Russia, Central Asia and Non‐traditional Security Threats from Afghanistan following the US Withdrawal

In the early 21st century, non‐traditional security threats such as terrorism and narcotics trafficking drove the revival of post‐Soviet Russia's interest in and concern about the Afghan problem. This article outlines main security threats for Russia and Central Asia in Afghanistan during two d...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Global policy 2022-02, Vol.13 (1), p.138-145
1. Verfasser: Stepanova, Ekaterina
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 145
container_issue 1
container_start_page 138
container_title Global policy
container_volume 13
creator Stepanova, Ekaterina
description In the early 21st century, non‐traditional security threats such as terrorism and narcotics trafficking drove the revival of post‐Soviet Russia's interest in and concern about the Afghan problem. This article outlines main security threats for Russia and Central Asia in Afghanistan during two decades of the United States (US) presence, identifies new risks, aggravating circumstances, and threat reduction factors following the US forces’ final departure and Taliban's comeback to power since 2021, and explores ways to counter main Afghanistan‐related security risks. For Russia and broader Eurasia, actual and potential non‐traditional security threats emanating from Afghanistan are likely to persist under the Taliban's second rule. However, none of them are unmanageable. While inside Afghanistan, much depends on the new Taliban authorities’ performance, it is up to the Central Asian states themselves and to Russia as their Eurasian security ally to hedge against potential scenarios. If the security pillar of Russia's response is confined to Central Asia and Central Security Treaty Organization (CSTO), the political‐diplomatic one extends to broader region and beyond. Overall, Russia has learnt its own historical lessons on Afghanistan: Moscow now prioritizes collective action in cooperation with regional powers, under multilateral frameworks extending beyond the region, and at the United Nations (UN).
doi_str_mv 10.1111/1758-5899.13058
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2638035733</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2638035733</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3168-a4c15bf0e5d2672d38e8b05d5728450943877e10b925075230f75a50611453853</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUMFOAjEQbYwmEuTstYlXF9rtdts9EqJoQsQIxGNTdrtsybLFthvCzU_wG_0Si2u4-i4z8-a9yeQBcIvREAeMMKM8ojzLhpggyi9A78xcnnuOrsHAuS0KIDxDMe6B6q11Tst7OFGNt7KG4zBB2RTwxTTfn1-BK7TXpgmrhcpbq_0RLiurpHewtGYHx-Wmko12XjawNHVtDrrZQF8puFrAd-2rwsqDrG_AVSlrpwZ_tQ9Wjw_LyVM0m0-fJ-NZlBOc8kgmOabrEilaxCmLC8IVXyNaUBbzhKIsIZwxhdE6iyliNCaoZFRSlGKcUMIp6YO77u7emo9WOS-2prXhfSfilHBEKCMkqEadKrfGOatKsbd6J-1RYCROiYpTZuKUn_hNNDjSznHQtTr-JxfT1_msM_4AR-J3WQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2638035733</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Russia, Central Asia and Non‐traditional Security Threats from Afghanistan following the US Withdrawal</title><source>Political Science Complete</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>PAIS Index</source><creator>Stepanova, Ekaterina</creator><creatorcontrib>Stepanova, Ekaterina</creatorcontrib><description>In the early 21st century, non‐traditional security threats such as terrorism and narcotics trafficking drove the revival of post‐Soviet Russia's interest in and concern about the Afghan problem. This article outlines main security threats for Russia and Central Asia in Afghanistan during two decades of the United States (US) presence, identifies new risks, aggravating circumstances, and threat reduction factors following the US forces’ final departure and Taliban's comeback to power since 2021, and explores ways to counter main Afghanistan‐related security risks. For Russia and broader Eurasia, actual and potential non‐traditional security threats emanating from Afghanistan are likely to persist under the Taliban's second rule. However, none of them are unmanageable. While inside Afghanistan, much depends on the new Taliban authorities’ performance, it is up to the Central Asian states themselves and to Russia as their Eurasian security ally to hedge against potential scenarios. If the security pillar of Russia's response is confined to Central Asia and Central Security Treaty Organization (CSTO), the political‐diplomatic one extends to broader region and beyond. Overall, Russia has learnt its own historical lessons on Afghanistan: Moscow now prioritizes collective action in cooperation with regional powers, under multilateral frameworks extending beyond the region, and at the United Nations (UN).</description><identifier>ISSN: 1758-5880</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1758-5899</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/1758-5899.13058</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Afghanistan War ; Aggravating circumstances ; Collective action ; International cooperation ; Military withdrawals ; Narcotics ; Security ; Terrorism ; Threats</subject><ispartof>Global policy, 2022-02, Vol.13 (1), p.138-145</ispartof><rights>2022 Durham University and John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2022 University of Durham and John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3168-a4c15bf0e5d2672d38e8b05d5728450943877e10b925075230f75a50611453853</citedby><orcidid>0000-0003-4666-4921</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2F1758-5899.13058$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2F1758-5899.13058$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27843,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Stepanova, Ekaterina</creatorcontrib><title>Russia, Central Asia and Non‐traditional Security Threats from Afghanistan following the US Withdrawal</title><title>Global policy</title><description>In the early 21st century, non‐traditional security threats such as terrorism and narcotics trafficking drove the revival of post‐Soviet Russia's interest in and concern about the Afghan problem. This article outlines main security threats for Russia and Central Asia in Afghanistan during two decades of the United States (US) presence, identifies new risks, aggravating circumstances, and threat reduction factors following the US forces’ final departure and Taliban's comeback to power since 2021, and explores ways to counter main Afghanistan‐related security risks. For Russia and broader Eurasia, actual and potential non‐traditional security threats emanating from Afghanistan are likely to persist under the Taliban's second rule. However, none of them are unmanageable. While inside Afghanistan, much depends on the new Taliban authorities’ performance, it is up to the Central Asian states themselves and to Russia as their Eurasian security ally to hedge against potential scenarios. If the security pillar of Russia's response is confined to Central Asia and Central Security Treaty Organization (CSTO), the political‐diplomatic one extends to broader region and beyond. Overall, Russia has learnt its own historical lessons on Afghanistan: Moscow now prioritizes collective action in cooperation with regional powers, under multilateral frameworks extending beyond the region, and at the United Nations (UN).</description><subject>Afghanistan War</subject><subject>Aggravating circumstances</subject><subject>Collective action</subject><subject>International cooperation</subject><subject>Military withdrawals</subject><subject>Narcotics</subject><subject>Security</subject><subject>Terrorism</subject><subject>Threats</subject><issn>1758-5880</issn><issn>1758-5899</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFUMFOAjEQbYwmEuTstYlXF9rtdts9EqJoQsQIxGNTdrtsybLFthvCzU_wG_0Si2u4-i4z8-a9yeQBcIvREAeMMKM8ojzLhpggyi9A78xcnnuOrsHAuS0KIDxDMe6B6q11Tst7OFGNt7KG4zBB2RTwxTTfn1-BK7TXpgmrhcpbq_0RLiurpHewtGYHx-Wmko12XjawNHVtDrrZQF8puFrAd-2rwsqDrG_AVSlrpwZ_tQ9Wjw_LyVM0m0-fJ-NZlBOc8kgmOabrEilaxCmLC8IVXyNaUBbzhKIsIZwxhdE6iyliNCaoZFRSlGKcUMIp6YO77u7emo9WOS-2prXhfSfilHBEKCMkqEadKrfGOatKsbd6J-1RYCROiYpTZuKUn_hNNDjSznHQtTr-JxfT1_msM_4AR-J3WQ</recordid><startdate>202202</startdate><enddate>202202</enddate><creator>Stepanova, Ekaterina</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4666-4921</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202202</creationdate><title>Russia, Central Asia and Non‐traditional Security Threats from Afghanistan following the US Withdrawal</title><author>Stepanova, Ekaterina</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3168-a4c15bf0e5d2672d38e8b05d5728450943877e10b925075230f75a50611453853</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Afghanistan War</topic><topic>Aggravating circumstances</topic><topic>Collective action</topic><topic>International cooperation</topic><topic>Military withdrawals</topic><topic>Narcotics</topic><topic>Security</topic><topic>Terrorism</topic><topic>Threats</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Stepanova, Ekaterina</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Global policy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Stepanova, Ekaterina</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Russia, Central Asia and Non‐traditional Security Threats from Afghanistan following the US Withdrawal</atitle><jtitle>Global policy</jtitle><date>2022-02</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>138</spage><epage>145</epage><pages>138-145</pages><issn>1758-5880</issn><eissn>1758-5899</eissn><abstract>In the early 21st century, non‐traditional security threats such as terrorism and narcotics trafficking drove the revival of post‐Soviet Russia's interest in and concern about the Afghan problem. This article outlines main security threats for Russia and Central Asia in Afghanistan during two decades of the United States (US) presence, identifies new risks, aggravating circumstances, and threat reduction factors following the US forces’ final departure and Taliban's comeback to power since 2021, and explores ways to counter main Afghanistan‐related security risks. For Russia and broader Eurasia, actual and potential non‐traditional security threats emanating from Afghanistan are likely to persist under the Taliban's second rule. However, none of them are unmanageable. While inside Afghanistan, much depends on the new Taliban authorities’ performance, it is up to the Central Asian states themselves and to Russia as their Eurasian security ally to hedge against potential scenarios. If the security pillar of Russia's response is confined to Central Asia and Central Security Treaty Organization (CSTO), the political‐diplomatic one extends to broader region and beyond. Overall, Russia has learnt its own historical lessons on Afghanistan: Moscow now prioritizes collective action in cooperation with regional powers, under multilateral frameworks extending beyond the region, and at the United Nations (UN).</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><doi>10.1111/1758-5899.13058</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4666-4921</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1758-5880
ispartof Global policy, 2022-02, Vol.13 (1), p.138-145
issn 1758-5880
1758-5899
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2638035733
source Political Science Complete; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; PAIS Index
subjects Afghanistan War
Aggravating circumstances
Collective action
International cooperation
Military withdrawals
Narcotics
Security
Terrorism
Threats
title Russia, Central Asia and Non‐traditional Security Threats from Afghanistan following the US Withdrawal
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T15%3A36%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Russia,%20Central%20Asia%20and%20Non%E2%80%90traditional%20Security%20Threats%20from%20Afghanistan%20following%20the%20US%20Withdrawal&rft.jtitle=Global%20policy&rft.au=Stepanova,%20Ekaterina&rft.date=2022-02&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=138&rft.epage=145&rft.pages=138-145&rft.issn=1758-5880&rft.eissn=1758-5899&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/1758-5899.13058&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2638035733%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2638035733&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true