LGBT ‘Communities’ and the (Self-)regulation and Shaping of Intimacy
This article draws on UK research with over 600 lesbian, gay, bisexual, and trans (LGBT+) people, funded by the Arts and Humanities Research Council (grant AH/J011894/1), which explored understandings and experiences of LGBT ‘community’. I examine the ways in which intimacy is regulated and shaped b...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Sociological research online 2022-03, Vol.27 (1), p.8-26 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 26 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 8 |
container_title | Sociological research online |
container_volume | 27 |
creator | Formby, Eleanor |
description | This article draws on UK research with over 600 lesbian, gay, bisexual, and trans (LGBT+) people, funded by the Arts and Humanities Research Council (grant AH/J011894/1), which explored understandings and experiences of LGBT ‘community’. I examine the ways in which intimacy is regulated and shaped by and within social interaction, which was apparent in three main ways. First, the research identified how for some people the very concept of ‘LGBT community’ was linked to intimacy. Second, there was strong evidence to suggest that some LGBT+ people self-regulate their practices of intimacy (such as holding hands or kissing in public) so as not to be recognised as enacting a same-gender relationship. This was understood as a form of self-protection or hate crime prevention, though degrees of habit and professed concern for other people’s feelings were also contributing factors. Third, experiences of intimate relations were shaped by intersectional dynamics, particularly relating to various forms of discrimination, including ageism, biphobia, classism, (dis)ableism, racism, and transphobia from and among LGBT+ people. Whilst LGBT ‘communities’ were thought to enable opportunities to seek sexual and/or intimate encounters, this is not without its complexities. Although there have been improvements in relation to legislation and wider social attitudes, there is, for some, persistent apprehension and self-regulation which, whether necessary or not, are significant. LGBT+ people’s experiences thus suggest that intimacy can be shaped by multiple inequalities both within and without LGBT ‘communities’. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/1360780420974031 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2640529917</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_1360780420974031</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2640529917</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-ac07332d570420ae26f99e2bd56bdfcfc03a165223914948a469bfe5ee04a7783</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1ULtOw0AQPCGQCIGe0hINFIa9ly9XQgRJpEgUCbV1tvcSR4kd7uwiXT4j_F6-BBsjgZCodjU7MzsaQq4p3FOq1APlEagBCAZaCeD0hPRaKGyx01_7ObnwfgXAqJK0R8bT0dM8OO4Pw3KzqYu8ytEf9x-BKbKgWmJwO8O1De8cLuq1qfKy-LrMlmabF4ugtMGkqPKNSXeX5Myatcer79knby_P8-E4nL6OJsPHaZhySavQpKA4Z5lUbVSDLLJaI0syGSWZTW0K3NBIMsY1FVoMjIh0YlEigjBKDXif3HS-W1e-1-ireFXWrmhexiwSIJnWVDUs6FipK713aOOta2K6XUwhbvuK__bVSMJO4s0Cf0z_5X8CzDVphg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2640529917</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>LGBT ‘Communities’ and the (Self-)regulation and Shaping of Intimacy</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><creator>Formby, Eleanor</creator><creatorcontrib>Formby, Eleanor</creatorcontrib><description>This article draws on UK research with over 600 lesbian, gay, bisexual, and trans (LGBT+) people, funded by the Arts and Humanities Research Council (grant AH/J011894/1), which explored understandings and experiences of LGBT ‘community’. I examine the ways in which intimacy is regulated and shaped by and within social interaction, which was apparent in three main ways. First, the research identified how for some people the very concept of ‘LGBT community’ was linked to intimacy. Second, there was strong evidence to suggest that some LGBT+ people self-regulate their practices of intimacy (such as holding hands or kissing in public) so as not to be recognised as enacting a same-gender relationship. This was understood as a form of self-protection or hate crime prevention, though degrees of habit and professed concern for other people’s feelings were also contributing factors. Third, experiences of intimate relations were shaped by intersectional dynamics, particularly relating to various forms of discrimination, including ageism, biphobia, classism, (dis)ableism, racism, and transphobia from and among LGBT+ people. Whilst LGBT ‘communities’ were thought to enable opportunities to seek sexual and/or intimate encounters, this is not without its complexities. Although there have been improvements in relation to legislation and wider social attitudes, there is, for some, persistent apprehension and self-regulation which, whether necessary or not, are significant. LGBT+ people’s experiences thus suggest that intimacy can be shaped by multiple inequalities both within and without LGBT ‘communities’.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1360-7804</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1360-7804</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/1360780420974031</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Age discrimination ; Anxiety ; Bisexuality ; Classism ; Community ; Crime prevention ; Discrimination ; Gender relations ; Hate crimes ; Humanities ; Inequality ; Intersectionality ; Intimacy ; Kissing ; Legislation ; Lesbianism ; LGBTQ people ; Racism ; Regulation ; Self control ; Self regulation ; Selfprotection ; Social attitudes ; Social interaction</subject><ispartof>Sociological research online, 2022-03, Vol.27 (1), p.8-26</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-ac07332d570420ae26f99e2bd56bdfcfc03a165223914948a469bfe5ee04a7783</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-ac07332d570420ae26f99e2bd56bdfcfc03a165223914948a469bfe5ee04a7783</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4137-6592</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1360780420974031$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1360780420974031$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,21806,27853,27911,27912,33761,43608,43609</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Formby, Eleanor</creatorcontrib><title>LGBT ‘Communities’ and the (Self-)regulation and Shaping of Intimacy</title><title>Sociological research online</title><description>This article draws on UK research with over 600 lesbian, gay, bisexual, and trans (LGBT+) people, funded by the Arts and Humanities Research Council (grant AH/J011894/1), which explored understandings and experiences of LGBT ‘community’. I examine the ways in which intimacy is regulated and shaped by and within social interaction, which was apparent in three main ways. First, the research identified how for some people the very concept of ‘LGBT community’ was linked to intimacy. Second, there was strong evidence to suggest that some LGBT+ people self-regulate their practices of intimacy (such as holding hands or kissing in public) so as not to be recognised as enacting a same-gender relationship. This was understood as a form of self-protection or hate crime prevention, though degrees of habit and professed concern for other people’s feelings were also contributing factors. Third, experiences of intimate relations were shaped by intersectional dynamics, particularly relating to various forms of discrimination, including ageism, biphobia, classism, (dis)ableism, racism, and transphobia from and among LGBT+ people. Whilst LGBT ‘communities’ were thought to enable opportunities to seek sexual and/or intimate encounters, this is not without its complexities. Although there have been improvements in relation to legislation and wider social attitudes, there is, for some, persistent apprehension and self-regulation which, whether necessary or not, are significant. LGBT+ people’s experiences thus suggest that intimacy can be shaped by multiple inequalities both within and without LGBT ‘communities’.</description><subject>Age discrimination</subject><subject>Anxiety</subject><subject>Bisexuality</subject><subject>Classism</subject><subject>Community</subject><subject>Crime prevention</subject><subject>Discrimination</subject><subject>Gender relations</subject><subject>Hate crimes</subject><subject>Humanities</subject><subject>Inequality</subject><subject>Intersectionality</subject><subject>Intimacy</subject><subject>Kissing</subject><subject>Legislation</subject><subject>Lesbianism</subject><subject>LGBTQ people</subject><subject>Racism</subject><subject>Regulation</subject><subject>Self control</subject><subject>Self regulation</subject><subject>Selfprotection</subject><subject>Social attitudes</subject><subject>Social interaction</subject><issn>1360-7804</issn><issn>1360-7804</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AFRWT</sourceid><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNp1ULtOw0AQPCGQCIGe0hINFIa9ly9XQgRJpEgUCbV1tvcSR4kd7uwiXT4j_F6-BBsjgZCodjU7MzsaQq4p3FOq1APlEagBCAZaCeD0hPRaKGyx01_7ObnwfgXAqJK0R8bT0dM8OO4Pw3KzqYu8ytEf9x-BKbKgWmJwO8O1De8cLuq1qfKy-LrMlmabF4ugtMGkqPKNSXeX5Myatcer79knby_P8-E4nL6OJsPHaZhySavQpKA4Z5lUbVSDLLJaI0syGSWZTW0K3NBIMsY1FVoMjIh0YlEigjBKDXif3HS-W1e-1-ireFXWrmhexiwSIJnWVDUs6FipK713aOOta2K6XUwhbvuK__bVSMJO4s0Cf0z_5X8CzDVphg</recordid><startdate>202203</startdate><enddate>202203</enddate><creator>Formby, Eleanor</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage Publications Ltd</general><scope>AFRWT</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>WZK</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4137-6592</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202203</creationdate><title>LGBT ‘Communities’ and the (Self-)regulation and Shaping of Intimacy</title><author>Formby, Eleanor</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-ac07332d570420ae26f99e2bd56bdfcfc03a165223914948a469bfe5ee04a7783</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Age discrimination</topic><topic>Anxiety</topic><topic>Bisexuality</topic><topic>Classism</topic><topic>Community</topic><topic>Crime prevention</topic><topic>Discrimination</topic><topic>Gender relations</topic><topic>Hate crimes</topic><topic>Humanities</topic><topic>Inequality</topic><topic>Intersectionality</topic><topic>Intimacy</topic><topic>Kissing</topic><topic>Legislation</topic><topic>Lesbianism</topic><topic>LGBTQ people</topic><topic>Racism</topic><topic>Regulation</topic><topic>Self control</topic><topic>Self regulation</topic><topic>Selfprotection</topic><topic>Social attitudes</topic><topic>Social interaction</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Formby, Eleanor</creatorcontrib><collection>Sage Journals GOLD Open Access 2024</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Sociological research online</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Formby, Eleanor</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>LGBT ‘Communities’ and the (Self-)regulation and Shaping of Intimacy</atitle><jtitle>Sociological research online</jtitle><date>2022-03</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>8</spage><epage>26</epage><pages>8-26</pages><issn>1360-7804</issn><eissn>1360-7804</eissn><abstract>This article draws on UK research with over 600 lesbian, gay, bisexual, and trans (LGBT+) people, funded by the Arts and Humanities Research Council (grant AH/J011894/1), which explored understandings and experiences of LGBT ‘community’. I examine the ways in which intimacy is regulated and shaped by and within social interaction, which was apparent in three main ways. First, the research identified how for some people the very concept of ‘LGBT community’ was linked to intimacy. Second, there was strong evidence to suggest that some LGBT+ people self-regulate their practices of intimacy (such as holding hands or kissing in public) so as not to be recognised as enacting a same-gender relationship. This was understood as a form of self-protection or hate crime prevention, though degrees of habit and professed concern for other people’s feelings were also contributing factors. Third, experiences of intimate relations were shaped by intersectional dynamics, particularly relating to various forms of discrimination, including ageism, biphobia, classism, (dis)ableism, racism, and transphobia from and among LGBT+ people. Whilst LGBT ‘communities’ were thought to enable opportunities to seek sexual and/or intimate encounters, this is not without its complexities. Although there have been improvements in relation to legislation and wider social attitudes, there is, for some, persistent apprehension and self-regulation which, whether necessary or not, are significant. LGBT+ people’s experiences thus suggest that intimacy can be shaped by multiple inequalities both within and without LGBT ‘communities’.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/1360780420974031</doi><tpages>19</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4137-6592</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1360-7804 |
ispartof | Sociological research online, 2022-03, Vol.27 (1), p.8-26 |
issn | 1360-7804 1360-7804 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2640529917 |
source | PAIS Index; Sociological Abstracts; SAGE Complete A-Z List |
subjects | Age discrimination Anxiety Bisexuality Classism Community Crime prevention Discrimination Gender relations Hate crimes Humanities Inequality Intersectionality Intimacy Kissing Legislation Lesbianism LGBTQ people Racism Regulation Self control Self regulation Selfprotection Social attitudes Social interaction |
title | LGBT ‘Communities’ and the (Self-)regulation and Shaping of Intimacy |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T18%3A50%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=LGBT%20%E2%80%98Communities%E2%80%99%20and%20the%20(Self-)regulation%20and%20Shaping%20of%20Intimacy&rft.jtitle=Sociological%20research%20online&rft.au=Formby,%20Eleanor&rft.date=2022-03&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=8&rft.epage=26&rft.pages=8-26&rft.issn=1360-7804&rft.eissn=1360-7804&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/1360780420974031&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2640529917%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2640529917&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_1360780420974031&rfr_iscdi=true |