Green Housing Subsidy Strategies Considering Consumers’ Green Preference

In order to address the environmental impact of building carbon emissions, some developed countries have established certification standards for green housing. However, in many other countries, the green housing and the traditional housing may coexist in the market, and consumers’ willingness to buy...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Sustainability 2022-03, Vol.14 (5), p.2748
Hauptverfasser: Ma, Weimin, Ren, Zitong, Ke, Hua
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 5
container_start_page 2748
container_title Sustainability
container_volume 14
creator Ma, Weimin
Ren, Zitong
Ke, Hua
description In order to address the environmental impact of building carbon emissions, some developed countries have established certification standards for green housing. However, in many other countries, the green housing and the traditional housing may coexist in the market, and consumers’ willingness to buy the green housing can be different. This paper constructs a duopoly game model that includes a green developer and a traditional developer considering the heterogeneity of consumers’ green preferences and studies how mandatory green standards and subsidies affect the green developer’s pricing decision, profits and the carbon emission reductions of the green housing. The results show that when the marginal cost of green technology is high, raising green standards will hurt the green developer’s profits. Therefore, fiscal subsidies should be considered. The green developer obtains higher profits when subsidizing green consumers. The effectiveness of increasing carbon emission reduction is better when subsidizing the green developer and how to subsidize depends on the cost structure of the green housing. In addition, subsidizing green consumers and the incremental cost of green housing can improve the policy effect of green housing standards. Therefore, a mixed policy of subsidies and green standards can also have a good effect.
doi_str_mv 10.3390/su14052748
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2637796662</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2637796662</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c295t-b6199b6a40cc64e6290b868422c98b218d1863af2d2004499d4eff02c7d67cea3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNUE1Lw0AQXUTBUnvxFwS8CdHZj-xmjxK0VQoK1fOy2UxKik3qbvbQm3_Dv-cvMSGCzmUeb97MPB4hlxRuONdwGyIVkDEl8hMyY6BoSiGD03_4nCxC2MFQnFNN5Yw8LT1im6y6GJp2m2xiGZrqmGx6b3vcNhiSomsHCv04HnHcow_fn1_JtPnisUaPrcMLclbb94CL3z4nbw_3r8UqXT8vH4u7deqYzvq0lFTrUloBzkmBkmkoc5kLxpzOS0bziuaS25pVDEAIrSuBdQ3MqUoqh5bPydV09-C7j4ihN7su-nZ4aZjkSmkpJRtU15PK-S6EwaQ5-GZv_dFQMGNc5i8u_gPLIFzp</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2637796662</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Green Housing Subsidy Strategies Considering Consumers’ Green Preference</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><creator>Ma, Weimin ; Ren, Zitong ; Ke, Hua</creator><creatorcontrib>Ma, Weimin ; Ren, Zitong ; Ke, Hua</creatorcontrib><description>In order to address the environmental impact of building carbon emissions, some developed countries have established certification standards for green housing. However, in many other countries, the green housing and the traditional housing may coexist in the market, and consumers’ willingness to buy the green housing can be different. This paper constructs a duopoly game model that includes a green developer and a traditional developer considering the heterogeneity of consumers’ green preferences and studies how mandatory green standards and subsidies affect the green developer’s pricing decision, profits and the carbon emission reductions of the green housing. The results show that when the marginal cost of green technology is high, raising green standards will hurt the green developer’s profits. Therefore, fiscal subsidies should be considered. The green developer obtains higher profits when subsidizing green consumers. The effectiveness of increasing carbon emission reduction is better when subsidizing the green developer and how to subsidize depends on the cost structure of the green housing. In addition, subsidizing green consumers and the incremental cost of green housing can improve the policy effect of green housing standards. Therefore, a mixed policy of subsidies and green standards can also have a good effect.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2071-1050</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2071-1050</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/su14052748</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Carbon ; Certification ; Clean technology ; Consumers ; COVID-19 ; Developed countries ; Emissions ; Energy consumption ; Energy efficiency ; Environmental impact ; Equilibrium ; Green buildings ; Heterogeneity ; Housing ; Housing policy ; Profits ; Sustainability ; Utility functions ; Willingness to pay</subject><ispartof>Sustainability, 2022-03, Vol.14 (5), p.2748</ispartof><rights>2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c295t-b6199b6a40cc64e6290b868422c98b218d1863af2d2004499d4eff02c7d67cea3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c295t-b6199b6a40cc64e6290b868422c98b218d1863af2d2004499d4eff02c7d67cea3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7206-1994</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27915,27916</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ma, Weimin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ren, Zitong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ke, Hua</creatorcontrib><title>Green Housing Subsidy Strategies Considering Consumers’ Green Preference</title><title>Sustainability</title><description>In order to address the environmental impact of building carbon emissions, some developed countries have established certification standards for green housing. However, in many other countries, the green housing and the traditional housing may coexist in the market, and consumers’ willingness to buy the green housing can be different. This paper constructs a duopoly game model that includes a green developer and a traditional developer considering the heterogeneity of consumers’ green preferences and studies how mandatory green standards and subsidies affect the green developer’s pricing decision, profits and the carbon emission reductions of the green housing. The results show that when the marginal cost of green technology is high, raising green standards will hurt the green developer’s profits. Therefore, fiscal subsidies should be considered. The green developer obtains higher profits when subsidizing green consumers. The effectiveness of increasing carbon emission reduction is better when subsidizing the green developer and how to subsidize depends on the cost structure of the green housing. In addition, subsidizing green consumers and the incremental cost of green housing can improve the policy effect of green housing standards. Therefore, a mixed policy of subsidies and green standards can also have a good effect.</description><subject>Carbon</subject><subject>Certification</subject><subject>Clean technology</subject><subject>Consumers</subject><subject>COVID-19</subject><subject>Developed countries</subject><subject>Emissions</subject><subject>Energy consumption</subject><subject>Energy efficiency</subject><subject>Environmental impact</subject><subject>Equilibrium</subject><subject>Green buildings</subject><subject>Heterogeneity</subject><subject>Housing</subject><subject>Housing policy</subject><subject>Profits</subject><subject>Sustainability</subject><subject>Utility functions</subject><subject>Willingness to pay</subject><issn>2071-1050</issn><issn>2071-1050</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNpNUE1Lw0AQXUTBUnvxFwS8CdHZj-xmjxK0VQoK1fOy2UxKik3qbvbQm3_Dv-cvMSGCzmUeb97MPB4hlxRuONdwGyIVkDEl8hMyY6BoSiGD03_4nCxC2MFQnFNN5Yw8LT1im6y6GJp2m2xiGZrqmGx6b3vcNhiSomsHCv04HnHcow_fn1_JtPnisUaPrcMLclbb94CL3z4nbw_3r8UqXT8vH4u7deqYzvq0lFTrUloBzkmBkmkoc5kLxpzOS0bziuaS25pVDEAIrSuBdQ3MqUoqh5bPydV09-C7j4ihN7su-nZ4aZjkSmkpJRtU15PK-S6EwaQ5-GZv_dFQMGNc5i8u_gPLIFzp</recordid><startdate>20220301</startdate><enddate>20220301</enddate><creator>Ma, Weimin</creator><creator>Ren, Zitong</creator><creator>Ke, Hua</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>COVID</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7206-1994</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220301</creationdate><title>Green Housing Subsidy Strategies Considering Consumers’ Green Preference</title><author>Ma, Weimin ; Ren, Zitong ; Ke, Hua</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c295t-b6199b6a40cc64e6290b868422c98b218d1863af2d2004499d4eff02c7d67cea3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Carbon</topic><topic>Certification</topic><topic>Clean technology</topic><topic>Consumers</topic><topic>COVID-19</topic><topic>Developed countries</topic><topic>Emissions</topic><topic>Energy consumption</topic><topic>Energy efficiency</topic><topic>Environmental impact</topic><topic>Equilibrium</topic><topic>Green buildings</topic><topic>Heterogeneity</topic><topic>Housing</topic><topic>Housing policy</topic><topic>Profits</topic><topic>Sustainability</topic><topic>Utility functions</topic><topic>Willingness to pay</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ma, Weimin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ren, Zitong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ke, Hua</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Coronavirus Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Sustainability</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ma, Weimin</au><au>Ren, Zitong</au><au>Ke, Hua</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Green Housing Subsidy Strategies Considering Consumers’ Green Preference</atitle><jtitle>Sustainability</jtitle><date>2022-03-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>2748</spage><pages>2748-</pages><issn>2071-1050</issn><eissn>2071-1050</eissn><abstract>In order to address the environmental impact of building carbon emissions, some developed countries have established certification standards for green housing. However, in many other countries, the green housing and the traditional housing may coexist in the market, and consumers’ willingness to buy the green housing can be different. This paper constructs a duopoly game model that includes a green developer and a traditional developer considering the heterogeneity of consumers’ green preferences and studies how mandatory green standards and subsidies affect the green developer’s pricing decision, profits and the carbon emission reductions of the green housing. The results show that when the marginal cost of green technology is high, raising green standards will hurt the green developer’s profits. Therefore, fiscal subsidies should be considered. The green developer obtains higher profits when subsidizing green consumers. The effectiveness of increasing carbon emission reduction is better when subsidizing the green developer and how to subsidize depends on the cost structure of the green housing. In addition, subsidizing green consumers and the incremental cost of green housing can improve the policy effect of green housing standards. Therefore, a mixed policy of subsidies and green standards can also have a good effect.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><doi>10.3390/su14052748</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7206-1994</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2071-1050
ispartof Sustainability, 2022-03, Vol.14 (5), p.2748
issn 2071-1050
2071-1050
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2637796662
source Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute
subjects Carbon
Certification
Clean technology
Consumers
COVID-19
Developed countries
Emissions
Energy consumption
Energy efficiency
Environmental impact
Equilibrium
Green buildings
Heterogeneity
Housing
Housing policy
Profits
Sustainability
Utility functions
Willingness to pay
title Green Housing Subsidy Strategies Considering Consumers’ Green Preference
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T06%3A01%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Green%20Housing%20Subsidy%20Strategies%20Considering%20Consumers%E2%80%99%20Green%20Preference&rft.jtitle=Sustainability&rft.au=Ma,%20Weimin&rft.date=2022-03-01&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=2748&rft.pages=2748-&rft.issn=2071-1050&rft.eissn=2071-1050&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/su14052748&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2637796662%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2637796662&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true