Seasonal Flux of Ice‐Related Organic Matter During Under‐Ice Blooms in the Western Arctic Ocean Revealed by Algal Lipid Biomarkers

Satellite observations and modeling data have suggested a significant increase in net primary production in the Arctic Ocean over the last decade due to retreating sea ice and the development of light availability caused by Arctic warming. Subsequently, under‐ice blooms (UIBs) are being recognized a...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of geophysical research. Oceans 2022-02, Vol.127 (2), p.n/a
Hauptverfasser: Gal, Jong‐Ku, Ha, Sun‐Yong, Park, Jisoo, Shin, Kyung‐Hoon, Kim, Dongseon, Kim, Nan‐Young, Kang, Sung‐Ho, Yang, Eun Jin
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page n/a
container_issue 2
container_start_page
container_title Journal of geophysical research. Oceans
container_volume 127
creator Gal, Jong‐Ku
Ha, Sun‐Yong
Park, Jisoo
Shin, Kyung‐Hoon
Kim, Dongseon
Kim, Nan‐Young
Kang, Sung‐Ho
Yang, Eun Jin
description Satellite observations and modeling data have suggested a significant increase in net primary production in the Arctic Ocean over the last decade due to retreating sea ice and the development of light availability caused by Arctic warming. Subsequently, under‐ice blooms (UIBs) are being recognized as an important phenomenon from the traditional perspective. However, the role of sea‐ice algae in UIBs is still unknown due to the limited availability of continuous observations. We analyzed data on primary producer‐derived lipid biomarkers from sinking particles collected over 1 year using time‐series sediment traps on the East Siberian Sea and Chukchi Sea slopes. Based on the seasonal changes in sympagic organic carbon derived from the data of the ice proxy (IP25) flux and pelagic biomarkers, such as highly branched isoprenoid trienes, epi‐brassicasterol and dinosterol, a UIB was identified in summer 2018 on the East Siberian Sea slope. Compared to the nutrient distribution on the Chukchi Sea slope, the UIB on the East Siberian Sea slope might have been triggered by the nutrient supply. The estimated flux‐weighted mean sympagic organic carbon value measured during the UIB period (May−August) was 1.04 mg m−2 d−1 on the East Siberian Sea slope, approximately five times greater than recorded that on the Chukchi Sea slope (0.23 mg m−2 d−1) during the same period. Our findings suggest that the importance of sea‐ice algae as primary producers has increased as the UIB phenomenon has become more important in the Arctic Ocean and that sea‐ice environments face changes due to Arctic warming. Plain Language Summary The production of phytoplankton in the Arctic Ocean is dramatically increasing due to sea‐ice losses caused by Arctic warming. This increase in production can also be observed in the production of phytoplankton living under sea ice. We determined the origins of these phytoplanktons through a chemical analysis of particles falling from the sea surface to the sea bottom in the Arctic Ocean. Considerable under‐ice phytoplanktonic growth caused by the nutrient supply was identified on the East Siberian Sea slope. In particular, the production of under‐ice phytoplankton on the East Siberian Sea slope was confirmed to increase by approximately five times compared to that measured on the Chukchi Sea slope during the high‐growth period (May−August). Our study suggests that under‐ice phytoplankton may play an increasingly important role as primary producers in the Arc
doi_str_mv 10.1029/2021JC017914
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2632130130</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2632130130</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3078-28ec9f089e048eed4624c5221fc96a06715779eb10cddeb33306a9f3cb5db2fa3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1PwzAMhisEEhPsxg-IxJVCPvqRHLfCxqahSYOJY5Wm7sjompF0wG6cOPMb-SUEDSFOWJbsw2P79RsEJwSfE0zFBcWUjDNMUkGivaBDSSJCQQXZ_-3T-DDoOrfEPjjhUSQ6wfstSGcaWaNBvXlFpkIjBZ9vHzOoZQslmtqFbLRCN7JtwaLLjdXNAs2bEqynPIv6tTErh3SD2gdA9-A816CeVa0fmyqQDZrBM8jabyu2qFcv_LGJXusS9bVZSfsI1h0HB5WsHXR_6lEwH1zdZdfhZDocZb1JqBhOeUg5KFFhLgBHHKCMEhqpmFJSKZFInKQkTlMBBcGqLKFgjOFEioqpIi4LWkl2FJzu9q6tedp4rfnSbKx_3-U0YZQw7NNTZztKWeOchSpfW-2VbnOC82-z879me5zt8Bddw_ZfNh8PZxmNeMLZF5Btgbg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2632130130</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Seasonal Flux of Ice‐Related Organic Matter During Under‐Ice Blooms in the Western Arctic Ocean Revealed by Algal Lipid Biomarkers</title><source>Wiley Journals</source><source>Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection)</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Gal, Jong‐Ku ; Ha, Sun‐Yong ; Park, Jisoo ; Shin, Kyung‐Hoon ; Kim, Dongseon ; Kim, Nan‐Young ; Kang, Sung‐Ho ; Yang, Eun Jin</creator><creatorcontrib>Gal, Jong‐Ku ; Ha, Sun‐Yong ; Park, Jisoo ; Shin, Kyung‐Hoon ; Kim, Dongseon ; Kim, Nan‐Young ; Kang, Sung‐Ho ; Yang, Eun Jin</creatorcontrib><description>Satellite observations and modeling data have suggested a significant increase in net primary production in the Arctic Ocean over the last decade due to retreating sea ice and the development of light availability caused by Arctic warming. Subsequently, under‐ice blooms (UIBs) are being recognized as an important phenomenon from the traditional perspective. However, the role of sea‐ice algae in UIBs is still unknown due to the limited availability of continuous observations. We analyzed data on primary producer‐derived lipid biomarkers from sinking particles collected over 1 year using time‐series sediment traps on the East Siberian Sea and Chukchi Sea slopes. Based on the seasonal changes in sympagic organic carbon derived from the data of the ice proxy (IP25) flux and pelagic biomarkers, such as highly branched isoprenoid trienes, epi‐brassicasterol and dinosterol, a UIB was identified in summer 2018 on the East Siberian Sea slope. Compared to the nutrient distribution on the Chukchi Sea slope, the UIB on the East Siberian Sea slope might have been triggered by the nutrient supply. The estimated flux‐weighted mean sympagic organic carbon value measured during the UIB period (May−August) was 1.04 mg m−2 d−1 on the East Siberian Sea slope, approximately five times greater than recorded that on the Chukchi Sea slope (0.23 mg m−2 d−1) during the same period. Our findings suggest that the importance of sea‐ice algae as primary producers has increased as the UIB phenomenon has become more important in the Arctic Ocean and that sea‐ice environments face changes due to Arctic warming. Plain Language Summary The production of phytoplankton in the Arctic Ocean is dramatically increasing due to sea‐ice losses caused by Arctic warming. This increase in production can also be observed in the production of phytoplankton living under sea ice. We determined the origins of these phytoplanktons through a chemical analysis of particles falling from the sea surface to the sea bottom in the Arctic Ocean. Considerable under‐ice phytoplanktonic growth caused by the nutrient supply was identified on the East Siberian Sea slope. In particular, the production of under‐ice phytoplankton on the East Siberian Sea slope was confirmed to increase by approximately five times compared to that measured on the Chukchi Sea slope during the high‐growth period (May−August). Our study suggests that under‐ice phytoplankton may play an increasingly important role as primary producers in the Arctic Ocean, a region in which sea‐ice environments face changes due to Arctic warming. Key Points Under‐ice blooms may be enhanced by the development of light availability and triggered by the nutrient supply The flux of ice‐related organic carbon during under‐ice blooms increased five times compared to that measured in nonbloom conditions Lipid biomarker analysis approach using sinking particles could be an important solution for understanding the under‐ice blooms</description><identifier>ISSN: 2169-9275</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2169-9291</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1029/2021JC017914</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Algae ; Availability ; Biomarkers ; Blooms ; Carbon ; Chemical analysis ; Chukchi sea ; East Siberian sea ; Fluctuations ; Geophysics ; highly branched isoprenoids ; Ice environments ; Identification ; IP25 ; Lipids ; Net Primary Productivity ; Nutrient cycles ; Nutrients ; Ocean models ; Oceans ; Organic carbon ; Organic matter ; Particulate flux ; Phytoplankton ; Plankton ; Primary production ; Satellite observation ; Sea ice ; Sea surface ; Seasonal variation ; Seasonal variations ; sediment trap ; Sediment traps ; Slopes ; Trienes ; under‐ice bloom</subject><ispartof>Journal of geophysical research. Oceans, 2022-02, Vol.127 (2), p.n/a</ispartof><rights>2022. American Geophysical Union. All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3078-28ec9f089e048eed4624c5221fc96a06715779eb10cddeb33306a9f3cb5db2fa3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3078-28ec9f089e048eed4624c5221fc96a06715779eb10cddeb33306a9f3cb5db2fa3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-7455-1206 ; 0000-0002-3169-4274 ; 0000-0003-0428-8358 ; 0000-0001-5949-2095 ; 0000-0002-8639-5968 ; 0000-0003-1252-7873</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1029%2F2021JC017914$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029%2F2021JC017914$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,1433,27924,27925,45574,45575,46409,46833</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gal, Jong‐Ku</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ha, Sun‐Yong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Jisoo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shin, Kyung‐Hoon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Dongseon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Nan‐Young</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kang, Sung‐Ho</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Eun Jin</creatorcontrib><title>Seasonal Flux of Ice‐Related Organic Matter During Under‐Ice Blooms in the Western Arctic Ocean Revealed by Algal Lipid Biomarkers</title><title>Journal of geophysical research. Oceans</title><description>Satellite observations and modeling data have suggested a significant increase in net primary production in the Arctic Ocean over the last decade due to retreating sea ice and the development of light availability caused by Arctic warming. Subsequently, under‐ice blooms (UIBs) are being recognized as an important phenomenon from the traditional perspective. However, the role of sea‐ice algae in UIBs is still unknown due to the limited availability of continuous observations. We analyzed data on primary producer‐derived lipid biomarkers from sinking particles collected over 1 year using time‐series sediment traps on the East Siberian Sea and Chukchi Sea slopes. Based on the seasonal changes in sympagic organic carbon derived from the data of the ice proxy (IP25) flux and pelagic biomarkers, such as highly branched isoprenoid trienes, epi‐brassicasterol and dinosterol, a UIB was identified in summer 2018 on the East Siberian Sea slope. Compared to the nutrient distribution on the Chukchi Sea slope, the UIB on the East Siberian Sea slope might have been triggered by the nutrient supply. The estimated flux‐weighted mean sympagic organic carbon value measured during the UIB period (May−August) was 1.04 mg m−2 d−1 on the East Siberian Sea slope, approximately five times greater than recorded that on the Chukchi Sea slope (0.23 mg m−2 d−1) during the same period. Our findings suggest that the importance of sea‐ice algae as primary producers has increased as the UIB phenomenon has become more important in the Arctic Ocean and that sea‐ice environments face changes due to Arctic warming. Plain Language Summary The production of phytoplankton in the Arctic Ocean is dramatically increasing due to sea‐ice losses caused by Arctic warming. This increase in production can also be observed in the production of phytoplankton living under sea ice. We determined the origins of these phytoplanktons through a chemical analysis of particles falling from the sea surface to the sea bottom in the Arctic Ocean. Considerable under‐ice phytoplanktonic growth caused by the nutrient supply was identified on the East Siberian Sea slope. In particular, the production of under‐ice phytoplankton on the East Siberian Sea slope was confirmed to increase by approximately five times compared to that measured on the Chukchi Sea slope during the high‐growth period (May−August). Our study suggests that under‐ice phytoplankton may play an increasingly important role as primary producers in the Arctic Ocean, a region in which sea‐ice environments face changes due to Arctic warming. Key Points Under‐ice blooms may be enhanced by the development of light availability and triggered by the nutrient supply The flux of ice‐related organic carbon during under‐ice blooms increased five times compared to that measured in nonbloom conditions Lipid biomarker analysis approach using sinking particles could be an important solution for understanding the under‐ice blooms</description><subject>Algae</subject><subject>Availability</subject><subject>Biomarkers</subject><subject>Blooms</subject><subject>Carbon</subject><subject>Chemical analysis</subject><subject>Chukchi sea</subject><subject>East Siberian sea</subject><subject>Fluctuations</subject><subject>Geophysics</subject><subject>highly branched isoprenoids</subject><subject>Ice environments</subject><subject>Identification</subject><subject>IP25</subject><subject>Lipids</subject><subject>Net Primary Productivity</subject><subject>Nutrient cycles</subject><subject>Nutrients</subject><subject>Ocean models</subject><subject>Oceans</subject><subject>Organic carbon</subject><subject>Organic matter</subject><subject>Particulate flux</subject><subject>Phytoplankton</subject><subject>Plankton</subject><subject>Primary production</subject><subject>Satellite observation</subject><subject>Sea ice</subject><subject>Sea surface</subject><subject>Seasonal variation</subject><subject>Seasonal variations</subject><subject>sediment trap</subject><subject>Sediment traps</subject><subject>Slopes</subject><subject>Trienes</subject><subject>under‐ice bloom</subject><issn>2169-9275</issn><issn>2169-9291</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1PwzAMhisEEhPsxg-IxJVCPvqRHLfCxqahSYOJY5Wm7sjompF0wG6cOPMb-SUEDSFOWJbsw2P79RsEJwSfE0zFBcWUjDNMUkGivaBDSSJCQQXZ_-3T-DDoOrfEPjjhUSQ6wfstSGcaWaNBvXlFpkIjBZ9vHzOoZQslmtqFbLRCN7JtwaLLjdXNAs2bEqynPIv6tTErh3SD2gdA9-A816CeVa0fmyqQDZrBM8jabyu2qFcv_LGJXusS9bVZSfsI1h0HB5WsHXR_6lEwH1zdZdfhZDocZb1JqBhOeUg5KFFhLgBHHKCMEhqpmFJSKZFInKQkTlMBBcGqLKFgjOFEioqpIi4LWkl2FJzu9q6tedp4rfnSbKx_3-U0YZQw7NNTZztKWeOchSpfW-2VbnOC82-z879me5zt8Bddw_ZfNh8PZxmNeMLZF5Btgbg</recordid><startdate>202202</startdate><enddate>202202</enddate><creator>Gal, Jong‐Ku</creator><creator>Ha, Sun‐Yong</creator><creator>Park, Jisoo</creator><creator>Shin, Kyung‐Hoon</creator><creator>Kim, Dongseon</creator><creator>Kim, Nan‐Young</creator><creator>Kang, Sung‐Ho</creator><creator>Yang, Eun Jin</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7455-1206</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3169-4274</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0428-8358</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5949-2095</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8639-5968</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1252-7873</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202202</creationdate><title>Seasonal Flux of Ice‐Related Organic Matter During Under‐Ice Blooms in the Western Arctic Ocean Revealed by Algal Lipid Biomarkers</title><author>Gal, Jong‐Ku ; Ha, Sun‐Yong ; Park, Jisoo ; Shin, Kyung‐Hoon ; Kim, Dongseon ; Kim, Nan‐Young ; Kang, Sung‐Ho ; Yang, Eun Jin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3078-28ec9f089e048eed4624c5221fc96a06715779eb10cddeb33306a9f3cb5db2fa3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Algae</topic><topic>Availability</topic><topic>Biomarkers</topic><topic>Blooms</topic><topic>Carbon</topic><topic>Chemical analysis</topic><topic>Chukchi sea</topic><topic>East Siberian sea</topic><topic>Fluctuations</topic><topic>Geophysics</topic><topic>highly branched isoprenoids</topic><topic>Ice environments</topic><topic>Identification</topic><topic>IP25</topic><topic>Lipids</topic><topic>Net Primary Productivity</topic><topic>Nutrient cycles</topic><topic>Nutrients</topic><topic>Ocean models</topic><topic>Oceans</topic><topic>Organic carbon</topic><topic>Organic matter</topic><topic>Particulate flux</topic><topic>Phytoplankton</topic><topic>Plankton</topic><topic>Primary production</topic><topic>Satellite observation</topic><topic>Sea ice</topic><topic>Sea surface</topic><topic>Seasonal variation</topic><topic>Seasonal variations</topic><topic>sediment trap</topic><topic>Sediment traps</topic><topic>Slopes</topic><topic>Trienes</topic><topic>under‐ice bloom</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gal, Jong‐Ku</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ha, Sun‐Yong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Jisoo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shin, Kyung‐Hoon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Dongseon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Nan‐Young</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kang, Sung‐Ho</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Eun Jin</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Journal of geophysical research. Oceans</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gal, Jong‐Ku</au><au>Ha, Sun‐Yong</au><au>Park, Jisoo</au><au>Shin, Kyung‐Hoon</au><au>Kim, Dongseon</au><au>Kim, Nan‐Young</au><au>Kang, Sung‐Ho</au><au>Yang, Eun Jin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Seasonal Flux of Ice‐Related Organic Matter During Under‐Ice Blooms in the Western Arctic Ocean Revealed by Algal Lipid Biomarkers</atitle><jtitle>Journal of geophysical research. Oceans</jtitle><date>2022-02</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>127</volume><issue>2</issue><epage>n/a</epage><issn>2169-9275</issn><eissn>2169-9291</eissn><abstract>Satellite observations and modeling data have suggested a significant increase in net primary production in the Arctic Ocean over the last decade due to retreating sea ice and the development of light availability caused by Arctic warming. Subsequently, under‐ice blooms (UIBs) are being recognized as an important phenomenon from the traditional perspective. However, the role of sea‐ice algae in UIBs is still unknown due to the limited availability of continuous observations. We analyzed data on primary producer‐derived lipid biomarkers from sinking particles collected over 1 year using time‐series sediment traps on the East Siberian Sea and Chukchi Sea slopes. Based on the seasonal changes in sympagic organic carbon derived from the data of the ice proxy (IP25) flux and pelagic biomarkers, such as highly branched isoprenoid trienes, epi‐brassicasterol and dinosterol, a UIB was identified in summer 2018 on the East Siberian Sea slope. Compared to the nutrient distribution on the Chukchi Sea slope, the UIB on the East Siberian Sea slope might have been triggered by the nutrient supply. The estimated flux‐weighted mean sympagic organic carbon value measured during the UIB period (May−August) was 1.04 mg m−2 d−1 on the East Siberian Sea slope, approximately five times greater than recorded that on the Chukchi Sea slope (0.23 mg m−2 d−1) during the same period. Our findings suggest that the importance of sea‐ice algae as primary producers has increased as the UIB phenomenon has become more important in the Arctic Ocean and that sea‐ice environments face changes due to Arctic warming. Plain Language Summary The production of phytoplankton in the Arctic Ocean is dramatically increasing due to sea‐ice losses caused by Arctic warming. This increase in production can also be observed in the production of phytoplankton living under sea ice. We determined the origins of these phytoplanktons through a chemical analysis of particles falling from the sea surface to the sea bottom in the Arctic Ocean. Considerable under‐ice phytoplanktonic growth caused by the nutrient supply was identified on the East Siberian Sea slope. In particular, the production of under‐ice phytoplankton on the East Siberian Sea slope was confirmed to increase by approximately five times compared to that measured on the Chukchi Sea slope during the high‐growth period (May−August). Our study suggests that under‐ice phytoplankton may play an increasingly important role as primary producers in the Arctic Ocean, a region in which sea‐ice environments face changes due to Arctic warming. Key Points Under‐ice blooms may be enhanced by the development of light availability and triggered by the nutrient supply The flux of ice‐related organic carbon during under‐ice blooms increased five times compared to that measured in nonbloom conditions Lipid biomarker analysis approach using sinking particles could be an important solution for understanding the under‐ice blooms</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1029/2021JC017914</doi><tpages>15</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7455-1206</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3169-4274</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0428-8358</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5949-2095</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8639-5968</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1252-7873</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2169-9275
ispartof Journal of geophysical research. Oceans, 2022-02, Vol.127 (2), p.n/a
issn 2169-9275
2169-9291
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2632130130
source Wiley Journals; Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection); Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Algae
Availability
Biomarkers
Blooms
Carbon
Chemical analysis
Chukchi sea
East Siberian sea
Fluctuations
Geophysics
highly branched isoprenoids
Ice environments
Identification
IP25
Lipids
Net Primary Productivity
Nutrient cycles
Nutrients
Ocean models
Oceans
Organic carbon
Organic matter
Particulate flux
Phytoplankton
Plankton
Primary production
Satellite observation
Sea ice
Sea surface
Seasonal variation
Seasonal variations
sediment trap
Sediment traps
Slopes
Trienes
under‐ice bloom
title Seasonal Flux of Ice‐Related Organic Matter During Under‐Ice Blooms in the Western Arctic Ocean Revealed by Algal Lipid Biomarkers
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T08%3A56%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Seasonal%20Flux%20of%20Ice%E2%80%90Related%20Organic%20Matter%20During%20Under%E2%80%90Ice%20Blooms%20in%20the%20Western%20Arctic%20Ocean%20Revealed%20by%20Algal%20Lipid%20Biomarkers&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20geophysical%20research.%20Oceans&rft.au=Gal,%20Jong%E2%80%90Ku&rft.date=2022-02&rft.volume=127&rft.issue=2&rft.epage=n/a&rft.issn=2169-9275&rft.eissn=2169-9291&rft_id=info:doi/10.1029/2021JC017914&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2632130130%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2632130130&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true