towards a taxonomy of modes of moral decision-making

towards a taxonomy of modes of moral decision-making

sunstein advocates a more systematic approach to the study of moral decision-making, namely the heuristics-and-biases paradigm. we offer two concerns and suggest that a focus on decision processes can add value. recent research on decision modes suggest that it is useful to distinguish between the q...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Behavioral and brain sciences 2005-08, Vol.28 (4), p.563-564
Hauptverfasser: weber, elke u., ancker, jessica s.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Decision making
open peer commentary
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 564
container_issue 4
container_start_page 563
container_title The Behavioral and brain sciences
container_volume 28
creator weber, elke u.
ancker, jessica s.
description sunstein advocates a more systematic approach to the study of moral decision-making, namely the heuristics-and-biases paradigm. we offer two concerns and suggest that a focus on decision processes can add value. recent research on decision modes suggest that it is useful to distinguish between the qualitative differences in the ways in which moral decisions can be made when they are not made by reflective, consequentialist reasoning.
doi_str_mv 10.1017/S0140525X05440091
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2637322096</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S0140525X05440091</cupid><sourcerecordid>2637322096</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c355t-dafef0dcbf9da228861421095ee80dcdb46a135e7a3c4216d808340cf10fb64d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE9LAzEQxYMotlY_gLcFz6uTv7t7lKKrWJBiBW8h3SRl2-6mJltsv70pW_QgnibM-715k0HoGsMtBpzdvQFmwAn_AM4YQIFP0BAzUaQ4J_wUDQ9yetAH6CKEJUDkeHGOBlgQKCIzRKxzX8rrkKikUzvXumafOJs0TpvQP7xaJ9pUdahdmzZqVbeLS3Rm1TqYq2MdoffHh9n4KZ28ls_j-0laUc67VCtrLOhqbgutCMlzgRnBUHBj8tjWcyYUptxkilZREDqHnDKoLAY7F0zTEbrp5268-9ya0Mml2_o2RkoiaEZJ_IWIFO6pyrsQvLFy4-tG-b3EIA93kn_uFD1p76lDZ3Y_BuVXUmQ041KUUzll5ax4iUPKyNNjhmrmvtYL87vK_ynfLYR2IA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2637322096</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>towards a taxonomy of modes of moral decision-making</title><source>Cambridge University Press Journals Complete</source><creator>weber, elke u. ; ancker, jessica s.</creator><creatorcontrib>weber, elke u. ; ancker, jessica s.</creatorcontrib><description>sunstein advocates a more systematic approach to the study of moral decision-making, namely the heuristics-and-biases paradigm. we offer two concerns and suggest that a focus on decision processes can add value. recent research on decision modes suggest that it is useful to distinguish between the qualitative differences in the ways in which moral decisions can be made when they are not made by reflective, consequentialist reasoning.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0140-525X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-1825</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S0140525X05440091</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16209825</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, USA: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Decision making ; open peer commentary</subject><ispartof>The Behavioral and brain sciences, 2005-08, Vol.28 (4), p.563-564</ispartof><rights>2005 cambridge university press</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c355t-dafef0dcbf9da228861421095ee80dcdb46a135e7a3c4216d808340cf10fb64d3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0140525X05440091/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,314,780,784,27924,27925,55628</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>weber, elke u.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ancker, jessica s.</creatorcontrib><title>towards a taxonomy of modes of moral decision-making</title><title>The Behavioral and brain sciences</title><addtitle>Behav Brain Sci</addtitle><description>sunstein advocates a more systematic approach to the study of moral decision-making, namely the heuristics-and-biases paradigm. we offer two concerns and suggest that a focus on decision processes can add value. recent research on decision modes suggest that it is useful to distinguish between the qualitative differences in the ways in which moral decisions can be made when they are not made by reflective, consequentialist reasoning.</description><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>open peer commentary</subject><issn>0140-525X</issn><issn>1469-1825</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kE9LAzEQxYMotlY_gLcFz6uTv7t7lKKrWJBiBW8h3SRl2-6mJltsv70pW_QgnibM-715k0HoGsMtBpzdvQFmwAn_AM4YQIFP0BAzUaQ4J_wUDQ9yetAH6CKEJUDkeHGOBlgQKCIzRKxzX8rrkKikUzvXumafOJs0TpvQP7xaJ9pUdahdmzZqVbeLS3Rm1TqYq2MdoffHh9n4KZ28ls_j-0laUc67VCtrLOhqbgutCMlzgRnBUHBj8tjWcyYUptxkilZREDqHnDKoLAY7F0zTEbrp5268-9ya0Mml2_o2RkoiaEZJ_IWIFO6pyrsQvLFy4-tG-b3EIA93kn_uFD1p76lDZ3Y_BuVXUmQ041KUUzll5ax4iUPKyNNjhmrmvtYL87vK_ynfLYR2IA</recordid><startdate>200508</startdate><enddate>200508</enddate><creator>weber, elke u.</creator><creator>ancker, jessica s.</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200508</creationdate><title>towards a taxonomy of modes of moral decision-making</title><author>weber, elke u. ; ancker, jessica s.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c355t-dafef0dcbf9da228861421095ee80dcdb46a135e7a3c4216d808340cf10fb64d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>open peer commentary</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>weber, elke u.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ancker, jessica s.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>The Behavioral and brain sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>weber, elke u.</au><au>ancker, jessica s.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>towards a taxonomy of modes of moral decision-making</atitle><jtitle>The Behavioral and brain sciences</jtitle><addtitle>Behav Brain Sci</addtitle><date>2005-08</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>28</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>563</spage><epage>564</epage><pages>563-564</pages><issn>0140-525X</issn><eissn>1469-1825</eissn><abstract>sunstein advocates a more systematic approach to the study of moral decision-making, namely the heuristics-and-biases paradigm. we offer two concerns and suggest that a focus on decision processes can add value. recent research on decision modes suggest that it is useful to distinguish between the qualitative differences in the ways in which moral decisions can be made when they are not made by reflective, consequentialist reasoning.</abstract><cop>New York, USA</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><pmid>16209825</pmid><doi>10.1017/S0140525X05440091</doi><tpages>2</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0140-525X
ispartof The Behavioral and brain sciences, 2005-08, Vol.28 (4), p.563-564
issn 0140-525X
1469-1825
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2637322096
source Cambridge University Press Journals Complete
subjects Decision making
open peer commentary
title towards a taxonomy of modes of moral decision-making
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T18%3A31%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=towards%20a%20taxonomy%20of%20modes%20of%20moral%20decision-making&rft.jtitle=The%20Behavioral%20and%20brain%20sciences&rft.au=weber,%20elke%20u.&rft.date=2005-08&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=563&rft.epage=564&rft.pages=563-564&rft.issn=0140-525X&rft.eissn=1469-1825&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S0140525X05440091&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2637322096%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2637322096&rft_id=info:pmid/16209825&rft_cupid=10_1017_S0140525X05440091&rfr_iscdi=true