Construction and Analysis of Governance Evaluation Index System of Beijing Urban Subcenter Based on System Theory and Information Theory

The construction of subcenters is considered an effective measure to solve the diseases in big cities and improve urban competitiveness. China takes the planning and construction of the Beijing urban subcenter as a major national decision-making deployment. Therefore, the establishment of a scientif...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Wireless communications and mobile computing 2022-02, Vol.2022, p.1-10
Hauptverfasser: Wang, Liexuan, Wang, Kunsheng, Huang, Huajin
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 10
container_issue
container_start_page 1
container_title Wireless communications and mobile computing
container_volume 2022
creator Wang, Liexuan
Wang, Kunsheng
Huang, Huajin
description The construction of subcenters is considered an effective measure to solve the diseases in big cities and improve urban competitiveness. China takes the planning and construction of the Beijing urban subcenter as a major national decision-making deployment. Therefore, the establishment of a scientific and reliable evaluation index system for the urban subcenter is of great significance to the public sector to diagnose urban problems and improve urban performance management. Under the guidance of system theory, this paper establishes the governance evaluation index system of the Beijing subcenter based on the five subsystems: economic subsystem, social subsystem, cultural subsystem, ecological subsystem, and administrative subsystem, and 29 secondary indicators. After comprehensively examining the panel data of the overall Beijing urban system during the construction of the subcenter (2010–2019), the entropy method is used to objectively assign the value of the Beijing urban subcenter (Tongzhou District), and it is compared with other 15 municipal districts. The derivation of the development dynamic evolution of the Beijing urban subcenter is completed through the geospatial visualization and the linear regression fitting. It is found that the comprehensive index of urban subcenter governance in Beijing shows an upward trend year by year and has developed by leaps and bounds under the promotion of the central policy. Driven by Beijing’s subcenter strategy, the development model of the whole of Beijing has moved from a typical center diffusion model to a dual center to a subcenter and even a diversified development pattern. This paper proposes to lead urban development with the concept of high-quality development, adhere to innovation-driven, improve urban comprehensive carrying capacity through urban software and hardware construction, and realize regional coordinated development on a larger spatial scale.
doi_str_mv 10.1155/2022/9496442
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2630681234</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2630681234</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c294t-8b0f352ebbc4c73827e498eef102e9eaee46ce2c782f47d0b3367dbb9114462e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90M1OAjEQB_DGaCKiNx-giUdd7dd-HYEgkpB4AM6btjsrS5YW211038DHdmGJR0-dNL-ZyfwRuqfkmdIwfGGEsZdUpJEQ7AINaMhJkERxfPlXR-k1uvF-SwjhhNEB-plY42vX6Lq0BkuT45GRVetLj22BZ_YAzkijAU8PsmrkSc1NDt942foadkc1hnJbmg-8dkoavGyUBlODw2PpIcddw5muNmBde1oyN4V1u35c_32LrgpZebg7v0O0fp2uJm_B4n02n4wWgWapqINEkYKHDJTSQsc8YTGINAEoKGGQggQQkQam44QVIs6J4jyKc6VSSoWIGPAheujn7p39bMDX2dY23Y2Vz1jESZRQxkWnnnqlnfXeQZHtXbmTrs0oyY5ZZ8ess3PWHX_s-aY0ufwq_9e_ULqABQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2630681234</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Construction and Analysis of Governance Evaluation Index System of Beijing Urban Subcenter Based on System Theory and Information Theory</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Titles</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Wang, Liexuan ; Wang, Kunsheng ; Huang, Huajin</creator><contributor>Rajakani, Kalidoss ; Kalidoss Rajakani</contributor><creatorcontrib>Wang, Liexuan ; Wang, Kunsheng ; Huang, Huajin ; Rajakani, Kalidoss ; Kalidoss Rajakani</creatorcontrib><description>The construction of subcenters is considered an effective measure to solve the diseases in big cities and improve urban competitiveness. China takes the planning and construction of the Beijing urban subcenter as a major national decision-making deployment. Therefore, the establishment of a scientific and reliable evaluation index system for the urban subcenter is of great significance to the public sector to diagnose urban problems and improve urban performance management. Under the guidance of system theory, this paper establishes the governance evaluation index system of the Beijing subcenter based on the five subsystems: economic subsystem, social subsystem, cultural subsystem, ecological subsystem, and administrative subsystem, and 29 secondary indicators. After comprehensively examining the panel data of the overall Beijing urban system during the construction of the subcenter (2010–2019), the entropy method is used to objectively assign the value of the Beijing urban subcenter (Tongzhou District), and it is compared with other 15 municipal districts. The derivation of the development dynamic evolution of the Beijing urban subcenter is completed through the geospatial visualization and the linear regression fitting. It is found that the comprehensive index of urban subcenter governance in Beijing shows an upward trend year by year and has developed by leaps and bounds under the promotion of the central policy. Driven by Beijing’s subcenter strategy, the development model of the whole of Beijing has moved from a typical center diffusion model to a dual center to a subcenter and even a diversified development pattern. This paper proposes to lead urban development with the concept of high-quality development, adhere to innovation-driven, improve urban comprehensive carrying capacity through urban software and hardware construction, and realize regional coordinated development on a larger spatial scale.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1530-8669</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1530-8677</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1155/2022/9496442</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Hindawi</publisher><subject>Carrying capacity ; Cities ; Construction ; Construction planning ; Decision making ; Delphi method ; Evolution ; Information theory ; Performance management ; Quality of life ; Regional development ; Rule of law ; Subsystems ; System theory ; Systems theory ; Urban development ; Urbanization</subject><ispartof>Wireless communications and mobile computing, 2022-02, Vol.2022, p.1-10</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2022 Liexuan Wang et al.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2022 Liexuan Wang et al. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c294t-8b0f352ebbc4c73827e498eef102e9eaee46ce2c782f47d0b3367dbb9114462e3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2110-3135</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27922,27923</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Rajakani, Kalidoss</contributor><contributor>Kalidoss Rajakani</contributor><creatorcontrib>Wang, Liexuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Kunsheng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Huajin</creatorcontrib><title>Construction and Analysis of Governance Evaluation Index System of Beijing Urban Subcenter Based on System Theory and Information Theory</title><title>Wireless communications and mobile computing</title><description>The construction of subcenters is considered an effective measure to solve the diseases in big cities and improve urban competitiveness. China takes the planning and construction of the Beijing urban subcenter as a major national decision-making deployment. Therefore, the establishment of a scientific and reliable evaluation index system for the urban subcenter is of great significance to the public sector to diagnose urban problems and improve urban performance management. Under the guidance of system theory, this paper establishes the governance evaluation index system of the Beijing subcenter based on the five subsystems: economic subsystem, social subsystem, cultural subsystem, ecological subsystem, and administrative subsystem, and 29 secondary indicators. After comprehensively examining the panel data of the overall Beijing urban system during the construction of the subcenter (2010–2019), the entropy method is used to objectively assign the value of the Beijing urban subcenter (Tongzhou District), and it is compared with other 15 municipal districts. The derivation of the development dynamic evolution of the Beijing urban subcenter is completed through the geospatial visualization and the linear regression fitting. It is found that the comprehensive index of urban subcenter governance in Beijing shows an upward trend year by year and has developed by leaps and bounds under the promotion of the central policy. Driven by Beijing’s subcenter strategy, the development model of the whole of Beijing has moved from a typical center diffusion model to a dual center to a subcenter and even a diversified development pattern. This paper proposes to lead urban development with the concept of high-quality development, adhere to innovation-driven, improve urban comprehensive carrying capacity through urban software and hardware construction, and realize regional coordinated development on a larger spatial scale.</description><subject>Carrying capacity</subject><subject>Cities</subject><subject>Construction</subject><subject>Construction planning</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Delphi method</subject><subject>Evolution</subject><subject>Information theory</subject><subject>Performance management</subject><subject>Quality of life</subject><subject>Regional development</subject><subject>Rule of law</subject><subject>Subsystems</subject><subject>System theory</subject><subject>Systems theory</subject><subject>Urban development</subject><subject>Urbanization</subject><issn>1530-8669</issn><issn>1530-8677</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>RHX</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp90M1OAjEQB_DGaCKiNx-giUdd7dd-HYEgkpB4AM6btjsrS5YW211038DHdmGJR0-dNL-ZyfwRuqfkmdIwfGGEsZdUpJEQ7AINaMhJkERxfPlXR-k1uvF-SwjhhNEB-plY42vX6Lq0BkuT45GRVetLj22BZ_YAzkijAU8PsmrkSc1NDt942foadkc1hnJbmg-8dkoavGyUBlODw2PpIcddw5muNmBde1oyN4V1u35c_32LrgpZebg7v0O0fp2uJm_B4n02n4wWgWapqINEkYKHDJTSQsc8YTGINAEoKGGQggQQkQam44QVIs6J4jyKc6VSSoWIGPAheujn7p39bMDX2dY23Y2Vz1jESZRQxkWnnnqlnfXeQZHtXbmTrs0oyY5ZZ8ess3PWHX_s-aY0ufwq_9e_ULqABQ</recordid><startdate>20220210</startdate><enddate>20220210</enddate><creator>Wang, Liexuan</creator><creator>Wang, Kunsheng</creator><creator>Huang, Huajin</creator><general>Hindawi</general><general>Hindawi Limited</general><scope>RHU</scope><scope>RHW</scope><scope>RHX</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K7-</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>M0N</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2110-3135</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220210</creationdate><title>Construction and Analysis of Governance Evaluation Index System of Beijing Urban Subcenter Based on System Theory and Information Theory</title><author>Wang, Liexuan ; Wang, Kunsheng ; Huang, Huajin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c294t-8b0f352ebbc4c73827e498eef102e9eaee46ce2c782f47d0b3367dbb9114462e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Carrying capacity</topic><topic>Cities</topic><topic>Construction</topic><topic>Construction planning</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Delphi method</topic><topic>Evolution</topic><topic>Information theory</topic><topic>Performance management</topic><topic>Quality of life</topic><topic>Regional development</topic><topic>Rule of law</topic><topic>Subsystems</topic><topic>System theory</topic><topic>Systems theory</topic><topic>Urban development</topic><topic>Urbanization</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wang, Liexuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Kunsheng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Huajin</creatorcontrib><collection>Hindawi Publishing Complete</collection><collection>Hindawi Publishing Subscription Journals</collection><collection>Hindawi Publishing Open Access Journals</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics &amp; Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Computer Science Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>Computing Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Wireless communications and mobile computing</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wang, Liexuan</au><au>Wang, Kunsheng</au><au>Huang, Huajin</au><au>Rajakani, Kalidoss</au><au>Kalidoss Rajakani</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Construction and Analysis of Governance Evaluation Index System of Beijing Urban Subcenter Based on System Theory and Information Theory</atitle><jtitle>Wireless communications and mobile computing</jtitle><date>2022-02-10</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>2022</volume><spage>1</spage><epage>10</epage><pages>1-10</pages><issn>1530-8669</issn><eissn>1530-8677</eissn><abstract>The construction of subcenters is considered an effective measure to solve the diseases in big cities and improve urban competitiveness. China takes the planning and construction of the Beijing urban subcenter as a major national decision-making deployment. Therefore, the establishment of a scientific and reliable evaluation index system for the urban subcenter is of great significance to the public sector to diagnose urban problems and improve urban performance management. Under the guidance of system theory, this paper establishes the governance evaluation index system of the Beijing subcenter based on the five subsystems: economic subsystem, social subsystem, cultural subsystem, ecological subsystem, and administrative subsystem, and 29 secondary indicators. After comprehensively examining the panel data of the overall Beijing urban system during the construction of the subcenter (2010–2019), the entropy method is used to objectively assign the value of the Beijing urban subcenter (Tongzhou District), and it is compared with other 15 municipal districts. The derivation of the development dynamic evolution of the Beijing urban subcenter is completed through the geospatial visualization and the linear regression fitting. It is found that the comprehensive index of urban subcenter governance in Beijing shows an upward trend year by year and has developed by leaps and bounds under the promotion of the central policy. Driven by Beijing’s subcenter strategy, the development model of the whole of Beijing has moved from a typical center diffusion model to a dual center to a subcenter and even a diversified development pattern. This paper proposes to lead urban development with the concept of high-quality development, adhere to innovation-driven, improve urban comprehensive carrying capacity through urban software and hardware construction, and realize regional coordinated development on a larger spatial scale.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Hindawi</pub><doi>10.1155/2022/9496442</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2110-3135</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1530-8669
ispartof Wireless communications and mobile computing, 2022-02, Vol.2022, p.1-10
issn 1530-8669
1530-8677
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2630681234
source Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Titles; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Carrying capacity
Cities
Construction
Construction planning
Decision making
Delphi method
Evolution
Information theory
Performance management
Quality of life
Regional development
Rule of law
Subsystems
System theory
Systems theory
Urban development
Urbanization
title Construction and Analysis of Governance Evaluation Index System of Beijing Urban Subcenter Based on System Theory and Information Theory
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T07%3A40%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Construction%20and%20Analysis%20of%20Governance%20Evaluation%20Index%20System%20of%20Beijing%20Urban%20Subcenter%20Based%20on%20System%20Theory%20and%20Information%20Theory&rft.jtitle=Wireless%20communications%20and%20mobile%20computing&rft.au=Wang,%20Liexuan&rft.date=2022-02-10&rft.volume=2022&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=10&rft.pages=1-10&rft.issn=1530-8669&rft.eissn=1530-8677&rft_id=info:doi/10.1155/2022/9496442&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2630681234%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2630681234&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true