Is Relationality Always Other-Oriented? Adam Smith, Catholic Social Teaching, and Civil Economy
Recent studies have investigated connections between Adam Smith’s economic and philosophical ideas and Catholic Social Teaching (CST). Scholars argue that their common background lies in their respective anthropologies, both endorsing a relational view of human beings. I raise one main concern regar...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Philosophy of management 2022-03, Vol.21 (1), p.49-68 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 68 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 49 |
| container_title | Philosophy of management |
| container_volume | 21 |
| creator | Santori, Paolo |
| description | Recent studies have investigated connections between Adam Smith’s economic and philosophical ideas and Catholic Social Teaching (CST). Scholars argue that their common background lies in their respective anthropologies, both endorsing a relational view of human beings. I raise one main concern regarding these analyses. I suggest that the relationality endorsed by Smith lacks a central element present in CST—the other-oriented perspective which is the intentional concern for promoting the good of others. Some key elements of CST, such as love, gift, gratuitousness, and fraternity, find a very different space in Smith’s social view and very little space in his economic view. Moreover, I show how CST relationality is more in accordance with a civil economy view of the market as a place of fraternity and mutual assistance. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s40926-021-00175-z |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2630553799</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2630553799</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-cc086d1f71ed3c8c099275ef62060e2e3aaa6f7f05df3fc737ce6cf5fb57898a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LAzEURYMoWLR_wFXAbaMvSTOZWUkZqhYKBVvXIWaSTsp81GSqTH-9oxXc-TZ3c8-FdxC6oXBHAeR9nELGEgKMEgAqBTmeoREDwUgmMnmORlROgfCUsks0jnEHw6UDCDBCahHxi61059tGV77r8az61H3Eq660gayCt01niwc8K3SN17XvygnOdVe2lTd43RqvK7yx2pS-2U6wbgqc-w9f4blpm7bur9GF01W049-8Qq-P803-TJarp0U-WxLDE94RYyBNCuoktQU3qYEsY1JYlzBIwDLLtdaJkw5E4bgzkktjE-OEexMyzVLNr9DtaXcf2veDjZ3atYcwvBQVSzgIwWWWDS12apnQxhisU_vgax16RUF9u1Qnl2pwqX5cquMA8RMUh3KzteFv-h_qC3Ewd0A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2630553799</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Is Relationality Always Other-Oriented? Adam Smith, Catholic Social Teaching, and Civil Economy</title><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Santori, Paolo</creator><creatorcontrib>Santori, Paolo</creatorcontrib><description>Recent studies have investigated connections between Adam Smith’s economic and philosophical ideas and Catholic Social Teaching (CST). Scholars argue that their common background lies in their respective anthropologies, both endorsing a relational view of human beings. I raise one main concern regarding these analyses. I suggest that the relationality endorsed by Smith lacks a central element present in CST—the other-oriented perspective which is the intentional concern for promoting the good of others. Some key elements of CST, such as love, gift, gratuitousness, and fraternity, find a very different space in Smith’s social view and very little space in his economic view. Moreover, I show how CST relationality is more in accordance with a civil economy view of the market as a place of fraternity and mutual assistance.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1740-3812</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2052-9597</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s40926-021-00175-z</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer International Publishing</publisher><subject>Business and Management ; Business ethics ; Education ; International Political Economy ; Philosophers ; Philosophy ; Principles ; Quality of Life Research ; Self interest ; Sympathy</subject><ispartof>Philosophy of management, 2022-03, Vol.21 (1), p.49-68</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2021</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2021. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-cc086d1f71ed3c8c099275ef62060e2e3aaa6f7f05df3fc737ce6cf5fb57898a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-cc086d1f71ed3c8c099275ef62060e2e3aaa6f7f05df3fc737ce6cf5fb57898a3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5705-0461</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s40926-021-00175-z$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40926-021-00175-z$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904,41467,42536,51298</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Santori, Paolo</creatorcontrib><title>Is Relationality Always Other-Oriented? Adam Smith, Catholic Social Teaching, and Civil Economy</title><title>Philosophy of management</title><addtitle>Philosophy of Management</addtitle><description>Recent studies have investigated connections between Adam Smith’s economic and philosophical ideas and Catholic Social Teaching (CST). Scholars argue that their common background lies in their respective anthropologies, both endorsing a relational view of human beings. I raise one main concern regarding these analyses. I suggest that the relationality endorsed by Smith lacks a central element present in CST—the other-oriented perspective which is the intentional concern for promoting the good of others. Some key elements of CST, such as love, gift, gratuitousness, and fraternity, find a very different space in Smith’s social view and very little space in his economic view. Moreover, I show how CST relationality is more in accordance with a civil economy view of the market as a place of fraternity and mutual assistance.</description><subject>Business and Management</subject><subject>Business ethics</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>International Political Economy</subject><subject>Philosophers</subject><subject>Philosophy</subject><subject>Principles</subject><subject>Quality of Life Research</subject><subject>Self interest</subject><subject>Sympathy</subject><issn>1740-3812</issn><issn>2052-9597</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1LAzEURYMoWLR_wFXAbaMvSTOZWUkZqhYKBVvXIWaSTsp81GSqTH-9oxXc-TZ3c8-FdxC6oXBHAeR9nELGEgKMEgAqBTmeoREDwUgmMnmORlROgfCUsks0jnEHw6UDCDBCahHxi61059tGV77r8az61H3Eq660gayCt01niwc8K3SN17XvygnOdVe2lTd43RqvK7yx2pS-2U6wbgqc-w9f4blpm7bur9GF01W049-8Qq-P803-TJarp0U-WxLDE94RYyBNCuoktQU3qYEsY1JYlzBIwDLLtdaJkw5E4bgzkktjE-OEexMyzVLNr9DtaXcf2veDjZ3atYcwvBQVSzgIwWWWDS12apnQxhisU_vgax16RUF9u1Qnl2pwqX5cquMA8RMUh3KzteFv-h_qC3Ewd0A</recordid><startdate>20220301</startdate><enddate>20220301</enddate><creator>Santori, Paolo</creator><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYYUZ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5705-0461</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220301</creationdate><title>Is Relationality Always Other-Oriented? Adam Smith, Catholic Social Teaching, and Civil Economy</title><author>Santori, Paolo</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-cc086d1f71ed3c8c099275ef62060e2e3aaa6f7f05df3fc737ce6cf5fb57898a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Business and Management</topic><topic>Business ethics</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>International Political Economy</topic><topic>Philosophers</topic><topic>Philosophy</topic><topic>Principles</topic><topic>Quality of Life Research</topic><topic>Self interest</topic><topic>Sympathy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Santori, Paolo</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Philosophy of management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Santori, Paolo</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Is Relationality Always Other-Oriented? Adam Smith, Catholic Social Teaching, and Civil Economy</atitle><jtitle>Philosophy of management</jtitle><stitle>Philosophy of Management</stitle><date>2022-03-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>49</spage><epage>68</epage><pages>49-68</pages><issn>1740-3812</issn><eissn>2052-9597</eissn><abstract>Recent studies have investigated connections between Adam Smith’s economic and philosophical ideas and Catholic Social Teaching (CST). Scholars argue that their common background lies in their respective anthropologies, both endorsing a relational view of human beings. I raise one main concern regarding these analyses. I suggest that the relationality endorsed by Smith lacks a central element present in CST—the other-oriented perspective which is the intentional concern for promoting the good of others. Some key elements of CST, such as love, gift, gratuitousness, and fraternity, find a very different space in Smith’s social view and very little space in his economic view. Moreover, I show how CST relationality is more in accordance with a civil economy view of the market as a place of fraternity and mutual assistance.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer International Publishing</pub><doi>10.1007/s40926-021-00175-z</doi><tpages>20</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5705-0461</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1740-3812 |
| ispartof | Philosophy of management, 2022-03, Vol.21 (1), p.49-68 |
| issn | 1740-3812 2052-9597 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2630553799 |
| source | Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals |
| subjects | Business and Management Business ethics Education International Political Economy Philosophers Philosophy Principles Quality of Life Research Self interest Sympathy |
| title | Is Relationality Always Other-Oriented? Adam Smith, Catholic Social Teaching, and Civil Economy |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T04%3A46%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Is%20Relationality%20Always%20Other-Oriented?%20Adam%20Smith,%20Catholic%20Social%20Teaching,%20and%20Civil%20Economy&rft.jtitle=Philosophy%20of%20management&rft.au=Santori,%20Paolo&rft.date=2022-03-01&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=49&rft.epage=68&rft.pages=49-68&rft.issn=1740-3812&rft.eissn=2052-9597&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s40926-021-00175-z&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2630553799%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2630553799&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |