A clustering-based approach for prioritizing health, safety and environment risks integrating fuzzy C-means and hybrid decision-making methods

The working world is undergoing profound changes, and occupational accidents are always a global concern due to substantial impacts on productivity collapse and workers’ safety. To address this problem, Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA) has been widely implemented to assess such risks. This,...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Stochastic environmental research and risk assessment 2022-03, Vol.36 (3), p.919-938
Hauptverfasser: Valipour, Mahsa, Yousefi, Samuel, Jahangoshai Rezaee, Mustafa, Saberi, Morteza
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 938
container_issue 3
container_start_page 919
container_title Stochastic environmental research and risk assessment
container_volume 36
creator Valipour, Mahsa
Yousefi, Samuel
Jahangoshai Rezaee, Mustafa
Saberi, Morteza
description The working world is undergoing profound changes, and occupational accidents are always a global concern due to substantial impacts on productivity collapse and workers’ safety. To address this problem, Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA) has been widely implemented to assess such risks. This, however, fails to provide reliable results because of some shortcomings of the risk priority number score of the FMEA including neglecting the weight of risk factors, having doubtful formulation, and performing poorly in distinguishing risks. This study presents a two-phase approach to identify and prioritize Health, Safety and Environment (HSE) risks to focus on critical risks instead of diverting organizational efforts to non-critical ones and overcoming the shortcomings of the traditional score. In the first phase, potential risks are identified, and after determining the value of risk factors using the FMEA technique, Fuzzy C-means (FCM) algorithm is applied to cluster these risks. Then, the weight of risk factors is calculated based on the Fuzzy Best–Worst Method (FBWM), and following this, clusters are labeled based on weighted Euclidean distance. In the second phase, a hybrid Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) method is proposed based on the FBWM and combined compromise solution to prioritize risks belonging to the critical cluster. This is to create a distinct priority for risks and facilitate the implementation of corrective/preventive actions. This approach is applied in the automotive industry, and results are compared with other FMEA-based MCDM methods to validate findings. Eventually, a sensitivity analysis is designed to show the ability and applicability of the proposed approach.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00477-021-02045-6
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2631380470</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2631380470</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-c3c9f9c28e6fc941885485c0dea1d5684d8b6ed3112454bf4af990e8bfc3ead43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM9OAyEQhzdGE5vaF_BE4tVVWNjtcmwa_yVNvOiZsDB0sV12BWrSPoTPLHWN3jwAk_D7ZjJfll0SfEMwnt8GjNl8nuOCpINZmVcn2YQwWuW0KPnpb83weTYLwTYJKinnBE-yzwVS212I4K1b540MoJEcBt9L1SLTezR423sb7SH9oxbkNrbXKEgDcY-k0wjch_W968BF5G3YBGRdhLWX8QiY3eGwR8u8A-nCd77dN95qpEHZYHuXd3JzDHYQ216Hi-zMyG2A2c87zV7v716Wj_nq-eFpuVjlihIe06244aqooTKKM1LXJatLhTVIosuqZrpuKtCUkIKVrDFMGs4x1I1RFKRmdJpdjX3Tpu87CFG89Tvv0khRVJTQOhnFKVWMKeX7EDwYkWx00u8FweKoXozqRVIvvtWLKkF0hMJwdAr-r_U_1BdqIoo2</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2631380470</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A clustering-based approach for prioritizing health, safety and environment risks integrating fuzzy C-means and hybrid decision-making methods</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Valipour, Mahsa ; Yousefi, Samuel ; Jahangoshai Rezaee, Mustafa ; Saberi, Morteza</creator><creatorcontrib>Valipour, Mahsa ; Yousefi, Samuel ; Jahangoshai Rezaee, Mustafa ; Saberi, Morteza</creatorcontrib><description>The working world is undergoing profound changes, and occupational accidents are always a global concern due to substantial impacts on productivity collapse and workers’ safety. To address this problem, Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA) has been widely implemented to assess such risks. This, however, fails to provide reliable results because of some shortcomings of the risk priority number score of the FMEA including neglecting the weight of risk factors, having doubtful formulation, and performing poorly in distinguishing risks. This study presents a two-phase approach to identify and prioritize Health, Safety and Environment (HSE) risks to focus on critical risks instead of diverting organizational efforts to non-critical ones and overcoming the shortcomings of the traditional score. In the first phase, potential risks are identified, and after determining the value of risk factors using the FMEA technique, Fuzzy C-means (FCM) algorithm is applied to cluster these risks. Then, the weight of risk factors is calculated based on the Fuzzy Best–Worst Method (FBWM), and following this, clusters are labeled based on weighted Euclidean distance. In the second phase, a hybrid Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) method is proposed based on the FBWM and combined compromise solution to prioritize risks belonging to the critical cluster. This is to create a distinct priority for risks and facilitate the implementation of corrective/preventive actions. This approach is applied in the automotive industry, and results are compared with other FMEA-based MCDM methods to validate findings. Eventually, a sensitivity analysis is designed to show the ability and applicability of the proposed approach.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1436-3240</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1436-3259</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00477-021-02045-6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Algorithms ; Aquatic Pollution ; Automobile industry ; Chemistry and Earth Sciences ; Clustering ; Computational Intelligence ; Computer Science ; Decision making ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Earth Sciences ; Environment ; Euclidean geometry ; Failure analysis ; Failure modes ; Math. Appl. in Environmental Science ; Multiple criterion ; Occupational safety ; Original Paper ; Physics ; Probability Theory and Stochastic Processes ; Risk analysis ; Risk factors ; Safety ; Sensitivity analysis ; Statistics for Engineering ; Waste Water Technology ; Water Management ; Water Pollution Control</subject><ispartof>Stochastic environmental research and risk assessment, 2022-03, Vol.36 (3), p.919-938</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2021</rights><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2021.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-c3c9f9c28e6fc941885485c0dea1d5684d8b6ed3112454bf4af990e8bfc3ead43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-c3c9f9c28e6fc941885485c0dea1d5684d8b6ed3112454bf4af990e8bfc3ead43</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3340-666X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00477-021-02045-6$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00477-021-02045-6$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924,41487,42556,51318</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Valipour, Mahsa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yousefi, Samuel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jahangoshai Rezaee, Mustafa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saberi, Morteza</creatorcontrib><title>A clustering-based approach for prioritizing health, safety and environment risks integrating fuzzy C-means and hybrid decision-making methods</title><title>Stochastic environmental research and risk assessment</title><addtitle>Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess</addtitle><description>The working world is undergoing profound changes, and occupational accidents are always a global concern due to substantial impacts on productivity collapse and workers’ safety. To address this problem, Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA) has been widely implemented to assess such risks. This, however, fails to provide reliable results because of some shortcomings of the risk priority number score of the FMEA including neglecting the weight of risk factors, having doubtful formulation, and performing poorly in distinguishing risks. This study presents a two-phase approach to identify and prioritize Health, Safety and Environment (HSE) risks to focus on critical risks instead of diverting organizational efforts to non-critical ones and overcoming the shortcomings of the traditional score. In the first phase, potential risks are identified, and after determining the value of risk factors using the FMEA technique, Fuzzy C-means (FCM) algorithm is applied to cluster these risks. Then, the weight of risk factors is calculated based on the Fuzzy Best–Worst Method (FBWM), and following this, clusters are labeled based on weighted Euclidean distance. In the second phase, a hybrid Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) method is proposed based on the FBWM and combined compromise solution to prioritize risks belonging to the critical cluster. This is to create a distinct priority for risks and facilitate the implementation of corrective/preventive actions. This approach is applied in the automotive industry, and results are compared with other FMEA-based MCDM methods to validate findings. Eventually, a sensitivity analysis is designed to show the ability and applicability of the proposed approach.</description><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Aquatic Pollution</subject><subject>Automobile industry</subject><subject>Chemistry and Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Clustering</subject><subject>Computational Intelligence</subject><subject>Computer Science</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Environment</subject><subject>Euclidean geometry</subject><subject>Failure analysis</subject><subject>Failure modes</subject><subject>Math. Appl. in Environmental Science</subject><subject>Multiple criterion</subject><subject>Occupational safety</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Physics</subject><subject>Probability Theory and Stochastic Processes</subject><subject>Risk analysis</subject><subject>Risk factors</subject><subject>Safety</subject><subject>Sensitivity analysis</subject><subject>Statistics for Engineering</subject><subject>Waste Water Technology</subject><subject>Water Management</subject><subject>Water Pollution Control</subject><issn>1436-3240</issn><issn>1436-3259</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kM9OAyEQhzdGE5vaF_BE4tVVWNjtcmwa_yVNvOiZsDB0sV12BWrSPoTPLHWN3jwAk_D7ZjJfll0SfEMwnt8GjNl8nuOCpINZmVcn2YQwWuW0KPnpb83weTYLwTYJKinnBE-yzwVS212I4K1b540MoJEcBt9L1SLTezR423sb7SH9oxbkNrbXKEgDcY-k0wjch_W968BF5G3YBGRdhLWX8QiY3eGwR8u8A-nCd77dN95qpEHZYHuXd3JzDHYQ216Hi-zMyG2A2c87zV7v716Wj_nq-eFpuVjlihIe06244aqooTKKM1LXJatLhTVIosuqZrpuKtCUkIKVrDFMGs4x1I1RFKRmdJpdjX3Tpu87CFG89Tvv0khRVJTQOhnFKVWMKeX7EDwYkWx00u8FweKoXozqRVIvvtWLKkF0hMJwdAr-r_U_1BdqIoo2</recordid><startdate>20220301</startdate><enddate>20220301</enddate><creator>Valipour, Mahsa</creator><creator>Yousefi, Samuel</creator><creator>Jahangoshai Rezaee, Mustafa</creator><creator>Saberi, Morteza</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0W</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3340-666X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220301</creationdate><title>A clustering-based approach for prioritizing health, safety and environment risks integrating fuzzy C-means and hybrid decision-making methods</title><author>Valipour, Mahsa ; Yousefi, Samuel ; Jahangoshai Rezaee, Mustafa ; Saberi, Morteza</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-c3c9f9c28e6fc941885485c0dea1d5684d8b6ed3112454bf4af990e8bfc3ead43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Aquatic Pollution</topic><topic>Automobile industry</topic><topic>Chemistry and Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Clustering</topic><topic>Computational Intelligence</topic><topic>Computer Science</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Environment</topic><topic>Euclidean geometry</topic><topic>Failure analysis</topic><topic>Failure modes</topic><topic>Math. Appl. in Environmental Science</topic><topic>Multiple criterion</topic><topic>Occupational safety</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Physics</topic><topic>Probability Theory and Stochastic Processes</topic><topic>Risk analysis</topic><topic>Risk factors</topic><topic>Safety</topic><topic>Sensitivity analysis</topic><topic>Statistics for Engineering</topic><topic>Waste Water Technology</topic><topic>Water Management</topic><topic>Water Pollution Control</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Valipour, Mahsa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yousefi, Samuel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jahangoshai Rezaee, Mustafa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saberi, Morteza</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>DELNET Engineering &amp; Technology Collection</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Stochastic environmental research and risk assessment</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Valipour, Mahsa</au><au>Yousefi, Samuel</au><au>Jahangoshai Rezaee, Mustafa</au><au>Saberi, Morteza</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A clustering-based approach for prioritizing health, safety and environment risks integrating fuzzy C-means and hybrid decision-making methods</atitle><jtitle>Stochastic environmental research and risk assessment</jtitle><stitle>Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess</stitle><date>2022-03-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>36</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>919</spage><epage>938</epage><pages>919-938</pages><issn>1436-3240</issn><eissn>1436-3259</eissn><abstract>The working world is undergoing profound changes, and occupational accidents are always a global concern due to substantial impacts on productivity collapse and workers’ safety. To address this problem, Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA) has been widely implemented to assess such risks. This, however, fails to provide reliable results because of some shortcomings of the risk priority number score of the FMEA including neglecting the weight of risk factors, having doubtful formulation, and performing poorly in distinguishing risks. This study presents a two-phase approach to identify and prioritize Health, Safety and Environment (HSE) risks to focus on critical risks instead of diverting organizational efforts to non-critical ones and overcoming the shortcomings of the traditional score. In the first phase, potential risks are identified, and after determining the value of risk factors using the FMEA technique, Fuzzy C-means (FCM) algorithm is applied to cluster these risks. Then, the weight of risk factors is calculated based on the Fuzzy Best–Worst Method (FBWM), and following this, clusters are labeled based on weighted Euclidean distance. In the second phase, a hybrid Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) method is proposed based on the FBWM and combined compromise solution to prioritize risks belonging to the critical cluster. This is to create a distinct priority for risks and facilitate the implementation of corrective/preventive actions. This approach is applied in the automotive industry, and results are compared with other FMEA-based MCDM methods to validate findings. Eventually, a sensitivity analysis is designed to show the ability and applicability of the proposed approach.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><doi>10.1007/s00477-021-02045-6</doi><tpages>20</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3340-666X</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1436-3240
ispartof Stochastic environmental research and risk assessment, 2022-03, Vol.36 (3), p.919-938
issn 1436-3240
1436-3259
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2631380470
source SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Algorithms
Aquatic Pollution
Automobile industry
Chemistry and Earth Sciences
Clustering
Computational Intelligence
Computer Science
Decision making
Earth and Environmental Science
Earth Sciences
Environment
Euclidean geometry
Failure analysis
Failure modes
Math. Appl. in Environmental Science
Multiple criterion
Occupational safety
Original Paper
Physics
Probability Theory and Stochastic Processes
Risk analysis
Risk factors
Safety
Sensitivity analysis
Statistics for Engineering
Waste Water Technology
Water Management
Water Pollution Control
title A clustering-based approach for prioritizing health, safety and environment risks integrating fuzzy C-means and hybrid decision-making methods
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T10%3A32%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20clustering-based%20approach%20for%20prioritizing%20health,%20safety%20and%20environment%20risks%20integrating%20fuzzy%20C-means%20and%20hybrid%20decision-making%20methods&rft.jtitle=Stochastic%20environmental%20research%20and%20risk%20assessment&rft.au=Valipour,%20Mahsa&rft.date=2022-03-01&rft.volume=36&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=919&rft.epage=938&rft.pages=919-938&rft.issn=1436-3240&rft.eissn=1436-3259&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00477-021-02045-6&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2631380470%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2631380470&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true