Commerce and Conquest in Early American Foreign Relations, 1750–1850

Ideas about free trade and open commerce drove early American foreign policy before the War of 1812. Concern with expansion was not entirely absent from American diplomacy, but until the 1820s, 30s and 40s, it played a less significant role in foreign policy decisions than trade. Before the Revoluti...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of the early Republic 2017-12, Vol.37 (4), p.735-770
1. Verfasser: GILJE, PAUL A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 770
container_issue 4
container_start_page 735
container_title Journal of the early Republic
container_volume 37
creator GILJE, PAUL A.
description Ideas about free trade and open commerce drove early American foreign policy before the War of 1812. Concern with expansion was not entirely absent from American diplomacy, but until the 1820s, 30s and 40s, it played a less significant role in foreign policy decisions than trade. Before the Revolutionary War both the British and American believed that their empire was based on commerce and not conquest. They engaged in wars for empire determined to secure the colonies from outside threats and to defend commerce. The American Revolution began in controversies over the regulation of commerce and taxation (usually connected to trade as well). The Revolutionaries sought to establish a new diplomatic regime based on free trade. They persisted in this concern in the creation of the Confederation government and with the establishment of the American republic under the Constitution of 1787. All of the major treaties between the United States and other nations before 1812 concerned commerce, even when they included territorial acquisition. The Louisiana Purchase began as an effort to secure commerce on the Mississippi by gaining the port of New Orleans. Conquest first emerged as the salient policy in dealing with Native Americans, and was then extended to Florida, Texas, and northern Mexico thereafter. However, even when manifest destiny had become the focus of American foreign policy, commerce and free trade remained important.
doi_str_mv 10.1353/jer.2017.0069
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2631911688</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>90014990</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>90014990</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-c1b51358a3c3f75cee888d5655619c6fd17c53a3c8befba6ee442d99b5f7e8153</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU1Lw0AQhhdRsFaPHoWAV1NnstmvYwmtCgXBj_OSbDaS0CR1Nz305n_wH_pL3FipNy8zh3nnnZdnCLlEmCFl9LaxbpYAihkAV0dkgozRGHgCx2QCiWAxhnJKzrxvADDhyCZkmfVta52xUd6VUdZ371vrh6juokXu1rtoHoa1ybto2Ttbv3XRk13nQ913_iZCweDr4xMlg3NyUuVrby9--5S8Lhcv2X28erx7yOar2FDkQ2ywYCGqzKmhlWDGWillyThjHJXhVYnCMBqmsrBVkXNr0zQplSpYJaxERqfkeu-7cf1PUt30W9eFkzrhFBUil_I_FSoJIklEOnrFe5VxvffOVnrj6jZ3O42gR6A6ANUjUD0CDfr04NpYM7Rbb_-MueBIU_08Qh-Zo0gBgNGwdrVfa_zQu8MNFV6QKgX0G47agCo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2631911688</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Commerce and Conquest in Early American Foreign Relations, 1750–1850</title><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><creator>GILJE, PAUL A.</creator><creatorcontrib>GILJE, PAUL A.</creatorcontrib><description>Ideas about free trade and open commerce drove early American foreign policy before the War of 1812. Concern with expansion was not entirely absent from American diplomacy, but until the 1820s, 30s and 40s, it played a less significant role in foreign policy decisions than trade. Before the Revolutionary War both the British and American believed that their empire was based on commerce and not conquest. They engaged in wars for empire determined to secure the colonies from outside threats and to defend commerce. The American Revolution began in controversies over the regulation of commerce and taxation (usually connected to trade as well). The Revolutionaries sought to establish a new diplomatic regime based on free trade. They persisted in this concern in the creation of the Confederation government and with the establishment of the American republic under the Constitution of 1787. All of the major treaties between the United States and other nations before 1812 concerned commerce, even when they included territorial acquisition. The Louisiana Purchase began as an effort to secure commerce on the Mississippi by gaining the port of New Orleans. Conquest first emerged as the salient policy in dealing with Native Americans, and was then extended to Florida, Texas, and northern Mexico thereafter. However, even when manifest destiny had become the focus of American foreign policy, commerce and free trade remained important.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0275-1275</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1553-0620</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1553-0620</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1353/jer.2017.0069</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press</publisher><subject>18th century ; American history ; American Indians ; American Revolution ; British Empire ; Colonies &amp; territories ; Diplomacy ; Foreign policy ; Free trade ; International relations ; International relations-US ; Mercantilism ; Native North Americans ; Seven Years War ; Taxation ; Trade policy ; Treaties ; Verbal aggression ; War ; War of 1812</subject><ispartof>Journal of the early Republic, 2017-12, Vol.37 (4), p.735-770</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2017 Society for Historians of the Early American Republic</rights><rights>Copyright © 2008 Society for Historians of the Early American Republic.</rights><rights>Copyright University of Pennsylvania Press Winter 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/90014990$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/90014990$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,12845,27924,27925,58017,58250</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>GILJE, PAUL A.</creatorcontrib><title>Commerce and Conquest in Early American Foreign Relations, 1750–1850</title><title>Journal of the early Republic</title><description>Ideas about free trade and open commerce drove early American foreign policy before the War of 1812. Concern with expansion was not entirely absent from American diplomacy, but until the 1820s, 30s and 40s, it played a less significant role in foreign policy decisions than trade. Before the Revolutionary War both the British and American believed that their empire was based on commerce and not conquest. They engaged in wars for empire determined to secure the colonies from outside threats and to defend commerce. The American Revolution began in controversies over the regulation of commerce and taxation (usually connected to trade as well). The Revolutionaries sought to establish a new diplomatic regime based on free trade. They persisted in this concern in the creation of the Confederation government and with the establishment of the American republic under the Constitution of 1787. All of the major treaties between the United States and other nations before 1812 concerned commerce, even when they included territorial acquisition. The Louisiana Purchase began as an effort to secure commerce on the Mississippi by gaining the port of New Orleans. Conquest first emerged as the salient policy in dealing with Native Americans, and was then extended to Florida, Texas, and northern Mexico thereafter. However, even when manifest destiny had become the focus of American foreign policy, commerce and free trade remained important.</description><subject>18th century</subject><subject>American history</subject><subject>American Indians</subject><subject>American Revolution</subject><subject>British Empire</subject><subject>Colonies &amp; territories</subject><subject>Diplomacy</subject><subject>Foreign policy</subject><subject>Free trade</subject><subject>International relations</subject><subject>International relations-US</subject><subject>Mercantilism</subject><subject>Native North Americans</subject><subject>Seven Years War</subject><subject>Taxation</subject><subject>Trade policy</subject><subject>Treaties</subject><subject>Verbal aggression</subject><subject>War</subject><subject>War of 1812</subject><issn>0275-1275</issn><issn>1553-0620</issn><issn>1553-0620</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AIMQZ</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><sourceid>PQHSC</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU1Lw0AQhhdRsFaPHoWAV1NnstmvYwmtCgXBj_OSbDaS0CR1Nz305n_wH_pL3FipNy8zh3nnnZdnCLlEmCFl9LaxbpYAihkAV0dkgozRGHgCx2QCiWAxhnJKzrxvADDhyCZkmfVta52xUd6VUdZ371vrh6juokXu1rtoHoa1ybto2Ttbv3XRk13nQ913_iZCweDr4xMlg3NyUuVrby9--5S8Lhcv2X28erx7yOar2FDkQ2ywYCGqzKmhlWDGWillyThjHJXhVYnCMBqmsrBVkXNr0zQplSpYJaxERqfkeu-7cf1PUt30W9eFkzrhFBUil_I_FSoJIklEOnrFe5VxvffOVnrj6jZ3O42gR6A6ANUjUD0CDfr04NpYM7Rbb_-MueBIU_08Qh-Zo0gBgNGwdrVfa_zQu8MNFV6QKgX0G47agCo</recordid><startdate>20171201</startdate><enddate>20171201</enddate><creator>GILJE, PAUL A.</creator><general>University of Pennsylvania Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AIMQZ</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>LIQON</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQHSC</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20171201</creationdate><title>Commerce and Conquest in Early American Foreign Relations, 1750–1850</title><author>GILJE, PAUL A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-c1b51358a3c3f75cee888d5655619c6fd17c53a3c8befba6ee442d99b5f7e8153</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>18th century</topic><topic>American history</topic><topic>American Indians</topic><topic>American Revolution</topic><topic>British Empire</topic><topic>Colonies &amp; territories</topic><topic>Diplomacy</topic><topic>Foreign policy</topic><topic>Free trade</topic><topic>International relations</topic><topic>International relations-US</topic><topic>Mercantilism</topic><topic>Native North Americans</topic><topic>Seven Years War</topic><topic>Taxation</topic><topic>Trade policy</topic><topic>Treaties</topic><topic>Verbal aggression</topic><topic>War</topic><topic>War of 1812</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>GILJE, PAUL A.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature - U.S. Customers Only</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>History Study Center</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Journal of the early Republic</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>GILJE, PAUL A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Commerce and Conquest in Early American Foreign Relations, 1750–1850</atitle><jtitle>Journal of the early Republic</jtitle><date>2017-12-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>37</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>735</spage><epage>770</epage><pages>735-770</pages><issn>0275-1275</issn><issn>1553-0620</issn><eissn>1553-0620</eissn><abstract>Ideas about free trade and open commerce drove early American foreign policy before the War of 1812. Concern with expansion was not entirely absent from American diplomacy, but until the 1820s, 30s and 40s, it played a less significant role in foreign policy decisions than trade. Before the Revolutionary War both the British and American believed that their empire was based on commerce and not conquest. They engaged in wars for empire determined to secure the colonies from outside threats and to defend commerce. The American Revolution began in controversies over the regulation of commerce and taxation (usually connected to trade as well). The Revolutionaries sought to establish a new diplomatic regime based on free trade. They persisted in this concern in the creation of the Confederation government and with the establishment of the American republic under the Constitution of 1787. All of the major treaties between the United States and other nations before 1812 concerned commerce, even when they included territorial acquisition. The Louisiana Purchase began as an effort to secure commerce on the Mississippi by gaining the port of New Orleans. Conquest first emerged as the salient policy in dealing with Native Americans, and was then extended to Florida, Texas, and northern Mexico thereafter. However, even when manifest destiny had become the focus of American foreign policy, commerce and free trade remained important.</abstract><cop>Philadelphia</cop><pub>University of Pennsylvania Press</pub><doi>10.1353/jer.2017.0069</doi><tpages>36</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0275-1275
ispartof Journal of the early Republic, 2017-12, Vol.37 (4), p.735-770
issn 0275-1275
1553-0620
1553-0620
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2631911688
source Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing
subjects 18th century
American history
American Indians
American Revolution
British Empire
Colonies & territories
Diplomacy
Foreign policy
Free trade
International relations
International relations-US
Mercantilism
Native North Americans
Seven Years War
Taxation
Trade policy
Treaties
Verbal aggression
War
War of 1812
title Commerce and Conquest in Early American Foreign Relations, 1750–1850
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T22%3A38%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Commerce%20and%20Conquest%20in%20Early%20American%20Foreign%20Relations,%201750%E2%80%931850&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20the%20early%20Republic&rft.au=GILJE,%20PAUL%20A.&rft.date=2017-12-01&rft.volume=37&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=735&rft.epage=770&rft.pages=735-770&rft.issn=0275-1275&rft.eissn=1553-0620&rft_id=info:doi/10.1353/jer.2017.0069&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E90014990%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2631911688&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=90014990&rfr_iscdi=true