What is the contribution of forest-related income to rural livelihood strategies in the Philippines' remaining forested landscapes?

Forest products have become scarce for local communities in the Philippines. After decades of severe deforestation, a net gain in forest area has only been observed in recent years for the first time. This paper seeks to broaden the understanding of forest livelihood relationships at the turning poi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Forest policy and economics 2022-02, Vol.135, p.102658, Article 102658
Hauptverfasser: Wiebe, Pia Christine, Zhunusova, Eliza, Lippe, Melvin, Ferrer Velasco, Rubén, Günter, Sven
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page 102658
container_title Forest policy and economics
container_volume 135
creator Wiebe, Pia Christine
Zhunusova, Eliza
Lippe, Melvin
Ferrer Velasco, Rubén
Günter, Sven
description Forest products have become scarce for local communities in the Philippines. After decades of severe deforestation, a net gain in forest area has only been observed in recent years for the first time. This paper seeks to broaden the understanding of forest livelihood relationships at the turning point of a forest transition trajectory. Based on 993 household surveys from 10 distinct research sites, we use Hierarchical Cluster Analysis to identify six distinct livelihood strategies (LS): remittances-based, livestock-based, crop farming-based, business-oriented, natural resource-based, and wage-based strategies. The highest number of households belongs to the wage-based cluster, which also shows the highest total income. Forest-related incomes only account for small shares of total income for the vast majority of households, although most households collect limited quantities of forest products for domestic use. Nevertheless, one cluster, which includes 12.4% of the sample, generates the largest shares of their income from extractive activities like harvesting forest products and fishing. The households relying most strongly on natural resources in our study sites are also the ones with the lowest total income. Our finding implies that future reforestation policies have to put a special focus on incorporating livelihood benefits for local communities. This should go beyond short-term payments for activities such as tree planting and enable the rural households to derive long-term impacts for human well-being and poverty alleviation. Because most of the forest products reported by our surveyed households were collected for domestic use, they did not contribute much to total household income. This indicates a potential for improving rural income, if forest-product value chains at the smallholder level are improved by future policy interventions. •This study identified six distinct livelihood strategies across research sites in the Philippines.•Households with remittances-based and wage-based livelihood strategies have the highest overall income.•While at the minimum point of a forest transition curve, households continue to collect a variety of forest products.•Fuelwood is the most important forest product collected by households in Philippines’ forested landscapes.•A small cluster of households generates major share of income from forest-related products and fisheries.•The natural resource-based cluster was characterized by low total income and little agricul
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.forpol.2021.102658
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2638079927</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1389934121002641</els_id><sourcerecordid>2638079927</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c380t-97fbd6d6edba26a85c6c9b87a92f20ee2a952ad4671d21f0b70713157b090f9b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LxDAQhoso-PkPPAQ8eOqapNumuSgifoGgB8VjSJPp7izdpCZZwbN_3Kz17GmG4X2fmXmL4pTRGaOsuVjNeh9GP8w45SyPeFO3O8UBawUvBa3pbu6rVpaymrP94jDGFaVMUFYdFN_vS50IRpKWQIx3KWC3Segd8T3JVIipDDDoBJagM34NJHkSNkEPZMBPGHDpvSUxhSxZIMSs-mW9LHHAcUQH8ZwEWGt06BZ_yAwbtLPR6BHi1XGx1-shwslfPSre7m5fbx7Kp-f7x5vrp9JULU2lFH1nG9uA7TRvdFubxsiuFVrynlMArmXNtZ03glnOetoJKljFatFRSXvZVUfF2cQdg__Y5DPUym-CyysVb_IKISUXWTWfVCb4GAP0agy41uFLMaq2cauVmuJW27jVFHe2XU42yB98IgQVDYIzYDGAScp6_B_wA20kjXQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2638079927</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>What is the contribution of forest-related income to rural livelihood strategies in the Philippines' remaining forested landscapes?</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Wiebe, Pia Christine ; Zhunusova, Eliza ; Lippe, Melvin ; Ferrer Velasco, Rubén ; Günter, Sven</creator><creatorcontrib>Wiebe, Pia Christine ; Zhunusova, Eliza ; Lippe, Melvin ; Ferrer Velasco, Rubén ; Günter, Sven</creatorcontrib><description>Forest products have become scarce for local communities in the Philippines. After decades of severe deforestation, a net gain in forest area has only been observed in recent years for the first time. This paper seeks to broaden the understanding of forest livelihood relationships at the turning point of a forest transition trajectory. Based on 993 household surveys from 10 distinct research sites, we use Hierarchical Cluster Analysis to identify six distinct livelihood strategies (LS): remittances-based, livestock-based, crop farming-based, business-oriented, natural resource-based, and wage-based strategies. The highest number of households belongs to the wage-based cluster, which also shows the highest total income. Forest-related incomes only account for small shares of total income for the vast majority of households, although most households collect limited quantities of forest products for domestic use. Nevertheless, one cluster, which includes 12.4% of the sample, generates the largest shares of their income from extractive activities like harvesting forest products and fishing. The households relying most strongly on natural resources in our study sites are also the ones with the lowest total income. Our finding implies that future reforestation policies have to put a special focus on incorporating livelihood benefits for local communities. This should go beyond short-term payments for activities such as tree planting and enable the rural households to derive long-term impacts for human well-being and poverty alleviation. Because most of the forest products reported by our surveyed households were collected for domestic use, they did not contribute much to total household income. This indicates a potential for improving rural income, if forest-product value chains at the smallholder level are improved by future policy interventions. •This study identified six distinct livelihood strategies across research sites in the Philippines.•Households with remittances-based and wage-based livelihood strategies have the highest overall income.•While at the minimum point of a forest transition curve, households continue to collect a variety of forest products.•Fuelwood is the most important forest product collected by households in Philippines’ forested landscapes.•A small cluster of households generates major share of income from forest-related products and fisheries.•The natural resource-based cluster was characterized by low total income and little agricultural land.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1389-9341</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-7050</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.forpol.2021.102658</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Agricultural economics ; Cluster analysis ; Deforestation ; Fishing ; Forest products ; Forest related income ; Forested landscapes ; Forests ; Harvesting ; Household survey ; Households ; Income ; Livelihood ; Livelihood strategies ; Livestock ; Local communities ; Natural resources ; Philippines ; Poverty ; Reforestation ; Remittances ; Rural areas ; Tree planting</subject><ispartof>Forest policy and economics, 2022-02, Vol.135, p.102658, Article 102658</ispartof><rights>2021 The Authors</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Feb 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c380t-97fbd6d6edba26a85c6c9b87a92f20ee2a952ad4671d21f0b70713157b090f9b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c380t-97fbd6d6edba26a85c6c9b87a92f20ee2a952ad4671d21f0b70713157b090f9b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2021.102658$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,3537,27847,27905,27906,45976</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wiebe, Pia Christine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhunusova, Eliza</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lippe, Melvin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferrer Velasco, Rubén</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Günter, Sven</creatorcontrib><title>What is the contribution of forest-related income to rural livelihood strategies in the Philippines' remaining forested landscapes?</title><title>Forest policy and economics</title><description>Forest products have become scarce for local communities in the Philippines. After decades of severe deforestation, a net gain in forest area has only been observed in recent years for the first time. This paper seeks to broaden the understanding of forest livelihood relationships at the turning point of a forest transition trajectory. Based on 993 household surveys from 10 distinct research sites, we use Hierarchical Cluster Analysis to identify six distinct livelihood strategies (LS): remittances-based, livestock-based, crop farming-based, business-oriented, natural resource-based, and wage-based strategies. The highest number of households belongs to the wage-based cluster, which also shows the highest total income. Forest-related incomes only account for small shares of total income for the vast majority of households, although most households collect limited quantities of forest products for domestic use. Nevertheless, one cluster, which includes 12.4% of the sample, generates the largest shares of their income from extractive activities like harvesting forest products and fishing. The households relying most strongly on natural resources in our study sites are also the ones with the lowest total income. Our finding implies that future reforestation policies have to put a special focus on incorporating livelihood benefits for local communities. This should go beyond short-term payments for activities such as tree planting and enable the rural households to derive long-term impacts for human well-being and poverty alleviation. Because most of the forest products reported by our surveyed households were collected for domestic use, they did not contribute much to total household income. This indicates a potential for improving rural income, if forest-product value chains at the smallholder level are improved by future policy interventions. •This study identified six distinct livelihood strategies across research sites in the Philippines.•Households with remittances-based and wage-based livelihood strategies have the highest overall income.•While at the minimum point of a forest transition curve, households continue to collect a variety of forest products.•Fuelwood is the most important forest product collected by households in Philippines’ forested landscapes.•A small cluster of households generates major share of income from forest-related products and fisheries.•The natural resource-based cluster was characterized by low total income and little agricultural land.</description><subject>Agricultural economics</subject><subject>Cluster analysis</subject><subject>Deforestation</subject><subject>Fishing</subject><subject>Forest products</subject><subject>Forest related income</subject><subject>Forested landscapes</subject><subject>Forests</subject><subject>Harvesting</subject><subject>Household survey</subject><subject>Households</subject><subject>Income</subject><subject>Livelihood</subject><subject>Livelihood strategies</subject><subject>Livestock</subject><subject>Local communities</subject><subject>Natural resources</subject><subject>Philippines</subject><subject>Poverty</subject><subject>Reforestation</subject><subject>Remittances</subject><subject>Rural areas</subject><subject>Tree planting</subject><issn>1389-9341</issn><issn>1872-7050</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1LxDAQhoso-PkPPAQ8eOqapNumuSgifoGgB8VjSJPp7izdpCZZwbN_3Kz17GmG4X2fmXmL4pTRGaOsuVjNeh9GP8w45SyPeFO3O8UBawUvBa3pbu6rVpaymrP94jDGFaVMUFYdFN_vS50IRpKWQIx3KWC3Segd8T3JVIipDDDoBJagM34NJHkSNkEPZMBPGHDpvSUxhSxZIMSs-mW9LHHAcUQH8ZwEWGt06BZ_yAwbtLPR6BHi1XGx1-shwslfPSre7m5fbx7Kp-f7x5vrp9JULU2lFH1nG9uA7TRvdFubxsiuFVrynlMArmXNtZ03glnOetoJKljFatFRSXvZVUfF2cQdg__Y5DPUym-CyysVb_IKISUXWTWfVCb4GAP0agy41uFLMaq2cauVmuJW27jVFHe2XU42yB98IgQVDYIzYDGAScp6_B_wA20kjXQ</recordid><startdate>202202</startdate><enddate>202202</enddate><creator>Wiebe, Pia Christine</creator><creator>Zhunusova, Eliza</creator><creator>Lippe, Melvin</creator><creator>Ferrer Velasco, Rubén</creator><creator>Günter, Sven</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202202</creationdate><title>What is the contribution of forest-related income to rural livelihood strategies in the Philippines' remaining forested landscapes?</title><author>Wiebe, Pia Christine ; Zhunusova, Eliza ; Lippe, Melvin ; Ferrer Velasco, Rubén ; Günter, Sven</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c380t-97fbd6d6edba26a85c6c9b87a92f20ee2a952ad4671d21f0b70713157b090f9b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Agricultural economics</topic><topic>Cluster analysis</topic><topic>Deforestation</topic><topic>Fishing</topic><topic>Forest products</topic><topic>Forest related income</topic><topic>Forested landscapes</topic><topic>Forests</topic><topic>Harvesting</topic><topic>Household survey</topic><topic>Households</topic><topic>Income</topic><topic>Livelihood</topic><topic>Livelihood strategies</topic><topic>Livestock</topic><topic>Local communities</topic><topic>Natural resources</topic><topic>Philippines</topic><topic>Poverty</topic><topic>Reforestation</topic><topic>Remittances</topic><topic>Rural areas</topic><topic>Tree planting</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wiebe, Pia Christine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhunusova, Eliza</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lippe, Melvin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferrer Velasco, Rubén</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Günter, Sven</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Forest policy and economics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wiebe, Pia Christine</au><au>Zhunusova, Eliza</au><au>Lippe, Melvin</au><au>Ferrer Velasco, Rubén</au><au>Günter, Sven</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>What is the contribution of forest-related income to rural livelihood strategies in the Philippines' remaining forested landscapes?</atitle><jtitle>Forest policy and economics</jtitle><date>2022-02</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>135</volume><spage>102658</spage><pages>102658-</pages><artnum>102658</artnum><issn>1389-9341</issn><eissn>1872-7050</eissn><abstract>Forest products have become scarce for local communities in the Philippines. After decades of severe deforestation, a net gain in forest area has only been observed in recent years for the first time. This paper seeks to broaden the understanding of forest livelihood relationships at the turning point of a forest transition trajectory. Based on 993 household surveys from 10 distinct research sites, we use Hierarchical Cluster Analysis to identify six distinct livelihood strategies (LS): remittances-based, livestock-based, crop farming-based, business-oriented, natural resource-based, and wage-based strategies. The highest number of households belongs to the wage-based cluster, which also shows the highest total income. Forest-related incomes only account for small shares of total income for the vast majority of households, although most households collect limited quantities of forest products for domestic use. Nevertheless, one cluster, which includes 12.4% of the sample, generates the largest shares of their income from extractive activities like harvesting forest products and fishing. The households relying most strongly on natural resources in our study sites are also the ones with the lowest total income. Our finding implies that future reforestation policies have to put a special focus on incorporating livelihood benefits for local communities. This should go beyond short-term payments for activities such as tree planting and enable the rural households to derive long-term impacts for human well-being and poverty alleviation. Because most of the forest products reported by our surveyed households were collected for domestic use, they did not contribute much to total household income. This indicates a potential for improving rural income, if forest-product value chains at the smallholder level are improved by future policy interventions. •This study identified six distinct livelihood strategies across research sites in the Philippines.•Households with remittances-based and wage-based livelihood strategies have the highest overall income.•While at the minimum point of a forest transition curve, households continue to collect a variety of forest products.•Fuelwood is the most important forest product collected by households in Philippines’ forested landscapes.•A small cluster of households generates major share of income from forest-related products and fisheries.•The natural resource-based cluster was characterized by low total income and little agricultural land.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.forpol.2021.102658</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1389-9341
ispartof Forest policy and economics, 2022-02, Vol.135, p.102658, Article 102658
issn 1389-9341
1872-7050
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2638079927
source PAIS Index; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Agricultural economics
Cluster analysis
Deforestation
Fishing
Forest products
Forest related income
Forested landscapes
Forests
Harvesting
Household survey
Households
Income
Livelihood
Livelihood strategies
Livestock
Local communities
Natural resources
Philippines
Poverty
Reforestation
Remittances
Rural areas
Tree planting
title What is the contribution of forest-related income to rural livelihood strategies in the Philippines' remaining forested landscapes?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-18T08%3A32%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=What%20is%20the%20contribution%20of%20forest-related%20income%20to%20rural%20livelihood%20strategies%20in%20the%20Philippines'%20remaining%20forested%20landscapes?&rft.jtitle=Forest%20policy%20and%20economics&rft.au=Wiebe,%20Pia%20Christine&rft.date=2022-02&rft.volume=135&rft.spage=102658&rft.pages=102658-&rft.artnum=102658&rft.issn=1389-9341&rft.eissn=1872-7050&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.forpol.2021.102658&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2638079927%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2638079927&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S1389934121002641&rfr_iscdi=true