Comparisons of competitor selection approaches for spatially explicit competition indices of natural spruce-fir-broadleaf mixed forests
Determining the competitor selection methods for spatial explicit competition indices is important for individual tree growth modelling and forest management. There is a lack of systematic comparisons on these methods for natural mixed forest, however. In this paper, subplots with the area of 0.0625...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | European journal of forest research 2022-02, Vol.141 (1), p.177-211 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 211 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 177 |
container_title | European journal of forest research |
container_volume | 141 |
creator | Zhou, Mengli Lei, Xiangdong Lu, Jun Gao, Wenqiang Zhang, Huiru |
description | Determining the competitor selection methods for spatial explicit competition indices is important for individual tree growth modelling and forest management. There is a lack of systematic comparisons on these methods for natural mixed forest, however. In this paper, subplots with the area of 0.0625 ha were randomly sampled from 3 one-hectare remeasured and stem-mapped plots and repeated 200 times for natural spruce-fir-broadleaf mixed forests in northeast China with a bootstrapping method. Totally 600 subplots were used to examined the optimal competitor selection methods. Nine distance-dependent competition indices (CIs) and nine main competitor selection methods were tested by including them in the individual tree basal area growth models. After the analysis of the difference in the performance between partial model (only DBH was included) and full model (both DBH and CIs were included), we found that the difference among the statistically valid methods was weak (the increase in the adjusted coefficient of determination were 0.042 to 2.014%, the mean square errors were 0.060 to 2.851%). According to the magnitude and consistency of the contribution of the selection methods for a CI and the sensitivity to distinguish the competition effects on tree growth among the constituent tree species, we comprehensively concluded that the optimal competitor selection method was dependent on the CI, but the difference among these methods was weak. In addition, the CI from Alemdag (Alemdag IS (1978) Evaluation of some competition indexes for the prediction of diameter increment in planted white spruce. Information Report Forest Management Institute (Canada) No. FMR-X-108.) with the gradually expanding radius of circle method and 8 m radius of influence circle was the best combination which could efficiently detect the difference in competition effects on tree growth among tree species groups. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10342-021-01430-8 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2629523226</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2629523226</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-94124f6e75aa7766003d6488e2af1b6dc2a9948e62ff28d03c376e809317a29a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtKAzEUhoMoWKsv4GrAdTSXaSZZSvEGBTe6DmnmRFOmM2OSgfYJfG0zHak7V0nI_32H8yN0TcktJaS6i5TwkmHCKCa05ATLEzSjgjJciqo6Pd6FOkcXMW4IYVJJOUPfy27bm-Bj18aic4XNT0g-daGI0IBNvmsL0_ehM_YTYuHGj94kb5pmX8Cub7z16YiNad_W3sLB1po0BNNkIgwWsPMBr7OpbsC4Yut3UI9CiCleojNnmghXv-ccvT8-vC2f8er16WV5v8KWU5WwKikrnYBqYUxVCUEIr0UpJTDj6FrUlhmlSgmCOcdkTbjllQBJFKeVYcrwObqZvHmjryFP1ptuCG0eqZlgasE4YyKn2JSyoYsxgNN98FsT9poSPRaup8J1LlwfCtcyQ3yC8ra-_YDwp_6H-gEn8oZt</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2629523226</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparisons of competitor selection approaches for spatially explicit competition indices of natural spruce-fir-broadleaf mixed forests</title><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><creator>Zhou, Mengli ; Lei, Xiangdong ; Lu, Jun ; Gao, Wenqiang ; Zhang, Huiru</creator><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Mengli ; Lei, Xiangdong ; Lu, Jun ; Gao, Wenqiang ; Zhang, Huiru</creatorcontrib><description>Determining the competitor selection methods for spatial explicit competition indices is important for individual tree growth modelling and forest management. There is a lack of systematic comparisons on these methods for natural mixed forest, however. In this paper, subplots with the area of 0.0625 ha were randomly sampled from 3 one-hectare remeasured and stem-mapped plots and repeated 200 times for natural spruce-fir-broadleaf mixed forests in northeast China with a bootstrapping method. Totally 600 subplots were used to examined the optimal competitor selection methods. Nine distance-dependent competition indices (CIs) and nine main competitor selection methods were tested by including them in the individual tree basal area growth models. After the analysis of the difference in the performance between partial model (only DBH was included) and full model (both DBH and CIs were included), we found that the difference among the statistically valid methods was weak (the increase in the adjusted coefficient of determination were 0.042 to 2.014%, the mean square errors were 0.060 to 2.851%). According to the magnitude and consistency of the contribution of the selection methods for a CI and the sensitivity to distinguish the competition effects on tree growth among the constituent tree species, we comprehensively concluded that the optimal competitor selection method was dependent on the CI, but the difference among these methods was weak. In addition, the CI from Alemdag (Alemdag IS (1978) Evaluation of some competition indexes for the prediction of diameter increment in planted white spruce. Information Report Forest Management Institute (Canada) No. FMR-X-108.) with the gradually expanding radius of circle method and 8 m radius of influence circle was the best combination which could efficiently detect the difference in competition effects on tree growth among tree species groups.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1612-4669</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1612-4677</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10342-021-01430-8</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Area ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Competition ; Diameters ; Forest management ; Forestry ; Forests ; Growth models ; Information management ; Life Sciences ; Mixed forests ; Original Paper ; Performance indices ; Plant Ecology ; Plant Sciences ; Plant species ; Statistical methods ; Trees</subject><ispartof>European journal of forest research, 2022-02, Vol.141 (1), p.177-211</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2021</rights><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2021.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-94124f6e75aa7766003d6488e2af1b6dc2a9948e62ff28d03c376e809317a29a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-94124f6e75aa7766003d6488e2af1b6dc2a9948e62ff28d03c376e809317a29a3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6582-587X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10342-021-01430-8$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10342-021-01430-8$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Mengli</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lei, Xiangdong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lu, Jun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gao, Wenqiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Huiru</creatorcontrib><title>Comparisons of competitor selection approaches for spatially explicit competition indices of natural spruce-fir-broadleaf mixed forests</title><title>European journal of forest research</title><addtitle>Eur J Forest Res</addtitle><description>Determining the competitor selection methods for spatial explicit competition indices is important for individual tree growth modelling and forest management. There is a lack of systematic comparisons on these methods for natural mixed forest, however. In this paper, subplots with the area of 0.0625 ha were randomly sampled from 3 one-hectare remeasured and stem-mapped plots and repeated 200 times for natural spruce-fir-broadleaf mixed forests in northeast China with a bootstrapping method. Totally 600 subplots were used to examined the optimal competitor selection methods. Nine distance-dependent competition indices (CIs) and nine main competitor selection methods were tested by including them in the individual tree basal area growth models. After the analysis of the difference in the performance between partial model (only DBH was included) and full model (both DBH and CIs were included), we found that the difference among the statistically valid methods was weak (the increase in the adjusted coefficient of determination were 0.042 to 2.014%, the mean square errors were 0.060 to 2.851%). According to the magnitude and consistency of the contribution of the selection methods for a CI and the sensitivity to distinguish the competition effects on tree growth among the constituent tree species, we comprehensively concluded that the optimal competitor selection method was dependent on the CI, but the difference among these methods was weak. In addition, the CI from Alemdag (Alemdag IS (1978) Evaluation of some competition indexes for the prediction of diameter increment in planted white spruce. Information Report Forest Management Institute (Canada) No. FMR-X-108.) with the gradually expanding radius of circle method and 8 m radius of influence circle was the best combination which could efficiently detect the difference in competition effects on tree growth among tree species groups.</description><subject>Area</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Competition</subject><subject>Diameters</subject><subject>Forest management</subject><subject>Forestry</subject><subject>Forests</subject><subject>Growth models</subject><subject>Information management</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Mixed forests</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Performance indices</subject><subject>Plant Ecology</subject><subject>Plant Sciences</subject><subject>Plant species</subject><subject>Statistical methods</subject><subject>Trees</subject><issn>1612-4669</issn><issn>1612-4677</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kMtKAzEUhoMoWKsv4GrAdTSXaSZZSvEGBTe6DmnmRFOmM2OSgfYJfG0zHak7V0nI_32H8yN0TcktJaS6i5TwkmHCKCa05ATLEzSjgjJciqo6Pd6FOkcXMW4IYVJJOUPfy27bm-Bj18aic4XNT0g-daGI0IBNvmsL0_ehM_YTYuHGj94kb5pmX8Cub7z16YiNad_W3sLB1po0BNNkIgwWsPMBr7OpbsC4Yut3UI9CiCleojNnmghXv-ccvT8-vC2f8er16WV5v8KWU5WwKikrnYBqYUxVCUEIr0UpJTDj6FrUlhmlSgmCOcdkTbjllQBJFKeVYcrwObqZvHmjryFP1ptuCG0eqZlgasE4YyKn2JSyoYsxgNN98FsT9poSPRaup8J1LlwfCtcyQ3yC8ra-_YDwp_6H-gEn8oZt</recordid><startdate>20220201</startdate><enddate>20220201</enddate><creator>Zhou, Mengli</creator><creator>Lei, Xiangdong</creator><creator>Lu, Jun</creator><creator>Gao, Wenqiang</creator><creator>Zhang, Huiru</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6582-587X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220201</creationdate><title>Comparisons of competitor selection approaches for spatially explicit competition indices of natural spruce-fir-broadleaf mixed forests</title><author>Zhou, Mengli ; Lei, Xiangdong ; Lu, Jun ; Gao, Wenqiang ; Zhang, Huiru</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-94124f6e75aa7766003d6488e2af1b6dc2a9948e62ff28d03c376e809317a29a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Area</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Competition</topic><topic>Diameters</topic><topic>Forest management</topic><topic>Forestry</topic><topic>Forests</topic><topic>Growth models</topic><topic>Information management</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Mixed forests</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Performance indices</topic><topic>Plant Ecology</topic><topic>Plant Sciences</topic><topic>Plant species</topic><topic>Statistical methods</topic><topic>Trees</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Mengli</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lei, Xiangdong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lu, Jun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gao, Wenqiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Huiru</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>European journal of forest research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zhou, Mengli</au><au>Lei, Xiangdong</au><au>Lu, Jun</au><au>Gao, Wenqiang</au><au>Zhang, Huiru</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparisons of competitor selection approaches for spatially explicit competition indices of natural spruce-fir-broadleaf mixed forests</atitle><jtitle>European journal of forest research</jtitle><stitle>Eur J Forest Res</stitle><date>2022-02-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>141</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>177</spage><epage>211</epage><pages>177-211</pages><issn>1612-4669</issn><eissn>1612-4677</eissn><abstract>Determining the competitor selection methods for spatial explicit competition indices is important for individual tree growth modelling and forest management. There is a lack of systematic comparisons on these methods for natural mixed forest, however. In this paper, subplots with the area of 0.0625 ha were randomly sampled from 3 one-hectare remeasured and stem-mapped plots and repeated 200 times for natural spruce-fir-broadleaf mixed forests in northeast China with a bootstrapping method. Totally 600 subplots were used to examined the optimal competitor selection methods. Nine distance-dependent competition indices (CIs) and nine main competitor selection methods were tested by including them in the individual tree basal area growth models. After the analysis of the difference in the performance between partial model (only DBH was included) and full model (both DBH and CIs were included), we found that the difference among the statistically valid methods was weak (the increase in the adjusted coefficient of determination were 0.042 to 2.014%, the mean square errors were 0.060 to 2.851%). According to the magnitude and consistency of the contribution of the selection methods for a CI and the sensitivity to distinguish the competition effects on tree growth among the constituent tree species, we comprehensively concluded that the optimal competitor selection method was dependent on the CI, but the difference among these methods was weak. In addition, the CI from Alemdag (Alemdag IS (1978) Evaluation of some competition indexes for the prediction of diameter increment in planted white spruce. Information Report Forest Management Institute (Canada) No. FMR-X-108.) with the gradually expanding radius of circle method and 8 m radius of influence circle was the best combination which could efficiently detect the difference in competition effects on tree growth among tree species groups.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><doi>10.1007/s10342-021-01430-8</doi><tpages>35</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6582-587X</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1612-4669 |
ispartof | European journal of forest research, 2022-02, Vol.141 (1), p.177-211 |
issn | 1612-4669 1612-4677 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2629523226 |
source | SpringerNature Journals |
subjects | Area Biomedical and Life Sciences Competition Diameters Forest management Forestry Forests Growth models Information management Life Sciences Mixed forests Original Paper Performance indices Plant Ecology Plant Sciences Plant species Statistical methods Trees |
title | Comparisons of competitor selection approaches for spatially explicit competition indices of natural spruce-fir-broadleaf mixed forests |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T16%3A57%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparisons%20of%20competitor%20selection%20approaches%20for%20spatially%20explicit%20competition%20indices%20of%20natural%20spruce-fir-broadleaf%20mixed%20forests&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20forest%20research&rft.au=Zhou,%20Mengli&rft.date=2022-02-01&rft.volume=141&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=177&rft.epage=211&rft.pages=177-211&rft.issn=1612-4669&rft.eissn=1612-4677&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10342-021-01430-8&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2629523226%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2629523226&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |