Validation of the Geriatric Anxiety Inventory in younger adults
This study investigated the psychometric properties of the Geriatric Anxiety Inventory (GAI) in younger adults. Participants were 212 younger adults age M = 22 (range = 17–53) years. They completed a demographic information questionnaire and self-report measures: the GAI, the Depression Anxiety Stre...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of behavioral development 2022-03, Vol.46 (2), p.148-156 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 156 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 148 |
container_title | International journal of behavioral development |
container_volume | 46 |
creator | Zhai, Tina Bailey, Phoebe E. Rogers, Kris D. Kneebone, Ian I. |
description | This study investigated the psychometric properties of the Geriatric Anxiety Inventory (GAI) in younger adults. Participants were 212 younger adults age M = 22 (range = 17–53) years. They completed a demographic information questionnaire and self-report measures: the GAI, the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS), the Generalized Anxiety Disorder–7 (GAD-7), the Patient Health Questionnaire–9 (PHQ-9), the Penn State Worry Questionnaire (PSWQ), and the Worry Behaviors Inventory (WBI). Data from the GAI were collected at two time points, one week apart, and data from other self-report measures were collected once via Qualtrics, an online survey platform. The internal consistency and test–retest score reliability of the GAI were excellent. It had good congruent validity with other anxiety measures, limited divergent validity with depression measures, and sound convergent validity with worry measures. The GAI showed good discrimination between probable cases and noncases of generalized anxiety disorder (participants who scored ⩾8 on the GAD-7) and its optimal cutoff score for probable cases of GAD was ⩾12. A unidimensional component structure of the GAI best fit this study’s data. This study has provided preliminary evidence that the GAI is reliable and valid for use in an Australian sample of younger adults. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/01650254211064348 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2632105834</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1333053</ericid><sage_id>10.1177_01650254211064348</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2632105834</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c334t-f85874a129b4c081fa1a2979fa8be3f555b3d77d86c93e51f42e84ed3fa0ac623</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kDFPwzAQhS0EEqXwAxiQLDGn-Hy240yoqkopqsQCrJGb2CVVSYrtIPLvSRUEA-KWG9733ukeIZfAJgBpesNAScal4ABMCRT6iIxAKJEwJeGYjA56cgBOyVkIW9YPpmxEbl_MripNrJqaNo7GV0sX1lcm-qqg0_qzsrGjy_rD1rHxHa1q2jVtvbGemrLdxXBOTpzZBXvxvcfk-W7-NLtPVo-L5Wy6SgpEEROnpU6FAZ6tRcE0OAOGZ2nmjF5bdFLKNZZpWmpVZGglOMGtFrZEZ5gpFMcxuR5y9755b22I-bZpfd2fzLlCDkxqFD0FA1X4JgRvXb731ZvxXQ4sP_SU_-mp91wNnv7t4oefPwAiMom9Phn0YDb29-r_gV-ueHAQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2632105834</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Validation of the Geriatric Anxiety Inventory in younger adults</title><source>Access via SAGE</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><creator>Zhai, Tina ; Bailey, Phoebe E. ; Rogers, Kris D. ; Kneebone, Ian I.</creator><creatorcontrib>Zhai, Tina ; Bailey, Phoebe E. ; Rogers, Kris D. ; Kneebone, Ian I.</creatorcontrib><description>This study investigated the psychometric properties of the Geriatric Anxiety Inventory (GAI) in younger adults. Participants were 212 younger adults age M = 22 (range = 17–53) years. They completed a demographic information questionnaire and self-report measures: the GAI, the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS), the Generalized Anxiety Disorder–7 (GAD-7), the Patient Health Questionnaire–9 (PHQ-9), the Penn State Worry Questionnaire (PSWQ), and the Worry Behaviors Inventory (WBI). Data from the GAI were collected at two time points, one week apart, and data from other self-report measures were collected once via Qualtrics, an online survey platform. The internal consistency and test–retest score reliability of the GAI were excellent. It had good congruent validity with other anxiety measures, limited divergent validity with depression measures, and sound convergent validity with worry measures. The GAI showed good discrimination between probable cases and noncases of generalized anxiety disorder (participants who scored ⩾8 on the GAD-7) and its optimal cutoff score for probable cases of GAD was ⩾12. A unidimensional component structure of the GAI best fit this study’s data. This study has provided preliminary evidence that the GAI is reliable and valid for use in an Australian sample of younger adults.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0165-0254</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1464-0651</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/01650254211064348</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Adults ; Anxiety ; Anxiety Disorders ; Convergent validity ; Correlation ; Depression (Psychology) ; Discrimination ; Foreign Countries ; Generalized anxiety disorder ; Geriatrics ; Individual Characteristics ; Late Adolescents ; Mental depression ; Psychometrics ; Quantitative psychology ; Questionnaires ; Reliability ; Screening Tests ; Self report ; Test Reliability ; Test Validity ; Undergraduate Students ; Validity ; Worry ; Young Adults</subject><ispartof>International journal of behavioral development, 2022-03, Vol.46 (2), p.148-156</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c334t-f85874a129b4c081fa1a2979fa8be3f555b3d77d86c93e51f42e84ed3fa0ac623</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c334t-f85874a129b4c081fa1a2979fa8be3f555b3d77d86c93e51f42e84ed3fa0ac623</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3324-7264</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/01650254211064348$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/01650254211064348$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,782,786,21828,27933,27934,31008,43630,43631</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1333053$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zhai, Tina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bailey, Phoebe E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rogers, Kris D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kneebone, Ian I.</creatorcontrib><title>Validation of the Geriatric Anxiety Inventory in younger adults</title><title>International journal of behavioral development</title><description>This study investigated the psychometric properties of the Geriatric Anxiety Inventory (GAI) in younger adults. Participants were 212 younger adults age M = 22 (range = 17–53) years. They completed a demographic information questionnaire and self-report measures: the GAI, the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS), the Generalized Anxiety Disorder–7 (GAD-7), the Patient Health Questionnaire–9 (PHQ-9), the Penn State Worry Questionnaire (PSWQ), and the Worry Behaviors Inventory (WBI). Data from the GAI were collected at two time points, one week apart, and data from other self-report measures were collected once via Qualtrics, an online survey platform. The internal consistency and test–retest score reliability of the GAI were excellent. It had good congruent validity with other anxiety measures, limited divergent validity with depression measures, and sound convergent validity with worry measures. The GAI showed good discrimination between probable cases and noncases of generalized anxiety disorder (participants who scored ⩾8 on the GAD-7) and its optimal cutoff score for probable cases of GAD was ⩾12. A unidimensional component structure of the GAI best fit this study’s data. This study has provided preliminary evidence that the GAI is reliable and valid for use in an Australian sample of younger adults.</description><subject>Adults</subject><subject>Anxiety</subject><subject>Anxiety Disorders</subject><subject>Convergent validity</subject><subject>Correlation</subject><subject>Depression (Psychology)</subject><subject>Discrimination</subject><subject>Foreign Countries</subject><subject>Generalized anxiety disorder</subject><subject>Geriatrics</subject><subject>Individual Characteristics</subject><subject>Late Adolescents</subject><subject>Mental depression</subject><subject>Psychometrics</subject><subject>Quantitative psychology</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Reliability</subject><subject>Screening Tests</subject><subject>Self report</subject><subject>Test Reliability</subject><subject>Test Validity</subject><subject>Undergraduate Students</subject><subject>Validity</subject><subject>Worry</subject><subject>Young Adults</subject><issn>0165-0254</issn><issn>1464-0651</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kDFPwzAQhS0EEqXwAxiQLDGn-Hy240yoqkopqsQCrJGb2CVVSYrtIPLvSRUEA-KWG9733ukeIZfAJgBpesNAScal4ABMCRT6iIxAKJEwJeGYjA56cgBOyVkIW9YPpmxEbl_MripNrJqaNo7GV0sX1lcm-qqg0_qzsrGjy_rD1rHxHa1q2jVtvbGemrLdxXBOTpzZBXvxvcfk-W7-NLtPVo-L5Wy6SgpEEROnpU6FAZ6tRcE0OAOGZ2nmjF5bdFLKNZZpWmpVZGglOMGtFrZEZ5gpFMcxuR5y9755b22I-bZpfd2fzLlCDkxqFD0FA1X4JgRvXb731ZvxXQ4sP_SU_-mp91wNnv7t4oefPwAiMom9Phn0YDb29-r_gV-ueHAQ</recordid><startdate>202203</startdate><enddate>202203</enddate><creator>Zhai, Tina</creator><creator>Bailey, Phoebe E.</creator><creator>Rogers, Kris D.</creator><creator>Kneebone, Ian I.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3324-7264</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202203</creationdate><title>Validation of the Geriatric Anxiety Inventory in younger adults</title><author>Zhai, Tina ; Bailey, Phoebe E. ; Rogers, Kris D. ; Kneebone, Ian I.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c334t-f85874a129b4c081fa1a2979fa8be3f555b3d77d86c93e51f42e84ed3fa0ac623</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Adults</topic><topic>Anxiety</topic><topic>Anxiety Disorders</topic><topic>Convergent validity</topic><topic>Correlation</topic><topic>Depression (Psychology)</topic><topic>Discrimination</topic><topic>Foreign Countries</topic><topic>Generalized anxiety disorder</topic><topic>Geriatrics</topic><topic>Individual Characteristics</topic><topic>Late Adolescents</topic><topic>Mental depression</topic><topic>Psychometrics</topic><topic>Quantitative psychology</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Reliability</topic><topic>Screening Tests</topic><topic>Self report</topic><topic>Test Reliability</topic><topic>Test Validity</topic><topic>Undergraduate Students</topic><topic>Validity</topic><topic>Worry</topic><topic>Young Adults</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zhai, Tina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bailey, Phoebe E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rogers, Kris D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kneebone, Ian I.</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><jtitle>International journal of behavioral development</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zhai, Tina</au><au>Bailey, Phoebe E.</au><au>Rogers, Kris D.</au><au>Kneebone, Ian I.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1333053</ericid><atitle>Validation of the Geriatric Anxiety Inventory in younger adults</atitle><jtitle>International journal of behavioral development</jtitle><date>2022-03</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>46</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>148</spage><epage>156</epage><pages>148-156</pages><issn>0165-0254</issn><eissn>1464-0651</eissn><abstract>This study investigated the psychometric properties of the Geriatric Anxiety Inventory (GAI) in younger adults. Participants were 212 younger adults age M = 22 (range = 17–53) years. They completed a demographic information questionnaire and self-report measures: the GAI, the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS), the Generalized Anxiety Disorder–7 (GAD-7), the Patient Health Questionnaire–9 (PHQ-9), the Penn State Worry Questionnaire (PSWQ), and the Worry Behaviors Inventory (WBI). Data from the GAI were collected at two time points, one week apart, and data from other self-report measures were collected once via Qualtrics, an online survey platform. The internal consistency and test–retest score reliability of the GAI were excellent. It had good congruent validity with other anxiety measures, limited divergent validity with depression measures, and sound convergent validity with worry measures. The GAI showed good discrimination between probable cases and noncases of generalized anxiety disorder (participants who scored ⩾8 on the GAD-7) and its optimal cutoff score for probable cases of GAD was ⩾12. A unidimensional component structure of the GAI best fit this study’s data. This study has provided preliminary evidence that the GAI is reliable and valid for use in an Australian sample of younger adults.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/01650254211064348</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3324-7264</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0165-0254 |
ispartof | International journal of behavioral development, 2022-03, Vol.46 (2), p.148-156 |
issn | 0165-0254 1464-0651 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2632105834 |
source | Access via SAGE; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA) |
subjects | Adults Anxiety Anxiety Disorders Convergent validity Correlation Depression (Psychology) Discrimination Foreign Countries Generalized anxiety disorder Geriatrics Individual Characteristics Late Adolescents Mental depression Psychometrics Quantitative psychology Questionnaires Reliability Screening Tests Self report Test Reliability Test Validity Undergraduate Students Validity Worry Young Adults |
title | Validation of the Geriatric Anxiety Inventory in younger adults |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-02T02%3A04%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Validation%20of%20the%20Geriatric%20Anxiety%20Inventory%20in%20younger%20adults&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20behavioral%20development&rft.au=Zhai,%20Tina&rft.date=2022-03&rft.volume=46&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=148&rft.epage=156&rft.pages=148-156&rft.issn=0165-0254&rft.eissn=1464-0651&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/01650254211064348&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2632105834%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2632105834&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1333053&rft_sage_id=10.1177_01650254211064348&rfr_iscdi=true |