Attending to Task Demands: Systematic Observation of Parent Directives and Guidance in Varying Situational Contexts

Background Parenting strategies such as communicating clear expectations, providing calm directions, and teaching specific skills can strengthen young children’s social-emotional development. Parenting programs for children with disruptive behavior often emphasize gaining compliance via effective di...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Child & youth care forum 2022-04, Vol.51 (2), p.421-437
Hauptverfasser: Rusby, Julie C., Prinz, Ronald J., Metzler, Carol W., Crowley, Ryann, Sanders, Matthew R.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 437
container_issue 2
container_start_page 421
container_title Child & youth care forum
container_volume 51
creator Rusby, Julie C.
Prinz, Ronald J.
Metzler, Carol W.
Crowley, Ryann
Sanders, Matthew R.
description Background Parenting strategies such as communicating clear expectations, providing calm directions, and teaching specific skills can strengthen young children’s social-emotional development. Parenting programs for children with disruptive behavior often emphasize gaining compliance via effective directives, and less on how to facilitate child skill acquisition or on effective parenting for differing situations and task demands. Objective We aimed to study how parenting strategies and associated child behavior vary by situational contexts. Specifically, we focused on the differential use of directives and guidance during different tasks. Method This observation study utilized a microsocial coding system, the Parent–Child Play Task Observation System (PCPTOS), to closely examine parent and child interactions in multiple analogue task situations. The study drew on pre-intervention data for 224 parent–child dyads who participated in a parenting-focused intervention trial for children ages 3–7 who presented elevated levels of disruptive behaviors. Results Interrater reliabilities were very good to excellent. Parents used directives more frequently during the clean-up task and guidance more frequently during the teaching task compared to the other tasks. Associations of parent use of directives and guidance with child behavior and affect differed by task. Observed parent directives were associated with child disruptive behavior during each task, whereas parent guidance was negatively associated with child disruptive behavior and positively associated with child positive affect during the teaching task. Conclusions Parenting strategies that are well matched to the situational context and proactively consider task demands are more likely to facilitate children’s social-emotional development.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10566-021-09637-x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2639124348</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1329949</ericid><sourcerecordid>2639124348</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c341t-d6e6aaa290b481b5cd01e900e7e2705a7ac47d4914d586f6dcbd2ac0fb1e55043</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kElLBDEQhRtRcP0DghDw3FrZuifeZNwRRnC5hnRSLXFJa5KRmX9vtEVvnurBq-9V8apql8IBBWgPEwXZNDUwWoNqeFsvVqoNKltec07VatEgeU0nCtarzZSeAEC1TG5U6ThnDM6HR5IHcmfSMznBVxNcOiK3y5SLzt6SWZcwfhQ5BDL05MZEDJmc-Ig2-w9MpBDkfO6dCRaJD-TBxOVX6K3P82_MvJDpEDIuctqu1nrzknDnZ25V92end9OL-np2fjk9vq4tFzTXrsHGGMMUdGJCO2kdUFQA2CJrQZrWWNE6oahwctL0jbOdY8ZC31GUEgTfqvbH3Lc4vM8xZf00zGP5JGnWcEWZ4GJStti4ZeOQUsRev0X_Wt7XFPRXuXosV5dy9Xe5elGgvRHC6O0vcHpFOVNKqOLz0U_FC48Y_07_k_oJcKOIdw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2639124348</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Attending to Task Demands: Systematic Observation of Parent Directives and Guidance in Varying Situational Contexts</title><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>SpringerNature Complete Journals</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>EBSCOhost Education Source</source><creator>Rusby, Julie C. ; Prinz, Ronald J. ; Metzler, Carol W. ; Crowley, Ryann ; Sanders, Matthew R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Rusby, Julie C. ; Prinz, Ronald J. ; Metzler, Carol W. ; Crowley, Ryann ; Sanders, Matthew R.</creatorcontrib><description>Background Parenting strategies such as communicating clear expectations, providing calm directions, and teaching specific skills can strengthen young children’s social-emotional development. Parenting programs for children with disruptive behavior often emphasize gaining compliance via effective directives, and less on how to facilitate child skill acquisition or on effective parenting for differing situations and task demands. Objective We aimed to study how parenting strategies and associated child behavior vary by situational contexts. Specifically, we focused on the differential use of directives and guidance during different tasks. Method This observation study utilized a microsocial coding system, the Parent–Child Play Task Observation System (PCPTOS), to closely examine parent and child interactions in multiple analogue task situations. The study drew on pre-intervention data for 224 parent–child dyads who participated in a parenting-focused intervention trial for children ages 3–7 who presented elevated levels of disruptive behaviors. Results Interrater reliabilities were very good to excellent. Parents used directives more frequently during the clean-up task and guidance more frequently during the teaching task compared to the other tasks. Associations of parent use of directives and guidance with child behavior and affect differed by task. Observed parent directives were associated with child disruptive behavior during each task, whereas parent guidance was negatively associated with child disruptive behavior and positively associated with child positive affect during the teaching task. Conclusions Parenting strategies that are well matched to the situational context and proactively consider task demands are more likely to facilitate children’s social-emotional development.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1053-1890</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-3319</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10566-021-09637-x</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Behavior ; Behavior Problems ; Behavioral Science and Psychology ; Child and School Psychology ; Child Behavior ; Child Development ; Child discipline ; Child Rearing ; Children ; Children &amp; youth ; Coding ; Correlation ; Disruptive behaviour ; Emotional development ; Emotions ; Guidance ; Interrater Reliability ; Intervention ; Observation ; Original Paper ; Outcomes of Education ; Parent Attitudes ; Parent Child Relationship ; Parent Education ; Parenthood education ; Parenting Skills ; Parenting Styles ; Parents ; Parents &amp; parenting ; Positive emotions ; Preschool Children ; Psychology ; Skill Development ; Social development ; Social Emotional Learning ; Social programs ; Strategies ; Task Analysis ; Teaching ; Young Children</subject><ispartof>Child &amp; youth care forum, 2022-04, Vol.51 (2), p.421-437</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2021</rights><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2021.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c341t-d6e6aaa290b481b5cd01e900e7e2705a7ac47d4914d586f6dcbd2ac0fb1e55043</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c341t-d6e6aaa290b481b5cd01e900e7e2705a7ac47d4914d586f6dcbd2ac0fb1e55043</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4514-0552</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10566-021-09637-x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10566-021-09637-x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,12846,27344,27924,27925,30999,33774,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1329949$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rusby, Julie C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prinz, Ronald J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Metzler, Carol W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crowley, Ryann</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sanders, Matthew R.</creatorcontrib><title>Attending to Task Demands: Systematic Observation of Parent Directives and Guidance in Varying Situational Contexts</title><title>Child &amp; youth care forum</title><addtitle>Child Youth Care Forum</addtitle><description>Background Parenting strategies such as communicating clear expectations, providing calm directions, and teaching specific skills can strengthen young children’s social-emotional development. Parenting programs for children with disruptive behavior often emphasize gaining compliance via effective directives, and less on how to facilitate child skill acquisition or on effective parenting for differing situations and task demands. Objective We aimed to study how parenting strategies and associated child behavior vary by situational contexts. Specifically, we focused on the differential use of directives and guidance during different tasks. Method This observation study utilized a microsocial coding system, the Parent–Child Play Task Observation System (PCPTOS), to closely examine parent and child interactions in multiple analogue task situations. The study drew on pre-intervention data for 224 parent–child dyads who participated in a parenting-focused intervention trial for children ages 3–7 who presented elevated levels of disruptive behaviors. Results Interrater reliabilities were very good to excellent. Parents used directives more frequently during the clean-up task and guidance more frequently during the teaching task compared to the other tasks. Associations of parent use of directives and guidance with child behavior and affect differed by task. Observed parent directives were associated with child disruptive behavior during each task, whereas parent guidance was negatively associated with child disruptive behavior and positively associated with child positive affect during the teaching task. Conclusions Parenting strategies that are well matched to the situational context and proactively consider task demands are more likely to facilitate children’s social-emotional development.</description><subject>Behavior</subject><subject>Behavior Problems</subject><subject>Behavioral Science and Psychology</subject><subject>Child and School Psychology</subject><subject>Child Behavior</subject><subject>Child Development</subject><subject>Child discipline</subject><subject>Child Rearing</subject><subject>Children</subject><subject>Children &amp; youth</subject><subject>Coding</subject><subject>Correlation</subject><subject>Disruptive behaviour</subject><subject>Emotional development</subject><subject>Emotions</subject><subject>Guidance</subject><subject>Interrater Reliability</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>Observation</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Outcomes of Education</subject><subject>Parent Attitudes</subject><subject>Parent Child Relationship</subject><subject>Parent Education</subject><subject>Parenthood education</subject><subject>Parenting Skills</subject><subject>Parenting Styles</subject><subject>Parents</subject><subject>Parents &amp; parenting</subject><subject>Positive emotions</subject><subject>Preschool Children</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Skill Development</subject><subject>Social development</subject><subject>Social Emotional Learning</subject><subject>Social programs</subject><subject>Strategies</subject><subject>Task Analysis</subject><subject>Teaching</subject><subject>Young Children</subject><issn>1053-1890</issn><issn>1573-3319</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kElLBDEQhRtRcP0DghDw3FrZuifeZNwRRnC5hnRSLXFJa5KRmX9vtEVvnurBq-9V8apql8IBBWgPEwXZNDUwWoNqeFsvVqoNKltec07VatEgeU0nCtarzZSeAEC1TG5U6ThnDM6HR5IHcmfSMznBVxNcOiK3y5SLzt6SWZcwfhQ5BDL05MZEDJmc-Ig2-w9MpBDkfO6dCRaJD-TBxOVX6K3P82_MvJDpEDIuctqu1nrzknDnZ25V92end9OL-np2fjk9vq4tFzTXrsHGGMMUdGJCO2kdUFQA2CJrQZrWWNE6oahwctL0jbOdY8ZC31GUEgTfqvbH3Lc4vM8xZf00zGP5JGnWcEWZ4GJStti4ZeOQUsRev0X_Wt7XFPRXuXosV5dy9Xe5elGgvRHC6O0vcHpFOVNKqOLz0U_FC48Y_07_k_oJcKOIdw</recordid><startdate>20220401</startdate><enddate>20220401</enddate><creator>Rusby, Julie C.</creator><creator>Prinz, Ronald J.</creator><creator>Metzler, Carol W.</creator><creator>Crowley, Ryann</creator><creator>Sanders, Matthew R.</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7U3</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4514-0552</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220401</creationdate><title>Attending to Task Demands: Systematic Observation of Parent Directives and Guidance in Varying Situational Contexts</title><author>Rusby, Julie C. ; Prinz, Ronald J. ; Metzler, Carol W. ; Crowley, Ryann ; Sanders, Matthew R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c341t-d6e6aaa290b481b5cd01e900e7e2705a7ac47d4914d586f6dcbd2ac0fb1e55043</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Behavior</topic><topic>Behavior Problems</topic><topic>Behavioral Science and Psychology</topic><topic>Child and School Psychology</topic><topic>Child Behavior</topic><topic>Child Development</topic><topic>Child discipline</topic><topic>Child Rearing</topic><topic>Children</topic><topic>Children &amp; youth</topic><topic>Coding</topic><topic>Correlation</topic><topic>Disruptive behaviour</topic><topic>Emotional development</topic><topic>Emotions</topic><topic>Guidance</topic><topic>Interrater Reliability</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>Observation</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Outcomes of Education</topic><topic>Parent Attitudes</topic><topic>Parent Child Relationship</topic><topic>Parent Education</topic><topic>Parenthood education</topic><topic>Parenting Skills</topic><topic>Parenting Styles</topic><topic>Parents</topic><topic>Parents &amp; parenting</topic><topic>Positive emotions</topic><topic>Preschool Children</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Skill Development</topic><topic>Social development</topic><topic>Social Emotional Learning</topic><topic>Social programs</topic><topic>Strategies</topic><topic>Task Analysis</topic><topic>Teaching</topic><topic>Young Children</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rusby, Julie C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prinz, Ronald J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Metzler, Carol W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crowley, Ryann</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sanders, Matthew R.</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Social Services Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Child &amp; youth care forum</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rusby, Julie C.</au><au>Prinz, Ronald J.</au><au>Metzler, Carol W.</au><au>Crowley, Ryann</au><au>Sanders, Matthew R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1329949</ericid><atitle>Attending to Task Demands: Systematic Observation of Parent Directives and Guidance in Varying Situational Contexts</atitle><jtitle>Child &amp; youth care forum</jtitle><stitle>Child Youth Care Forum</stitle><date>2022-04-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>51</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>421</spage><epage>437</epage><pages>421-437</pages><issn>1053-1890</issn><eissn>1573-3319</eissn><abstract>Background Parenting strategies such as communicating clear expectations, providing calm directions, and teaching specific skills can strengthen young children’s social-emotional development. Parenting programs for children with disruptive behavior often emphasize gaining compliance via effective directives, and less on how to facilitate child skill acquisition or on effective parenting for differing situations and task demands. Objective We aimed to study how parenting strategies and associated child behavior vary by situational contexts. Specifically, we focused on the differential use of directives and guidance during different tasks. Method This observation study utilized a microsocial coding system, the Parent–Child Play Task Observation System (PCPTOS), to closely examine parent and child interactions in multiple analogue task situations. The study drew on pre-intervention data for 224 parent–child dyads who participated in a parenting-focused intervention trial for children ages 3–7 who presented elevated levels of disruptive behaviors. Results Interrater reliabilities were very good to excellent. Parents used directives more frequently during the clean-up task and guidance more frequently during the teaching task compared to the other tasks. Associations of parent use of directives and guidance with child behavior and affect differed by task. Observed parent directives were associated with child disruptive behavior during each task, whereas parent guidance was negatively associated with child disruptive behavior and positively associated with child positive affect during the teaching task. Conclusions Parenting strategies that are well matched to the situational context and proactively consider task demands are more likely to facilitate children’s social-emotional development.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><doi>10.1007/s10566-021-09637-x</doi><tpages>17</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4514-0552</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1053-1890
ispartof Child & youth care forum, 2022-04, Vol.51 (2), p.421-437
issn 1053-1890
1573-3319
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2639124348
source Sociological Abstracts; SpringerNature Complete Journals; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); EBSCOhost Education Source
subjects Behavior
Behavior Problems
Behavioral Science and Psychology
Child and School Psychology
Child Behavior
Child Development
Child discipline
Child Rearing
Children
Children & youth
Coding
Correlation
Disruptive behaviour
Emotional development
Emotions
Guidance
Interrater Reliability
Intervention
Observation
Original Paper
Outcomes of Education
Parent Attitudes
Parent Child Relationship
Parent Education
Parenthood education
Parenting Skills
Parenting Styles
Parents
Parents & parenting
Positive emotions
Preschool Children
Psychology
Skill Development
Social development
Social Emotional Learning
Social programs
Strategies
Task Analysis
Teaching
Young Children
title Attending to Task Demands: Systematic Observation of Parent Directives and Guidance in Varying Situational Contexts
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T09%3A26%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Attending%20to%20Task%20Demands:%20Systematic%20Observation%20of%20Parent%20Directives%20and%20Guidance%20in%20Varying%20Situational%20Contexts&rft.jtitle=Child%20&%20youth%20care%20forum&rft.au=Rusby,%20Julie%20C.&rft.date=2022-04-01&rft.volume=51&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=421&rft.epage=437&rft.pages=421-437&rft.issn=1053-1890&rft.eissn=1573-3319&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10566-021-09637-x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2639124348%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2639124348&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1329949&rfr_iscdi=true