Socioeconomic and ecological indicators in willingness to accept compensation for the conservation of medicinal plants in a tropical dry forest
The contingent valuation method employs a hypothetical scenario to record a person’s declared preference with regard to their willingness to pay for an environmental asset or willingness to accept (WTA) compensation for not using it. Many studies have evaluated the inclination to conserve watersheds...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Environment, development and sustainability development and sustainability, 2022-03, Vol.24 (3), p.4471-4489 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 4489 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | 4471 |
| container_title | Environment, development and sustainability |
| container_volume | 24 |
| creator | Laurentino, Marcelânio de Lima Araújo, Elcida Ramos, Marcelo Alves Cavalcanti, Maria Clara Bezerra Tenório Gonçalves, Paulo Henrique Santos Albuquerque, Ulysses Paulino |
| description | The contingent valuation method employs a hypothetical scenario to record a person’s declared preference with regard to their willingness to pay for an environmental asset or willingness to accept (WTA) compensation for not using it. Many studies have evaluated the inclination to conserve watersheds, forest areas, or certain species. In this study, we reported the economical values of medicinal species based on the perceptions of locals living within a protected area in a seasonal dry tropical forest in Northeastern Brazil. Moreover, we assessed the effects of socioeconomic variables (gender, family income, and family size) on the WTA compensation for not using the species. We interviewed 96 household heads from seven communities to obtain their socioeconomic data and WTA values. Additionally, we used data from a plant inventory to gather information on species abundance. We found that the selected socioeconomic variables are a poor predictor of the WTA values. Our findings also demonstrate that women accept lower WTA values to not use some species. Additionally, individuals from bigger families accept lower WTA values to not use just one of the plant species. Species abundance did not influence informants’ WTA values. Generally, informants overestimated bids, which may hinder biodiversity conservation. Socioeconomic and ecological factors may not have an influence on WTA values in communities that inhabit protected areas. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10668-021-01608-5 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2630419602</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2630419602</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-621c6dad00c01e4906a3adbfbe9a5428f80731892874bddf303d975022fbcf713</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtKxDAUhosoOF5ewFXAdfUkadN2KYM3GHChgruQ5jJm6CQ1ySjzFL6ymangztW58P_fOfxFcYHhCgM01xEDY20JBJeAGbRlfVDMcN3QknRNfZh72jZl3dZvx8VJjCsAAh1hs-L72UvrtfTOr61EwimUh8EvrRQDsk7lmnyIuUVfdhisWzodI0oeCSn1mJD061G7KJL1DhkfUHrXeemiDp_T0hu01hlkXUaOg3BpjxMoBT_u76iw3Vl1TGfFkRFD1Oe_9bR4vbt9mT-Ui6f7x_nNopQUd6lkBEumhAKQgHXVARNUqN70uhN1RVrTQkNx25G2qXqlDAWqchBAiOmlaTA9LS4n7hj8xyYf5iu_CfnByAmjUOGOAckqMqlk8DEGbfgY7FqELcfAd8HzKXieg-f74HmdTXQyxSx2Sx3-0P-4fgDaYIl5</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2630419602</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Socioeconomic and ecological indicators in willingness to accept compensation for the conservation of medicinal plants in a tropical dry forest</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Laurentino, Marcelânio ; de Lima Araújo, Elcida ; Ramos, Marcelo Alves ; Cavalcanti, Maria Clara Bezerra Tenório ; Gonçalves, Paulo Henrique Santos ; Albuquerque, Ulysses Paulino</creator><creatorcontrib>Laurentino, Marcelânio ; de Lima Araújo, Elcida ; Ramos, Marcelo Alves ; Cavalcanti, Maria Clara Bezerra Tenório ; Gonçalves, Paulo Henrique Santos ; Albuquerque, Ulysses Paulino</creatorcontrib><description>The contingent valuation method employs a hypothetical scenario to record a person’s declared preference with regard to their willingness to pay for an environmental asset or willingness to accept (WTA) compensation for not using it. Many studies have evaluated the inclination to conserve watersheds, forest areas, or certain species. In this study, we reported the economical values of medicinal species based on the perceptions of locals living within a protected area in a seasonal dry tropical forest in Northeastern Brazil. Moreover, we assessed the effects of socioeconomic variables (gender, family income, and family size) on the WTA compensation for not using the species. We interviewed 96 household heads from seven communities to obtain their socioeconomic data and WTA values. Additionally, we used data from a plant inventory to gather information on species abundance. We found that the selected socioeconomic variables are a poor predictor of the WTA values. Our findings also demonstrate that women accept lower WTA values to not use some species. Additionally, individuals from bigger families accept lower WTA values to not use just one of the plant species. Species abundance did not influence informants’ WTA values. Generally, informants overestimated bids, which may hinder biodiversity conservation. Socioeconomic and ecological factors may not have an influence on WTA values in communities that inhabit protected areas.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1387-585X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-2975</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10668-021-01608-5</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Biodiversity ; Case Study ; Community ; Compensation ; Conservation ; Contingent valuation ; Data collection ; Dry forests ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Ecological effects ; Ecology ; Economic Geology ; Economic Growth ; Ecosystems ; Environment ; Environmental Economics ; Environmental Management ; Family income ; Family size ; Herbal medicine ; Households ; Medicinal plants ; National parks ; Native peoples ; Plant species ; Protected areas ; Respondents ; Social factors ; Socioeconomic factors ; Socioeconomics ; Species ; Sustainable Development ; Tropical forests ; Valuation methods ; Watersheds ; Wildlife conservation ; Willingness to pay ; Women</subject><ispartof>Environment, development and sustainability, 2022-03, Vol.24 (3), p.4471-4489</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V. 2021</rights><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V. 2021.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-621c6dad00c01e4906a3adbfbe9a5428f80731892874bddf303d975022fbcf713</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-621c6dad00c01e4906a3adbfbe9a5428f80731892874bddf303d975022fbcf713</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8131-8429</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10668-021-01608-5$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10668-021-01608-5$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,27926,27927,41490,42559,51321</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Laurentino, Marcelânio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Lima Araújo, Elcida</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramos, Marcelo Alves</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cavalcanti, Maria Clara Bezerra Tenório</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gonçalves, Paulo Henrique Santos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Albuquerque, Ulysses Paulino</creatorcontrib><title>Socioeconomic and ecological indicators in willingness to accept compensation for the conservation of medicinal plants in a tropical dry forest</title><title>Environment, development and sustainability</title><addtitle>Environ Dev Sustain</addtitle><description>The contingent valuation method employs a hypothetical scenario to record a person’s declared preference with regard to their willingness to pay for an environmental asset or willingness to accept (WTA) compensation for not using it. Many studies have evaluated the inclination to conserve watersheds, forest areas, or certain species. In this study, we reported the economical values of medicinal species based on the perceptions of locals living within a protected area in a seasonal dry tropical forest in Northeastern Brazil. Moreover, we assessed the effects of socioeconomic variables (gender, family income, and family size) on the WTA compensation for not using the species. We interviewed 96 household heads from seven communities to obtain their socioeconomic data and WTA values. Additionally, we used data from a plant inventory to gather information on species abundance. We found that the selected socioeconomic variables are a poor predictor of the WTA values. Our findings also demonstrate that women accept lower WTA values to not use some species. Additionally, individuals from bigger families accept lower WTA values to not use just one of the plant species. Species abundance did not influence informants’ WTA values. Generally, informants overestimated bids, which may hinder biodiversity conservation. Socioeconomic and ecological factors may not have an influence on WTA values in communities that inhabit protected areas.</description><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Case Study</subject><subject>Community</subject><subject>Compensation</subject><subject>Conservation</subject><subject>Contingent valuation</subject><subject>Data collection</subject><subject>Dry forests</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Ecological effects</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Economic Geology</subject><subject>Economic Growth</subject><subject>Ecosystems</subject><subject>Environment</subject><subject>Environmental Economics</subject><subject>Environmental Management</subject><subject>Family income</subject><subject>Family size</subject><subject>Herbal medicine</subject><subject>Households</subject><subject>Medicinal plants</subject><subject>National parks</subject><subject>Native peoples</subject><subject>Plant species</subject><subject>Protected areas</subject><subject>Respondents</subject><subject>Social factors</subject><subject>Socioeconomic factors</subject><subject>Socioeconomics</subject><subject>Species</subject><subject>Sustainable Development</subject><subject>Tropical forests</subject><subject>Valuation methods</subject><subject>Watersheds</subject><subject>Wildlife conservation</subject><subject>Willingness to pay</subject><subject>Women</subject><issn>1387-585X</issn><issn>1573-2975</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kMtKxDAUhosoOF5ewFXAdfUkadN2KYM3GHChgruQ5jJm6CQ1ySjzFL6ymangztW58P_fOfxFcYHhCgM01xEDY20JBJeAGbRlfVDMcN3QknRNfZh72jZl3dZvx8VJjCsAAh1hs-L72UvrtfTOr61EwimUh8EvrRQDsk7lmnyIuUVfdhisWzodI0oeCSn1mJD061G7KJL1DhkfUHrXeemiDp_T0hu01hlkXUaOg3BpjxMoBT_u76iw3Vl1TGfFkRFD1Oe_9bR4vbt9mT-Ui6f7x_nNopQUd6lkBEumhAKQgHXVARNUqN70uhN1RVrTQkNx25G2qXqlDAWqchBAiOmlaTA9LS4n7hj8xyYf5iu_CfnByAmjUOGOAckqMqlk8DEGbfgY7FqELcfAd8HzKXieg-f74HmdTXQyxSx2Sx3-0P-4fgDaYIl5</recordid><startdate>20220301</startdate><enddate>20220301</enddate><creator>Laurentino, Marcelânio</creator><creator>de Lima Araújo, Elcida</creator><creator>Ramos, Marcelo Alves</creator><creator>Cavalcanti, Maria Clara Bezerra Tenório</creator><creator>Gonçalves, Paulo Henrique Santos</creator><creator>Albuquerque, Ulysses Paulino</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8131-8429</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220301</creationdate><title>Socioeconomic and ecological indicators in willingness to accept compensation for the conservation of medicinal plants in a tropical dry forest</title><author>Laurentino, Marcelânio ; de Lima Araújo, Elcida ; Ramos, Marcelo Alves ; Cavalcanti, Maria Clara Bezerra Tenório ; Gonçalves, Paulo Henrique Santos ; Albuquerque, Ulysses Paulino</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-621c6dad00c01e4906a3adbfbe9a5428f80731892874bddf303d975022fbcf713</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Case Study</topic><topic>Community</topic><topic>Compensation</topic><topic>Conservation</topic><topic>Contingent valuation</topic><topic>Data collection</topic><topic>Dry forests</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Ecological effects</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Economic Geology</topic><topic>Economic Growth</topic><topic>Ecosystems</topic><topic>Environment</topic><topic>Environmental Economics</topic><topic>Environmental Management</topic><topic>Family income</topic><topic>Family size</topic><topic>Herbal medicine</topic><topic>Households</topic><topic>Medicinal plants</topic><topic>National parks</topic><topic>Native peoples</topic><topic>Plant species</topic><topic>Protected areas</topic><topic>Respondents</topic><topic>Social factors</topic><topic>Socioeconomic factors</topic><topic>Socioeconomics</topic><topic>Species</topic><topic>Sustainable Development</topic><topic>Tropical forests</topic><topic>Valuation methods</topic><topic>Watersheds</topic><topic>Wildlife conservation</topic><topic>Willingness to pay</topic><topic>Women</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Laurentino, Marcelânio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Lima Araújo, Elcida</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramos, Marcelo Alves</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cavalcanti, Maria Clara Bezerra Tenório</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gonçalves, Paulo Henrique Santos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Albuquerque, Ulysses Paulino</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Access via ABI/INFORM (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Environment, development and sustainability</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Laurentino, Marcelânio</au><au>de Lima Araújo, Elcida</au><au>Ramos, Marcelo Alves</au><au>Cavalcanti, Maria Clara Bezerra Tenório</au><au>Gonçalves, Paulo Henrique Santos</au><au>Albuquerque, Ulysses Paulino</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Socioeconomic and ecological indicators in willingness to accept compensation for the conservation of medicinal plants in a tropical dry forest</atitle><jtitle>Environment, development and sustainability</jtitle><stitle>Environ Dev Sustain</stitle><date>2022-03-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>4471</spage><epage>4489</epage><pages>4471-4489</pages><issn>1387-585X</issn><eissn>1573-2975</eissn><abstract>The contingent valuation method employs a hypothetical scenario to record a person’s declared preference with regard to their willingness to pay for an environmental asset or willingness to accept (WTA) compensation for not using it. Many studies have evaluated the inclination to conserve watersheds, forest areas, or certain species. In this study, we reported the economical values of medicinal species based on the perceptions of locals living within a protected area in a seasonal dry tropical forest in Northeastern Brazil. Moreover, we assessed the effects of socioeconomic variables (gender, family income, and family size) on the WTA compensation for not using the species. We interviewed 96 household heads from seven communities to obtain their socioeconomic data and WTA values. Additionally, we used data from a plant inventory to gather information on species abundance. We found that the selected socioeconomic variables are a poor predictor of the WTA values. Our findings also demonstrate that women accept lower WTA values to not use some species. Additionally, individuals from bigger families accept lower WTA values to not use just one of the plant species. Species abundance did not influence informants’ WTA values. Generally, informants overestimated bids, which may hinder biodiversity conservation. Socioeconomic and ecological factors may not have an influence on WTA values in communities that inhabit protected areas.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s10668-021-01608-5</doi><tpages>19</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8131-8429</orcidid></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1387-585X |
| ispartof | Environment, development and sustainability, 2022-03, Vol.24 (3), p.4471-4489 |
| issn | 1387-585X 1573-2975 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2630419602 |
| source | SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
| subjects | Biodiversity Case Study Community Compensation Conservation Contingent valuation Data collection Dry forests Earth and Environmental Science Ecological effects Ecology Economic Geology Economic Growth Ecosystems Environment Environmental Economics Environmental Management Family income Family size Herbal medicine Households Medicinal plants National parks Native peoples Plant species Protected areas Respondents Social factors Socioeconomic factors Socioeconomics Species Sustainable Development Tropical forests Valuation methods Watersheds Wildlife conservation Willingness to pay Women |
| title | Socioeconomic and ecological indicators in willingness to accept compensation for the conservation of medicinal plants in a tropical dry forest |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-18T08%3A58%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Socioeconomic%20and%20ecological%20indicators%20in%20willingness%20to%20accept%20compensation%20for%20the%20conservation%20of%20medicinal%20plants%20in%20a%20tropical%20dry%20forest&rft.jtitle=Environment,%20development%20and%20sustainability&rft.au=Laurentino,%20Marcel%C3%A2nio&rft.date=2022-03-01&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=4471&rft.epage=4489&rft.pages=4471-4489&rft.issn=1387-585X&rft.eissn=1573-2975&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10668-021-01608-5&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2630419602%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2630419602&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |