Validation of the Geriatric Anxiety Inventory in younger adults

This study investigated the psychometric properties of the Geriatric Anxiety Inventory (GAI) in younger adults. Participants were 212 younger adults age M = 22 (range = 17–53) years. They completed a demographic information questionnaire and self-report measures: the GAI, the Depression Anxiety Stre...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of behavioral development 2022-03, Vol.46 (2), p.148-156
Hauptverfasser: Zhai, Tina, Bailey, Phoebe E., Rogers, Kris D., Kneebone, Ian I.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 156
container_issue 2
container_start_page 148
container_title International journal of behavioral development
container_volume 46
creator Zhai, Tina
Bailey, Phoebe E.
Rogers, Kris D.
Kneebone, Ian I.
description This study investigated the psychometric properties of the Geriatric Anxiety Inventory (GAI) in younger adults. Participants were 212 younger adults age M = 22 (range = 17–53) years. They completed a demographic information questionnaire and self-report measures: the GAI, the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS), the Generalized Anxiety Disorder–7 (GAD-7), the Patient Health Questionnaire–9 (PHQ-9), the Penn State Worry Questionnaire (PSWQ), and the Worry Behaviors Inventory (WBI). Data from the GAI were collected at two time points, one week apart, and data from other self-report measures were collected once via Qualtrics, an online survey platform. The internal consistency and test–retest score reliability of the GAI were excellent. It had good congruent validity with other anxiety measures, limited divergent validity with depression measures, and sound convergent validity with worry measures. The GAI showed good discrimination between probable cases and noncases of generalized anxiety disorder (participants who scored ⩾8 on the GAD-7) and its optimal cutoff score for probable cases of GAD was ⩾12. A unidimensional component structure of the GAI best fit this study’s data. This study has provided preliminary evidence that the GAI is reliable and valid for use in an Australian sample of younger adults.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/01650254211064348
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2632105834</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1333053</ericid><sage_id>10.1177_01650254211064348</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2632105834</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c334t-f85874a129b4c081fa1a2979fa8be3f555b3d77d86c93e51f42e84ed3fa0ac623</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kDFPwzAQhS0EEqXwAxiQLDGn-Hy240yoqkopqsQCrJGb2CVVSYrtIPLvSRUEA-KWG9733ukeIZfAJgBpesNAScal4ABMCRT6iIxAKJEwJeGYjA56cgBOyVkIW9YPpmxEbl_MripNrJqaNo7GV0sX1lcm-qqg0_qzsrGjy_rD1rHxHa1q2jVtvbGemrLdxXBOTpzZBXvxvcfk-W7-NLtPVo-L5Wy6SgpEEROnpU6FAZ6tRcE0OAOGZ2nmjF5bdFLKNZZpWmpVZGglOMGtFrZEZ5gpFMcxuR5y9755b22I-bZpfd2fzLlCDkxqFD0FA1X4JgRvXb731ZvxXQ4sP_SU_-mp91wNnv7t4oefPwAiMom9Phn0YDb29-r_gV-ueHAQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2632105834</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Validation of the Geriatric Anxiety Inventory in younger adults</title><source>Access via SAGE</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><creator>Zhai, Tina ; Bailey, Phoebe E. ; Rogers, Kris D. ; Kneebone, Ian I.</creator><creatorcontrib>Zhai, Tina ; Bailey, Phoebe E. ; Rogers, Kris D. ; Kneebone, Ian I.</creatorcontrib><description>This study investigated the psychometric properties of the Geriatric Anxiety Inventory (GAI) in younger adults. Participants were 212 younger adults age M = 22 (range = 17–53) years. They completed a demographic information questionnaire and self-report measures: the GAI, the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS), the Generalized Anxiety Disorder–7 (GAD-7), the Patient Health Questionnaire–9 (PHQ-9), the Penn State Worry Questionnaire (PSWQ), and the Worry Behaviors Inventory (WBI). Data from the GAI were collected at two time points, one week apart, and data from other self-report measures were collected once via Qualtrics, an online survey platform. The internal consistency and test–retest score reliability of the GAI were excellent. It had good congruent validity with other anxiety measures, limited divergent validity with depression measures, and sound convergent validity with worry measures. The GAI showed good discrimination between probable cases and noncases of generalized anxiety disorder (participants who scored ⩾8 on the GAD-7) and its optimal cutoff score for probable cases of GAD was ⩾12. A unidimensional component structure of the GAI best fit this study’s data. This study has provided preliminary evidence that the GAI is reliable and valid for use in an Australian sample of younger adults.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0165-0254</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1464-0651</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/01650254211064348</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Adults ; Anxiety ; Anxiety Disorders ; Convergent validity ; Correlation ; Depression (Psychology) ; Discrimination ; Foreign Countries ; Generalized anxiety disorder ; Geriatrics ; Individual Characteristics ; Late Adolescents ; Mental depression ; Psychometrics ; Quantitative psychology ; Questionnaires ; Reliability ; Screening Tests ; Self report ; Test Reliability ; Test Validity ; Undergraduate Students ; Validity ; Worry ; Young Adults</subject><ispartof>International journal of behavioral development, 2022-03, Vol.46 (2), p.148-156</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c334t-f85874a129b4c081fa1a2979fa8be3f555b3d77d86c93e51f42e84ed3fa0ac623</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c334t-f85874a129b4c081fa1a2979fa8be3f555b3d77d86c93e51f42e84ed3fa0ac623</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3324-7264</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/01650254211064348$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/01650254211064348$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,782,786,21828,27933,27934,31008,43630,43631</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1333053$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zhai, Tina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bailey, Phoebe E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rogers, Kris D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kneebone, Ian I.</creatorcontrib><title>Validation of the Geriatric Anxiety Inventory in younger adults</title><title>International journal of behavioral development</title><description>This study investigated the psychometric properties of the Geriatric Anxiety Inventory (GAI) in younger adults. Participants were 212 younger adults age M = 22 (range = 17–53) years. They completed a demographic information questionnaire and self-report measures: the GAI, the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS), the Generalized Anxiety Disorder–7 (GAD-7), the Patient Health Questionnaire–9 (PHQ-9), the Penn State Worry Questionnaire (PSWQ), and the Worry Behaviors Inventory (WBI). Data from the GAI were collected at two time points, one week apart, and data from other self-report measures were collected once via Qualtrics, an online survey platform. The internal consistency and test–retest score reliability of the GAI were excellent. It had good congruent validity with other anxiety measures, limited divergent validity with depression measures, and sound convergent validity with worry measures. The GAI showed good discrimination between probable cases and noncases of generalized anxiety disorder (participants who scored ⩾8 on the GAD-7) and its optimal cutoff score for probable cases of GAD was ⩾12. A unidimensional component structure of the GAI best fit this study’s data. This study has provided preliminary evidence that the GAI is reliable and valid for use in an Australian sample of younger adults.</description><subject>Adults</subject><subject>Anxiety</subject><subject>Anxiety Disorders</subject><subject>Convergent validity</subject><subject>Correlation</subject><subject>Depression (Psychology)</subject><subject>Discrimination</subject><subject>Foreign Countries</subject><subject>Generalized anxiety disorder</subject><subject>Geriatrics</subject><subject>Individual Characteristics</subject><subject>Late Adolescents</subject><subject>Mental depression</subject><subject>Psychometrics</subject><subject>Quantitative psychology</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Reliability</subject><subject>Screening Tests</subject><subject>Self report</subject><subject>Test Reliability</subject><subject>Test Validity</subject><subject>Undergraduate Students</subject><subject>Validity</subject><subject>Worry</subject><subject>Young Adults</subject><issn>0165-0254</issn><issn>1464-0651</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kDFPwzAQhS0EEqXwAxiQLDGn-Hy240yoqkopqsQCrJGb2CVVSYrtIPLvSRUEA-KWG9733ukeIZfAJgBpesNAScal4ABMCRT6iIxAKJEwJeGYjA56cgBOyVkIW9YPpmxEbl_MripNrJqaNo7GV0sX1lcm-qqg0_qzsrGjy_rD1rHxHa1q2jVtvbGemrLdxXBOTpzZBXvxvcfk-W7-NLtPVo-L5Wy6SgpEEROnpU6FAZ6tRcE0OAOGZ2nmjF5bdFLKNZZpWmpVZGglOMGtFrZEZ5gpFMcxuR5y9755b22I-bZpfd2fzLlCDkxqFD0FA1X4JgRvXb731ZvxXQ4sP_SU_-mp91wNnv7t4oefPwAiMom9Phn0YDb29-r_gV-ueHAQ</recordid><startdate>202203</startdate><enddate>202203</enddate><creator>Zhai, Tina</creator><creator>Bailey, Phoebe E.</creator><creator>Rogers, Kris D.</creator><creator>Kneebone, Ian I.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3324-7264</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202203</creationdate><title>Validation of the Geriatric Anxiety Inventory in younger adults</title><author>Zhai, Tina ; Bailey, Phoebe E. ; Rogers, Kris D. ; Kneebone, Ian I.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c334t-f85874a129b4c081fa1a2979fa8be3f555b3d77d86c93e51f42e84ed3fa0ac623</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Adults</topic><topic>Anxiety</topic><topic>Anxiety Disorders</topic><topic>Convergent validity</topic><topic>Correlation</topic><topic>Depression (Psychology)</topic><topic>Discrimination</topic><topic>Foreign Countries</topic><topic>Generalized anxiety disorder</topic><topic>Geriatrics</topic><topic>Individual Characteristics</topic><topic>Late Adolescents</topic><topic>Mental depression</topic><topic>Psychometrics</topic><topic>Quantitative psychology</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Reliability</topic><topic>Screening Tests</topic><topic>Self report</topic><topic>Test Reliability</topic><topic>Test Validity</topic><topic>Undergraduate Students</topic><topic>Validity</topic><topic>Worry</topic><topic>Young Adults</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zhai, Tina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bailey, Phoebe E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rogers, Kris D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kneebone, Ian I.</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><jtitle>International journal of behavioral development</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zhai, Tina</au><au>Bailey, Phoebe E.</au><au>Rogers, Kris D.</au><au>Kneebone, Ian I.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1333053</ericid><atitle>Validation of the Geriatric Anxiety Inventory in younger adults</atitle><jtitle>International journal of behavioral development</jtitle><date>2022-03</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>46</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>148</spage><epage>156</epage><pages>148-156</pages><issn>0165-0254</issn><eissn>1464-0651</eissn><abstract>This study investigated the psychometric properties of the Geriatric Anxiety Inventory (GAI) in younger adults. Participants were 212 younger adults age M = 22 (range = 17–53) years. They completed a demographic information questionnaire and self-report measures: the GAI, the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS), the Generalized Anxiety Disorder–7 (GAD-7), the Patient Health Questionnaire–9 (PHQ-9), the Penn State Worry Questionnaire (PSWQ), and the Worry Behaviors Inventory (WBI). Data from the GAI were collected at two time points, one week apart, and data from other self-report measures were collected once via Qualtrics, an online survey platform. The internal consistency and test–retest score reliability of the GAI were excellent. It had good congruent validity with other anxiety measures, limited divergent validity with depression measures, and sound convergent validity with worry measures. The GAI showed good discrimination between probable cases and noncases of generalized anxiety disorder (participants who scored ⩾8 on the GAD-7) and its optimal cutoff score for probable cases of GAD was ⩾12. A unidimensional component structure of the GAI best fit this study’s data. This study has provided preliminary evidence that the GAI is reliable and valid for use in an Australian sample of younger adults.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/01650254211064348</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3324-7264</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0165-0254
ispartof International journal of behavioral development, 2022-03, Vol.46 (2), p.148-156
issn 0165-0254
1464-0651
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2632105834
source Access via SAGE; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)
subjects Adults
Anxiety
Anxiety Disorders
Convergent validity
Correlation
Depression (Psychology)
Discrimination
Foreign Countries
Generalized anxiety disorder
Geriatrics
Individual Characteristics
Late Adolescents
Mental depression
Psychometrics
Quantitative psychology
Questionnaires
Reliability
Screening Tests
Self report
Test Reliability
Test Validity
Undergraduate Students
Validity
Worry
Young Adults
title Validation of the Geriatric Anxiety Inventory in younger adults
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-02T02%3A04%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Validation%20of%20the%20Geriatric%20Anxiety%20Inventory%20in%20younger%20adults&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20behavioral%20development&rft.au=Zhai,%20Tina&rft.date=2022-03&rft.volume=46&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=148&rft.epage=156&rft.pages=148-156&rft.issn=0165-0254&rft.eissn=1464-0651&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/01650254211064348&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2632105834%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2632105834&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1333053&rft_sage_id=10.1177_01650254211064348&rfr_iscdi=true