Ambidexterity in left-handed and right-handed individuals and implications for surgical training

Surgical training has historically been geared toward right-handed individuals. This could cause mentors to perceive left-handed students and residents as being more difficult to train. This study examined whether differences in dexterity exist between left-handed and right-handed individuals and th...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Proceedings - Baylor University. Medical Center 2022, Vol.35 (2), p.176-179
Hauptverfasser: Lombana, Nicholas F., Naeger, Patrick A., Padilla, Pablo L., Falola, Reuben A., Cole, Eric L.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 179
container_issue 2
container_start_page 176
container_title Proceedings - Baylor University. Medical Center
container_volume 35
creator Lombana, Nicholas F.
Naeger, Patrick A.
Padilla, Pablo L.
Falola, Reuben A.
Cole, Eric L.
description Surgical training has historically been geared toward right-handed individuals. This could cause mentors to perceive left-handed students and residents as being more difficult to train. This study examined whether differences in dexterity exist between left-handed and right-handed individuals and the implications this may have on surgical training. Recent literature suggests that surgical training may need to be updated to train left-handed students more effectively. In this prospective, crossover study, 50 right-handed and 50 left-handed individuals of varying ages and occupations were evaluated using the O'Conner Tweezer Dexterity Test. Participants were timed while they used flat-tipped forceps to pick up 1″ brass metal pins and sequentially place one pin each in 100 pinholes 1/16″ in diameter on a 21″ × 12″ board. Participants completed this exercise with their dominant hand followed by their nondominant hand. Nondominant hand dexterity was measured by dividing the nondominant hand completion time by the dominant hand completion time, with a higher percentage associated with higher ambidexterity. Using the Student's two-tailed t test, we found that left-handed individuals had an 97.2% congruence between dominant and nondominant hands while right-handed individuals had a 71.6% congruence (P 
doi_str_mv 10.1080/08998280.2021.2008585
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2629518335</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2637583264</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4115-9a6507f70cee6741f4f7272ea6be2d0cf7773ac4d4a291433df3ff6e439c1c303</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU1vEzEQhi0EomnhJ4BW4sJliz_X3guiqiggVeoFzsbxRzLVrh3s3UL-PU6TRrQHLmNp5pl3Zvwi9Ibgc4IV_oBV3yuq8DnFlNSAlVDiGVoQQUXLqKDP0WLHtDvoBJ2WcosxJ4zIl-iECdoRzsUC_bwYl-D8n8lnmLYNxGbwYWrXJjrvmhqbDKv1MQHRwR242QzlvgjjZgBrJkixNCHlpsx5VRNDM2UDEeLqFXoRKu1fH94z9OPq8_fLr-31zZdvlxfXreWEiLY3ncAySGy97yQngQdJJfWmW3rqsA1SSmYsd9zQnnDGXGAhdJ6z3hLLMDtDH_e6m3k5emd9rBsMepNhNHmrkwH9uBJhrVfpTivVCUZYFXh_EMjp1-zLpEco1g-DiT7NRdOOSaEY7XhF3z1Bb9OcYz2vUrQXRDEmKiX2lM2plOzDcRmC9c5D_eCh3nmoDx7Wvrf_XnLsejCtAp_2AMT65aP5nfLg9GS2Q8ohm2ihaPb_GX8Bs-es3g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2629518335</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Ambidexterity in left-handed and right-handed individuals and implications for surgical training</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Lombana, Nicholas F. ; Naeger, Patrick A. ; Padilla, Pablo L. ; Falola, Reuben A. ; Cole, Eric L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Lombana, Nicholas F. ; Naeger, Patrick A. ; Padilla, Pablo L. ; Falola, Reuben A. ; Cole, Eric L.</creatorcontrib><description>Surgical training has historically been geared toward right-handed individuals. This could cause mentors to perceive left-handed students and residents as being more difficult to train. This study examined whether differences in dexterity exist between left-handed and right-handed individuals and the implications this may have on surgical training. Recent literature suggests that surgical training may need to be updated to train left-handed students more effectively. In this prospective, crossover study, 50 right-handed and 50 left-handed individuals of varying ages and occupations were evaluated using the O'Conner Tweezer Dexterity Test. Participants were timed while they used flat-tipped forceps to pick up 1″ brass metal pins and sequentially place one pin each in 100 pinholes 1/16″ in diameter on a 21″ × 12″ board. Participants completed this exercise with their dominant hand followed by their nondominant hand. Nondominant hand dexterity was measured by dividing the nondominant hand completion time by the dominant hand completion time, with a higher percentage associated with higher ambidexterity. Using the Student's two-tailed t test, we found that left-handed individuals had an 97.2% congruence between dominant and nondominant hands while right-handed individuals had a 71.6% congruence (P &lt; 0.001). In conclusion, our results show that left-handed individuals have a greater degree of ambidexterity than their right-handed counterparts. These results suggest that any perceived difference between left-handed and right-handed surgical residents may not be due to innate skill or dexterity, but rather a combination of external influences.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0899-8280</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1525-3252</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/08998280.2021.2008585</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35261445</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Taylor &amp; Francis</publisher><subject>Ambidexterity ; dexterity ; Handedness ; left-handed ; Original Research ; right-handed ; Surgeons ; Surgery ; surgical training ; Training</subject><ispartof>Proceedings - Baylor University. Medical Center, 2022, Vol.35 (2), p.176-179</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2021 Baylor University Medical Center 2021</rights><rights>Copyright © 2021 Baylor University Medical Center.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2021 Baylor University Medical Center</rights><rights>Copyright © 2021 Baylor University Medical Center 2021 Baylor University Medical Center</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4115-9a6507f70cee6741f4f7272ea6be2d0cf7773ac4d4a291433df3ff6e439c1c303</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4115-9a6507f70cee6741f4f7272ea6be2d0cf7773ac4d4a291433df3ff6e439c1c303</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8865313/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8865313/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,4010,27900,27901,27902,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35261445$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lombana, Nicholas F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Naeger, Patrick A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Padilla, Pablo L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Falola, Reuben A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cole, Eric L.</creatorcontrib><title>Ambidexterity in left-handed and right-handed individuals and implications for surgical training</title><title>Proceedings - Baylor University. Medical Center</title><addtitle>Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent)</addtitle><description>Surgical training has historically been geared toward right-handed individuals. This could cause mentors to perceive left-handed students and residents as being more difficult to train. This study examined whether differences in dexterity exist between left-handed and right-handed individuals and the implications this may have on surgical training. Recent literature suggests that surgical training may need to be updated to train left-handed students more effectively. In this prospective, crossover study, 50 right-handed and 50 left-handed individuals of varying ages and occupations were evaluated using the O'Conner Tweezer Dexterity Test. Participants were timed while they used flat-tipped forceps to pick up 1″ brass metal pins and sequentially place one pin each in 100 pinholes 1/16″ in diameter on a 21″ × 12″ board. Participants completed this exercise with their dominant hand followed by their nondominant hand. Nondominant hand dexterity was measured by dividing the nondominant hand completion time by the dominant hand completion time, with a higher percentage associated with higher ambidexterity. Using the Student's two-tailed t test, we found that left-handed individuals had an 97.2% congruence between dominant and nondominant hands while right-handed individuals had a 71.6% congruence (P &lt; 0.001). In conclusion, our results show that left-handed individuals have a greater degree of ambidexterity than their right-handed counterparts. These results suggest that any perceived difference between left-handed and right-handed surgical residents may not be due to innate skill or dexterity, but rather a combination of external influences.</description><subject>Ambidexterity</subject><subject>dexterity</subject><subject>Handedness</subject><subject>left-handed</subject><subject>Original Research</subject><subject>right-handed</subject><subject>Surgeons</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>surgical training</subject><subject>Training</subject><issn>0899-8280</issn><issn>1525-3252</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kU1vEzEQhi0EomnhJ4BW4sJliz_X3guiqiggVeoFzsbxRzLVrh3s3UL-PU6TRrQHLmNp5pl3Zvwi9Ibgc4IV_oBV3yuq8DnFlNSAlVDiGVoQQUXLqKDP0WLHtDvoBJ2WcosxJ4zIl-iECdoRzsUC_bwYl-D8n8lnmLYNxGbwYWrXJjrvmhqbDKv1MQHRwR242QzlvgjjZgBrJkixNCHlpsx5VRNDM2UDEeLqFXoRKu1fH94z9OPq8_fLr-31zZdvlxfXreWEiLY3ncAySGy97yQngQdJJfWmW3rqsA1SSmYsd9zQnnDGXGAhdJ6z3hLLMDtDH_e6m3k5emd9rBsMepNhNHmrkwH9uBJhrVfpTivVCUZYFXh_EMjp1-zLpEco1g-DiT7NRdOOSaEY7XhF3z1Bb9OcYz2vUrQXRDEmKiX2lM2plOzDcRmC9c5D_eCh3nmoDx7Wvrf_XnLsejCtAp_2AMT65aP5nfLg9GS2Q8ohm2ihaPb_GX8Bs-es3g</recordid><startdate>2022</startdate><enddate>2022</enddate><creator>Lombana, Nicholas F.</creator><creator>Naeger, Patrick A.</creator><creator>Padilla, Pablo L.</creator><creator>Falola, Reuben A.</creator><creator>Cole, Eric L.</creator><general>Taylor &amp; Francis</general><general>Taylor &amp; Francis Ltd</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2022</creationdate><title>Ambidexterity in left-handed and right-handed individuals and implications for surgical training</title><author>Lombana, Nicholas F. ; Naeger, Patrick A. ; Padilla, Pablo L. ; Falola, Reuben A. ; Cole, Eric L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4115-9a6507f70cee6741f4f7272ea6be2d0cf7773ac4d4a291433df3ff6e439c1c303</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Ambidexterity</topic><topic>dexterity</topic><topic>Handedness</topic><topic>left-handed</topic><topic>Original Research</topic><topic>right-handed</topic><topic>Surgeons</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>surgical training</topic><topic>Training</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lombana, Nicholas F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Naeger, Patrick A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Padilla, Pablo L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Falola, Reuben A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cole, Eric L.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Proceedings - Baylor University. Medical Center</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lombana, Nicholas F.</au><au>Naeger, Patrick A.</au><au>Padilla, Pablo L.</au><au>Falola, Reuben A.</au><au>Cole, Eric L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Ambidexterity in left-handed and right-handed individuals and implications for surgical training</atitle><jtitle>Proceedings - Baylor University. Medical Center</jtitle><addtitle>Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent)</addtitle><date>2022</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>176</spage><epage>179</epage><pages>176-179</pages><issn>0899-8280</issn><eissn>1525-3252</eissn><abstract>Surgical training has historically been geared toward right-handed individuals. This could cause mentors to perceive left-handed students and residents as being more difficult to train. This study examined whether differences in dexterity exist between left-handed and right-handed individuals and the implications this may have on surgical training. Recent literature suggests that surgical training may need to be updated to train left-handed students more effectively. In this prospective, crossover study, 50 right-handed and 50 left-handed individuals of varying ages and occupations were evaluated using the O'Conner Tweezer Dexterity Test. Participants were timed while they used flat-tipped forceps to pick up 1″ brass metal pins and sequentially place one pin each in 100 pinholes 1/16″ in diameter on a 21″ × 12″ board. Participants completed this exercise with their dominant hand followed by their nondominant hand. Nondominant hand dexterity was measured by dividing the nondominant hand completion time by the dominant hand completion time, with a higher percentage associated with higher ambidexterity. Using the Student's two-tailed t test, we found that left-handed individuals had an 97.2% congruence between dominant and nondominant hands while right-handed individuals had a 71.6% congruence (P &lt; 0.001). In conclusion, our results show that left-handed individuals have a greater degree of ambidexterity than their right-handed counterparts. These results suggest that any perceived difference between left-handed and right-handed surgical residents may not be due to innate skill or dexterity, but rather a combination of external influences.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Taylor &amp; Francis</pub><pmid>35261445</pmid><doi>10.1080/08998280.2021.2008585</doi><tpages>4</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0899-8280
ispartof Proceedings - Baylor University. Medical Center, 2022, Vol.35 (2), p.176-179
issn 0899-8280
1525-3252
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2629518335
source Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central
subjects Ambidexterity
dexterity
Handedness
left-handed
Original Research
right-handed
Surgeons
Surgery
surgical training
Training
title Ambidexterity in left-handed and right-handed individuals and implications for surgical training
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T16%3A38%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Ambidexterity%20in%20left-handed%20and%20right-handed%20individuals%20and%20implications%20for%20surgical%20training&rft.jtitle=Proceedings%20-%20Baylor%20University.%20Medical%20Center&rft.au=Lombana,%20Nicholas%20F.&rft.date=2022&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=176&rft.epage=179&rft.pages=176-179&rft.issn=0899-8280&rft.eissn=1525-3252&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/08998280.2021.2008585&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2637583264%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2629518335&rft_id=info:pmid/35261445&rfr_iscdi=true