Literacy instruction in first grade: classroom‐level associations between reading skills and literacy instruction activities

Background Adapting instruction to individual students' needs is known to be effective, but there is a lack of evidence whether students' reading skills are associated with literacy instruction activities at classroom‐level. Both the content of the literacy instruction and teachers' i...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of research in reading 2022-02, Vol.45 (1), p.83-99
Hauptverfasser: Ruotsalainen, Jenni, Pakarinen, Eija, Poikkeus, Anna‐Maija, Lerkkanen, Marja‐Kristiina
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 99
container_issue 1
container_start_page 83
container_title Journal of research in reading
container_volume 45
creator Ruotsalainen, Jenni
Pakarinen, Eija
Poikkeus, Anna‐Maija
Lerkkanen, Marja‐Kristiina
description Background Adapting instruction to individual students' needs is known to be effective, but there is a lack of evidence whether students' reading skills are associated with literacy instruction activities at classroom‐level. Both the content of the literacy instruction and teachers' instructional support through instructional management are considered. Methods The data were collected in the context of Finland where first graders' reading skills show great variation at school entry but rapid progress. Students (n = 616) were individually tested on their reading skills, and literacy lessons in 35 classrooms were video recorded in the autumn of first grade. Multilevel path analyses were conducted to examine the classroom‐level associations between reading skills (accuracy and fluency) and three types of literacy instruction activities (coded from the video recordings). The number of students present and the teachers' work experience were controlled in the analyses. Results The results indicated that, at classroom‐level, lower average reading skills were associated with more lesson time allocated to code‐focused activities such as decoding and spelling tasks in which instructional management was directed for the whole group. In turn, higher average reading skills in classrooms were associated with more lesson time allocated to individual or small group assignments. The reading skills were not associated with meaning‐focused activities such as text‐level reading activities and class discussions with the whole group. Conclusions In early literacy lessons, students' reading skills were associated with teachers' implementation of different literacy instruction activities at classroom‐level. In classrooms with more students having already acquired basic decoding skills, teachers provided more classroom time for independent practice and individual support, which is likely to support consolidation of students' literacy skills. Highlights What is already known about this topic Students' reading skills vary greatly at the entry to primary school. Adapting both the content and amount of instructional support based on a student's skills has been shown to be effective, but the knowledge of these processes is limited into studying adaptations at the level of the individual student or specific learning situations. However, the students' skills at classroom‐level may also affect the instruction. In order to support students' reading skills development, both the content of th
doi_str_mv 10.1111/1467-9817.12384
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2637880471</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1329099</ericid><sourcerecordid>2637880471</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3794-1bf40dc0383a12b1a8e1633fa9fac8cd824ff841fe43b70294508c3f922bae683</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUMtKAzEUDaJgra5dCQHX0-blTMadlKotBaHoOmQyNyV1nNFk2tKN-Al-o19i6khXgndzX-ecyz0InVMyoDGGVKRZkkuaDSjjUhyg3n5yiHqECpoQwfgxOglhSQhhgqU99D5zLXhtttjVofUr07qmjjW2zocWL7wu4RqbSofgm-bl6-OzgjVUOPaNcXqHDriAdgNQYw-6dPUCh2dXVQHrusTVX_I6prVrHYRTdGR1FeDsN_fR0-34cXSfzB7uJqObWWJ4louEFlaQ0hAuuaasoFoCTTm3OrfaSFNKJqyVgloQvMgIy8UVkYbbnLFCQyp5H112uq--eVtBaNWyWfk6nlQs5ZmURGQ0ooYdyvgm_gtWvXr3ov1WUaJ2JqudpWpnqfoxOTIuOgZ4Z_bo8ZRylpM8j_u0229cBdv_5NR0Ppl3wt-tfow6</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2637880471</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Literacy instruction in first grade: classroom‐level associations between reading skills and literacy instruction activities</title><source>Education Source (MeL)</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Ruotsalainen, Jenni ; Pakarinen, Eija ; Poikkeus, Anna‐Maija ; Lerkkanen, Marja‐Kristiina</creator><creatorcontrib>Ruotsalainen, Jenni ; Pakarinen, Eija ; Poikkeus, Anna‐Maija ; Lerkkanen, Marja‐Kristiina</creatorcontrib><description>Background Adapting instruction to individual students' needs is known to be effective, but there is a lack of evidence whether students' reading skills are associated with literacy instruction activities at classroom‐level. Both the content of the literacy instruction and teachers' instructional support through instructional management are considered. Methods The data were collected in the context of Finland where first graders' reading skills show great variation at school entry but rapid progress. Students (n = 616) were individually tested on their reading skills, and literacy lessons in 35 classrooms were video recorded in the autumn of first grade. Multilevel path analyses were conducted to examine the classroom‐level associations between reading skills (accuracy and fluency) and three types of literacy instruction activities (coded from the video recordings). The number of students present and the teachers' work experience were controlled in the analyses. Results The results indicated that, at classroom‐level, lower average reading skills were associated with more lesson time allocated to code‐focused activities such as decoding and spelling tasks in which instructional management was directed for the whole group. In turn, higher average reading skills in classrooms were associated with more lesson time allocated to individual or small group assignments. The reading skills were not associated with meaning‐focused activities such as text‐level reading activities and class discussions with the whole group. Conclusions In early literacy lessons, students' reading skills were associated with teachers' implementation of different literacy instruction activities at classroom‐level. In classrooms with more students having already acquired basic decoding skills, teachers provided more classroom time for independent practice and individual support, which is likely to support consolidation of students' literacy skills. Highlights What is already known about this topic Students' reading skills vary greatly at the entry to primary school. Adapting both the content and amount of instructional support based on a student's skills has been shown to be effective, but the knowledge of these processes is limited into studying adaptations at the level of the individual student or specific learning situations. However, the students' skills at classroom‐level may also affect the instruction. In order to support students' reading skills development, both the content of the instruction and adequate support for learning are important. What this paper adds This study is among the first to analyse classroom‐level associations between students' reading skills and literacy instruction activities in the lesson. Students learning to read have been shown to benefit from code‐focused activities with teacher support, whereas more advanced students have been shown to benefit from independently practicing their skills. This study showed that teachers typically engaged their students in whole group instruction on accurate decoding and spelling when the students reading skills were lower at classroom‐level (i.e. there were more students learning to read), whereas higher reading skills (i.e. more students that were able to read) were associated with more time spent in independent practicing. Higher skills of students in a classroom (i.e. more students that are able to read) may invite and offer more opportunities for the teacher to adapt instruction at the level of the individual student. Implications for theory, policy or practice Teachers should sensitively observe the skills development of their students and adapt their instruction based on this information. Teachers' continued professional development on adapting literacy instruction activities and flexible planning of lessons according to their students' skills should be supported.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0141-0423</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1467-9817</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/1467-9817.12384</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Wiley</publisher><subject>Classrooms ; Decoding ; Early literacy ; Educational activities ; Elementary education ; Emergent Literacy ; first grade ; Fluency ; Grade 1 ; Instructional Development ; Learning ; Learning Activities ; Literacy ; Literacy Education ; literacy instruction ; Reading ability ; reading accuracy ; Reading acquisition ; Reading Comprehension ; Reading Fluency ; Reading instruction ; Reading Skills ; Skill development ; Spelling ; Students ; Teacher education ; Teachers ; Teaching ; Teaching Methods ; Time on Task ; Work Experience</subject><ispartof>Journal of research in reading, 2022-02, Vol.45 (1), p.83-99</ispartof><rights>2022 The Authors. published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd on behalf of United Kingdom Literacy Association.</rights><rights>2022. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3794-1bf40dc0383a12b1a8e1633fa9fac8cd824ff841fe43b70294508c3f922bae683</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3794-1bf40dc0383a12b1a8e1633fa9fac8cd824ff841fe43b70294508c3f922bae683</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-9165-8638 ; 0000-0002-5709-5800 ; 0000-0001-7913-8691 ; 0000-0001-7190-6705</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2F1467-9817.12384$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2F1467-9817.12384$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27903,27904,45553,45554</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1329099$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ruotsalainen, Jenni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pakarinen, Eija</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Poikkeus, Anna‐Maija</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lerkkanen, Marja‐Kristiina</creatorcontrib><title>Literacy instruction in first grade: classroom‐level associations between reading skills and literacy instruction activities</title><title>Journal of research in reading</title><description>Background Adapting instruction to individual students' needs is known to be effective, but there is a lack of evidence whether students' reading skills are associated with literacy instruction activities at classroom‐level. Both the content of the literacy instruction and teachers' instructional support through instructional management are considered. Methods The data were collected in the context of Finland where first graders' reading skills show great variation at school entry but rapid progress. Students (n = 616) were individually tested on their reading skills, and literacy lessons in 35 classrooms were video recorded in the autumn of first grade. Multilevel path analyses were conducted to examine the classroom‐level associations between reading skills (accuracy and fluency) and three types of literacy instruction activities (coded from the video recordings). The number of students present and the teachers' work experience were controlled in the analyses. Results The results indicated that, at classroom‐level, lower average reading skills were associated with more lesson time allocated to code‐focused activities such as decoding and spelling tasks in which instructional management was directed for the whole group. In turn, higher average reading skills in classrooms were associated with more lesson time allocated to individual or small group assignments. The reading skills were not associated with meaning‐focused activities such as text‐level reading activities and class discussions with the whole group. Conclusions In early literacy lessons, students' reading skills were associated with teachers' implementation of different literacy instruction activities at classroom‐level. In classrooms with more students having already acquired basic decoding skills, teachers provided more classroom time for independent practice and individual support, which is likely to support consolidation of students' literacy skills. Highlights What is already known about this topic Students' reading skills vary greatly at the entry to primary school. Adapting both the content and amount of instructional support based on a student's skills has been shown to be effective, but the knowledge of these processes is limited into studying adaptations at the level of the individual student or specific learning situations. However, the students' skills at classroom‐level may also affect the instruction. In order to support students' reading skills development, both the content of the instruction and adequate support for learning are important. What this paper adds This study is among the first to analyse classroom‐level associations between students' reading skills and literacy instruction activities in the lesson. Students learning to read have been shown to benefit from code‐focused activities with teacher support, whereas more advanced students have been shown to benefit from independently practicing their skills. This study showed that teachers typically engaged their students in whole group instruction on accurate decoding and spelling when the students reading skills were lower at classroom‐level (i.e. there were more students learning to read), whereas higher reading skills (i.e. more students that were able to read) were associated with more time spent in independent practicing. Higher skills of students in a classroom (i.e. more students that are able to read) may invite and offer more opportunities for the teacher to adapt instruction at the level of the individual student. Implications for theory, policy or practice Teachers should sensitively observe the skills development of their students and adapt their instruction based on this information. Teachers' continued professional development on adapting literacy instruction activities and flexible planning of lessons according to their students' skills should be supported.</description><subject>Classrooms</subject><subject>Decoding</subject><subject>Early literacy</subject><subject>Educational activities</subject><subject>Elementary education</subject><subject>Emergent Literacy</subject><subject>first grade</subject><subject>Fluency</subject><subject>Grade 1</subject><subject>Instructional Development</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Learning Activities</subject><subject>Literacy</subject><subject>Literacy Education</subject><subject>literacy instruction</subject><subject>Reading ability</subject><subject>reading accuracy</subject><subject>Reading acquisition</subject><subject>Reading Comprehension</subject><subject>Reading Fluency</subject><subject>Reading instruction</subject><subject>Reading Skills</subject><subject>Skill development</subject><subject>Spelling</subject><subject>Students</subject><subject>Teacher education</subject><subject>Teachers</subject><subject>Teaching</subject><subject>Teaching Methods</subject><subject>Time on Task</subject><subject>Work Experience</subject><issn>0141-0423</issn><issn>1467-9817</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><recordid>eNqFUMtKAzEUDaJgra5dCQHX0-blTMadlKotBaHoOmQyNyV1nNFk2tKN-Al-o19i6khXgndzX-ecyz0InVMyoDGGVKRZkkuaDSjjUhyg3n5yiHqECpoQwfgxOglhSQhhgqU99D5zLXhtttjVofUr07qmjjW2zocWL7wu4RqbSofgm-bl6-OzgjVUOPaNcXqHDriAdgNQYw-6dPUCh2dXVQHrusTVX_I6prVrHYRTdGR1FeDsN_fR0-34cXSfzB7uJqObWWJ4louEFlaQ0hAuuaasoFoCTTm3OrfaSFNKJqyVgloQvMgIy8UVkYbbnLFCQyp5H112uq--eVtBaNWyWfk6nlQs5ZmURGQ0ooYdyvgm_gtWvXr3ov1WUaJ2JqudpWpnqfoxOTIuOgZ4Z_bo8ZRylpM8j_u0229cBdv_5NR0Ppl3wt-tfow6</recordid><startdate>202202</startdate><enddate>202202</enddate><creator>Ruotsalainen, Jenni</creator><creator>Pakarinen, Eija</creator><creator>Poikkeus, Anna‐Maija</creator><creator>Lerkkanen, Marja‐Kristiina</creator><general>Wiley</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T9</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9165-8638</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5709-5800</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7913-8691</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7190-6705</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202202</creationdate><title>Literacy instruction in first grade: classroom‐level associations between reading skills and literacy instruction activities</title><author>Ruotsalainen, Jenni ; Pakarinen, Eija ; Poikkeus, Anna‐Maija ; Lerkkanen, Marja‐Kristiina</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3794-1bf40dc0383a12b1a8e1633fa9fac8cd824ff841fe43b70294508c3f922bae683</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Classrooms</topic><topic>Decoding</topic><topic>Early literacy</topic><topic>Educational activities</topic><topic>Elementary education</topic><topic>Emergent Literacy</topic><topic>first grade</topic><topic>Fluency</topic><topic>Grade 1</topic><topic>Instructional Development</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Learning Activities</topic><topic>Literacy</topic><topic>Literacy Education</topic><topic>literacy instruction</topic><topic>Reading ability</topic><topic>reading accuracy</topic><topic>Reading acquisition</topic><topic>Reading Comprehension</topic><topic>Reading Fluency</topic><topic>Reading instruction</topic><topic>Reading Skills</topic><topic>Skill development</topic><topic>Spelling</topic><topic>Students</topic><topic>Teacher education</topic><topic>Teachers</topic><topic>Teaching</topic><topic>Teaching Methods</topic><topic>Time on Task</topic><topic>Work Experience</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ruotsalainen, Jenni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pakarinen, Eija</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Poikkeus, Anna‐Maija</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lerkkanen, Marja‐Kristiina</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Open Access</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><jtitle>Journal of research in reading</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ruotsalainen, Jenni</au><au>Pakarinen, Eija</au><au>Poikkeus, Anna‐Maija</au><au>Lerkkanen, Marja‐Kristiina</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1329099</ericid><atitle>Literacy instruction in first grade: classroom‐level associations between reading skills and literacy instruction activities</atitle><jtitle>Journal of research in reading</jtitle><date>2022-02</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>45</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>83</spage><epage>99</epage><pages>83-99</pages><issn>0141-0423</issn><eissn>1467-9817</eissn><abstract>Background Adapting instruction to individual students' needs is known to be effective, but there is a lack of evidence whether students' reading skills are associated with literacy instruction activities at classroom‐level. Both the content of the literacy instruction and teachers' instructional support through instructional management are considered. Methods The data were collected in the context of Finland where first graders' reading skills show great variation at school entry but rapid progress. Students (n = 616) were individually tested on their reading skills, and literacy lessons in 35 classrooms were video recorded in the autumn of first grade. Multilevel path analyses were conducted to examine the classroom‐level associations between reading skills (accuracy and fluency) and three types of literacy instruction activities (coded from the video recordings). The number of students present and the teachers' work experience were controlled in the analyses. Results The results indicated that, at classroom‐level, lower average reading skills were associated with more lesson time allocated to code‐focused activities such as decoding and spelling tasks in which instructional management was directed for the whole group. In turn, higher average reading skills in classrooms were associated with more lesson time allocated to individual or small group assignments. The reading skills were not associated with meaning‐focused activities such as text‐level reading activities and class discussions with the whole group. Conclusions In early literacy lessons, students' reading skills were associated with teachers' implementation of different literacy instruction activities at classroom‐level. In classrooms with more students having already acquired basic decoding skills, teachers provided more classroom time for independent practice and individual support, which is likely to support consolidation of students' literacy skills. Highlights What is already known about this topic Students' reading skills vary greatly at the entry to primary school. Adapting both the content and amount of instructional support based on a student's skills has been shown to be effective, but the knowledge of these processes is limited into studying adaptations at the level of the individual student or specific learning situations. However, the students' skills at classroom‐level may also affect the instruction. In order to support students' reading skills development, both the content of the instruction and adequate support for learning are important. What this paper adds This study is among the first to analyse classroom‐level associations between students' reading skills and literacy instruction activities in the lesson. Students learning to read have been shown to benefit from code‐focused activities with teacher support, whereas more advanced students have been shown to benefit from independently practicing their skills. This study showed that teachers typically engaged their students in whole group instruction on accurate decoding and spelling when the students reading skills were lower at classroom‐level (i.e. there were more students learning to read), whereas higher reading skills (i.e. more students that were able to read) were associated with more time spent in independent practicing. Higher skills of students in a classroom (i.e. more students that are able to read) may invite and offer more opportunities for the teacher to adapt instruction at the level of the individual student. Implications for theory, policy or practice Teachers should sensitively observe the skills development of their students and adapt their instruction based on this information. Teachers' continued professional development on adapting literacy instruction activities and flexible planning of lessons according to their students' skills should be supported.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Wiley</pub><doi>10.1111/1467-9817.12384</doi><tpages>17</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9165-8638</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5709-5800</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7913-8691</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7190-6705</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0141-0423
ispartof Journal of research in reading, 2022-02, Vol.45 (1), p.83-99
issn 0141-0423
1467-9817
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2637880471
source Education Source (MeL); Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Classrooms
Decoding
Early literacy
Educational activities
Elementary education
Emergent Literacy
first grade
Fluency
Grade 1
Instructional Development
Learning
Learning Activities
Literacy
Literacy Education
literacy instruction
Reading ability
reading accuracy
Reading acquisition
Reading Comprehension
Reading Fluency
Reading instruction
Reading Skills
Skill development
Spelling
Students
Teacher education
Teachers
Teaching
Teaching Methods
Time on Task
Work Experience
title Literacy instruction in first grade: classroom‐level associations between reading skills and literacy instruction activities
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T17%3A11%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Literacy%20instruction%20in%20first%20grade:%20classroom%E2%80%90level%20associations%20between%20reading%20skills%20and%20literacy%20instruction%20activities&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20research%20in%20reading&rft.au=Ruotsalainen,%20Jenni&rft.date=2022-02&rft.volume=45&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=83&rft.epage=99&rft.pages=83-99&rft.issn=0141-0423&rft.eissn=1467-9817&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/1467-9817.12384&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2637880471%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2637880471&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1329099&rfr_iscdi=true