Comparison of Frontal and Lateral Measurements of Bone Mineral Density of the Lumbar Spine with Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA) in Spinal Deformity: a Phantom Study
The bone mineral density (BMD) measurement of the lumbar spine with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) has the advantage of being able to detect early changes in BMD, which is usually used for the evaluation of drug therapy. However, DXA is not considered suitable for spinal deformity because it...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Japanese Journal of Radiological Technology 2022/02/20, Vol.78(2), pp.171-179 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | jpn |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 179 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 171 |
| container_title | Japanese Journal of Radiological Technology |
| container_volume | 78 |
| creator | Takeya, Mei Ishida, Satoru Tozawa, Mitsuyuki Inaoka, Tsutomu Terada, Hitoshi |
| description | The bone mineral density (BMD) measurement of the lumbar spine with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) has the advantage of being able to detect early changes in BMD, which is usually used for the evaluation of drug therapy. However, DXA is not considered suitable for spinal deformity because it is a two-dimensional measurement. The aims of this study were to compare frontal and lateral measurements with a phantom and to examine the possibility of the evaluation of lumbar spine BMD in spinal deformity. The values of frontal and lateral measurements were compared when the lumbar phantom was tilted by 10 degrees from 0 to 40 degrees, assuming kyphosis, and when it was tilted by 5 degrees from 0 to 10 degrees to the right and left, assuming scoliosis. We revealed that in the case of kyphosis, the frontal is more accurate, and in the case of scoliosis, the lateral is more accurate; small rotation of subjects on the plane parallel to the image receiving surface could be acceptable. In general, the two-directional BMD measurement is useful for the improvement of the accuracy and may have a potential to measure patients with spinal deformity, which was previously thought to be impossible. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.6009/jjrt.780207 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2634937550</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2634937550</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-j1426-166bb6cdef3a5107c9d9138768dd7f95342de3c7d1febc0df45b74095dce8a153</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kU1v1DAQhi0EoqvSE3dkiQscUuw4_gi3ZZcC0lYgFaTeIieedB1t7GA7QvlN_Em8u6WXmdG8z7wazSD0mpJrQUj9YRhCupaKlEQ-QyuqFC0qpdhztCJM1EXFCL9AVzHalmQ8t0j1El0wThUntVihvxs_TjrY6B32Pb4J3iV9wNoZvNMJQq5vQcc5wAguxSPzyTvAt9adxC24aNNy7Kc94N08tjrguynL-I9Ne7yd9aGADD8s-L4IesHrNvowJetHSGHB77b36_fYutPQybH3YcyeH7HGP_baJT_iuzSb5RV60etDhKvHfIl-3Xz-ufla7L5_-bZZ74qBVqUoqBBtKzoDPdOcEtnVpqZMSaGMkX3NWVUaYJ00tIe2I6aveCsrUnPTgdKUs0v09uw7Bf97hpiawc8h7xabUrCqZpJzkqk3j9TcjmCaKdhRh6X5f9sMrM_AEJN-gCdAh2S7AzTH1zVSNeUxnF_4pHV7HRpw7B-BAZUl</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2634937550</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of Frontal and Lateral Measurements of Bone Mineral Density of the Lumbar Spine with Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA) in Spinal Deformity: a Phantom Study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Takeya, Mei ; Ishida, Satoru ; Tozawa, Mitsuyuki ; Inaoka, Tsutomu ; Terada, Hitoshi</creator><creatorcontrib>Takeya, Mei ; Ishida, Satoru ; Tozawa, Mitsuyuki ; Inaoka, Tsutomu ; Terada, Hitoshi</creatorcontrib><description>The bone mineral density (BMD) measurement of the lumbar spine with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) has the advantage of being able to detect early changes in BMD, which is usually used for the evaluation of drug therapy. However, DXA is not considered suitable for spinal deformity because it is a two-dimensional measurement. The aims of this study were to compare frontal and lateral measurements with a phantom and to examine the possibility of the evaluation of lumbar spine BMD in spinal deformity. The values of frontal and lateral measurements were compared when the lumbar phantom was tilted by 10 degrees from 0 to 40 degrees, assuming kyphosis, and when it was tilted by 5 degrees from 0 to 10 degrees to the right and left, assuming scoliosis. We revealed that in the case of kyphosis, the frontal is more accurate, and in the case of scoliosis, the lateral is more accurate; small rotation of subjects on the plane parallel to the image receiving surface could be acceptable. In general, the two-directional BMD measurement is useful for the improvement of the accuracy and may have a potential to measure patients with spinal deformity, which was previously thought to be impossible.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0369-4305</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1881-4883</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.6009/jjrt.780207</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35185096</identifier><language>jpn</language><publisher>Japan: Japanese Society of Radiological Technology</publisher><subject>Absorptiometry, Photon - methods ; Bone Density ; Bone mineral density ; bone mineral density (BMD) ; Chemotherapy ; Dimensional measurement ; Drug therapy ; Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry ; dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) ; Energy ; Evaluation ; Humans ; Kyphosis ; Lumbar Vertebrae - diagnostic imaging ; Phantoms, Imaging ; Scoliosis ; spinal deformity ; Spine ; Spine (lumbar)</subject><ispartof>Japanese Journal of Radiological Technology, 2022/02/20, Vol.78(2), pp.171-179</ispartof><rights>2022 Japanese Society of Radiological Technology</rights><rights>Copyright Japan Science and Technology Agency 2022</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,4010,27900,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35185096$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Takeya, Mei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ishida, Satoru</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tozawa, Mitsuyuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Inaoka, Tsutomu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Terada, Hitoshi</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of Frontal and Lateral Measurements of Bone Mineral Density of the Lumbar Spine with Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA) in Spinal Deformity: a Phantom Study</title><title>Japanese Journal of Radiological Technology</title><addtitle>Jpn. J. Radiol. Technol.</addtitle><description>The bone mineral density (BMD) measurement of the lumbar spine with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) has the advantage of being able to detect early changes in BMD, which is usually used for the evaluation of drug therapy. However, DXA is not considered suitable for spinal deformity because it is a two-dimensional measurement. The aims of this study were to compare frontal and lateral measurements with a phantom and to examine the possibility of the evaluation of lumbar spine BMD in spinal deformity. The values of frontal and lateral measurements were compared when the lumbar phantom was tilted by 10 degrees from 0 to 40 degrees, assuming kyphosis, and when it was tilted by 5 degrees from 0 to 10 degrees to the right and left, assuming scoliosis. We revealed that in the case of kyphosis, the frontal is more accurate, and in the case of scoliosis, the lateral is more accurate; small rotation of subjects on the plane parallel to the image receiving surface could be acceptable. In general, the two-directional BMD measurement is useful for the improvement of the accuracy and may have a potential to measure patients with spinal deformity, which was previously thought to be impossible.</description><subject>Absorptiometry, Photon - methods</subject><subject>Bone Density</subject><subject>Bone mineral density</subject><subject>bone mineral density (BMD)</subject><subject>Chemotherapy</subject><subject>Dimensional measurement</subject><subject>Drug therapy</subject><subject>Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry</subject><subject>dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA)</subject><subject>Energy</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Kyphosis</subject><subject>Lumbar Vertebrae - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Phantoms, Imaging</subject><subject>Scoliosis</subject><subject>spinal deformity</subject><subject>Spine</subject><subject>Spine (lumbar)</subject><issn>0369-4305</issn><issn>1881-4883</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kU1v1DAQhi0EoqvSE3dkiQscUuw4_gi3ZZcC0lYgFaTeIieedB1t7GA7QvlN_Em8u6WXmdG8z7wazSD0mpJrQUj9YRhCupaKlEQ-QyuqFC0qpdhztCJM1EXFCL9AVzHalmQ8t0j1El0wThUntVihvxs_TjrY6B32Pb4J3iV9wNoZvNMJQq5vQcc5wAguxSPzyTvAt9adxC24aNNy7Kc94N08tjrguynL-I9Ne7yd9aGADD8s-L4IesHrNvowJetHSGHB77b36_fYutPQybH3YcyeH7HGP_baJT_iuzSb5RV60etDhKvHfIl-3Xz-ufla7L5_-bZZ74qBVqUoqBBtKzoDPdOcEtnVpqZMSaGMkX3NWVUaYJ00tIe2I6aveCsrUnPTgdKUs0v09uw7Bf97hpiawc8h7xabUrCqZpJzkqk3j9TcjmCaKdhRh6X5f9sMrM_AEJN-gCdAh2S7AzTH1zVSNeUxnF_4pHV7HRpw7B-BAZUl</recordid><startdate>2022</startdate><enddate>2022</enddate><creator>Takeya, Mei</creator><creator>Ishida, Satoru</creator><creator>Tozawa, Mitsuyuki</creator><creator>Inaoka, Tsutomu</creator><creator>Terada, Hitoshi</creator><general>Japanese Society of Radiological Technology</general><general>Japan Science and Technology Agency</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>P64</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2022</creationdate><title>Comparison of Frontal and Lateral Measurements of Bone Mineral Density of the Lumbar Spine with Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA) in Spinal Deformity: a Phantom Study</title><author>Takeya, Mei ; Ishida, Satoru ; Tozawa, Mitsuyuki ; Inaoka, Tsutomu ; Terada, Hitoshi</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-j1426-166bb6cdef3a5107c9d9138768dd7f95342de3c7d1febc0df45b74095dce8a153</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>jpn</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Absorptiometry, Photon - methods</topic><topic>Bone Density</topic><topic>Bone mineral density</topic><topic>bone mineral density (BMD)</topic><topic>Chemotherapy</topic><topic>Dimensional measurement</topic><topic>Drug therapy</topic><topic>Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry</topic><topic>dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA)</topic><topic>Energy</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Kyphosis</topic><topic>Lumbar Vertebrae - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Phantoms, Imaging</topic><topic>Scoliosis</topic><topic>spinal deformity</topic><topic>Spine</topic><topic>Spine (lumbar)</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Takeya, Mei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ishida, Satoru</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tozawa, Mitsuyuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Inaoka, Tsutomu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Terada, Hitoshi</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Japanese Journal of Radiological Technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Takeya, Mei</au><au>Ishida, Satoru</au><au>Tozawa, Mitsuyuki</au><au>Inaoka, Tsutomu</au><au>Terada, Hitoshi</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of Frontal and Lateral Measurements of Bone Mineral Density of the Lumbar Spine with Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA) in Spinal Deformity: a Phantom Study</atitle><jtitle>Japanese Journal of Radiological Technology</jtitle><addtitle>Jpn. J. Radiol. Technol.</addtitle><date>2022</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>78</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>171</spage><epage>179</epage><pages>171-179</pages><issn>0369-4305</issn><eissn>1881-4883</eissn><abstract>The bone mineral density (BMD) measurement of the lumbar spine with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) has the advantage of being able to detect early changes in BMD, which is usually used for the evaluation of drug therapy. However, DXA is not considered suitable for spinal deformity because it is a two-dimensional measurement. The aims of this study were to compare frontal and lateral measurements with a phantom and to examine the possibility of the evaluation of lumbar spine BMD in spinal deformity. The values of frontal and lateral measurements were compared when the lumbar phantom was tilted by 10 degrees from 0 to 40 degrees, assuming kyphosis, and when it was tilted by 5 degrees from 0 to 10 degrees to the right and left, assuming scoliosis. We revealed that in the case of kyphosis, the frontal is more accurate, and in the case of scoliosis, the lateral is more accurate; small rotation of subjects on the plane parallel to the image receiving surface could be acceptable. In general, the two-directional BMD measurement is useful for the improvement of the accuracy and may have a potential to measure patients with spinal deformity, which was previously thought to be impossible.</abstract><cop>Japan</cop><pub>Japanese Society of Radiological Technology</pub><pmid>35185096</pmid><doi>10.6009/jjrt.780207</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0369-4305 |
| ispartof | Japanese Journal of Radiological Technology, 2022/02/20, Vol.78(2), pp.171-179 |
| issn | 0369-4305 1881-4883 |
| language | jpn |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2634937550 |
| source | MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals |
| subjects | Absorptiometry, Photon - methods Bone Density Bone mineral density bone mineral density (BMD) Chemotherapy Dimensional measurement Drug therapy Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) Energy Evaluation Humans Kyphosis Lumbar Vertebrae - diagnostic imaging Phantoms, Imaging Scoliosis spinal deformity Spine Spine (lumbar) |
| title | Comparison of Frontal and Lateral Measurements of Bone Mineral Density of the Lumbar Spine with Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA) in Spinal Deformity: a Phantom Study |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T20%3A39%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20Frontal%20and%20Lateral%20Measurements%20of%20Bone%20Mineral%20Density%20of%20the%20Lumbar%20Spine%20with%20Dual-energy%20X-ray%20Absorptiometry%20(DXA)%20in%20Spinal%20Deformity:%20a%20Phantom%20Study&rft.jtitle=Japanese%20Journal%20of%20Radiological%20Technology&rft.au=Takeya,%20Mei&rft.date=2022&rft.volume=78&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=171&rft.epage=179&rft.pages=171-179&rft.issn=0369-4305&rft.eissn=1881-4883&rft_id=info:doi/10.6009/jjrt.780207&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2634937550%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2634937550&rft_id=info:pmid/35185096&rfr_iscdi=true |