Seismic response of piles in layered soils: Performance of pseudostatic Winkler models against centrifuge data
In this study, the suitability of the pseudostatic approach for the seismic analysis of pile foundations in layered soils is explored by means of experimental data from centrifuge tests performed at 60g. A free-head single pile and a capped (1 × 3) pile group, embedded in a two-layered soil comprisi...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Soil dynamics and earthquake engineering (1984) 2022-02, Vol.153, p.107110, Article 107110 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 107110 |
container_title | Soil dynamics and earthquake engineering (1984) |
container_volume | 153 |
creator | Tott-Buswell, J. Garala, T.K. Prendergast, L.J. Madabhushi, S.P.G. Rovithis, E. |
description | In this study, the suitability of the pseudostatic approach for the seismic analysis of pile foundations in layered soils is explored by means of experimental data from centrifuge tests performed at 60g. A free-head single pile and a capped (1 × 3) pile group, embedded in a two-layered soil comprising a soft clay layer underlain by dense sand, are tested in the centrifuge under sinusoidal and earthquake excitations. For the pseudostatic analysis, a one-dimensional Winkler model is developed using hyperbolic p-y curves from design codes. The kinematic and inertial loads on the pile foundations are derived using the experimentally measured free-field soil displacements and accelerations, respectively. Different approaches of modifying the p-y relationship to account for soil layering are compared. The importance of considering peak spectral acceleration in lieu of peak ground acceleration at the soil surface to compute the inertial force for the pseudostatic analysis is highlighted. Pile group effects are investigated by considering p-multipliers from literature to account for pile-soil-pile interaction. Results reveal that: (i) for low-intensity seismic motions, the pseudostatic approach with inertial pile-head loading stemming from peak ground acceleration (PGA) at soil surface led to a reasonable agreement of the maximum bending moment with experimental data for both single pile and pile group, (ii) for high-intensity base excitations, the use of the peak spectral acceleration, instead of PGA, at soil surface with suitable damping considerations to derive the inertial load in the pseudostatic model provided a maximum bending moment prediction that was acceptable for the single pile but conservative for the piles in the group compared to the centrifuge records.
•Pseudostatic analysis of a single pile and pile group embedded in layered soil was performed by considering one-dimensional Winkler model.•Different approaches of modifying the p-y relationship to account for soil layering are compared.•The pseudostatic results are compared with the dynamic centrifuge data to evaluate the efficacy of pseudostatic methods and p-y relationships recommended by the design codes.•The importance of group effects and using peak spectral acceleration to compute the inertial force for pseudostatic analysis is highlighted. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.soildyn.2021.107110 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2636863663</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0267726121005327</els_id><sourcerecordid>2636863663</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a407t-ed510f64b5784af709f7637b9bf560dcbd2b937f55db48312838d02a01b7e6413</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkFtLxDAQhYMouK7-BCHgc9ekl6Tri8jiDRYUVPQtpM1kydomNdMK--_t0n33YRgYzjnD-Qi55GzBGRfX2wUG15idX6Qs5eNNcs6OyIyXcplkOf86JjOWCpnIVPBTcoa4ZYxLXooZ8W_gsHU1jYBd8Ag0WNq5BpA6Txu9gwiG7vPxhr5CtCG22teTDGEwAXvdj_5P578biLQNBhqkeqOdx57W4Pvo7LABanSvz8mJ1Q3CxWHPycfD_fvqKVm_PD6v7taJzpnsEzAFZ1bkVSHLXFvJllaKTFbLyhaCmboyabXMpC0KU-VlxtMyKw1LNeOVBJHzbE6uptwuhp8BsFfbMEQ_vlSpyEQ5jshGVTGp6hgQI1jVRdfquFOcqT1atVUHtGqPVk1oR9_t5Bubwq-DqLB2MFIxLkLdKxPcPwl_2T2GOw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2636863663</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Seismic response of piles in layered soils: Performance of pseudostatic Winkler models against centrifuge data</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Tott-Buswell, J. ; Garala, T.K. ; Prendergast, L.J. ; Madabhushi, S.P.G. ; Rovithis, E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Tott-Buswell, J. ; Garala, T.K. ; Prendergast, L.J. ; Madabhushi, S.P.G. ; Rovithis, E.</creatorcontrib><description>In this study, the suitability of the pseudostatic approach for the seismic analysis of pile foundations in layered soils is explored by means of experimental data from centrifuge tests performed at 60g. A free-head single pile and a capped (1 × 3) pile group, embedded in a two-layered soil comprising a soft clay layer underlain by dense sand, are tested in the centrifuge under sinusoidal and earthquake excitations. For the pseudostatic analysis, a one-dimensional Winkler model is developed using hyperbolic p-y curves from design codes. The kinematic and inertial loads on the pile foundations are derived using the experimentally measured free-field soil displacements and accelerations, respectively. Different approaches of modifying the p-y relationship to account for soil layering are compared. The importance of considering peak spectral acceleration in lieu of peak ground acceleration at the soil surface to compute the inertial force for the pseudostatic analysis is highlighted. Pile group effects are investigated by considering p-multipliers from literature to account for pile-soil-pile interaction. Results reveal that: (i) for low-intensity seismic motions, the pseudostatic approach with inertial pile-head loading stemming from peak ground acceleration (PGA) at soil surface led to a reasonable agreement of the maximum bending moment with experimental data for both single pile and pile group, (ii) for high-intensity base excitations, the use of the peak spectral acceleration, instead of PGA, at soil surface with suitable damping considerations to derive the inertial load in the pseudostatic model provided a maximum bending moment prediction that was acceptable for the single pile but conservative for the piles in the group compared to the centrifuge records.
•Pseudostatic analysis of a single pile and pile group embedded in layered soil was performed by considering one-dimensional Winkler model.•Different approaches of modifying the p-y relationship to account for soil layering are compared.•The pseudostatic results are compared with the dynamic centrifuge data to evaluate the efficacy of pseudostatic methods and p-y relationships recommended by the design codes.•The importance of group effects and using peak spectral acceleration to compute the inertial force for pseudostatic analysis is highlighted.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0267-7261</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-341X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2021.107110</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Barking: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Bending moments ; Building codes ; Centrifuge ; Centrifuges ; Clay soils ; Damping ; Dimensional analysis ; Earthquake ; Earthquakes ; Excitation ; Experimental data ; Group effects ; Layered soil ; Layered soils ; Maximum bending ; Mechanical properties ; Pile foundations ; Pile groups ; Pseudostatic analysis ; Seismic activity ; Seismic analysis ; Seismic response ; Soft clay ; Soil investigations ; Soil layers ; Soil-pile interaction ; Soils</subject><ispartof>Soil dynamics and earthquake engineering (1984), 2022-02, Vol.153, p.107110, Article 107110</ispartof><rights>2021 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier BV Feb 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a407t-ed510f64b5784af709f7637b9bf560dcbd2b937f55db48312838d02a01b7e6413</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a407t-ed510f64b5784af709f7637b9bf560dcbd2b937f55db48312838d02a01b7e6413</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2021.107110$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tott-Buswell, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garala, T.K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prendergast, L.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Madabhushi, S.P.G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rovithis, E.</creatorcontrib><title>Seismic response of piles in layered soils: Performance of pseudostatic Winkler models against centrifuge data</title><title>Soil dynamics and earthquake engineering (1984)</title><description>In this study, the suitability of the pseudostatic approach for the seismic analysis of pile foundations in layered soils is explored by means of experimental data from centrifuge tests performed at 60g. A free-head single pile and a capped (1 × 3) pile group, embedded in a two-layered soil comprising a soft clay layer underlain by dense sand, are tested in the centrifuge under sinusoidal and earthquake excitations. For the pseudostatic analysis, a one-dimensional Winkler model is developed using hyperbolic p-y curves from design codes. The kinematic and inertial loads on the pile foundations are derived using the experimentally measured free-field soil displacements and accelerations, respectively. Different approaches of modifying the p-y relationship to account for soil layering are compared. The importance of considering peak spectral acceleration in lieu of peak ground acceleration at the soil surface to compute the inertial force for the pseudostatic analysis is highlighted. Pile group effects are investigated by considering p-multipliers from literature to account for pile-soil-pile interaction. Results reveal that: (i) for low-intensity seismic motions, the pseudostatic approach with inertial pile-head loading stemming from peak ground acceleration (PGA) at soil surface led to a reasonable agreement of the maximum bending moment with experimental data for both single pile and pile group, (ii) for high-intensity base excitations, the use of the peak spectral acceleration, instead of PGA, at soil surface with suitable damping considerations to derive the inertial load in the pseudostatic model provided a maximum bending moment prediction that was acceptable for the single pile but conservative for the piles in the group compared to the centrifuge records.
•Pseudostatic analysis of a single pile and pile group embedded in layered soil was performed by considering one-dimensional Winkler model.•Different approaches of modifying the p-y relationship to account for soil layering are compared.•The pseudostatic results are compared with the dynamic centrifuge data to evaluate the efficacy of pseudostatic methods and p-y relationships recommended by the design codes.•The importance of group effects and using peak spectral acceleration to compute the inertial force for pseudostatic analysis is highlighted.</description><subject>Bending moments</subject><subject>Building codes</subject><subject>Centrifuge</subject><subject>Centrifuges</subject><subject>Clay soils</subject><subject>Damping</subject><subject>Dimensional analysis</subject><subject>Earthquake</subject><subject>Earthquakes</subject><subject>Excitation</subject><subject>Experimental data</subject><subject>Group effects</subject><subject>Layered soil</subject><subject>Layered soils</subject><subject>Maximum bending</subject><subject>Mechanical properties</subject><subject>Pile foundations</subject><subject>Pile groups</subject><subject>Pseudostatic analysis</subject><subject>Seismic activity</subject><subject>Seismic analysis</subject><subject>Seismic response</subject><subject>Soft clay</subject><subject>Soil investigations</subject><subject>Soil layers</subject><subject>Soil-pile interaction</subject><subject>Soils</subject><issn>0267-7261</issn><issn>1879-341X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkFtLxDAQhYMouK7-BCHgc9ekl6Tri8jiDRYUVPQtpM1kydomNdMK--_t0n33YRgYzjnD-Qi55GzBGRfX2wUG15idX6Qs5eNNcs6OyIyXcplkOf86JjOWCpnIVPBTcoa4ZYxLXooZ8W_gsHU1jYBd8Ag0WNq5BpA6Txu9gwiG7vPxhr5CtCG22teTDGEwAXvdj_5P578biLQNBhqkeqOdx57W4Pvo7LABanSvz8mJ1Q3CxWHPycfD_fvqKVm_PD6v7taJzpnsEzAFZ1bkVSHLXFvJllaKTFbLyhaCmboyabXMpC0KU-VlxtMyKw1LNeOVBJHzbE6uptwuhp8BsFfbMEQ_vlSpyEQ5jshGVTGp6hgQI1jVRdfquFOcqT1atVUHtGqPVk1oR9_t5Bubwq-DqLB2MFIxLkLdKxPcPwl_2T2GOw</recordid><startdate>202202</startdate><enddate>202202</enddate><creator>Tott-Buswell, J.</creator><creator>Garala, T.K.</creator><creator>Prendergast, L.J.</creator><creator>Madabhushi, S.P.G.</creator><creator>Rovithis, E.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier BV</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202202</creationdate><title>Seismic response of piles in layered soils: Performance of pseudostatic Winkler models against centrifuge data</title><author>Tott-Buswell, J. ; Garala, T.K. ; Prendergast, L.J. ; Madabhushi, S.P.G. ; Rovithis, E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a407t-ed510f64b5784af709f7637b9bf560dcbd2b937f55db48312838d02a01b7e6413</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Bending moments</topic><topic>Building codes</topic><topic>Centrifuge</topic><topic>Centrifuges</topic><topic>Clay soils</topic><topic>Damping</topic><topic>Dimensional analysis</topic><topic>Earthquake</topic><topic>Earthquakes</topic><topic>Excitation</topic><topic>Experimental data</topic><topic>Group effects</topic><topic>Layered soil</topic><topic>Layered soils</topic><topic>Maximum bending</topic><topic>Mechanical properties</topic><topic>Pile foundations</topic><topic>Pile groups</topic><topic>Pseudostatic analysis</topic><topic>Seismic activity</topic><topic>Seismic analysis</topic><topic>Seismic response</topic><topic>Soft clay</topic><topic>Soil investigations</topic><topic>Soil layers</topic><topic>Soil-pile interaction</topic><topic>Soils</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tott-Buswell, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garala, T.K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prendergast, L.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Madabhushi, S.P.G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rovithis, E.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Soil dynamics and earthquake engineering (1984)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tott-Buswell, J.</au><au>Garala, T.K.</au><au>Prendergast, L.J.</au><au>Madabhushi, S.P.G.</au><au>Rovithis, E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Seismic response of piles in layered soils: Performance of pseudostatic Winkler models against centrifuge data</atitle><jtitle>Soil dynamics and earthquake engineering (1984)</jtitle><date>2022-02</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>153</volume><spage>107110</spage><pages>107110-</pages><artnum>107110</artnum><issn>0267-7261</issn><eissn>1879-341X</eissn><abstract>In this study, the suitability of the pseudostatic approach for the seismic analysis of pile foundations in layered soils is explored by means of experimental data from centrifuge tests performed at 60g. A free-head single pile and a capped (1 × 3) pile group, embedded in a two-layered soil comprising a soft clay layer underlain by dense sand, are tested in the centrifuge under sinusoidal and earthquake excitations. For the pseudostatic analysis, a one-dimensional Winkler model is developed using hyperbolic p-y curves from design codes. The kinematic and inertial loads on the pile foundations are derived using the experimentally measured free-field soil displacements and accelerations, respectively. Different approaches of modifying the p-y relationship to account for soil layering are compared. The importance of considering peak spectral acceleration in lieu of peak ground acceleration at the soil surface to compute the inertial force for the pseudostatic analysis is highlighted. Pile group effects are investigated by considering p-multipliers from literature to account for pile-soil-pile interaction. Results reveal that: (i) for low-intensity seismic motions, the pseudostatic approach with inertial pile-head loading stemming from peak ground acceleration (PGA) at soil surface led to a reasonable agreement of the maximum bending moment with experimental data for both single pile and pile group, (ii) for high-intensity base excitations, the use of the peak spectral acceleration, instead of PGA, at soil surface with suitable damping considerations to derive the inertial load in the pseudostatic model provided a maximum bending moment prediction that was acceptable for the single pile but conservative for the piles in the group compared to the centrifuge records.
•Pseudostatic analysis of a single pile and pile group embedded in layered soil was performed by considering one-dimensional Winkler model.•Different approaches of modifying the p-y relationship to account for soil layering are compared.•The pseudostatic results are compared with the dynamic centrifuge data to evaluate the efficacy of pseudostatic methods and p-y relationships recommended by the design codes.•The importance of group effects and using peak spectral acceleration to compute the inertial force for pseudostatic analysis is highlighted.</abstract><cop>Barking</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.soildyn.2021.107110</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0267-7261 |
ispartof | Soil dynamics and earthquake engineering (1984), 2022-02, Vol.153, p.107110, Article 107110 |
issn | 0267-7261 1879-341X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2636863663 |
source | ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present) |
subjects | Bending moments Building codes Centrifuge Centrifuges Clay soils Damping Dimensional analysis Earthquake Earthquakes Excitation Experimental data Group effects Layered soil Layered soils Maximum bending Mechanical properties Pile foundations Pile groups Pseudostatic analysis Seismic activity Seismic analysis Seismic response Soft clay Soil investigations Soil layers Soil-pile interaction Soils |
title | Seismic response of piles in layered soils: Performance of pseudostatic Winkler models against centrifuge data |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T04%3A16%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Seismic%20response%20of%20piles%20in%20layered%20soils:%20Performance%20of%20pseudostatic%20Winkler%20models%20against%20centrifuge%20data&rft.jtitle=Soil%20dynamics%20and%20earthquake%20engineering%20(1984)&rft.au=Tott-Buswell,%20J.&rft.date=2022-02&rft.volume=153&rft.spage=107110&rft.pages=107110-&rft.artnum=107110&rft.issn=0267-7261&rft.eissn=1879-341X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.soildyn.2021.107110&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2636863663%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2636863663&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0267726121005327&rfr_iscdi=true |