Assessment of stakeholder satisfaction as additive to improve building design quality: AHP-based approach
It is possible to obtain better, qualified and error-free structures by evaluating the multidimensional criteria reflects all manner of opinions in the building production process. Stakeholders’ integration plays a major role in achieving this evaluation expecting the targeted quality in building pr...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of housing and the built environment 2022-03, Vol.37 (1), p.505-528 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 528 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 505 |
container_title | Journal of housing and the built environment |
container_volume | 37 |
creator | Eryürük, Şule Kürüm Varolgüneş, Fatma Varolgüneş, Sadık |
description | It is possible to obtain better, qualified and error-free structures by evaluating the multidimensional criteria reflects all manner of opinions in the building production process. Stakeholders’ integration plays a major role in achieving this evaluation expecting the targeted quality in building production, and different priorities could be defined by various type of stakeholders. Therefore, applicable approaches should be used where the stakeholders of the building production process will be included to determine priority levels of criteria. All the criteria considered should provide that all dimensions of demands and expectations are met in the creation of the new building and the built environment. In this study, which is a widely used multi-criteria decision-making method, is applied to ensure mutual satisfaction of decision-makers and beneficiaries in construction process. Four main criteria and sub-criteria related to these main criteria were determined by adding “green and sustainability issues” to the “functionality”, “build quality” and “impact” trilogy determined by Vitruvius for the development of architectural quality. The method used here is based on an evaluation system takes into account all of the stakeholders’ expressions. Necessary data is gathered from three type of stakeholders; a technical team of five individuals consists of architects and engineers, a focus group of twelve individuals consist of occupiers as mass housing clients and the last one is the focus group of three individuals from building production firms as facilities manager. It was observed that distinct type of stakeholder ranked the weight of each main and sub-criterion differently. Therefore, it has been concluded that definition of criteria and determination of the weights of them shall not be determined by only one stakeholder in a project, but also all particular stakeholder are also shall be included during planning and application process. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10901-021-09855-8 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2632485729</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2632485729</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-2781e2cc0ebf115acbaf2922bb5aba6e65d68f156f02694eb9c507fdbda822fb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE9LAzEQxYMoWKtfwFPA82qSbTaJt1L8BwU96Dkkm6RN3e62O1mh397UFbx5GGYOv_ce8xC6puSWEiLugBJFaEFYHiU5L-QJmlAuykIIwU6Pd1UVM0XJOboA2JBMlkJOUJwDeICtbxPuAoZkPv26a5zvMZgUIZg6xa7FBrBxLqb45XHqcNzu-i6fdoiNi-0KOw9x1eL9YJqYDvd4_vxWWAPeYbPLqKnXl-gsmAb81e-eoo_Hh_fFc7F8fXpZzJdFXVKVCiYk9ayuibeBUm5qawJTjFnLjTWVr7irZMjvBMIqNfNW1ZyI4KwzkrFgyym6GX1z7H7wkPSmG_o2R2pWlWwmuWAqU2yk6r4D6H3Quz5uTX_QlOhjpXqsVOei9E-lWmZROYogw-3K93_W_6i-Af3Pe64</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2632485729</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Assessment of stakeholder satisfaction as additive to improve building design quality: AHP-based approach</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Eryürük, Şule ; Kürüm Varolgüneş, Fatma ; Varolgüneş, Sadık</creator><creatorcontrib>Eryürük, Şule ; Kürüm Varolgüneş, Fatma ; Varolgüneş, Sadık</creatorcontrib><description>It is possible to obtain better, qualified and error-free structures by evaluating the multidimensional criteria reflects all manner of opinions in the building production process. Stakeholders’ integration plays a major role in achieving this evaluation expecting the targeted quality in building production, and different priorities could be defined by various type of stakeholders. Therefore, applicable approaches should be used where the stakeholders of the building production process will be included to determine priority levels of criteria. All the criteria considered should provide that all dimensions of demands and expectations are met in the creation of the new building and the built environment. In this study, which is a widely used multi-criteria decision-making method, is applied to ensure mutual satisfaction of decision-makers and beneficiaries in construction process. Four main criteria and sub-criteria related to these main criteria were determined by adding “green and sustainability issues” to the “functionality”, “build quality” and “impact” trilogy determined by Vitruvius for the development of architectural quality. The method used here is based on an evaluation system takes into account all of the stakeholders’ expressions. Necessary data is gathered from three type of stakeholders; a technical team of five individuals consists of architects and engineers, a focus group of twelve individuals consist of occupiers as mass housing clients and the last one is the focus group of three individuals from building production firms as facilities manager. It was observed that distinct type of stakeholder ranked the weight of each main and sub-criterion differently. Therefore, it has been concluded that definition of criteria and determination of the weights of them shall not be determined by only one stakeholder in a project, but also all particular stakeholder are also shall be included during planning and application process.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1566-4910</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-7772</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10901-021-09855-8</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Architecture ; Beneficiaries ; Building design ; Built environment ; Construction ; Decision makers ; Decision making ; Evaluation ; Focus groups ; Geography ; Housing ; Human Geography ; Landscape/Regional and Urban Planning ; Multiple criterion ; Social Sciences ; Stakeholders ; Teams ; Urban environments</subject><ispartof>Journal of housing and the built environment, 2022-03, Vol.37 (1), p.505-528</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V. 2021</rights><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V. 2021.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-2781e2cc0ebf115acbaf2922bb5aba6e65d68f156f02694eb9c507fdbda822fb3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-2781e2cc0ebf115acbaf2922bb5aba6e65d68f156f02694eb9c507fdbda822fb3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3214-4274 ; 0000-0003-2746-1598 ; 0000-0001-9580-9889</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10901-021-09855-8$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10901-021-09855-8$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Eryürük, Şule</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kürüm Varolgüneş, Fatma</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Varolgüneş, Sadık</creatorcontrib><title>Assessment of stakeholder satisfaction as additive to improve building design quality: AHP-based approach</title><title>Journal of housing and the built environment</title><addtitle>J Hous and the Built Environ</addtitle><description>It is possible to obtain better, qualified and error-free structures by evaluating the multidimensional criteria reflects all manner of opinions in the building production process. Stakeholders’ integration plays a major role in achieving this evaluation expecting the targeted quality in building production, and different priorities could be defined by various type of stakeholders. Therefore, applicable approaches should be used where the stakeholders of the building production process will be included to determine priority levels of criteria. All the criteria considered should provide that all dimensions of demands and expectations are met in the creation of the new building and the built environment. In this study, which is a widely used multi-criteria decision-making method, is applied to ensure mutual satisfaction of decision-makers and beneficiaries in construction process. Four main criteria and sub-criteria related to these main criteria were determined by adding “green and sustainability issues” to the “functionality”, “build quality” and “impact” trilogy determined by Vitruvius for the development of architectural quality. The method used here is based on an evaluation system takes into account all of the stakeholders’ expressions. Necessary data is gathered from three type of stakeholders; a technical team of five individuals consists of architects and engineers, a focus group of twelve individuals consist of occupiers as mass housing clients and the last one is the focus group of three individuals from building production firms as facilities manager. It was observed that distinct type of stakeholder ranked the weight of each main and sub-criterion differently. Therefore, it has been concluded that definition of criteria and determination of the weights of them shall not be determined by only one stakeholder in a project, but also all particular stakeholder are also shall be included during planning and application process.</description><subject>Architecture</subject><subject>Beneficiaries</subject><subject>Building design</subject><subject>Built environment</subject><subject>Construction</subject><subject>Decision makers</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Focus groups</subject><subject>Geography</subject><subject>Housing</subject><subject>Human Geography</subject><subject>Landscape/Regional and Urban Planning</subject><subject>Multiple criterion</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>Stakeholders</subject><subject>Teams</subject><subject>Urban environments</subject><issn>1566-4910</issn><issn>1573-7772</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE9LAzEQxYMoWKtfwFPA82qSbTaJt1L8BwU96Dkkm6RN3e62O1mh397UFbx5GGYOv_ce8xC6puSWEiLugBJFaEFYHiU5L-QJmlAuykIIwU6Pd1UVM0XJOboA2JBMlkJOUJwDeICtbxPuAoZkPv26a5zvMZgUIZg6xa7FBrBxLqb45XHqcNzu-i6fdoiNi-0KOw9x1eL9YJqYDvd4_vxWWAPeYbPLqKnXl-gsmAb81e-eoo_Hh_fFc7F8fXpZzJdFXVKVCiYk9ayuibeBUm5qawJTjFnLjTWVr7irZMjvBMIqNfNW1ZyI4KwzkrFgyym6GX1z7H7wkPSmG_o2R2pWlWwmuWAqU2yk6r4D6H3Quz5uTX_QlOhjpXqsVOei9E-lWmZROYogw-3K93_W_6i-Af3Pe64</recordid><startdate>20220301</startdate><enddate>20220301</enddate><creator>Eryürük, Şule</creator><creator>Kürüm Varolgüneş, Fatma</creator><creator>Varolgüneş, Sadık</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3214-4274</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2746-1598</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9580-9889</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220301</creationdate><title>Assessment of stakeholder satisfaction as additive to improve building design quality: AHP-based approach</title><author>Eryürük, Şule ; Kürüm Varolgüneş, Fatma ; Varolgüneş, Sadık</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-2781e2cc0ebf115acbaf2922bb5aba6e65d68f156f02694eb9c507fdbda822fb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Architecture</topic><topic>Beneficiaries</topic><topic>Building design</topic><topic>Built environment</topic><topic>Construction</topic><topic>Decision makers</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Focus groups</topic><topic>Geography</topic><topic>Housing</topic><topic>Human Geography</topic><topic>Landscape/Regional and Urban Planning</topic><topic>Multiple criterion</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>Stakeholders</topic><topic>Teams</topic><topic>Urban environments</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Eryürük, Şule</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kürüm Varolgüneş, Fatma</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Varolgüneş, Sadık</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Journal of housing and the built environment</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Eryürük, Şule</au><au>Kürüm Varolgüneş, Fatma</au><au>Varolgüneş, Sadık</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Assessment of stakeholder satisfaction as additive to improve building design quality: AHP-based approach</atitle><jtitle>Journal of housing and the built environment</jtitle><stitle>J Hous and the Built Environ</stitle><date>2022-03-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>37</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>505</spage><epage>528</epage><pages>505-528</pages><issn>1566-4910</issn><eissn>1573-7772</eissn><abstract>It is possible to obtain better, qualified and error-free structures by evaluating the multidimensional criteria reflects all manner of opinions in the building production process. Stakeholders’ integration plays a major role in achieving this evaluation expecting the targeted quality in building production, and different priorities could be defined by various type of stakeholders. Therefore, applicable approaches should be used where the stakeholders of the building production process will be included to determine priority levels of criteria. All the criteria considered should provide that all dimensions of demands and expectations are met in the creation of the new building and the built environment. In this study, which is a widely used multi-criteria decision-making method, is applied to ensure mutual satisfaction of decision-makers and beneficiaries in construction process. Four main criteria and sub-criteria related to these main criteria were determined by adding “green and sustainability issues” to the “functionality”, “build quality” and “impact” trilogy determined by Vitruvius for the development of architectural quality. The method used here is based on an evaluation system takes into account all of the stakeholders’ expressions. Necessary data is gathered from three type of stakeholders; a technical team of five individuals consists of architects and engineers, a focus group of twelve individuals consist of occupiers as mass housing clients and the last one is the focus group of three individuals from building production firms as facilities manager. It was observed that distinct type of stakeholder ranked the weight of each main and sub-criterion differently. Therefore, it has been concluded that definition of criteria and determination of the weights of them shall not be determined by only one stakeholder in a project, but also all particular stakeholder are also shall be included during planning and application process.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s10901-021-09855-8</doi><tpages>24</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3214-4274</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2746-1598</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9580-9889</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1566-4910 |
ispartof | Journal of housing and the built environment, 2022-03, Vol.37 (1), p.505-528 |
issn | 1566-4910 1573-7772 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2632485729 |
source | SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Architecture Beneficiaries Building design Built environment Construction Decision makers Decision making Evaluation Focus groups Geography Housing Human Geography Landscape/Regional and Urban Planning Multiple criterion Social Sciences Stakeholders Teams Urban environments |
title | Assessment of stakeholder satisfaction as additive to improve building design quality: AHP-based approach |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T16%3A07%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Assessment%20of%20stakeholder%20satisfaction%20as%20additive%20to%20improve%20building%20design%20quality:%20AHP-based%20approach&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20housing%20and%20the%20built%20environment&rft.au=Ery%C3%BCr%C3%BCk,%20%C5%9Eule&rft.date=2022-03-01&rft.volume=37&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=505&rft.epage=528&rft.pages=505-528&rft.issn=1566-4910&rft.eissn=1573-7772&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10901-021-09855-8&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2632485729%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2632485729&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |