</topic><topic>Community</topic><topic>Crime prevention</topic><topic>Discrimination</topic><topic>Gender relations</topic><topic>Hate crimes</topic><topic>Humanities</topic><topic>Inequality</topic><topic>Intersectionality</topic><topic>Intimacy</topic><topic>Kissing</topic><topic>Legislation</topic><topic>Lesbianism</topic><topic>LGBTQ people</topic><topic>Racism</topic><topic>Regulation</topic><topic>Self control</topic><topic>Self regulation</topic><topic>Selfprotection</topic><topic>Social attitudes</topic><topic>Social interaction</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Formby, Eleanor</creatorcontrib><collection>Sage Journals GOLD Open Access 2024</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Sociological research online</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Formby, Eleanor</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>LGBT ‘Communities’ and the (Self-)regulation and Shaping of Intimacy</atitle><jtitle>Sociological research online</jtitle><date>2022-03</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>8</spage><epage>26</epage><pages>8-26</pages><issn>1360-7804</issn><eissn>1360-7804</eissn><abstract>This article draws on UK research with over 600 lesbian, gay, bisexual, and trans (LGBT+) people, funded by the Arts and Humanities Research Council (grant AH/J011894/1), which explored understandings and experiences of LGBT ‘community’. I examine the ways in which intimacy is regulated and shaped by and within social interaction, which was apparent in three main ways. First, the research identified how for some people the very concept of ‘LGBT community’ was linked to intimacy. Second, there was strong evidence to suggest that some LGBT+ people self-regulate their practices of intimacy (such as holding hands or kissing in public) so as not to be recognised as enacting a same-gender relationship. This was understood as a form of self-protection or hate crime prevention, though degrees of habit and professed concern for other people’s feelings were also contributing factors. Third, experiences of intimate relations were shaped by intersectional dynamics, particularly relating to various forms of discrimination, including ageism, biphobia, classism, (dis)ableism, racism, and transphobia from and among LGBT+ people. Whilst LGBT ‘communities’ were thought to enable opportunities to seek sexual and/or intimate encounters, this is not without its complexities. Although there have been improvements in relation to legislation and wider social attitudes, there is, for some, persistent apprehension and self-regulation which, whether necessary or not, are significant. LGBT+ people’s experiences thus suggest that intimacy can be shaped by multiple inequalities both within and without LGBT ‘communities’.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/1360780420974031</doi><tpages>19</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4137-6592</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1360-7804
ispartof Sociological research online, 2022-03, Vol.27 (1), p.8-26
issn 1360-7804
1360-7804
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2640529917
source PAIS Index; Sociological Abstracts; SAGE Complete A-Z List
subjects Age discrimination
Anxiety
Bisexuality
Classism
Community
Crime prevention
Discrimination
Gender relations
Hate crimes
Humanities
Inequality
Intersectionality
Intimacy
Kissing
Legislation
Lesbianism
LGBTQ people
Racism
Regulation
Self control
Self regulation
Selfprotection
Social attitudes
Social interaction
title LGBT ‘Communities’ and the (Self-)regulation and Shaping of Intimacy
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T18%3A50%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=LGBT%20%E2%80%98Communities%E2%80%99%20and%20the%20(Self-)regulation%20and%20Shaping%20of%20Intimacy&rft.jtitle=Sociological%20research%20online&rft.au=Formby,%20Eleanor&rft.date=2022-03&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=8&rft.epage=26&rft.pages=8-26&rft.issn=1360-7804&rft.eissn=1360-7804&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/1360780420974031&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2640529917%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2640529917&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_1360780420974031&rfr_iscdi=true