Comparative Study between Flatness-Based and Field-Oriented Control Methods of a Grid-Connected Wind Energy Conversion System
Wind energy is an alternative to meet the growing energy demand. Control of wind turbines should help the reliability and stable operation of the power grid. Furthermore, they should respect the technical requirements according to the grid codes to inject the wind energy into the grid. In this paper...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Processes 2022-02, Vol.10 (2), p.378 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 378 |
container_title | Processes |
container_volume | 10 |
creator | Aimene, Merzak Payman, Alireza Dakyo, Brayima |
description | Wind energy is an alternative to meet the growing energy demand. Control of wind turbines should help the reliability and stable operation of the power grid. Furthermore, they should respect the technical requirements according to the grid codes to inject the wind energy into the grid. In this paper, a well-known field-oriented control (FOC) method and a new control method based on the flatness properties (FBC) are presented and compared. These control methods are applied to a wind energy conversion system (WECS), which connects a variable-speed wind turbine (WT) based on a permanent magnet synchronous generator (PMSG) to the grid via a back-to-back converter. The main aim of both control methods is to extract the maximum power from the wind. For this purpose, the mathematical model of each subsystem, i.e., WT, PMSG, and electrical grid, is presented. To evaluate and to compare the dynamic behavior of the high-power wind energy conversion system, it is modeled and the control strategies are developed using SimPowerSystems Toolbox in MATLAB. The simulation results obtained in the time domain show that the FBC performs better at managing the energy in the studied system. Indeed, the proposed FBC is a high bandwidth control method with only one closed-loop control, which leads to a high dynamic performance. Therefore, that strategy can be used to provide ancillary services such as frequency control and spinning reserves according to the grid codes. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3390/pr10020378 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2633055990</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2633055990</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c336t-64e5243b0094b7b1a9392b49a18eae958fbf2ec458388a908eeef0583a11459d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkMtKAzEUhoMoWLQbnyDgThjNZS7JUoe2CpUuqrgcMpMzOmWajElamYXvbkoFPZtz-86FH6ErSm45l-RucJQQRnghTtCEMVYksqDF6b_4HE2935BoknKR5RP0XdrtoJwK3R7wOuz0iGsIXwAGz3sVDHifPCgPGiuj8byDXicr14EJsVRaE5zt8TOED6s9ti1WeOE6ncSOgebAvHVxbmbAvY8Hfg_Od9bg9egDbC_RWat6D9Nff4Fe57OX8jFZrhZP5f0yaTjPQ5KnkLGU1_HttC5qqiSXrE6logIUyEy0dcugSTPBhVCSCABoScwUpWkmNb9A18e9g7OfO_Ch2tidM_FkxXLOSZZJSSJ1c6QaZ7130FaD67bKjRUl1UHh6k9h_gMoWm49</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2633055990</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparative Study between Flatness-Based and Field-Oriented Control Methods of a Grid-Connected Wind Energy Conversion System</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><creator>Aimene, Merzak ; Payman, Alireza ; Dakyo, Brayima</creator><creatorcontrib>Aimene, Merzak ; Payman, Alireza ; Dakyo, Brayima</creatorcontrib><description>Wind energy is an alternative to meet the growing energy demand. Control of wind turbines should help the reliability and stable operation of the power grid. Furthermore, they should respect the technical requirements according to the grid codes to inject the wind energy into the grid. In this paper, a well-known field-oriented control (FOC) method and a new control method based on the flatness properties (FBC) are presented and compared. These control methods are applied to a wind energy conversion system (WECS), which connects a variable-speed wind turbine (WT) based on a permanent magnet synchronous generator (PMSG) to the grid via a back-to-back converter. The main aim of both control methods is to extract the maximum power from the wind. For this purpose, the mathematical model of each subsystem, i.e., WT, PMSG, and electrical grid, is presented. To evaluate and to compare the dynamic behavior of the high-power wind energy conversion system, it is modeled and the control strategies are developed using SimPowerSystems Toolbox in MATLAB. The simulation results obtained in the time domain show that the FBC performs better at managing the energy in the studied system. Indeed, the proposed FBC is a high bandwidth control method with only one closed-loop control, which leads to a high dynamic performance. Therefore, that strategy can be used to provide ancillary services such as frequency control and spinning reserves according to the grid codes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2227-9717</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2227-9717</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/pr10020378</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Ancillary services ; Comparative studies ; Control algorithms ; Control methods ; Converters ; Efficiency ; Electric power grids ; Energy ; Energy conversion ; Feedback control ; Flatness ; Frequency control ; Generators ; Mathematical models ; Maximum power ; Methods ; Permanent magnets ; Subsystems ; Turbines ; Wind farms ; Wind power ; Wind turbines</subject><ispartof>Processes, 2022-02, Vol.10 (2), p.378</ispartof><rights>2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c336t-64e5243b0094b7b1a9392b49a18eae958fbf2ec458388a908eeef0583a11459d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c336t-64e5243b0094b7b1a9392b49a18eae958fbf2ec458388a908eeef0583a11459d3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5684-9642 ; 0000-0002-3756-6513</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Aimene, Merzak</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Payman, Alireza</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dakyo, Brayima</creatorcontrib><title>Comparative Study between Flatness-Based and Field-Oriented Control Methods of a Grid-Connected Wind Energy Conversion System</title><title>Processes</title><description>Wind energy is an alternative to meet the growing energy demand. Control of wind turbines should help the reliability and stable operation of the power grid. Furthermore, they should respect the technical requirements according to the grid codes to inject the wind energy into the grid. In this paper, a well-known field-oriented control (FOC) method and a new control method based on the flatness properties (FBC) are presented and compared. These control methods are applied to a wind energy conversion system (WECS), which connects a variable-speed wind turbine (WT) based on a permanent magnet synchronous generator (PMSG) to the grid via a back-to-back converter. The main aim of both control methods is to extract the maximum power from the wind. For this purpose, the mathematical model of each subsystem, i.e., WT, PMSG, and electrical grid, is presented. To evaluate and to compare the dynamic behavior of the high-power wind energy conversion system, it is modeled and the control strategies are developed using SimPowerSystems Toolbox in MATLAB. The simulation results obtained in the time domain show that the FBC performs better at managing the energy in the studied system. Indeed, the proposed FBC is a high bandwidth control method with only one closed-loop control, which leads to a high dynamic performance. Therefore, that strategy can be used to provide ancillary services such as frequency control and spinning reserves according to the grid codes.</description><subject>Ancillary services</subject><subject>Comparative studies</subject><subject>Control algorithms</subject><subject>Control methods</subject><subject>Converters</subject><subject>Efficiency</subject><subject>Electric power grids</subject><subject>Energy</subject><subject>Energy conversion</subject><subject>Feedback control</subject><subject>Flatness</subject><subject>Frequency control</subject><subject>Generators</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Maximum power</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Permanent magnets</subject><subject>Subsystems</subject><subject>Turbines</subject><subject>Wind farms</subject><subject>Wind power</subject><subject>Wind turbines</subject><issn>2227-9717</issn><issn>2227-9717</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkMtKAzEUhoMoWLQbnyDgThjNZS7JUoe2CpUuqrgcMpMzOmWajElamYXvbkoFPZtz-86FH6ErSm45l-RucJQQRnghTtCEMVYksqDF6b_4HE2935BoknKR5RP0XdrtoJwK3R7wOuz0iGsIXwAGz3sVDHifPCgPGiuj8byDXicr14EJsVRaE5zt8TOED6s9ti1WeOE6ncSOgebAvHVxbmbAvY8Hfg_Od9bg9egDbC_RWat6D9Nff4Fe57OX8jFZrhZP5f0yaTjPQ5KnkLGU1_HttC5qqiSXrE6logIUyEy0dcugSTPBhVCSCABoScwUpWkmNb9A18e9g7OfO_Ch2tidM_FkxXLOSZZJSSJ1c6QaZ7130FaD67bKjRUl1UHh6k9h_gMoWm49</recordid><startdate>20220201</startdate><enddate>20220201</enddate><creator>Aimene, Merzak</creator><creator>Payman, Alireza</creator><creator>Dakyo, Brayima</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5684-9642</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3756-6513</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220201</creationdate><title>Comparative Study between Flatness-Based and Field-Oriented Control Methods of a Grid-Connected Wind Energy Conversion System</title><author>Aimene, Merzak ; Payman, Alireza ; Dakyo, Brayima</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c336t-64e5243b0094b7b1a9392b49a18eae958fbf2ec458388a908eeef0583a11459d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Ancillary services</topic><topic>Comparative studies</topic><topic>Control algorithms</topic><topic>Control methods</topic><topic>Converters</topic><topic>Efficiency</topic><topic>Electric power grids</topic><topic>Energy</topic><topic>Energy conversion</topic><topic>Feedback control</topic><topic>Flatness</topic><topic>Frequency control</topic><topic>Generators</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Maximum power</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Permanent magnets</topic><topic>Subsystems</topic><topic>Turbines</topic><topic>Wind farms</topic><topic>Wind power</topic><topic>Wind turbines</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Aimene, Merzak</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Payman, Alireza</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dakyo, Brayima</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Processes</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Aimene, Merzak</au><au>Payman, Alireza</au><au>Dakyo, Brayima</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparative Study between Flatness-Based and Field-Oriented Control Methods of a Grid-Connected Wind Energy Conversion System</atitle><jtitle>Processes</jtitle><date>2022-02-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>378</spage><pages>378-</pages><issn>2227-9717</issn><eissn>2227-9717</eissn><abstract>Wind energy is an alternative to meet the growing energy demand. Control of wind turbines should help the reliability and stable operation of the power grid. Furthermore, they should respect the technical requirements according to the grid codes to inject the wind energy into the grid. In this paper, a well-known field-oriented control (FOC) method and a new control method based on the flatness properties (FBC) are presented and compared. These control methods are applied to a wind energy conversion system (WECS), which connects a variable-speed wind turbine (WT) based on a permanent magnet synchronous generator (PMSG) to the grid via a back-to-back converter. The main aim of both control methods is to extract the maximum power from the wind. For this purpose, the mathematical model of each subsystem, i.e., WT, PMSG, and electrical grid, is presented. To evaluate and to compare the dynamic behavior of the high-power wind energy conversion system, it is modeled and the control strategies are developed using SimPowerSystems Toolbox in MATLAB. The simulation results obtained in the time domain show that the FBC performs better at managing the energy in the studied system. Indeed, the proposed FBC is a high bandwidth control method with only one closed-loop control, which leads to a high dynamic performance. Therefore, that strategy can be used to provide ancillary services such as frequency control and spinning reserves according to the grid codes.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><doi>10.3390/pr10020378</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5684-9642</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3756-6513</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2227-9717 |
ispartof | Processes, 2022-02, Vol.10 (2), p.378 |
issn | 2227-9717 2227-9717 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2633055990 |
source | Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute |
subjects | Ancillary services Comparative studies Control algorithms Control methods Converters Efficiency Electric power grids Energy Energy conversion Feedback control Flatness Frequency control Generators Mathematical models Maximum power Methods Permanent magnets Subsystems Turbines Wind farms Wind power Wind turbines |
title | Comparative Study between Flatness-Based and Field-Oriented Control Methods of a Grid-Connected Wind Energy Conversion System |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T09%3A26%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparative%20Study%20between%20Flatness-Based%20and%20Field-Oriented%20Control%20Methods%20of%20a%20Grid-Connected%20Wind%20Energy%20Conversion%20System&rft.jtitle=Processes&rft.au=Aimene,%20Merzak&rft.date=2022-02-01&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=378&rft.pages=378-&rft.issn=2227-9717&rft.eissn=2227-9717&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/pr10020378&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2633055990%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2633055990&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |