Green Housing Subsidy Strategies Considering Consumers’ Green Preference
In order to address the environmental impact of building carbon emissions, some developed countries have established certification standards for green housing. However, in many other countries, the green housing and the traditional housing may coexist in the market, and consumers’ willingness to buy...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Sustainability 2022-03, Vol.14 (5), p.2748 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 2748 |
container_title | Sustainability |
container_volume | 14 |
creator | Ma, Weimin Ren, Zitong Ke, Hua |
description | In order to address the environmental impact of building carbon emissions, some developed countries have established certification standards for green housing. However, in many other countries, the green housing and the traditional housing may coexist in the market, and consumers’ willingness to buy the green housing can be different. This paper constructs a duopoly game model that includes a green developer and a traditional developer considering the heterogeneity of consumers’ green preferences and studies how mandatory green standards and subsidies affect the green developer’s pricing decision, profits and the carbon emission reductions of the green housing. The results show that when the marginal cost of green technology is high, raising green standards will hurt the green developer’s profits. Therefore, fiscal subsidies should be considered. The green developer obtains higher profits when subsidizing green consumers. The effectiveness of increasing carbon emission reduction is better when subsidizing the green developer and how to subsidize depends on the cost structure of the green housing. In addition, subsidizing green consumers and the incremental cost of green housing can improve the policy effect of green housing standards. Therefore, a mixed policy of subsidies and green standards can also have a good effect. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3390/su14052748 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2637796662</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2637796662</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c295t-b6199b6a40cc64e6290b868422c98b218d1863af2d2004499d4eff02c7d67cea3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNUE1Lw0AQXUTBUnvxFwS8CdHZj-xmjxK0VQoK1fOy2UxKik3qbvbQm3_Dv-cvMSGCzmUeb97MPB4hlxRuONdwGyIVkDEl8hMyY6BoSiGD03_4nCxC2MFQnFNN5Yw8LT1im6y6GJp2m2xiGZrqmGx6b3vcNhiSomsHCv04HnHcow_fn1_JtPnisUaPrcMLclbb94CL3z4nbw_3r8UqXT8vH4u7deqYzvq0lFTrUloBzkmBkmkoc5kLxpzOS0bziuaS25pVDEAIrSuBdQ3MqUoqh5bPydV09-C7j4ihN7su-nZ4aZjkSmkpJRtU15PK-S6EwaQ5-GZv_dFQMGNc5i8u_gPLIFzp</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2637796662</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Green Housing Subsidy Strategies Considering Consumers’ Green Preference</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><creator>Ma, Weimin ; Ren, Zitong ; Ke, Hua</creator><creatorcontrib>Ma, Weimin ; Ren, Zitong ; Ke, Hua</creatorcontrib><description>In order to address the environmental impact of building carbon emissions, some developed countries have established certification standards for green housing. However, in many other countries, the green housing and the traditional housing may coexist in the market, and consumers’ willingness to buy the green housing can be different. This paper constructs a duopoly game model that includes a green developer and a traditional developer considering the heterogeneity of consumers’ green preferences and studies how mandatory green standards and subsidies affect the green developer’s pricing decision, profits and the carbon emission reductions of the green housing. The results show that when the marginal cost of green technology is high, raising green standards will hurt the green developer’s profits. Therefore, fiscal subsidies should be considered. The green developer obtains higher profits when subsidizing green consumers. The effectiveness of increasing carbon emission reduction is better when subsidizing the green developer and how to subsidize depends on the cost structure of the green housing. In addition, subsidizing green consumers and the incremental cost of green housing can improve the policy effect of green housing standards. Therefore, a mixed policy of subsidies and green standards can also have a good effect.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2071-1050</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2071-1050</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/su14052748</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Carbon ; Certification ; Clean technology ; Consumers ; COVID-19 ; Developed countries ; Emissions ; Energy consumption ; Energy efficiency ; Environmental impact ; Equilibrium ; Green buildings ; Heterogeneity ; Housing ; Housing policy ; Profits ; Sustainability ; Utility functions ; Willingness to pay</subject><ispartof>Sustainability, 2022-03, Vol.14 (5), p.2748</ispartof><rights>2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c295t-b6199b6a40cc64e6290b868422c98b218d1863af2d2004499d4eff02c7d67cea3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c295t-b6199b6a40cc64e6290b868422c98b218d1863af2d2004499d4eff02c7d67cea3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7206-1994</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27915,27916</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ma, Weimin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ren, Zitong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ke, Hua</creatorcontrib><title>Green Housing Subsidy Strategies Considering Consumers’ Green Preference</title><title>Sustainability</title><description>In order to address the environmental impact of building carbon emissions, some developed countries have established certification standards for green housing. However, in many other countries, the green housing and the traditional housing may coexist in the market, and consumers’ willingness to buy the green housing can be different. This paper constructs a duopoly game model that includes a green developer and a traditional developer considering the heterogeneity of consumers’ green preferences and studies how mandatory green standards and subsidies affect the green developer’s pricing decision, profits and the carbon emission reductions of the green housing. The results show that when the marginal cost of green technology is high, raising green standards will hurt the green developer’s profits. Therefore, fiscal subsidies should be considered. The green developer obtains higher profits when subsidizing green consumers. The effectiveness of increasing carbon emission reduction is better when subsidizing the green developer and how to subsidize depends on the cost structure of the green housing. In addition, subsidizing green consumers and the incremental cost of green housing can improve the policy effect of green housing standards. Therefore, a mixed policy of subsidies and green standards can also have a good effect.</description><subject>Carbon</subject><subject>Certification</subject><subject>Clean technology</subject><subject>Consumers</subject><subject>COVID-19</subject><subject>Developed countries</subject><subject>Emissions</subject><subject>Energy consumption</subject><subject>Energy efficiency</subject><subject>Environmental impact</subject><subject>Equilibrium</subject><subject>Green buildings</subject><subject>Heterogeneity</subject><subject>Housing</subject><subject>Housing policy</subject><subject>Profits</subject><subject>Sustainability</subject><subject>Utility functions</subject><subject>Willingness to pay</subject><issn>2071-1050</issn><issn>2071-1050</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNpNUE1Lw0AQXUTBUnvxFwS8CdHZj-xmjxK0VQoK1fOy2UxKik3qbvbQm3_Dv-cvMSGCzmUeb97MPB4hlxRuONdwGyIVkDEl8hMyY6BoSiGD03_4nCxC2MFQnFNN5Yw8LT1im6y6GJp2m2xiGZrqmGx6b3vcNhiSomsHCv04HnHcow_fn1_JtPnisUaPrcMLclbb94CL3z4nbw_3r8UqXT8vH4u7deqYzvq0lFTrUloBzkmBkmkoc5kLxpzOS0bziuaS25pVDEAIrSuBdQ3MqUoqh5bPydV09-C7j4ihN7su-nZ4aZjkSmkpJRtU15PK-S6EwaQ5-GZv_dFQMGNc5i8u_gPLIFzp</recordid><startdate>20220301</startdate><enddate>20220301</enddate><creator>Ma, Weimin</creator><creator>Ren, Zitong</creator><creator>Ke, Hua</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>COVID</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7206-1994</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220301</creationdate><title>Green Housing Subsidy Strategies Considering Consumers’ Green Preference</title><author>Ma, Weimin ; Ren, Zitong ; Ke, Hua</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c295t-b6199b6a40cc64e6290b868422c98b218d1863af2d2004499d4eff02c7d67cea3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Carbon</topic><topic>Certification</topic><topic>Clean technology</topic><topic>Consumers</topic><topic>COVID-19</topic><topic>Developed countries</topic><topic>Emissions</topic><topic>Energy consumption</topic><topic>Energy efficiency</topic><topic>Environmental impact</topic><topic>Equilibrium</topic><topic>Green buildings</topic><topic>Heterogeneity</topic><topic>Housing</topic><topic>Housing policy</topic><topic>Profits</topic><topic>Sustainability</topic><topic>Utility functions</topic><topic>Willingness to pay</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ma, Weimin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ren, Zitong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ke, Hua</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Coronavirus Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Sustainability</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ma, Weimin</au><au>Ren, Zitong</au><au>Ke, Hua</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Green Housing Subsidy Strategies Considering Consumers’ Green Preference</atitle><jtitle>Sustainability</jtitle><date>2022-03-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>2748</spage><pages>2748-</pages><issn>2071-1050</issn><eissn>2071-1050</eissn><abstract>In order to address the environmental impact of building carbon emissions, some developed countries have established certification standards for green housing. However, in many other countries, the green housing and the traditional housing may coexist in the market, and consumers’ willingness to buy the green housing can be different. This paper constructs a duopoly game model that includes a green developer and a traditional developer considering the heterogeneity of consumers’ green preferences and studies how mandatory green standards and subsidies affect the green developer’s pricing decision, profits and the carbon emission reductions of the green housing. The results show that when the marginal cost of green technology is high, raising green standards will hurt the green developer’s profits. Therefore, fiscal subsidies should be considered. The green developer obtains higher profits when subsidizing green consumers. The effectiveness of increasing carbon emission reduction is better when subsidizing the green developer and how to subsidize depends on the cost structure of the green housing. In addition, subsidizing green consumers and the incremental cost of green housing can improve the policy effect of green housing standards. Therefore, a mixed policy of subsidies and green standards can also have a good effect.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><doi>10.3390/su14052748</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7206-1994</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2071-1050 |
ispartof | Sustainability, 2022-03, Vol.14 (5), p.2748 |
issn | 2071-1050 2071-1050 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2637796662 |
source | Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute |
subjects | Carbon Certification Clean technology Consumers COVID-19 Developed countries Emissions Energy consumption Energy efficiency Environmental impact Equilibrium Green buildings Heterogeneity Housing Housing policy Profits Sustainability Utility functions Willingness to pay |
title | Green Housing Subsidy Strategies Considering Consumers’ Green Preference |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T06%3A01%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Green%20Housing%20Subsidy%20Strategies%20Considering%20Consumers%E2%80%99%20Green%20Preference&rft.jtitle=Sustainability&rft.au=Ma,%20Weimin&rft.date=2022-03-01&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=2748&rft.pages=2748-&rft.issn=2071-1050&rft.eissn=2071-1050&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/su14052748&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2637796662%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2637796662&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |