Rove beetle diversity and coffee agroecosystems in the Colombian Andes
The intensification of coffee plantations has driven biodiversity loss worldwide, but little is known about how it affects the ecological structure of Andean rove beetle communities. The rove beetle diversity was estimated in a coffee‐intensification gradient located on the western slope of Central...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Biotropica 2022-03, Vol.54 (2), p.381-391 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 391 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 381 |
| container_title | Biotropica |
| container_volume | 54 |
| creator | Méndez‐Rojas, Diana M. López‐García, Margarita M. García‐Cárdenas, Delly R. Cultid‐Medina, Carlos A. |
| description | The intensification of coffee plantations has driven biodiversity loss worldwide, but little is known about how it affects the ecological structure of Andean rove beetle communities. The rove beetle diversity was estimated in a coffee‐intensification gradient located on the western slope of Central Andes (1300–1800 m elevation). Sixteen sampling sites in four land uses were selected: four native forest patches and twelve coffee production systems (four polygeneric shade coffee plantations, four monogeneric shade coffee plantations, and four sun‐grown coffee plantations). We used unbaited pitfall traps and leaf litter extraction and recorded environmental and vegetation variables in each land use. 101 staphylinid species were collected in 12 subfamilies and 45 genera (N = 522 individuals). We recorded for the first time the subfamily Leptotyphlinae in Colombia. Anotylus sp. 1 was the most abundant species with about 16% of the total individuals, while 60% of the remaining species showed |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1111/btp.13059 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2636178069</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2636178069</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2979-e600d05b7091226ee01168f3ae234cb6ec6909fd2dc5593cb8dbc77392b766163</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEFLwzAUx4MoOKcHv0HAk4duL0mbNMc5nAoDReY5NOmrdnTNTLpJv73VevVdHg9-7_-HHyHXDGZsmLnt9jMmINMnZMJUmiYq5fqUTABAJkKCPCcXMW6HU2eQTsjq1R-RWsSuQVrWRwyx7npatCV1vqoQafEePDof-9jhLtK6pd0H0qVv_M7WRUsXbYnxkpxVRRPx6m9PydvqfrN8TNbPD0_LxTpxXCudoAQoIbMKNONcIgJjMq9EgVykzkp0UoOuSl66LNPC2by0TimhuVVSMimm5GbM3Qf_ecDYma0_hHaoNFwKyVQOUg_U7Ui54GMMWJl9qHdF6A0D86PJDJrMr6aBnY_sV91g_z9o7jYv48c3CKBoSA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2636178069</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Rove beetle diversity and coffee agroecosystems in the Colombian Andes</title><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Méndez‐Rojas, Diana M. ; López‐García, Margarita M. ; García‐Cárdenas, Delly R. ; Cultid‐Medina, Carlos A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Méndez‐Rojas, Diana M. ; López‐García, Margarita M. ; García‐Cárdenas, Delly R. ; Cultid‐Medina, Carlos A.</creatorcontrib><description>The intensification of coffee plantations has driven biodiversity loss worldwide, but little is known about how it affects the ecological structure of Andean rove beetle communities. The rove beetle diversity was estimated in a coffee‐intensification gradient located on the western slope of Central Andes (1300–1800 m elevation). Sixteen sampling sites in four land uses were selected: four native forest patches and twelve coffee production systems (four polygeneric shade coffee plantations, four monogeneric shade coffee plantations, and four sun‐grown coffee plantations). We used unbaited pitfall traps and leaf litter extraction and recorded environmental and vegetation variables in each land use. 101 staphylinid species were collected in 12 subfamilies and 45 genera (N = 522 individuals). We recorded for the first time the subfamily Leptotyphlinae in Colombia. Anotylus sp. 1 was the most abundant species with about 16% of the total individuals, while 60% of the remaining species showed <2 individuals. Native forest and polygeneric shade coffee plantations were more diverse than monogeneric shade and sun‐grown coffee plantations (for all
qD measures). Monogeneric shade coffee plantations were the least diverse in all studies. Species composition was different between forests and coffee plantations, and the sun‐grown coffee had a low number of exclusive species. The rove beetle diversity did not show a linear reduction with the intensification levels of the coffee plantation, and the sun‐grown coffee did not represent an absolutely hostile environment. We discuss the role of staphylinid as model group for comparative ecological studies in the tropical agricultural landscape.
The rove beetle diversity did not show a lineal reduction with the intensification levels of the coffee plantation. Native forest and polygeneric shade coffee plantations were the most diverse land uses. Monogeneric shade coffee plantations were the least diverse in all land uses studied.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0006-3606</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1744-7429</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/btp.13059</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Agricultural ecosystems ; Agricultural land ; Agriculture ; agriculture intensification ; Beetles ; Biodiversity ; Biodiversity loss ; Coffee ; Coleoptera ; Community composition ; Dominant species ; Ecological studies ; gradient ; Hill’ numbers ; Indigenous species ; Land use ; Leaf litter ; New records ; non‐linear influence ; Pitfall traps ; Plantations ; Shade ; Species composition ; Species diversity ; staphylinid ; Tropical climate</subject><ispartof>Biotropica, 2022-03, Vol.54 (2), p.381-391</ispartof><rights>2021 The Association for Tropical Biology and Conservation</rights><rights>Copyright © 2022 Association for Tropical Biology and Conservation Inc</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2979-e600d05b7091226ee01168f3ae234cb6ec6909fd2dc5593cb8dbc77392b766163</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2979-e600d05b7091226ee01168f3ae234cb6ec6909fd2dc5593cb8dbc77392b766163</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4821-6754 ; 0000-0002-5863-4044 ; 0000-0003-2796-2931 ; 0000-0002-4929-8405</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fbtp.13059$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fbtp.13059$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Méndez‐Rojas, Diana M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>López‐García, Margarita M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>García‐Cárdenas, Delly R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cultid‐Medina, Carlos A.</creatorcontrib><title>Rove beetle diversity and coffee agroecosystems in the Colombian Andes</title><title>Biotropica</title><description>The intensification of coffee plantations has driven biodiversity loss worldwide, but little is known about how it affects the ecological structure of Andean rove beetle communities. The rove beetle diversity was estimated in a coffee‐intensification gradient located on the western slope of Central Andes (1300–1800 m elevation). Sixteen sampling sites in four land uses were selected: four native forest patches and twelve coffee production systems (four polygeneric shade coffee plantations, four monogeneric shade coffee plantations, and four sun‐grown coffee plantations). We used unbaited pitfall traps and leaf litter extraction and recorded environmental and vegetation variables in each land use. 101 staphylinid species were collected in 12 subfamilies and 45 genera (N = 522 individuals). We recorded for the first time the subfamily Leptotyphlinae in Colombia. Anotylus sp. 1 was the most abundant species with about 16% of the total individuals, while 60% of the remaining species showed <2 individuals. Native forest and polygeneric shade coffee plantations were more diverse than monogeneric shade and sun‐grown coffee plantations (for all
qD measures). Monogeneric shade coffee plantations were the least diverse in all studies. Species composition was different between forests and coffee plantations, and the sun‐grown coffee had a low number of exclusive species. The rove beetle diversity did not show a linear reduction with the intensification levels of the coffee plantation, and the sun‐grown coffee did not represent an absolutely hostile environment. We discuss the role of staphylinid as model group for comparative ecological studies in the tropical agricultural landscape.
The rove beetle diversity did not show a lineal reduction with the intensification levels of the coffee plantation. Native forest and polygeneric shade coffee plantations were the most diverse land uses. Monogeneric shade coffee plantations were the least diverse in all land uses studied.</description><subject>Agricultural ecosystems</subject><subject>Agricultural land</subject><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>agriculture intensification</subject><subject>Beetles</subject><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Biodiversity loss</subject><subject>Coffee</subject><subject>Coleoptera</subject><subject>Community composition</subject><subject>Dominant species</subject><subject>Ecological studies</subject><subject>gradient</subject><subject>Hill’ numbers</subject><subject>Indigenous species</subject><subject>Land use</subject><subject>Leaf litter</subject><subject>New records</subject><subject>non‐linear influence</subject><subject>Pitfall traps</subject><subject>Plantations</subject><subject>Shade</subject><subject>Species composition</subject><subject>Species diversity</subject><subject>staphylinid</subject><subject>Tropical climate</subject><issn>0006-3606</issn><issn>1744-7429</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kEFLwzAUx4MoOKcHv0HAk4duL0mbNMc5nAoDReY5NOmrdnTNTLpJv73VevVdHg9-7_-HHyHXDGZsmLnt9jMmINMnZMJUmiYq5fqUTABAJkKCPCcXMW6HU2eQTsjq1R-RWsSuQVrWRwyx7npatCV1vqoQafEePDof-9jhLtK6pd0H0qVv_M7WRUsXbYnxkpxVRRPx6m9PydvqfrN8TNbPD0_LxTpxXCudoAQoIbMKNONcIgJjMq9EgVykzkp0UoOuSl66LNPC2by0TimhuVVSMimm5GbM3Qf_ecDYma0_hHaoNFwKyVQOUg_U7Ui54GMMWJl9qHdF6A0D86PJDJrMr6aBnY_sV91g_z9o7jYv48c3CKBoSA</recordid><startdate>202203</startdate><enddate>202203</enddate><creator>Méndez‐Rojas, Diana M.</creator><creator>López‐García, Margarita M.</creator><creator>García‐Cárdenas, Delly R.</creator><creator>Cultid‐Medina, Carlos A.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4821-6754</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5863-4044</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2796-2931</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4929-8405</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202203</creationdate><title>Rove beetle diversity and coffee agroecosystems in the Colombian Andes</title><author>Méndez‐Rojas, Diana M. ; López‐García, Margarita M. ; García‐Cárdenas, Delly R. ; Cultid‐Medina, Carlos A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2979-e600d05b7091226ee01168f3ae234cb6ec6909fd2dc5593cb8dbc77392b766163</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Agricultural ecosystems</topic><topic>Agricultural land</topic><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>agriculture intensification</topic><topic>Beetles</topic><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Biodiversity loss</topic><topic>Coffee</topic><topic>Coleoptera</topic><topic>Community composition</topic><topic>Dominant species</topic><topic>Ecological studies</topic><topic>gradient</topic><topic>Hill’ numbers</topic><topic>Indigenous species</topic><topic>Land use</topic><topic>Leaf litter</topic><topic>New records</topic><topic>non‐linear influence</topic><topic>Pitfall traps</topic><topic>Plantations</topic><topic>Shade</topic><topic>Species composition</topic><topic>Species diversity</topic><topic>staphylinid</topic><topic>Tropical climate</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Méndez‐Rojas, Diana M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>López‐García, Margarita M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>García‐Cárdenas, Delly R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cultid‐Medina, Carlos A.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Biotropica</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Méndez‐Rojas, Diana M.</au><au>López‐García, Margarita M.</au><au>García‐Cárdenas, Delly R.</au><au>Cultid‐Medina, Carlos A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Rove beetle diversity and coffee agroecosystems in the Colombian Andes</atitle><jtitle>Biotropica</jtitle><date>2022-03</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>54</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>381</spage><epage>391</epage><pages>381-391</pages><issn>0006-3606</issn><eissn>1744-7429</eissn><abstract>The intensification of coffee plantations has driven biodiversity loss worldwide, but little is known about how it affects the ecological structure of Andean rove beetle communities. The rove beetle diversity was estimated in a coffee‐intensification gradient located on the western slope of Central Andes (1300–1800 m elevation). Sixteen sampling sites in four land uses were selected: four native forest patches and twelve coffee production systems (four polygeneric shade coffee plantations, four monogeneric shade coffee plantations, and four sun‐grown coffee plantations). We used unbaited pitfall traps and leaf litter extraction and recorded environmental and vegetation variables in each land use. 101 staphylinid species were collected in 12 subfamilies and 45 genera (N = 522 individuals). We recorded for the first time the subfamily Leptotyphlinae in Colombia. Anotylus sp. 1 was the most abundant species with about 16% of the total individuals, while 60% of the remaining species showed <2 individuals. Native forest and polygeneric shade coffee plantations were more diverse than monogeneric shade and sun‐grown coffee plantations (for all
qD measures). Monogeneric shade coffee plantations were the least diverse in all studies. Species composition was different between forests and coffee plantations, and the sun‐grown coffee had a low number of exclusive species. The rove beetle diversity did not show a linear reduction with the intensification levels of the coffee plantation, and the sun‐grown coffee did not represent an absolutely hostile environment. We discuss the role of staphylinid as model group for comparative ecological studies in the tropical agricultural landscape.
The rove beetle diversity did not show a lineal reduction with the intensification levels of the coffee plantation. Native forest and polygeneric shade coffee plantations were the most diverse land uses. Monogeneric shade coffee plantations were the least diverse in all land uses studied.</abstract><cop>Hoboken</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><doi>10.1111/btp.13059</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4821-6754</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5863-4044</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2796-2931</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4929-8405</orcidid></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0006-3606 |
| ispartof | Biotropica, 2022-03, Vol.54 (2), p.381-391 |
| issn | 0006-3606 1744-7429 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2636178069 |
| source | Access via Wiley Online Library |
| subjects | Agricultural ecosystems Agricultural land Agriculture agriculture intensification Beetles Biodiversity Biodiversity loss Coffee Coleoptera Community composition Dominant species Ecological studies gradient Hill’ numbers Indigenous species Land use Leaf litter New records non‐linear influence Pitfall traps Plantations Shade Species composition Species diversity staphylinid Tropical climate |
| title | Rove beetle diversity and coffee agroecosystems in the Colombian Andes |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T12%3A13%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Rove%20beetle%20diversity%20and%20coffee%20agroecosystems%20in%20the%20Colombian%20Andes&rft.jtitle=Biotropica&rft.au=M%C3%A9ndez%E2%80%90Rojas,%20Diana%20M.&rft.date=2022-03&rft.volume=54&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=381&rft.epage=391&rft.pages=381-391&rft.issn=0006-3606&rft.eissn=1744-7429&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/btp.13059&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2636178069%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2636178069&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |