Agency costs, board structure and institutional investors: case of India
PurposeThe author examines the role of board structure and institutional investors in dealing with the agency issues for the Indian firms by taking the data of NSE-500 nonfinancial firms for the period 2010–2019.Design/methodology/approachThe author applies dynamic panel data methodology to deal wit...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | AJAR (Asian Journal of Accounting Research) (Online) 2022-02, Vol.7 (1), p.44-58 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 58 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 44 |
container_title | AJAR (Asian Journal of Accounting Research) (Online) |
container_volume | 7 |
creator | Chaudhary, Pankaj |
description | PurposeThe author examines the role of board structure and institutional investors in dealing with the agency issues for the Indian firms by taking the data of NSE-500 nonfinancial firms for the period 2010–2019.Design/methodology/approachThe author applies dynamic panel data methodology to deal with endogeneity concerns prevalent in corporate finance variables.FindingsThe agency view is consistent with the board size in the context of India. The author observed that the board size has a harmful effect on agency cost. A larger board size may create a coordination problem, or CEO may find it easy to thrust his or her decisions on board. The author also noticed that firms should have sizeable institutional ownership, particularly pressure-insensitive investors, in equity as they can reduce agency-related issues.Originality/valueThis study focuses on one of the largest emerging economies, i.e. India. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1108/AJAR-12-2020-0130 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2629524292</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_07c57ac9737e4244b1d5f0f3907f319d</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2629524292</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2502-6b11d3e71919515dbc93042c67461fe0796984101060f83e11ad92c54ccdde43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkV1LwzAUhosoONQf4F3AW6vnnKRN490Y6iYDQXYfsiSVjtlo0gr797ZO_ACv8sH7PuE8ybJzhCtEqK6nD9OnHCknIMgBORxkExKC5wJlcfhrf5ydpbQBAOLIy4om2Xz67Fu7YzakLl2ydTDRsdTF3nZ99My0jjVt6pqu75rQmu1wevepCzHdMGuSZ6Fmi9Y15jQ7qs02-bOv9SRb3d2uZvN8-Xi_mE2XuaUCKC_XiI57iQpVgYVbW8VBkC2lKLH2IFWpKoGAUEJdcY9onCJbCGud84KfZIs91gWz0a-xeTFxp4Np9OdFiM_axK6xW69B2kIaqySXXgwK1uiKGmquQNYclRtYF3vWawxv_TCV3oQ-DkMmTSWpggQpGlK4T9kYUoq-_n4VQY_69ahfI-lRvx71Dx2273gb2ib9NCrkRCTLEQtfkRcfzdb9S_3zqfwDCT2Nhg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2629524292</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Agency costs, board structure and institutional investors: case of India</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Emerald Open Access</source><creator>Chaudhary, Pankaj</creator><creatorcontrib>Chaudhary, Pankaj</creatorcontrib><description>PurposeThe author examines the role of board structure and institutional investors in dealing with the agency issues for the Indian firms by taking the data of NSE-500 nonfinancial firms for the period 2010–2019.Design/methodology/approachThe author applies dynamic panel data methodology to deal with endogeneity concerns prevalent in corporate finance variables.FindingsThe agency view is consistent with the board size in the context of India. The author observed that the board size has a harmful effect on agency cost. A larger board size may create a coordination problem, or CEO may find it easy to thrust his or her decisions on board. The author also noticed that firms should have sizeable institutional ownership, particularly pressure-insensitive investors, in equity as they can reduce agency-related issues.Originality/valueThis study focuses on one of the largest emerging economies, i.e. India.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2443-4175</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2443-4175</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1108/AJAR-12-2020-0130</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bingley: Emerald Publishing Limited</publisher><subject>agency cost ; board structure ; Boards of directors ; Capital markets ; Conflicts of interest ; Corporate governance ; Costs ; Dependency theory ; Directors ; governance ; Hypotheses ; Institutional investments ; institutional investors ; Related party transactions ; Stockholders</subject><ispartof>AJAR (Asian Journal of Accounting Research) (Online), 2022-02, Vol.7 (1), p.44-58</ispartof><rights>Pankaj Chaudhary</rights><rights>Pankaj Chaudhary. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2502-6b11d3e71919515dbc93042c67461fe0796984101060f83e11ad92c54ccdde43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2502-6b11d3e71919515dbc93042c67461fe0796984101060f83e11ad92c54ccdde43</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/AJAR-12-2020-0130/full/html$$EHTML$$P50$$Gemerald$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,860,2095,27830,27903,27904,52669</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chaudhary, Pankaj</creatorcontrib><title>Agency costs, board structure and institutional investors: case of India</title><title>AJAR (Asian Journal of Accounting Research) (Online)</title><description>PurposeThe author examines the role of board structure and institutional investors in dealing with the agency issues for the Indian firms by taking the data of NSE-500 nonfinancial firms for the period 2010–2019.Design/methodology/approachThe author applies dynamic panel data methodology to deal with endogeneity concerns prevalent in corporate finance variables.FindingsThe agency view is consistent with the board size in the context of India. The author observed that the board size has a harmful effect on agency cost. A larger board size may create a coordination problem, or CEO may find it easy to thrust his or her decisions on board. The author also noticed that firms should have sizeable institutional ownership, particularly pressure-insensitive investors, in equity as they can reduce agency-related issues.Originality/valueThis study focuses on one of the largest emerging economies, i.e. India.</description><subject>agency cost</subject><subject>board structure</subject><subject>Boards of directors</subject><subject>Capital markets</subject><subject>Conflicts of interest</subject><subject>Corporate governance</subject><subject>Costs</subject><subject>Dependency theory</subject><subject>Directors</subject><subject>governance</subject><subject>Hypotheses</subject><subject>Institutional investments</subject><subject>institutional investors</subject><subject>Related party transactions</subject><subject>Stockholders</subject><issn>2443-4175</issn><issn>2443-4175</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>XDTOA</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNptkV1LwzAUhosoONQf4F3AW6vnnKRN490Y6iYDQXYfsiSVjtlo0gr797ZO_ACv8sH7PuE8ybJzhCtEqK6nD9OnHCknIMgBORxkExKC5wJlcfhrf5ydpbQBAOLIy4om2Xz67Fu7YzakLl2ydTDRsdTF3nZ99My0jjVt6pqu75rQmu1wevepCzHdMGuSZ6Fmi9Y15jQ7qs02-bOv9SRb3d2uZvN8-Xi_mE2XuaUCKC_XiI57iQpVgYVbW8VBkC2lKLH2IFWpKoGAUEJdcY9onCJbCGud84KfZIs91gWz0a-xeTFxp4Np9OdFiM_axK6xW69B2kIaqySXXgwK1uiKGmquQNYclRtYF3vWawxv_TCV3oQ-DkMmTSWpggQpGlK4T9kYUoq-_n4VQY_69ahfI-lRvx71Dx2273gb2ib9NCrkRCTLEQtfkRcfzdb9S_3zqfwDCT2Nhg</recordid><startdate>20220221</startdate><enddate>20220221</enddate><creator>Chaudhary, Pankaj</creator><general>Emerald Publishing Limited</general><general>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</general><general>Emerald Publishing</general><scope>XDTOA</scope><scope>OQ6</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7RO</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X1</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ANIOZ</scope><scope>AXJJW</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220221</creationdate><title>Agency costs, board structure and institutional investors: case of India</title><author>Chaudhary, Pankaj</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2502-6b11d3e71919515dbc93042c67461fe0796984101060f83e11ad92c54ccdde43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>agency cost</topic><topic>board structure</topic><topic>Boards of directors</topic><topic>Capital markets</topic><topic>Conflicts of interest</topic><topic>Corporate governance</topic><topic>Costs</topic><topic>Dependency theory</topic><topic>Directors</topic><topic>governance</topic><topic>Hypotheses</topic><topic>Institutional investments</topic><topic>institutional investors</topic><topic>Related party transactions</topic><topic>Stockholders</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chaudhary, Pankaj</creatorcontrib><collection>Emerald Open Access</collection><collection>ECONIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Asian Business Database</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Accounting & Tax Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Accounting, Tax & Banking Collection</collection><collection>Asian & European Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>AJAR (Asian Journal of Accounting Research) (Online)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chaudhary, Pankaj</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Agency costs, board structure and institutional investors: case of India</atitle><jtitle>AJAR (Asian Journal of Accounting Research) (Online)</jtitle><date>2022-02-21</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>7</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>44</spage><epage>58</epage><pages>44-58</pages><issn>2443-4175</issn><eissn>2443-4175</eissn><abstract>PurposeThe author examines the role of board structure and institutional investors in dealing with the agency issues for the Indian firms by taking the data of NSE-500 nonfinancial firms for the period 2010–2019.Design/methodology/approachThe author applies dynamic panel data methodology to deal with endogeneity concerns prevalent in corporate finance variables.FindingsThe agency view is consistent with the board size in the context of India. The author observed that the board size has a harmful effect on agency cost. A larger board size may create a coordination problem, or CEO may find it easy to thrust his or her decisions on board. The author also noticed that firms should have sizeable institutional ownership, particularly pressure-insensitive investors, in equity as they can reduce agency-related issues.Originality/valueThis study focuses on one of the largest emerging economies, i.e. India.</abstract><cop>Bingley</cop><pub>Emerald Publishing Limited</pub><doi>10.1108/AJAR-12-2020-0130</doi><tpages>15</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2443-4175 |
ispartof | AJAR (Asian Journal of Accounting Research) (Online), 2022-02, Vol.7 (1), p.44-58 |
issn | 2443-4175 2443-4175 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2629524292 |
source | DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Emerald Open Access |
subjects | agency cost board structure Boards of directors Capital markets Conflicts of interest Corporate governance Costs Dependency theory Directors governance Hypotheses Institutional investments institutional investors Related party transactions Stockholders |
title | Agency costs, board structure and institutional investors: case of India |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T03%3A47%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Agency%20costs,%20board%20structure%20and%20institutional%20investors:%20case%20of%20India&rft.jtitle=AJAR%20(Asian%20Journal%20of%20Accounting%20Research)%20(Online)&rft.au=Chaudhary,%20Pankaj&rft.date=2022-02-21&rft.volume=7&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=44&rft.epage=58&rft.pages=44-58&rft.issn=2443-4175&rft.eissn=2443-4175&rft_id=info:doi/10.1108/AJAR-12-2020-0130&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2629524292%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2629524292&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_07c57ac9737e4244b1d5f0f3907f319d&rfr_iscdi=true |