Assessment of stakeholder satisfaction as additive to improve building design quality: AHP-based approach

It is possible to obtain better, qualified and error-free structures by evaluating the multidimensional criteria reflects all manner of opinions in the building production process. Stakeholders’ integration plays a major role in achieving this evaluation expecting the targeted quality in building pr...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of housing and the built environment 2022-03, Vol.37 (1), p.505-528
Hauptverfasser: Eryürük, Şule, Kürüm Varolgüneş, Fatma, Varolgüneş, Sadık
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 528
container_issue 1
container_start_page 505
container_title Journal of housing and the built environment
container_volume 37
creator Eryürük, Şule
Kürüm Varolgüneş, Fatma
Varolgüneş, Sadık
description It is possible to obtain better, qualified and error-free structures by evaluating the multidimensional criteria reflects all manner of opinions in the building production process. Stakeholders’ integration plays a major role in achieving this evaluation expecting the targeted quality in building production, and different priorities could be defined by various type of stakeholders. Therefore, applicable approaches should be used where the stakeholders of the building production process will be included to determine priority levels of criteria. All the criteria considered should provide that all dimensions of demands and expectations are met in the creation of the new building and the built environment. In this study, which is a widely used multi-criteria decision-making method, is applied to ensure mutual satisfaction of decision-makers and beneficiaries in construction process. Four main criteria and sub-criteria related to these main criteria were determined by adding “green and sustainability issues” to the “functionality”, “build quality” and “impact” trilogy determined by Vitruvius for the development of architectural quality. The method used here is based on an evaluation system takes into account all of the stakeholders’ expressions. Necessary data is gathered from three type of stakeholders; a technical team of five individuals consists of architects and engineers, a focus group of twelve individuals consist of occupiers as mass housing clients and the last one is the focus group of three individuals from building production firms as facilities manager. It was observed that distinct type of stakeholder ranked the weight of each main and sub-criterion differently. Therefore, it has been concluded that definition of criteria and determination of the weights of them shall not be determined by only one stakeholder in a project, but also all particular stakeholder are also shall be included during planning and application process.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10901-021-09855-8
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2632485729</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2632485729</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-2781e2cc0ebf115acbaf2922bb5aba6e65d68f156f02694eb9c507fdbda822fb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE9LAzEQxYMoWKtfwFPA82qSbTaJt1L8BwU96Dkkm6RN3e62O1mh397UFbx5GGYOv_ce8xC6puSWEiLugBJFaEFYHiU5L-QJmlAuykIIwU6Pd1UVM0XJOboA2JBMlkJOUJwDeICtbxPuAoZkPv26a5zvMZgUIZg6xa7FBrBxLqb45XHqcNzu-i6fdoiNi-0KOw9x1eL9YJqYDvd4_vxWWAPeYbPLqKnXl-gsmAb81e-eoo_Hh_fFc7F8fXpZzJdFXVKVCiYk9ayuibeBUm5qawJTjFnLjTWVr7irZMjvBMIqNfNW1ZyI4KwzkrFgyym6GX1z7H7wkPSmG_o2R2pWlWwmuWAqU2yk6r4D6H3Quz5uTX_QlOhjpXqsVOei9E-lWmZROYogw-3K93_W_6i-Af3Pe64</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2632485729</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Assessment of stakeholder satisfaction as additive to improve building design quality: AHP-based approach</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Eryürük, Şule ; Kürüm Varolgüneş, Fatma ; Varolgüneş, Sadık</creator><creatorcontrib>Eryürük, Şule ; Kürüm Varolgüneş, Fatma ; Varolgüneş, Sadık</creatorcontrib><description>It is possible to obtain better, qualified and error-free structures by evaluating the multidimensional criteria reflects all manner of opinions in the building production process. Stakeholders’ integration plays a major role in achieving this evaluation expecting the targeted quality in building production, and different priorities could be defined by various type of stakeholders. Therefore, applicable approaches should be used where the stakeholders of the building production process will be included to determine priority levels of criteria. All the criteria considered should provide that all dimensions of demands and expectations are met in the creation of the new building and the built environment. In this study, which is a widely used multi-criteria decision-making method, is applied to ensure mutual satisfaction of decision-makers and beneficiaries in construction process. Four main criteria and sub-criteria related to these main criteria were determined by adding “green and sustainability issues” to the “functionality”, “build quality” and “impact” trilogy determined by Vitruvius for the development of architectural quality. The method used here is based on an evaluation system takes into account all of the stakeholders’ expressions. Necessary data is gathered from three type of stakeholders; a technical team of five individuals consists of architects and engineers, a focus group of twelve individuals consist of occupiers as mass housing clients and the last one is the focus group of three individuals from building production firms as facilities manager. It was observed that distinct type of stakeholder ranked the weight of each main and sub-criterion differently. Therefore, it has been concluded that definition of criteria and determination of the weights of them shall not be determined by only one stakeholder in a project, but also all particular stakeholder are also shall be included during planning and application process.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1566-4910</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-7772</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10901-021-09855-8</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Architecture ; Beneficiaries ; Building design ; Built environment ; Construction ; Decision makers ; Decision making ; Evaluation ; Focus groups ; Geography ; Housing ; Human Geography ; Landscape/Regional and Urban Planning ; Multiple criterion ; Social Sciences ; Stakeholders ; Teams ; Urban environments</subject><ispartof>Journal of housing and the built environment, 2022-03, Vol.37 (1), p.505-528</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V. 2021</rights><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V. 2021.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-2781e2cc0ebf115acbaf2922bb5aba6e65d68f156f02694eb9c507fdbda822fb3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-2781e2cc0ebf115acbaf2922bb5aba6e65d68f156f02694eb9c507fdbda822fb3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3214-4274 ; 0000-0003-2746-1598 ; 0000-0001-9580-9889</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10901-021-09855-8$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10901-021-09855-8$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Eryürük, Şule</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kürüm Varolgüneş, Fatma</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Varolgüneş, Sadık</creatorcontrib><title>Assessment of stakeholder satisfaction as additive to improve building design quality: AHP-based approach</title><title>Journal of housing and the built environment</title><addtitle>J Hous and the Built Environ</addtitle><description>It is possible to obtain better, qualified and error-free structures by evaluating the multidimensional criteria reflects all manner of opinions in the building production process. Stakeholders’ integration plays a major role in achieving this evaluation expecting the targeted quality in building production, and different priorities could be defined by various type of stakeholders. Therefore, applicable approaches should be used where the stakeholders of the building production process will be included to determine priority levels of criteria. All the criteria considered should provide that all dimensions of demands and expectations are met in the creation of the new building and the built environment. In this study, which is a widely used multi-criteria decision-making method, is applied to ensure mutual satisfaction of decision-makers and beneficiaries in construction process. Four main criteria and sub-criteria related to these main criteria were determined by adding “green and sustainability issues” to the “functionality”, “build quality” and “impact” trilogy determined by Vitruvius for the development of architectural quality. The method used here is based on an evaluation system takes into account all of the stakeholders’ expressions. Necessary data is gathered from three type of stakeholders; a technical team of five individuals consists of architects and engineers, a focus group of twelve individuals consist of occupiers as mass housing clients and the last one is the focus group of three individuals from building production firms as facilities manager. It was observed that distinct type of stakeholder ranked the weight of each main and sub-criterion differently. Therefore, it has been concluded that definition of criteria and determination of the weights of them shall not be determined by only one stakeholder in a project, but also all particular stakeholder are also shall be included during planning and application process.</description><subject>Architecture</subject><subject>Beneficiaries</subject><subject>Building design</subject><subject>Built environment</subject><subject>Construction</subject><subject>Decision makers</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Focus groups</subject><subject>Geography</subject><subject>Housing</subject><subject>Human Geography</subject><subject>Landscape/Regional and Urban Planning</subject><subject>Multiple criterion</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>Stakeholders</subject><subject>Teams</subject><subject>Urban environments</subject><issn>1566-4910</issn><issn>1573-7772</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE9LAzEQxYMoWKtfwFPA82qSbTaJt1L8BwU96Dkkm6RN3e62O1mh397UFbx5GGYOv_ce8xC6puSWEiLugBJFaEFYHiU5L-QJmlAuykIIwU6Pd1UVM0XJOboA2JBMlkJOUJwDeICtbxPuAoZkPv26a5zvMZgUIZg6xa7FBrBxLqb45XHqcNzu-i6fdoiNi-0KOw9x1eL9YJqYDvd4_vxWWAPeYbPLqKnXl-gsmAb81e-eoo_Hh_fFc7F8fXpZzJdFXVKVCiYk9ayuibeBUm5qawJTjFnLjTWVr7irZMjvBMIqNfNW1ZyI4KwzkrFgyym6GX1z7H7wkPSmG_o2R2pWlWwmuWAqU2yk6r4D6H3Quz5uTX_QlOhjpXqsVOei9E-lWmZROYogw-3K93_W_6i-Af3Pe64</recordid><startdate>20220301</startdate><enddate>20220301</enddate><creator>Eryürük, Şule</creator><creator>Kürüm Varolgüneş, Fatma</creator><creator>Varolgüneş, Sadık</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3214-4274</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2746-1598</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9580-9889</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220301</creationdate><title>Assessment of stakeholder satisfaction as additive to improve building design quality: AHP-based approach</title><author>Eryürük, Şule ; Kürüm Varolgüneş, Fatma ; Varolgüneş, Sadık</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-2781e2cc0ebf115acbaf2922bb5aba6e65d68f156f02694eb9c507fdbda822fb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Architecture</topic><topic>Beneficiaries</topic><topic>Building design</topic><topic>Built environment</topic><topic>Construction</topic><topic>Decision makers</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Focus groups</topic><topic>Geography</topic><topic>Housing</topic><topic>Human Geography</topic><topic>Landscape/Regional and Urban Planning</topic><topic>Multiple criterion</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>Stakeholders</topic><topic>Teams</topic><topic>Urban environments</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Eryürük, Şule</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kürüm Varolgüneş, Fatma</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Varolgüneş, Sadık</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Journal of housing and the built environment</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Eryürük, Şule</au><au>Kürüm Varolgüneş, Fatma</au><au>Varolgüneş, Sadık</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Assessment of stakeholder satisfaction as additive to improve building design quality: AHP-based approach</atitle><jtitle>Journal of housing and the built environment</jtitle><stitle>J Hous and the Built Environ</stitle><date>2022-03-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>37</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>505</spage><epage>528</epage><pages>505-528</pages><issn>1566-4910</issn><eissn>1573-7772</eissn><abstract>It is possible to obtain better, qualified and error-free structures by evaluating the multidimensional criteria reflects all manner of opinions in the building production process. Stakeholders’ integration plays a major role in achieving this evaluation expecting the targeted quality in building production, and different priorities could be defined by various type of stakeholders. Therefore, applicable approaches should be used where the stakeholders of the building production process will be included to determine priority levels of criteria. All the criteria considered should provide that all dimensions of demands and expectations are met in the creation of the new building and the built environment. In this study, which is a widely used multi-criteria decision-making method, is applied to ensure mutual satisfaction of decision-makers and beneficiaries in construction process. Four main criteria and sub-criteria related to these main criteria were determined by adding “green and sustainability issues” to the “functionality”, “build quality” and “impact” trilogy determined by Vitruvius for the development of architectural quality. The method used here is based on an evaluation system takes into account all of the stakeholders’ expressions. Necessary data is gathered from three type of stakeholders; a technical team of five individuals consists of architects and engineers, a focus group of twelve individuals consist of occupiers as mass housing clients and the last one is the focus group of three individuals from building production firms as facilities manager. It was observed that distinct type of stakeholder ranked the weight of each main and sub-criterion differently. Therefore, it has been concluded that definition of criteria and determination of the weights of them shall not be determined by only one stakeholder in a project, but also all particular stakeholder are also shall be included during planning and application process.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s10901-021-09855-8</doi><tpages>24</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3214-4274</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2746-1598</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9580-9889</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1566-4910
ispartof Journal of housing and the built environment, 2022-03, Vol.37 (1), p.505-528
issn 1566-4910
1573-7772
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2632485729
source SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Architecture
Beneficiaries
Building design
Built environment
Construction
Decision makers
Decision making
Evaluation
Focus groups
Geography
Housing
Human Geography
Landscape/Regional and Urban Planning
Multiple criterion
Social Sciences
Stakeholders
Teams
Urban environments
title Assessment of stakeholder satisfaction as additive to improve building design quality: AHP-based approach
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T16%3A07%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Assessment%20of%20stakeholder%20satisfaction%20as%20additive%20to%20improve%20building%20design%20quality:%20AHP-based%20approach&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20housing%20and%20the%20built%20environment&rft.au=Ery%C3%BCr%C3%BCk,%20%C5%9Eule&rft.date=2022-03-01&rft.volume=37&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=505&rft.epage=528&rft.pages=505-528&rft.issn=1566-4910&rft.eissn=1573-7772&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10901-021-09855-8&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2632485729%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2632485729&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true