Seismic response of piles in layered soils: Performance of pseudostatic Winkler models against centrifuge data

In this study, the suitability of the pseudostatic approach for the seismic analysis of pile foundations in layered soils is explored by means of experimental data from centrifuge tests performed at 60g. A free-head single pile and a capped (1 × 3) pile group, embedded in a two-layered soil comprisi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Soil dynamics and earthquake engineering (1984) 2022-02, Vol.153, p.107110, Article 107110
Hauptverfasser: Tott-Buswell, J., Garala, T.K., Prendergast, L.J., Madabhushi, S.P.G., Rovithis, E.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page 107110
container_title Soil dynamics and earthquake engineering (1984)
container_volume 153
creator Tott-Buswell, J.
Garala, T.K.
Prendergast, L.J.
Madabhushi, S.P.G.
Rovithis, E.
description In this study, the suitability of the pseudostatic approach for the seismic analysis of pile foundations in layered soils is explored by means of experimental data from centrifuge tests performed at 60g. A free-head single pile and a capped (1 × 3) pile group, embedded in a two-layered soil comprising a soft clay layer underlain by dense sand, are tested in the centrifuge under sinusoidal and earthquake excitations. For the pseudostatic analysis, a one-dimensional Winkler model is developed using hyperbolic p-y curves from design codes. The kinematic and inertial loads on the pile foundations are derived using the experimentally measured free-field soil displacements and accelerations, respectively. Different approaches of modifying the p-y relationship to account for soil layering are compared. The importance of considering peak spectral acceleration in lieu of peak ground acceleration at the soil surface to compute the inertial force for the pseudostatic analysis is highlighted. Pile group effects are investigated by considering p-multipliers from literature to account for pile-soil-pile interaction. Results reveal that: (i) for low-intensity seismic motions, the pseudostatic approach with inertial pile-head loading stemming from peak ground acceleration (PGA) at soil surface led to a reasonable agreement of the maximum bending moment with experimental data for both single pile and pile group, (ii) for high-intensity base excitations, the use of the peak spectral acceleration, instead of PGA, at soil surface with suitable damping considerations to derive the inertial load in the pseudostatic model provided a maximum bending moment prediction that was acceptable for the single pile but conservative for the piles in the group compared to the centrifuge records. •Pseudostatic analysis of a single pile and pile group embedded in layered soil was performed by considering one-dimensional Winkler model.•Different approaches of modifying the p-y relationship to account for soil layering are compared.•The pseudostatic results are compared with the dynamic centrifuge data to evaluate the efficacy of pseudostatic methods and p-y relationships recommended by the design codes.•The importance of group effects and using peak spectral acceleration to compute the inertial force for pseudostatic analysis is highlighted.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.soildyn.2021.107110
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2636863663</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0267726121005327</els_id><sourcerecordid>2636863663</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a407t-ed510f64b5784af709f7637b9bf560dcbd2b937f55db48312838d02a01b7e6413</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkFtLxDAQhYMouK7-BCHgc9ekl6Tri8jiDRYUVPQtpM1kydomNdMK--_t0n33YRgYzjnD-Qi55GzBGRfX2wUG15idX6Qs5eNNcs6OyIyXcplkOf86JjOWCpnIVPBTcoa4ZYxLXooZ8W_gsHU1jYBd8Ag0WNq5BpA6Txu9gwiG7vPxhr5CtCG22teTDGEwAXvdj_5P578biLQNBhqkeqOdx57W4Pvo7LABanSvz8mJ1Q3CxWHPycfD_fvqKVm_PD6v7taJzpnsEzAFZ1bkVSHLXFvJllaKTFbLyhaCmboyabXMpC0KU-VlxtMyKw1LNeOVBJHzbE6uptwuhp8BsFfbMEQ_vlSpyEQ5jshGVTGp6hgQI1jVRdfquFOcqT1atVUHtGqPVk1oR9_t5Bubwq-DqLB2MFIxLkLdKxPcPwl_2T2GOw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2636863663</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Seismic response of piles in layered soils: Performance of pseudostatic Winkler models against centrifuge data</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Tott-Buswell, J. ; Garala, T.K. ; Prendergast, L.J. ; Madabhushi, S.P.G. ; Rovithis, E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Tott-Buswell, J. ; Garala, T.K. ; Prendergast, L.J. ; Madabhushi, S.P.G. ; Rovithis, E.</creatorcontrib><description>In this study, the suitability of the pseudostatic approach for the seismic analysis of pile foundations in layered soils is explored by means of experimental data from centrifuge tests performed at 60g. A free-head single pile and a capped (1 × 3) pile group, embedded in a two-layered soil comprising a soft clay layer underlain by dense sand, are tested in the centrifuge under sinusoidal and earthquake excitations. For the pseudostatic analysis, a one-dimensional Winkler model is developed using hyperbolic p-y curves from design codes. The kinematic and inertial loads on the pile foundations are derived using the experimentally measured free-field soil displacements and accelerations, respectively. Different approaches of modifying the p-y relationship to account for soil layering are compared. The importance of considering peak spectral acceleration in lieu of peak ground acceleration at the soil surface to compute the inertial force for the pseudostatic analysis is highlighted. Pile group effects are investigated by considering p-multipliers from literature to account for pile-soil-pile interaction. Results reveal that: (i) for low-intensity seismic motions, the pseudostatic approach with inertial pile-head loading stemming from peak ground acceleration (PGA) at soil surface led to a reasonable agreement of the maximum bending moment with experimental data for both single pile and pile group, (ii) for high-intensity base excitations, the use of the peak spectral acceleration, instead of PGA, at soil surface with suitable damping considerations to derive the inertial load in the pseudostatic model provided a maximum bending moment prediction that was acceptable for the single pile but conservative for the piles in the group compared to the centrifuge records. •Pseudostatic analysis of a single pile and pile group embedded in layered soil was performed by considering one-dimensional Winkler model.•Different approaches of modifying the p-y relationship to account for soil layering are compared.•The pseudostatic results are compared with the dynamic centrifuge data to evaluate the efficacy of pseudostatic methods and p-y relationships recommended by the design codes.•The importance of group effects and using peak spectral acceleration to compute the inertial force for pseudostatic analysis is highlighted.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0267-7261</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-341X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2021.107110</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Barking: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Bending moments ; Building codes ; Centrifuge ; Centrifuges ; Clay soils ; Damping ; Dimensional analysis ; Earthquake ; Earthquakes ; Excitation ; Experimental data ; Group effects ; Layered soil ; Layered soils ; Maximum bending ; Mechanical properties ; Pile foundations ; Pile groups ; Pseudostatic analysis ; Seismic activity ; Seismic analysis ; Seismic response ; Soft clay ; Soil investigations ; Soil layers ; Soil-pile interaction ; Soils</subject><ispartof>Soil dynamics and earthquake engineering (1984), 2022-02, Vol.153, p.107110, Article 107110</ispartof><rights>2021 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier BV Feb 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a407t-ed510f64b5784af709f7637b9bf560dcbd2b937f55db48312838d02a01b7e6413</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a407t-ed510f64b5784af709f7637b9bf560dcbd2b937f55db48312838d02a01b7e6413</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2021.107110$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tott-Buswell, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garala, T.K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prendergast, L.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Madabhushi, S.P.G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rovithis, E.</creatorcontrib><title>Seismic response of piles in layered soils: Performance of pseudostatic Winkler models against centrifuge data</title><title>Soil dynamics and earthquake engineering (1984)</title><description>In this study, the suitability of the pseudostatic approach for the seismic analysis of pile foundations in layered soils is explored by means of experimental data from centrifuge tests performed at 60g. A free-head single pile and a capped (1 × 3) pile group, embedded in a two-layered soil comprising a soft clay layer underlain by dense sand, are tested in the centrifuge under sinusoidal and earthquake excitations. For the pseudostatic analysis, a one-dimensional Winkler model is developed using hyperbolic p-y curves from design codes. The kinematic and inertial loads on the pile foundations are derived using the experimentally measured free-field soil displacements and accelerations, respectively. Different approaches of modifying the p-y relationship to account for soil layering are compared. The importance of considering peak spectral acceleration in lieu of peak ground acceleration at the soil surface to compute the inertial force for the pseudostatic analysis is highlighted. Pile group effects are investigated by considering p-multipliers from literature to account for pile-soil-pile interaction. Results reveal that: (i) for low-intensity seismic motions, the pseudostatic approach with inertial pile-head loading stemming from peak ground acceleration (PGA) at soil surface led to a reasonable agreement of the maximum bending moment with experimental data for both single pile and pile group, (ii) for high-intensity base excitations, the use of the peak spectral acceleration, instead of PGA, at soil surface with suitable damping considerations to derive the inertial load in the pseudostatic model provided a maximum bending moment prediction that was acceptable for the single pile but conservative for the piles in the group compared to the centrifuge records. •Pseudostatic analysis of a single pile and pile group embedded in layered soil was performed by considering one-dimensional Winkler model.•Different approaches of modifying the p-y relationship to account for soil layering are compared.•The pseudostatic results are compared with the dynamic centrifuge data to evaluate the efficacy of pseudostatic methods and p-y relationships recommended by the design codes.•The importance of group effects and using peak spectral acceleration to compute the inertial force for pseudostatic analysis is highlighted.</description><subject>Bending moments</subject><subject>Building codes</subject><subject>Centrifuge</subject><subject>Centrifuges</subject><subject>Clay soils</subject><subject>Damping</subject><subject>Dimensional analysis</subject><subject>Earthquake</subject><subject>Earthquakes</subject><subject>Excitation</subject><subject>Experimental data</subject><subject>Group effects</subject><subject>Layered soil</subject><subject>Layered soils</subject><subject>Maximum bending</subject><subject>Mechanical properties</subject><subject>Pile foundations</subject><subject>Pile groups</subject><subject>Pseudostatic analysis</subject><subject>Seismic activity</subject><subject>Seismic analysis</subject><subject>Seismic response</subject><subject>Soft clay</subject><subject>Soil investigations</subject><subject>Soil layers</subject><subject>Soil-pile interaction</subject><subject>Soils</subject><issn>0267-7261</issn><issn>1879-341X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkFtLxDAQhYMouK7-BCHgc9ekl6Tri8jiDRYUVPQtpM1kydomNdMK--_t0n33YRgYzjnD-Qi55GzBGRfX2wUG15idX6Qs5eNNcs6OyIyXcplkOf86JjOWCpnIVPBTcoa4ZYxLXooZ8W_gsHU1jYBd8Ag0WNq5BpA6Txu9gwiG7vPxhr5CtCG22teTDGEwAXvdj_5P578biLQNBhqkeqOdx57W4Pvo7LABanSvz8mJ1Q3CxWHPycfD_fvqKVm_PD6v7taJzpnsEzAFZ1bkVSHLXFvJllaKTFbLyhaCmboyabXMpC0KU-VlxtMyKw1LNeOVBJHzbE6uptwuhp8BsFfbMEQ_vlSpyEQ5jshGVTGp6hgQI1jVRdfquFOcqT1atVUHtGqPVk1oR9_t5Bubwq-DqLB2MFIxLkLdKxPcPwl_2T2GOw</recordid><startdate>202202</startdate><enddate>202202</enddate><creator>Tott-Buswell, J.</creator><creator>Garala, T.K.</creator><creator>Prendergast, L.J.</creator><creator>Madabhushi, S.P.G.</creator><creator>Rovithis, E.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier BV</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202202</creationdate><title>Seismic response of piles in layered soils: Performance of pseudostatic Winkler models against centrifuge data</title><author>Tott-Buswell, J. ; Garala, T.K. ; Prendergast, L.J. ; Madabhushi, S.P.G. ; Rovithis, E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a407t-ed510f64b5784af709f7637b9bf560dcbd2b937f55db48312838d02a01b7e6413</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Bending moments</topic><topic>Building codes</topic><topic>Centrifuge</topic><topic>Centrifuges</topic><topic>Clay soils</topic><topic>Damping</topic><topic>Dimensional analysis</topic><topic>Earthquake</topic><topic>Earthquakes</topic><topic>Excitation</topic><topic>Experimental data</topic><topic>Group effects</topic><topic>Layered soil</topic><topic>Layered soils</topic><topic>Maximum bending</topic><topic>Mechanical properties</topic><topic>Pile foundations</topic><topic>Pile groups</topic><topic>Pseudostatic analysis</topic><topic>Seismic activity</topic><topic>Seismic analysis</topic><topic>Seismic response</topic><topic>Soft clay</topic><topic>Soil investigations</topic><topic>Soil layers</topic><topic>Soil-pile interaction</topic><topic>Soils</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tott-Buswell, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garala, T.K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prendergast, L.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Madabhushi, S.P.G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rovithis, E.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Soil dynamics and earthquake engineering (1984)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tott-Buswell, J.</au><au>Garala, T.K.</au><au>Prendergast, L.J.</au><au>Madabhushi, S.P.G.</au><au>Rovithis, E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Seismic response of piles in layered soils: Performance of pseudostatic Winkler models against centrifuge data</atitle><jtitle>Soil dynamics and earthquake engineering (1984)</jtitle><date>2022-02</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>153</volume><spage>107110</spage><pages>107110-</pages><artnum>107110</artnum><issn>0267-7261</issn><eissn>1879-341X</eissn><abstract>In this study, the suitability of the pseudostatic approach for the seismic analysis of pile foundations in layered soils is explored by means of experimental data from centrifuge tests performed at 60g. A free-head single pile and a capped (1 × 3) pile group, embedded in a two-layered soil comprising a soft clay layer underlain by dense sand, are tested in the centrifuge under sinusoidal and earthquake excitations. For the pseudostatic analysis, a one-dimensional Winkler model is developed using hyperbolic p-y curves from design codes. The kinematic and inertial loads on the pile foundations are derived using the experimentally measured free-field soil displacements and accelerations, respectively. Different approaches of modifying the p-y relationship to account for soil layering are compared. The importance of considering peak spectral acceleration in lieu of peak ground acceleration at the soil surface to compute the inertial force for the pseudostatic analysis is highlighted. Pile group effects are investigated by considering p-multipliers from literature to account for pile-soil-pile interaction. Results reveal that: (i) for low-intensity seismic motions, the pseudostatic approach with inertial pile-head loading stemming from peak ground acceleration (PGA) at soil surface led to a reasonable agreement of the maximum bending moment with experimental data for both single pile and pile group, (ii) for high-intensity base excitations, the use of the peak spectral acceleration, instead of PGA, at soil surface with suitable damping considerations to derive the inertial load in the pseudostatic model provided a maximum bending moment prediction that was acceptable for the single pile but conservative for the piles in the group compared to the centrifuge records. •Pseudostatic analysis of a single pile and pile group embedded in layered soil was performed by considering one-dimensional Winkler model.•Different approaches of modifying the p-y relationship to account for soil layering are compared.•The pseudostatic results are compared with the dynamic centrifuge data to evaluate the efficacy of pseudostatic methods and p-y relationships recommended by the design codes.•The importance of group effects and using peak spectral acceleration to compute the inertial force for pseudostatic analysis is highlighted.</abstract><cop>Barking</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.soildyn.2021.107110</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0267-7261
ispartof Soil dynamics and earthquake engineering (1984), 2022-02, Vol.153, p.107110, Article 107110
issn 0267-7261
1879-341X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2636863663
source ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects Bending moments
Building codes
Centrifuge
Centrifuges
Clay soils
Damping
Dimensional analysis
Earthquake
Earthquakes
Excitation
Experimental data
Group effects
Layered soil
Layered soils
Maximum bending
Mechanical properties
Pile foundations
Pile groups
Pseudostatic analysis
Seismic activity
Seismic analysis
Seismic response
Soft clay
Soil investigations
Soil layers
Soil-pile interaction
Soils
title Seismic response of piles in layered soils: Performance of pseudostatic Winkler models against centrifuge data
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T04%3A16%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Seismic%20response%20of%20piles%20in%20layered%20soils:%20Performance%20of%20pseudostatic%20Winkler%20models%20against%20centrifuge%20data&rft.jtitle=Soil%20dynamics%20and%20earthquake%20engineering%20(1984)&rft.au=Tott-Buswell,%20J.&rft.date=2022-02&rft.volume=153&rft.spage=107110&rft.pages=107110-&rft.artnum=107110&rft.issn=0267-7261&rft.eissn=1879-341X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.soildyn.2021.107110&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2636863663%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2636863663&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0267726121005327&rfr_iscdi=true