Attending to Task Demands: Systematic Observation of Parent Directives and Guidance in Varying Situational Contexts
Background Parenting strategies such as communicating clear expectations, providing calm directions, and teaching specific skills can strengthen young children’s social-emotional development. Parenting programs for children with disruptive behavior often emphasize gaining compliance via effective di...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Child & youth care forum 2022-04, Vol.51 (2), p.421-437 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 437 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 421 |
container_title | Child & youth care forum |
container_volume | 51 |
creator | Rusby, Julie C. Prinz, Ronald J. Metzler, Carol W. Crowley, Ryann Sanders, Matthew R. |
description | Background
Parenting strategies such as communicating clear expectations, providing calm directions, and teaching specific skills can strengthen young children’s social-emotional development. Parenting programs for children with disruptive behavior often emphasize gaining compliance via effective directives, and less on how to facilitate child skill acquisition or on effective parenting for differing situations and task demands.
Objective
We aimed to study how parenting strategies and associated child behavior vary by situational contexts. Specifically, we focused on the differential use of directives and guidance during different tasks.
Method
This observation study utilized a microsocial coding system, the Parent–Child Play Task Observation System (PCPTOS), to closely examine parent and child interactions in multiple analogue task situations. The study drew on pre-intervention data for 224 parent–child dyads who participated in a parenting-focused intervention trial for children ages 3–7 who presented elevated levels of disruptive behaviors.
Results
Interrater reliabilities were very good to excellent. Parents used directives more frequently during the clean-up task and guidance more frequently during the teaching task compared to the other tasks. Associations of parent use of directives and guidance with child behavior and affect differed by task. Observed parent directives were associated with child disruptive behavior during each task, whereas parent guidance was negatively associated with child disruptive behavior and positively associated with child positive affect during the teaching task.
Conclusions
Parenting strategies that are well matched to the situational context and proactively consider task demands are more likely to facilitate children’s social-emotional development. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10566-021-09637-x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2639124348</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1329949</ericid><sourcerecordid>2639124348</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c341t-d6e6aaa290b481b5cd01e900e7e2705a7ac47d4914d586f6dcbd2ac0fb1e55043</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kElLBDEQhRtRcP0DghDw3FrZuifeZNwRRnC5hnRSLXFJa5KRmX9vtEVvnurBq-9V8apql8IBBWgPEwXZNDUwWoNqeFsvVqoNKltec07VatEgeU0nCtarzZSeAEC1TG5U6ThnDM6HR5IHcmfSMznBVxNcOiK3y5SLzt6SWZcwfhQ5BDL05MZEDJmc-Ig2-w9MpBDkfO6dCRaJD-TBxOVX6K3P82_MvJDpEDIuctqu1nrzknDnZ25V92end9OL-np2fjk9vq4tFzTXrsHGGMMUdGJCO2kdUFQA2CJrQZrWWNE6oahwctL0jbOdY8ZC31GUEgTfqvbH3Lc4vM8xZf00zGP5JGnWcEWZ4GJStti4ZeOQUsRev0X_Wt7XFPRXuXosV5dy9Xe5elGgvRHC6O0vcHpFOVNKqOLz0U_FC48Y_07_k_oJcKOIdw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2639124348</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Attending to Task Demands: Systematic Observation of Parent Directives and Guidance in Varying Situational Contexts</title><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>SpringerNature Complete Journals</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>EBSCOhost Education Source</source><creator>Rusby, Julie C. ; Prinz, Ronald J. ; Metzler, Carol W. ; Crowley, Ryann ; Sanders, Matthew R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Rusby, Julie C. ; Prinz, Ronald J. ; Metzler, Carol W. ; Crowley, Ryann ; Sanders, Matthew R.</creatorcontrib><description>Background
Parenting strategies such as communicating clear expectations, providing calm directions, and teaching specific skills can strengthen young children’s social-emotional development. Parenting programs for children with disruptive behavior often emphasize gaining compliance via effective directives, and less on how to facilitate child skill acquisition or on effective parenting for differing situations and task demands.
Objective
We aimed to study how parenting strategies and associated child behavior vary by situational contexts. Specifically, we focused on the differential use of directives and guidance during different tasks.
Method
This observation study utilized a microsocial coding system, the Parent–Child Play Task Observation System (PCPTOS), to closely examine parent and child interactions in multiple analogue task situations. The study drew on pre-intervention data for 224 parent–child dyads who participated in a parenting-focused intervention trial for children ages 3–7 who presented elevated levels of disruptive behaviors.
Results
Interrater reliabilities were very good to excellent. Parents used directives more frequently during the clean-up task and guidance more frequently during the teaching task compared to the other tasks. Associations of parent use of directives and guidance with child behavior and affect differed by task. Observed parent directives were associated with child disruptive behavior during each task, whereas parent guidance was negatively associated with child disruptive behavior and positively associated with child positive affect during the teaching task.
Conclusions
Parenting strategies that are well matched to the situational context and proactively consider task demands are more likely to facilitate children’s social-emotional development.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1053-1890</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-3319</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10566-021-09637-x</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Behavior ; Behavior Problems ; Behavioral Science and Psychology ; Child and School Psychology ; Child Behavior ; Child Development ; Child discipline ; Child Rearing ; Children ; Children & youth ; Coding ; Correlation ; Disruptive behaviour ; Emotional development ; Emotions ; Guidance ; Interrater Reliability ; Intervention ; Observation ; Original Paper ; Outcomes of Education ; Parent Attitudes ; Parent Child Relationship ; Parent Education ; Parenthood education ; Parenting Skills ; Parenting Styles ; Parents ; Parents & parenting ; Positive emotions ; Preschool Children ; Psychology ; Skill Development ; Social development ; Social Emotional Learning ; Social programs ; Strategies ; Task Analysis ; Teaching ; Young Children</subject><ispartof>Child & youth care forum, 2022-04, Vol.51 (2), p.421-437</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2021</rights><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2021.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c341t-d6e6aaa290b481b5cd01e900e7e2705a7ac47d4914d586f6dcbd2ac0fb1e55043</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c341t-d6e6aaa290b481b5cd01e900e7e2705a7ac47d4914d586f6dcbd2ac0fb1e55043</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4514-0552</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10566-021-09637-x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10566-021-09637-x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,12846,27344,27924,27925,30999,33774,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1329949$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rusby, Julie C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prinz, Ronald J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Metzler, Carol W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crowley, Ryann</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sanders, Matthew R.</creatorcontrib><title>Attending to Task Demands: Systematic Observation of Parent Directives and Guidance in Varying Situational Contexts</title><title>Child & youth care forum</title><addtitle>Child Youth Care Forum</addtitle><description>Background
Parenting strategies such as communicating clear expectations, providing calm directions, and teaching specific skills can strengthen young children’s social-emotional development. Parenting programs for children with disruptive behavior often emphasize gaining compliance via effective directives, and less on how to facilitate child skill acquisition or on effective parenting for differing situations and task demands.
Objective
We aimed to study how parenting strategies and associated child behavior vary by situational contexts. Specifically, we focused on the differential use of directives and guidance during different tasks.
Method
This observation study utilized a microsocial coding system, the Parent–Child Play Task Observation System (PCPTOS), to closely examine parent and child interactions in multiple analogue task situations. The study drew on pre-intervention data for 224 parent–child dyads who participated in a parenting-focused intervention trial for children ages 3–7 who presented elevated levels of disruptive behaviors.
Results
Interrater reliabilities were very good to excellent. Parents used directives more frequently during the clean-up task and guidance more frequently during the teaching task compared to the other tasks. Associations of parent use of directives and guidance with child behavior and affect differed by task. Observed parent directives were associated with child disruptive behavior during each task, whereas parent guidance was negatively associated with child disruptive behavior and positively associated with child positive affect during the teaching task.
Conclusions
Parenting strategies that are well matched to the situational context and proactively consider task demands are more likely to facilitate children’s social-emotional development.</description><subject>Behavior</subject><subject>Behavior Problems</subject><subject>Behavioral Science and Psychology</subject><subject>Child and School Psychology</subject><subject>Child Behavior</subject><subject>Child Development</subject><subject>Child discipline</subject><subject>Child Rearing</subject><subject>Children</subject><subject>Children & youth</subject><subject>Coding</subject><subject>Correlation</subject><subject>Disruptive behaviour</subject><subject>Emotional development</subject><subject>Emotions</subject><subject>Guidance</subject><subject>Interrater Reliability</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>Observation</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Outcomes of Education</subject><subject>Parent Attitudes</subject><subject>Parent Child Relationship</subject><subject>Parent Education</subject><subject>Parenthood education</subject><subject>Parenting Skills</subject><subject>Parenting Styles</subject><subject>Parents</subject><subject>Parents & parenting</subject><subject>Positive emotions</subject><subject>Preschool Children</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Skill Development</subject><subject>Social development</subject><subject>Social Emotional Learning</subject><subject>Social programs</subject><subject>Strategies</subject><subject>Task Analysis</subject><subject>Teaching</subject><subject>Young Children</subject><issn>1053-1890</issn><issn>1573-3319</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kElLBDEQhRtRcP0DghDw3FrZuifeZNwRRnC5hnRSLXFJa5KRmX9vtEVvnurBq-9V8apql8IBBWgPEwXZNDUwWoNqeFsvVqoNKltec07VatEgeU0nCtarzZSeAEC1TG5U6ThnDM6HR5IHcmfSMznBVxNcOiK3y5SLzt6SWZcwfhQ5BDL05MZEDJmc-Ig2-w9MpBDkfO6dCRaJD-TBxOVX6K3P82_MvJDpEDIuctqu1nrzknDnZ25V92end9OL-np2fjk9vq4tFzTXrsHGGMMUdGJCO2kdUFQA2CJrQZrWWNE6oahwctL0jbOdY8ZC31GUEgTfqvbH3Lc4vM8xZf00zGP5JGnWcEWZ4GJStti4ZeOQUsRev0X_Wt7XFPRXuXosV5dy9Xe5elGgvRHC6O0vcHpFOVNKqOLz0U_FC48Y_07_k_oJcKOIdw</recordid><startdate>20220401</startdate><enddate>20220401</enddate><creator>Rusby, Julie C.</creator><creator>Prinz, Ronald J.</creator><creator>Metzler, Carol W.</creator><creator>Crowley, Ryann</creator><creator>Sanders, Matthew R.</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7U3</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4514-0552</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220401</creationdate><title>Attending to Task Demands: Systematic Observation of Parent Directives and Guidance in Varying Situational Contexts</title><author>Rusby, Julie C. ; Prinz, Ronald J. ; Metzler, Carol W. ; Crowley, Ryann ; Sanders, Matthew R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c341t-d6e6aaa290b481b5cd01e900e7e2705a7ac47d4914d586f6dcbd2ac0fb1e55043</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Behavior</topic><topic>Behavior Problems</topic><topic>Behavioral Science and Psychology</topic><topic>Child and School Psychology</topic><topic>Child Behavior</topic><topic>Child Development</topic><topic>Child discipline</topic><topic>Child Rearing</topic><topic>Children</topic><topic>Children & youth</topic><topic>Coding</topic><topic>Correlation</topic><topic>Disruptive behaviour</topic><topic>Emotional development</topic><topic>Emotions</topic><topic>Guidance</topic><topic>Interrater Reliability</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>Observation</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Outcomes of Education</topic><topic>Parent Attitudes</topic><topic>Parent Child Relationship</topic><topic>Parent Education</topic><topic>Parenthood education</topic><topic>Parenting Skills</topic><topic>Parenting Styles</topic><topic>Parents</topic><topic>Parents & parenting</topic><topic>Positive emotions</topic><topic>Preschool Children</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Skill Development</topic><topic>Social development</topic><topic>Social Emotional Learning</topic><topic>Social programs</topic><topic>Strategies</topic><topic>Task Analysis</topic><topic>Teaching</topic><topic>Young Children</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rusby, Julie C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prinz, Ronald J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Metzler, Carol W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crowley, Ryann</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sanders, Matthew R.</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Social Services Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Child & youth care forum</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rusby, Julie C.</au><au>Prinz, Ronald J.</au><au>Metzler, Carol W.</au><au>Crowley, Ryann</au><au>Sanders, Matthew R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1329949</ericid><atitle>Attending to Task Demands: Systematic Observation of Parent Directives and Guidance in Varying Situational Contexts</atitle><jtitle>Child & youth care forum</jtitle><stitle>Child Youth Care Forum</stitle><date>2022-04-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>51</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>421</spage><epage>437</epage><pages>421-437</pages><issn>1053-1890</issn><eissn>1573-3319</eissn><abstract>Background
Parenting strategies such as communicating clear expectations, providing calm directions, and teaching specific skills can strengthen young children’s social-emotional development. Parenting programs for children with disruptive behavior often emphasize gaining compliance via effective directives, and less on how to facilitate child skill acquisition or on effective parenting for differing situations and task demands.
Objective
We aimed to study how parenting strategies and associated child behavior vary by situational contexts. Specifically, we focused on the differential use of directives and guidance during different tasks.
Method
This observation study utilized a microsocial coding system, the Parent–Child Play Task Observation System (PCPTOS), to closely examine parent and child interactions in multiple analogue task situations. The study drew on pre-intervention data for 224 parent–child dyads who participated in a parenting-focused intervention trial for children ages 3–7 who presented elevated levels of disruptive behaviors.
Results
Interrater reliabilities were very good to excellent. Parents used directives more frequently during the clean-up task and guidance more frequently during the teaching task compared to the other tasks. Associations of parent use of directives and guidance with child behavior and affect differed by task. Observed parent directives were associated with child disruptive behavior during each task, whereas parent guidance was negatively associated with child disruptive behavior and positively associated with child positive affect during the teaching task.
Conclusions
Parenting strategies that are well matched to the situational context and proactively consider task demands are more likely to facilitate children’s social-emotional development.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><doi>10.1007/s10566-021-09637-x</doi><tpages>17</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4514-0552</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1053-1890 |
ispartof | Child & youth care forum, 2022-04, Vol.51 (2), p.421-437 |
issn | 1053-1890 1573-3319 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2639124348 |
source | Sociological Abstracts; SpringerNature Complete Journals; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); EBSCOhost Education Source |
subjects | Behavior Behavior Problems Behavioral Science and Psychology Child and School Psychology Child Behavior Child Development Child discipline Child Rearing Children Children & youth Coding Correlation Disruptive behaviour Emotional development Emotions Guidance Interrater Reliability Intervention Observation Original Paper Outcomes of Education Parent Attitudes Parent Child Relationship Parent Education Parenthood education Parenting Skills Parenting Styles Parents Parents & parenting Positive emotions Preschool Children Psychology Skill Development Social development Social Emotional Learning Social programs Strategies Task Analysis Teaching Young Children |
title | Attending to Task Demands: Systematic Observation of Parent Directives and Guidance in Varying Situational Contexts |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T09%3A26%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Attending%20to%20Task%20Demands:%20Systematic%20Observation%20of%20Parent%20Directives%20and%20Guidance%20in%20Varying%20Situational%20Contexts&rft.jtitle=Child%20&%20youth%20care%20forum&rft.au=Rusby,%20Julie%20C.&rft.date=2022-04-01&rft.volume=51&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=421&rft.epage=437&rft.pages=421-437&rft.issn=1053-1890&rft.eissn=1573-3319&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10566-021-09637-x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2639124348%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2639124348&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1329949&rfr_iscdi=true |