The Framework for the Assessment of Children in Need and Their Families and Signs of Safety: Competing or Complementary Frameworks?
Abstract Signs of Safety (SoS) is a comprehensive assessment framework (AF) used in some form in most English children’s service departments as well as in many other countries. The Framework for the Assessment of Children in Need and their Families (AF) was introduced nearly twenty years ago to addr...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The British journal of social work 2021-10, Vol.51 (7), p.2571-2589 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 2589 |
---|---|
container_issue | 7 |
container_start_page | 2571 |
container_title | The British journal of social work |
container_volume | 51 |
creator | Baginsky, Mary Manthorpe, Jill Moriarty, Jo |
description | Abstract
Signs of Safety (SoS) is a comprehensive assessment framework (AF) used in some form in most English children’s service departments as well as in many other countries. The Framework for the Assessment of Children in Need and their Families (AF) was introduced nearly twenty years ago to address identified failures to adopt a holistic approach to assessments of families where there were concerns that children were in need of protection or support. The AF is not only a statutory requirement in England but it has influenced the development of approaches to assessment globally. An evaluation of SoS in pilot local authorities in England provided opportunities to examine the extent to which the two frameworks were being used together. Findings from interviews, case record analysis and a survey indicate that while recording processes were aligned with the AF, it was not central to many of the assessments conducted and it proved difficult to detect its influence on their content. It appears timely to examine the extent to which the AF is used across England, to assess its relevance to current practice and the extent to which frameworks such as SoS have supplemented or replaced it. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1093/bjsw/bcaa058 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2638556876</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/bjsw/bcaa058</oup_id><sourcerecordid>2638556876</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c333t-7d06b6b7f7b684588d250f2c76d9923535c00cdc2280c576459640a6f80999163</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMFLwzAUxoMoOKc3_4CABy_WvTZNmnoRKU6FoYdN8FbSNNky26YmHWNn_3FbN_Dm6fEev-_7Hh9ClyHchpCSSbH220khhQDKj9AojBkPIkY-jtEIIKYBCSE6RWferwEgoRCO0PdipfDUiVptrfvE2jrc9ZcH75X3tWo6bDXOVqYqnWqwafCrUiUWTYl7oXF4KmpTGeV_T3OzbPwgmAutut0dzmzdqs40S9z7DkulBk_hdn-Z_v4cnWhReXVxmGP0Pn1cZM_B7O3pJXuYBZIQ0gVJCaxgRaKTgvGYcl5GFHQkE1amaUQooRJAljKKOEiasJimLAbBNIc0TUNGxuhq79s6-7VRvsvXduOaPjLvW-KUMp4M1M2eks5675TOW2fq_uU8hHyoOR9qzg819_j1Hreb9n_yBxHHfsw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2638556876</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Framework for the Assessment of Children in Need and Their Families and Signs of Safety: Competing or Complementary Frameworks?</title><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><creator>Baginsky, Mary ; Manthorpe, Jill ; Moriarty, Jo</creator><creatorcontrib>Baginsky, Mary ; Manthorpe, Jill ; Moriarty, Jo</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract
Signs of Safety (SoS) is a comprehensive assessment framework (AF) used in some form in most English children’s service departments as well as in many other countries. The Framework for the Assessment of Children in Need and their Families (AF) was introduced nearly twenty years ago to address identified failures to adopt a holistic approach to assessments of families where there were concerns that children were in need of protection or support. The AF is not only a statutory requirement in England but it has influenced the development of approaches to assessment globally. An evaluation of SoS in pilot local authorities in England provided opportunities to examine the extent to which the two frameworks were being used together. Findings from interviews, case record analysis and a survey indicate that while recording processes were aligned with the AF, it was not central to many of the assessments conducted and it proved difficult to detect its influence on their content. It appears timely to examine the extent to which the AF is used across England, to assess its relevance to current practice and the extent to which frameworks such as SoS have supplemented or replaced it.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0045-3102</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-263X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/bjsw/bcaa058</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Case records ; Children ; Evaluation ; Families & family life ; Holistic approach ; Local authorities ; Safety</subject><ispartof>The British journal of social work, 2021-10, Vol.51 (7), p.2571-2589</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The British Association of Social Workers. 2020</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The British Association of Social Workers.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c333t-7d06b6b7f7b684588d250f2c76d9923535c00cdc2280c576459640a6f80999163</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c333t-7d06b6b7f7b684588d250f2c76d9923535c00cdc2280c576459640a6f80999163</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9006-1410 ; 0000-0002-8763-2363</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1584,27924,27925,30999,33774</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Baginsky, Mary</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Manthorpe, Jill</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moriarty, Jo</creatorcontrib><title>The Framework for the Assessment of Children in Need and Their Families and Signs of Safety: Competing or Complementary Frameworks?</title><title>The British journal of social work</title><description>Abstract
Signs of Safety (SoS) is a comprehensive assessment framework (AF) used in some form in most English children’s service departments as well as in many other countries. The Framework for the Assessment of Children in Need and their Families (AF) was introduced nearly twenty years ago to address identified failures to adopt a holistic approach to assessments of families where there were concerns that children were in need of protection or support. The AF is not only a statutory requirement in England but it has influenced the development of approaches to assessment globally. An evaluation of SoS in pilot local authorities in England provided opportunities to examine the extent to which the two frameworks were being used together. Findings from interviews, case record analysis and a survey indicate that while recording processes were aligned with the AF, it was not central to many of the assessments conducted and it proved difficult to detect its influence on their content. It appears timely to examine the extent to which the AF is used across England, to assess its relevance to current practice and the extent to which frameworks such as SoS have supplemented or replaced it.</description><subject>Case records</subject><subject>Children</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Families & family life</subject><subject>Holistic approach</subject><subject>Local authorities</subject><subject>Safety</subject><issn>0045-3102</issn><issn>1468-263X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>TOX</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kMFLwzAUxoMoOKc3_4CABy_WvTZNmnoRKU6FoYdN8FbSNNky26YmHWNn_3FbN_Dm6fEev-_7Hh9ClyHchpCSSbH220khhQDKj9AojBkPIkY-jtEIIKYBCSE6RWferwEgoRCO0PdipfDUiVptrfvE2jrc9ZcH75X3tWo6bDXOVqYqnWqwafCrUiUWTYl7oXF4KmpTGeV_T3OzbPwgmAutut0dzmzdqs40S9z7DkulBk_hdn-Z_v4cnWhReXVxmGP0Pn1cZM_B7O3pJXuYBZIQ0gVJCaxgRaKTgvGYcl5GFHQkE1amaUQooRJAljKKOEiasJimLAbBNIc0TUNGxuhq79s6-7VRvsvXduOaPjLvW-KUMp4M1M2eks5675TOW2fq_uU8hHyoOR9qzg819_j1Hreb9n_yBxHHfsw</recordid><startdate>20211001</startdate><enddate>20211001</enddate><creator>Baginsky, Mary</creator><creator>Manthorpe, Jill</creator><creator>Moriarty, Jo</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><general>Oxford Publishing Limited (England)</general><scope>TOX</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7U3</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9006-1410</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8763-2363</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20211001</creationdate><title>The Framework for the Assessment of Children in Need and Their Families and Signs of Safety: Competing or Complementary Frameworks?</title><author>Baginsky, Mary ; Manthorpe, Jill ; Moriarty, Jo</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c333t-7d06b6b7f7b684588d250f2c76d9923535c00cdc2280c576459640a6f80999163</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Case records</topic><topic>Children</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Families & family life</topic><topic>Holistic approach</topic><topic>Local authorities</topic><topic>Safety</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Baginsky, Mary</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Manthorpe, Jill</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moriarty, Jo</creatorcontrib><collection>Oxford Journals Open Access Collection</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Social Services Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><jtitle>The British journal of social work</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Baginsky, Mary</au><au>Manthorpe, Jill</au><au>Moriarty, Jo</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Framework for the Assessment of Children in Need and Their Families and Signs of Safety: Competing or Complementary Frameworks?</atitle><jtitle>The British journal of social work</jtitle><date>2021-10-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>51</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>2571</spage><epage>2589</epage><pages>2571-2589</pages><issn>0045-3102</issn><eissn>1468-263X</eissn><abstract>Abstract
Signs of Safety (SoS) is a comprehensive assessment framework (AF) used in some form in most English children’s service departments as well as in many other countries. The Framework for the Assessment of Children in Need and their Families (AF) was introduced nearly twenty years ago to address identified failures to adopt a holistic approach to assessments of families where there were concerns that children were in need of protection or support. The AF is not only a statutory requirement in England but it has influenced the development of approaches to assessment globally. An evaluation of SoS in pilot local authorities in England provided opportunities to examine the extent to which the two frameworks were being used together. Findings from interviews, case record analysis and a survey indicate that while recording processes were aligned with the AF, it was not central to many of the assessments conducted and it proved difficult to detect its influence on their content. It appears timely to examine the extent to which the AF is used across England, to assess its relevance to current practice and the extent to which frameworks such as SoS have supplemented or replaced it.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><doi>10.1093/bjsw/bcaa058</doi><tpages>19</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9006-1410</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8763-2363</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0045-3102 |
ispartof | The British journal of social work, 2021-10, Vol.51 (7), p.2571-2589 |
issn | 0045-3102 1468-263X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2638556876 |
source | Sociological Abstracts; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current) |
subjects | Case records Children Evaluation Families & family life Holistic approach Local authorities Safety |
title | The Framework for the Assessment of Children in Need and Their Families and Signs of Safety: Competing or Complementary Frameworks? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-18T16%3A32%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Framework%20for%20the%20Assessment%20of%20Children%20in%20Need%20and%20Their%20Families%20and%20Signs%20of%20Safety:%20Competing%20or%20Complementary%20Frameworks?&rft.jtitle=The%20British%20journal%20of%20social%20work&rft.au=Baginsky,%20Mary&rft.date=2021-10-01&rft.volume=51&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=2571&rft.epage=2589&rft.pages=2571-2589&rft.issn=0045-3102&rft.eissn=1468-263X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/bjsw/bcaa058&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2638556876%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2638556876&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_oup_id=10.1093/bjsw/bcaa058&rfr_iscdi=true |