Evaluating Persian Tokenizers
Tokenization plays a significant role in the process of lexical analysis. Tokens become the input for other natural language processing tasks, like semantic parsing and language modeling. Natural Language Processing in Persian is challenging due to Persian's exceptional cases, such as half-spac...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | arXiv.org 2022-02 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | |
|---|---|
| container_issue | |
| container_start_page | |
| container_title | arXiv.org |
| container_volume | |
| creator | Kamali, Danial Janfada, Behrooz Mohammad Ebrahim Shenasa Minaei-Bidgoli, Behrouz |
| description | Tokenization plays a significant role in the process of lexical analysis. Tokens become the input for other natural language processing tasks, like semantic parsing and language modeling. Natural Language Processing in Persian is challenging due to Persian's exceptional cases, such as half-spaces. Thus, it is crucial to have a precise tokenizer for Persian. This article provides a novel work by introducing the most widely used tokenizers for Persian and comparing and evaluating their performance on Persian texts using a simple algorithm with a pre-tagged Persian dependency dataset. After evaluating tokenizers with the F1-Score, the hybrid version of the Farsi Verb and Hazm with bounded morphemes fixing showed the best performance with an F1 score of 98.97%. |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2632030667</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2632030667</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_26320306673</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpjYuA0MjY21LUwMTLiYOAtLs4yMDAwMjM3MjU15mSQdS1LzClNLMnMS1cISC0qzkzMUwjJz07Ny6wC8ngYWNMSc4pTeaE0N4Oym2uIs4duQVF-YWlqcUl8Vn5pUR5QKt7IzNjIwNjAzMzcmDhVAHjnLDg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2632030667</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluating Persian Tokenizers</title><source>Freely Accessible Journals</source><creator>Kamali, Danial ; Janfada, Behrooz ; Mohammad Ebrahim Shenasa ; Minaei-Bidgoli, Behrouz</creator><creatorcontrib>Kamali, Danial ; Janfada, Behrooz ; Mohammad Ebrahim Shenasa ; Minaei-Bidgoli, Behrouz</creatorcontrib><description>Tokenization plays a significant role in the process of lexical analysis. Tokens become the input for other natural language processing tasks, like semantic parsing and language modeling. Natural Language Processing in Persian is challenging due to Persian's exceptional cases, such as half-spaces. Thus, it is crucial to have a precise tokenizer for Persian. This article provides a novel work by introducing the most widely used tokenizers for Persian and comparing and evaluating their performance on Persian texts using a simple algorithm with a pre-tagged Persian dependency dataset. After evaluating tokenizers with the F1-Score, the hybrid version of the Farsi Verb and Hazm with bounded morphemes fixing showed the best performance with an F1 score of 98.97%.</description><identifier>EISSN: 2331-8422</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ithaca: Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</publisher><subject>Algorithms ; Half spaces ; Natural language processing ; Performance evaluation</subject><ispartof>arXiv.org, 2022-02</ispartof><rights>2022. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>780,784</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kamali, Danial</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Janfada, Behrooz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mohammad Ebrahim Shenasa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Minaei-Bidgoli, Behrouz</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluating Persian Tokenizers</title><title>arXiv.org</title><description>Tokenization plays a significant role in the process of lexical analysis. Tokens become the input for other natural language processing tasks, like semantic parsing and language modeling. Natural Language Processing in Persian is challenging due to Persian's exceptional cases, such as half-spaces. Thus, it is crucial to have a precise tokenizer for Persian. This article provides a novel work by introducing the most widely used tokenizers for Persian and comparing and evaluating their performance on Persian texts using a simple algorithm with a pre-tagged Persian dependency dataset. After evaluating tokenizers with the F1-Score, the hybrid version of the Farsi Verb and Hazm with bounded morphemes fixing showed the best performance with an F1 score of 98.97%.</description><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Half spaces</subject><subject>Natural language processing</subject><subject>Performance evaluation</subject><issn>2331-8422</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNpjYuA0MjY21LUwMTLiYOAtLs4yMDAwMjM3MjU15mSQdS1LzClNLMnMS1cISC0qzkzMUwjJz07Ny6wC8ngYWNMSc4pTeaE0N4Oym2uIs4duQVF-YWlqcUl8Vn5pUR5QKt7IzNjIwNjAzMzcmDhVAHjnLDg</recordid><startdate>20220222</startdate><enddate>20220222</enddate><creator>Kamali, Danial</creator><creator>Janfada, Behrooz</creator><creator>Mohammad Ebrahim Shenasa</creator><creator>Minaei-Bidgoli, Behrouz</creator><general>Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</general><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220222</creationdate><title>Evaluating Persian Tokenizers</title><author>Kamali, Danial ; Janfada, Behrooz ; Mohammad Ebrahim Shenasa ; Minaei-Bidgoli, Behrouz</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_26320306673</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Half spaces</topic><topic>Natural language processing</topic><topic>Performance evaluation</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kamali, Danial</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Janfada, Behrooz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mohammad Ebrahim Shenasa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Minaei-Bidgoli, Behrouz</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kamali, Danial</au><au>Janfada, Behrooz</au><au>Mohammad Ebrahim Shenasa</au><au>Minaei-Bidgoli, Behrouz</au><format>book</format><genre>document</genre><ristype>GEN</ristype><atitle>Evaluating Persian Tokenizers</atitle><jtitle>arXiv.org</jtitle><date>2022-02-22</date><risdate>2022</risdate><eissn>2331-8422</eissn><abstract>Tokenization plays a significant role in the process of lexical analysis. Tokens become the input for other natural language processing tasks, like semantic parsing and language modeling. Natural Language Processing in Persian is challenging due to Persian's exceptional cases, such as half-spaces. Thus, it is crucial to have a precise tokenizer for Persian. This article provides a novel work by introducing the most widely used tokenizers for Persian and comparing and evaluating their performance on Persian texts using a simple algorithm with a pre-tagged Persian dependency dataset. After evaluating tokenizers with the F1-Score, the hybrid version of the Farsi Verb and Hazm with bounded morphemes fixing showed the best performance with an F1 score of 98.97%.</abstract><cop>Ithaca</cop><pub>Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</pub><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | EISSN: 2331-8422 |
| ispartof | arXiv.org, 2022-02 |
| issn | 2331-8422 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2632030667 |
| source | Freely Accessible Journals |
| subjects | Algorithms Half spaces Natural language processing Performance evaluation |
| title | Evaluating Persian Tokenizers |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T16%3A18%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=document&rft.atitle=Evaluating%20Persian%20Tokenizers&rft.jtitle=arXiv.org&rft.au=Kamali,%20Danial&rft.date=2022-02-22&rft.eissn=2331-8422&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2632030667%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2632030667&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |