BIM-Specific Prequalification Criteria in Construction Projects: Exploring the Nature and Timeline of Their Inclusion

AbstractBuilding information modeling (BIM) can potentially enhance project visibility, improve productivity, and promote shared understanding among various construction project stakeholders. The benefits of BIM implementation in a construction project may remain a distant dream if there is no struc...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of legal affairs and dispute resolution in engineering and construction 2022-05, Vol.14 (2)
Hauptverfasser: Malla, Vijayeta, Jagannathan, Murali, Delhi, Venkata Santosh Kumar, S. Nair, Bhagya
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 2
container_start_page
container_title Journal of legal affairs and dispute resolution in engineering and construction
container_volume 14
creator Malla, Vijayeta
Jagannathan, Murali
Delhi, Venkata Santosh Kumar
S. Nair, Bhagya
description AbstractBuilding information modeling (BIM) can potentially enhance project visibility, improve productivity, and promote shared understanding among various construction project stakeholders. The benefits of BIM implementation in a construction project may remain a distant dream if there is no structured way to select a BIM-capable contractor. Existing studies have focused on identifying BIM prequalification (PQ) criteria in countries where BIM implementation is advanced. Therefore, considering the early stages of BIM adoption in many developing countries, this study identified the mandatory and desirable BIM-specific PQ criteria to be included in the short, medium, and long term, considering the perspectives of clients, contractors, consultants, and academicians in the context of engineering, procurement, and construction—turnkey (EPC–Turnkey) projects. Objectives were achieved by identifying the relevant BIM-specific PQ criteria through content analysis of the literature and interviews with experts predominantly from countries where BIM implementation is nascent. Following the literature review and interviews, a questionnaire survey of globally spread stakeholders assessed their extent of agreement or disagreement on including a criterion as a BIM-specific PQ criterion. The results showed that, while all the identified BIM-specific PQ criteria were rated on the agreement side, most respondents preferred including the criteria as desirable rather than mandatory, with their inclusion in the short and medium term (less than five years). In terms of stakeholder perspectives, there was no significant difference between the agreement levels of stakeholder groups. However, considering the overall responses, realizing the need to provide time for holistic BIM diffusion, the practitioners preferred a middle path to include the BIM-specific PQ criteria as desirable rather than mandatory within a timeline of the next five years. The study results can help project stakeholders assess bidders’ BIM implementation capability by considering the conflicting dual needs of BIM implementation urgency and the varying extents of BIM percolation among contractor organizations.
doi_str_mv 10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000540
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2632146476</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2632146476</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a337t-410c52282828fd94f42953b2daeede911cb4b916b1795e28e9d82c6520aa43223</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEFPwyAUxxujiXP6HYhe9NAJlNJ1t9pMXTJ1yeaZUPrqWLq2A5rot7d1c56EA__A-71Hfp53TfCIYE7ub5NlOr2bJyMSs8BnJMIj3K2Q4RNvcLw7PWZOz70LazcY85AHbOC1D7MXf9mA0oVWaGFg18qyz9LpukKp0Q6Mlkh3ua6sM636eViYegPK2QmafjZlbXT1gdwa0Kt0rQEkqxyt9BZKXQGqC7RagzZoVqmytR1-6Z0VsrRwdTiH3vvjdJU--_O3p1mazH0ZBJHr_otVSOm430Ues4LROAwymkuAHGJCVMaymPCMRHEIdAxxPqaKhxRLyQJKg6F3s-_bmHrXgnViU7em6kYKygNKGGcR76om-yplamsNFKIxeivNlyBY9JqF6DWLeSJ6jaJXKg6aO5jvYWkV_LX_Jf8HvwEwRoGd</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2632146476</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>BIM-Specific Prequalification Criteria in Construction Projects: Exploring the Nature and Timeline of Their Inclusion</title><source>American Society of Civil Engineers:NESLI2:Journals:2014</source><creator>Malla, Vijayeta ; Jagannathan, Murali ; Delhi, Venkata Santosh Kumar ; S. Nair, Bhagya</creator><creatorcontrib>Malla, Vijayeta ; Jagannathan, Murali ; Delhi, Venkata Santosh Kumar ; S. Nair, Bhagya</creatorcontrib><description>AbstractBuilding information modeling (BIM) can potentially enhance project visibility, improve productivity, and promote shared understanding among various construction project stakeholders. The benefits of BIM implementation in a construction project may remain a distant dream if there is no structured way to select a BIM-capable contractor. Existing studies have focused on identifying BIM prequalification (PQ) criteria in countries where BIM implementation is advanced. Therefore, considering the early stages of BIM adoption in many developing countries, this study identified the mandatory and desirable BIM-specific PQ criteria to be included in the short, medium, and long term, considering the perspectives of clients, contractors, consultants, and academicians in the context of engineering, procurement, and construction—turnkey (EPC–Turnkey) projects. Objectives were achieved by identifying the relevant BIM-specific PQ criteria through content analysis of the literature and interviews with experts predominantly from countries where BIM implementation is nascent. Following the literature review and interviews, a questionnaire survey of globally spread stakeholders assessed their extent of agreement or disagreement on including a criterion as a BIM-specific PQ criterion. The results showed that, while all the identified BIM-specific PQ criteria were rated on the agreement side, most respondents preferred including the criteria as desirable rather than mandatory, with their inclusion in the short and medium term (less than five years). In terms of stakeholder perspectives, there was no significant difference between the agreement levels of stakeholder groups. However, considering the overall responses, realizing the need to provide time for holistic BIM diffusion, the practitioners preferred a middle path to include the BIM-specific PQ criteria as desirable rather than mandatory within a timeline of the next five years. The study results can help project stakeholders assess bidders’ BIM implementation capability by considering the conflicting dual needs of BIM implementation urgency and the varying extents of BIM percolation among contractor organizations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1943-4162</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1943-4170</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000540</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Reston: American Society of Civil Engineers</publisher><subject>Building information modeling ; Building management systems ; Content analysis ; Contractors ; Criteria ; Developing countries ; LDCs ; Literature reviews ; Percolation ; Scholarly Paper ; Scholarly Papers ; Stakeholders ; Visibility</subject><ispartof>Journal of legal affairs and dispute resolution in engineering and construction, 2022-05, Vol.14 (2)</ispartof><rights>2022 American Society of Civil Engineers</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a337t-410c52282828fd94f42953b2daeede911cb4b916b1795e28e9d82c6520aa43223</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a337t-410c52282828fd94f42953b2daeede911cb4b916b1795e28e9d82c6520aa43223</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-9377-8414 ; 0000-0003-2267-632X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttp://ascelibrary.org/doi/pdf/10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000540$$EPDF$$P50$$Gasce$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttp://ascelibrary.org/doi/abs/10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000540$$EHTML$$P50$$Gasce$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27922,27923,75963,75971</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Malla, Vijayeta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jagannathan, Murali</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Delhi, Venkata Santosh Kumar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>S. Nair, Bhagya</creatorcontrib><title>BIM-Specific Prequalification Criteria in Construction Projects: Exploring the Nature and Timeline of Their Inclusion</title><title>Journal of legal affairs and dispute resolution in engineering and construction</title><description>AbstractBuilding information modeling (BIM) can potentially enhance project visibility, improve productivity, and promote shared understanding among various construction project stakeholders. The benefits of BIM implementation in a construction project may remain a distant dream if there is no structured way to select a BIM-capable contractor. Existing studies have focused on identifying BIM prequalification (PQ) criteria in countries where BIM implementation is advanced. Therefore, considering the early stages of BIM adoption in many developing countries, this study identified the mandatory and desirable BIM-specific PQ criteria to be included in the short, medium, and long term, considering the perspectives of clients, contractors, consultants, and academicians in the context of engineering, procurement, and construction—turnkey (EPC–Turnkey) projects. Objectives were achieved by identifying the relevant BIM-specific PQ criteria through content analysis of the literature and interviews with experts predominantly from countries where BIM implementation is nascent. Following the literature review and interviews, a questionnaire survey of globally spread stakeholders assessed their extent of agreement or disagreement on including a criterion as a BIM-specific PQ criterion. The results showed that, while all the identified BIM-specific PQ criteria were rated on the agreement side, most respondents preferred including the criteria as desirable rather than mandatory, with their inclusion in the short and medium term (less than five years). In terms of stakeholder perspectives, there was no significant difference between the agreement levels of stakeholder groups. However, considering the overall responses, realizing the need to provide time for holistic BIM diffusion, the practitioners preferred a middle path to include the BIM-specific PQ criteria as desirable rather than mandatory within a timeline of the next five years. The study results can help project stakeholders assess bidders’ BIM implementation capability by considering the conflicting dual needs of BIM implementation urgency and the varying extents of BIM percolation among contractor organizations.</description><subject>Building information modeling</subject><subject>Building management systems</subject><subject>Content analysis</subject><subject>Contractors</subject><subject>Criteria</subject><subject>Developing countries</subject><subject>LDCs</subject><subject>Literature reviews</subject><subject>Percolation</subject><subject>Scholarly Paper</subject><subject>Scholarly Papers</subject><subject>Stakeholders</subject><subject>Visibility</subject><issn>1943-4162</issn><issn>1943-4170</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kEFPwyAUxxujiXP6HYhe9NAJlNJ1t9pMXTJ1yeaZUPrqWLq2A5rot7d1c56EA__A-71Hfp53TfCIYE7ub5NlOr2bJyMSs8BnJMIj3K2Q4RNvcLw7PWZOz70LazcY85AHbOC1D7MXf9mA0oVWaGFg18qyz9LpukKp0Q6Mlkh3ua6sM636eViYegPK2QmafjZlbXT1gdwa0Kt0rQEkqxyt9BZKXQGqC7RagzZoVqmytR1-6Z0VsrRwdTiH3vvjdJU--_O3p1mazH0ZBJHr_otVSOm430Ues4LROAwymkuAHGJCVMaymPCMRHEIdAxxPqaKhxRLyQJKg6F3s-_bmHrXgnViU7em6kYKygNKGGcR76om-yplamsNFKIxeivNlyBY9JqF6DWLeSJ6jaJXKg6aO5jvYWkV_LX_Jf8HvwEwRoGd</recordid><startdate>20220501</startdate><enddate>20220501</enddate><creator>Malla, Vijayeta</creator><creator>Jagannathan, Murali</creator><creator>Delhi, Venkata Santosh Kumar</creator><creator>S. Nair, Bhagya</creator><general>American Society of Civil Engineers</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>KR7</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9377-8414</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2267-632X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220501</creationdate><title>BIM-Specific Prequalification Criteria in Construction Projects: Exploring the Nature and Timeline of Their Inclusion</title><author>Malla, Vijayeta ; Jagannathan, Murali ; Delhi, Venkata Santosh Kumar ; S. Nair, Bhagya</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a337t-410c52282828fd94f42953b2daeede911cb4b916b1795e28e9d82c6520aa43223</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Building information modeling</topic><topic>Building management systems</topic><topic>Content analysis</topic><topic>Contractors</topic><topic>Criteria</topic><topic>Developing countries</topic><topic>LDCs</topic><topic>Literature reviews</topic><topic>Percolation</topic><topic>Scholarly Paper</topic><topic>Scholarly Papers</topic><topic>Stakeholders</topic><topic>Visibility</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Malla, Vijayeta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jagannathan, Murali</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Delhi, Venkata Santosh Kumar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>S. Nair, Bhagya</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of legal affairs and dispute resolution in engineering and construction</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Malla, Vijayeta</au><au>Jagannathan, Murali</au><au>Delhi, Venkata Santosh Kumar</au><au>S. Nair, Bhagya</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>BIM-Specific Prequalification Criteria in Construction Projects: Exploring the Nature and Timeline of Their Inclusion</atitle><jtitle>Journal of legal affairs and dispute resolution in engineering and construction</jtitle><date>2022-05-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>2</issue><issn>1943-4162</issn><eissn>1943-4170</eissn><abstract>AbstractBuilding information modeling (BIM) can potentially enhance project visibility, improve productivity, and promote shared understanding among various construction project stakeholders. The benefits of BIM implementation in a construction project may remain a distant dream if there is no structured way to select a BIM-capable contractor. Existing studies have focused on identifying BIM prequalification (PQ) criteria in countries where BIM implementation is advanced. Therefore, considering the early stages of BIM adoption in many developing countries, this study identified the mandatory and desirable BIM-specific PQ criteria to be included in the short, medium, and long term, considering the perspectives of clients, contractors, consultants, and academicians in the context of engineering, procurement, and construction—turnkey (EPC–Turnkey) projects. Objectives were achieved by identifying the relevant BIM-specific PQ criteria through content analysis of the literature and interviews with experts predominantly from countries where BIM implementation is nascent. Following the literature review and interviews, a questionnaire survey of globally spread stakeholders assessed their extent of agreement or disagreement on including a criterion as a BIM-specific PQ criterion. The results showed that, while all the identified BIM-specific PQ criteria were rated on the agreement side, most respondents preferred including the criteria as desirable rather than mandatory, with their inclusion in the short and medium term (less than five years). In terms of stakeholder perspectives, there was no significant difference between the agreement levels of stakeholder groups. However, considering the overall responses, realizing the need to provide time for holistic BIM diffusion, the practitioners preferred a middle path to include the BIM-specific PQ criteria as desirable rather than mandatory within a timeline of the next five years. The study results can help project stakeholders assess bidders’ BIM implementation capability by considering the conflicting dual needs of BIM implementation urgency and the varying extents of BIM percolation among contractor organizations.</abstract><cop>Reston</cop><pub>American Society of Civil Engineers</pub><doi>10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000540</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9377-8414</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2267-632X</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1943-4162
ispartof Journal of legal affairs and dispute resolution in engineering and construction, 2022-05, Vol.14 (2)
issn 1943-4162
1943-4170
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2632146476
source American Society of Civil Engineers:NESLI2:Journals:2014
subjects Building information modeling
Building management systems
Content analysis
Contractors
Criteria
Developing countries
LDCs
Literature reviews
Percolation
Scholarly Paper
Scholarly Papers
Stakeholders
Visibility
title BIM-Specific Prequalification Criteria in Construction Projects: Exploring the Nature and Timeline of Their Inclusion
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T16%3A14%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=BIM-Specific%20Prequalification%20Criteria%20in%20Construction%20Projects:%20Exploring%20the%20Nature%20and%20Timeline%20of%20Their%20Inclusion&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20legal%20affairs%20and%20dispute%20resolution%20in%20engineering%20and%20construction&rft.au=Malla,%20Vijayeta&rft.date=2022-05-01&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=2&rft.issn=1943-4162&rft.eissn=1943-4170&rft_id=info:doi/10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000540&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2632146476%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2632146476&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true