Lost and Found: Bourgeois Dependency Theory and the Forgotten Roots of Neodevelopmentalism
Neodevelopmentalism emerged in Brazil and Argentina in the aftermath of the demoralization of the Washington Consensus. Although its intellectual proponents place it within the long tradition of Latin American developmentalism, an important theoretical origin of neodevelopmentalism—dependency theory...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Latin American perspectives 2022-01, Vol.49 (1), p.36-56 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 56 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 36 |
container_title | Latin American perspectives |
container_volume | 49 |
creator | Antunes de Oliveira, Felipe |
description | Neodevelopmentalism emerged in Brazil and Argentina in the aftermath of the demoralization of the Washington Consensus. Although its intellectual proponents place it within the long tradition of Latin American developmentalism, an important theoretical origin of neodevelopmentalism—dependency theory—has so far been ignored. The term appeared for the first time in 1978 as an expletive in the heated controversy between Ruy Mauro Marini and Fernando Henrique Cardoso and José Serra in the Revista Mexicana de Sociología. Breaking with the supposition that underdevelopment could be overcome only through social revolution, Cardoso and Serra embraced a perspective of long-term social transformation based on class alliances with fractions of the national bourgeoisie and international capital. This perspective was gradually weakened and finally abandoned in favor of full-fledged neoliberalism when Cardoso became president of Brazil in 1994, only to be resuscitated by so-called pink-tide administrations after 2002.
O neodesenvolvimentismo surgiu no Brasil e na Argentina após a desmoralização do Consenso de Washington. Embora seus proponentes intelectuais o coloquem dentro da longa tradição do desenvolvimentismo latino-americano, uma importante origem teórica do neodesenvolvimentismo - a teoria da dependência - até agora foi ignorado. O termo apareceu pela primeira vez em 1978 como um palavrão na polêmica acalorada entre Ruy Mauro Marini e Fernando Henrique Cardoso e José Serra na Revista Mexicana de Sociología. Rompendo com a suposição de que o subdesenvolvimento só poderia ser superado por meio da revolução social, Cardoso e Serra abraçaram uma perspectiva de transformação social de longo prazo baseada em alianças de classe com frações da burguesia nacional e do capital internacional. Essa perspectiva foi gradualmente enfraquecida e finalmente abandonada em favor do neoliberalismo completo quando Cardoso se tornou presidente do Brasil em 1994, apenas para ser ressuscitada por administrações da chamada maré rosa após 2002. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/0094582X211037341 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2629014665</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_0094582X211037341</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2629014665</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c312t-21566b18fd0498960f22b61afd47995394ada1cecef08323ef06ada8ce76471d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE9LAzEQxYMoWKsfwFvA82omm2R3vWm1KhQFqVC8LOlmtn9okzVJhX57Uyt4EE_DzPzeG-YRcg7sEqAorhirhCz5hAOwvMgFHJAeSMkzVZSTQ9Lb7bMdcExOQliy1EspeuR95EKk2ho6dBtrrumt2_gZukWgd9ihNWibLR3P0fntNxbnmFA_czGipa_OxUBdS5_RGfzElevWaKNeLcL6lBy1ehXw7Kf2ydvwfjx4zEYvD0-Dm1HW5MBjxkEqNYWyNUxUZaVYy_lUgW6NKKpK5pXQRkODDbaszHmeikqTssFCiQJM3icXe9_Ou48Nhlgv0w82nay54hUDoZRMFOypxrsQPLZ15xdr7bc1sHoXYf0nwqS53GuCnuGv6_-CLzLgcTg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2629014665</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Lost and Found: Bourgeois Dependency Theory and the Forgotten Roots of Neodevelopmentalism</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><creator>Antunes de Oliveira, Felipe</creator><creatorcontrib>Antunes de Oliveira, Felipe</creatorcontrib><description>Neodevelopmentalism emerged in Brazil and Argentina in the aftermath of the demoralization of the Washington Consensus. Although its intellectual proponents place it within the long tradition of Latin American developmentalism, an important theoretical origin of neodevelopmentalism—dependency theory—has so far been ignored. The term appeared for the first time in 1978 as an expletive in the heated controversy between Ruy Mauro Marini and Fernando Henrique Cardoso and José Serra in the Revista Mexicana de Sociología. Breaking with the supposition that underdevelopment could be overcome only through social revolution, Cardoso and Serra embraced a perspective of long-term social transformation based on class alliances with fractions of the national bourgeoisie and international capital. This perspective was gradually weakened and finally abandoned in favor of full-fledged neoliberalism when Cardoso became president of Brazil in 1994, only to be resuscitated by so-called pink-tide administrations after 2002.
O neodesenvolvimentismo surgiu no Brasil e na Argentina após a desmoralização do Consenso de Washington. Embora seus proponentes intelectuais o coloquem dentro da longa tradição do desenvolvimentismo latino-americano, uma importante origem teórica do neodesenvolvimentismo - a teoria da dependência - até agora foi ignorado. O termo apareceu pela primeira vez em 1978 como um palavrão na polêmica acalorada entre Ruy Mauro Marini e Fernando Henrique Cardoso e José Serra na Revista Mexicana de Sociología. Rompendo com a suposição de que o subdesenvolvimento só poderia ser superado por meio da revolução social, Cardoso e Serra abraçaram uma perspectiva de transformação social de longo prazo baseada em alianças de classe com frações da burguesia nacional e do capital internacional. Essa perspectiva foi gradualmente enfraquecida e finalmente abandonada em favor do neoliberalismo completo quando Cardoso se tornou presidente do Brasil em 1994, apenas para ser ressuscitada por administrações da chamada maré rosa após 2002.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0094-582X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-678X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0094582X211037341</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Bourgeoisie ; Dependency theory ; Developmentalism ; Economic development ; Marini, Ruy Mauro ; Neoliberalism ; Presidents ; Resuscitation ; Social change ; Social revolution ; Transformation ; Washington Consensus</subject><ispartof>Latin American perspectives, 2022-01, Vol.49 (1), p.36-56</ispartof><rights>2021 Latin American Perspectives</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c312t-21566b18fd0498960f22b61afd47995394ada1cecef08323ef06ada8ce76471d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c312t-21566b18fd0498960f22b61afd47995394ada1cecef08323ef06ada8ce76471d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0094582X211037341$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0094582X211037341$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,21800,27847,27905,27906,43602,43603</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Antunes de Oliveira, Felipe</creatorcontrib><title>Lost and Found: Bourgeois Dependency Theory and the Forgotten Roots of Neodevelopmentalism</title><title>Latin American perspectives</title><description>Neodevelopmentalism emerged in Brazil and Argentina in the aftermath of the demoralization of the Washington Consensus. Although its intellectual proponents place it within the long tradition of Latin American developmentalism, an important theoretical origin of neodevelopmentalism—dependency theory—has so far been ignored. The term appeared for the first time in 1978 as an expletive in the heated controversy between Ruy Mauro Marini and Fernando Henrique Cardoso and José Serra in the Revista Mexicana de Sociología. Breaking with the supposition that underdevelopment could be overcome only through social revolution, Cardoso and Serra embraced a perspective of long-term social transformation based on class alliances with fractions of the national bourgeoisie and international capital. This perspective was gradually weakened and finally abandoned in favor of full-fledged neoliberalism when Cardoso became president of Brazil in 1994, only to be resuscitated by so-called pink-tide administrations after 2002.
O neodesenvolvimentismo surgiu no Brasil e na Argentina após a desmoralização do Consenso de Washington. Embora seus proponentes intelectuais o coloquem dentro da longa tradição do desenvolvimentismo latino-americano, uma importante origem teórica do neodesenvolvimentismo - a teoria da dependência - até agora foi ignorado. O termo apareceu pela primeira vez em 1978 como um palavrão na polêmica acalorada entre Ruy Mauro Marini e Fernando Henrique Cardoso e José Serra na Revista Mexicana de Sociología. Rompendo com a suposição de que o subdesenvolvimento só poderia ser superado por meio da revolução social, Cardoso e Serra abraçaram uma perspectiva de transformação social de longo prazo baseada em alianças de classe com frações da burguesia nacional e do capital internacional. Essa perspectiva foi gradualmente enfraquecida e finalmente abandonada em favor do neoliberalismo completo quando Cardoso se tornou presidente do Brasil em 1994, apenas para ser ressuscitada por administrações da chamada maré rosa após 2002.</description><subject>Bourgeoisie</subject><subject>Dependency theory</subject><subject>Developmentalism</subject><subject>Economic development</subject><subject>Marini, Ruy Mauro</subject><subject>Neoliberalism</subject><subject>Presidents</subject><subject>Resuscitation</subject><subject>Social change</subject><subject>Social revolution</subject><subject>Transformation</subject><subject>Washington Consensus</subject><issn>0094-582X</issn><issn>1552-678X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AFRWT</sourceid><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kE9LAzEQxYMoWKsfwFvA82omm2R3vWm1KhQFqVC8LOlmtn9okzVJhX57Uyt4EE_DzPzeG-YRcg7sEqAorhirhCz5hAOwvMgFHJAeSMkzVZSTQ9Lb7bMdcExOQliy1EspeuR95EKk2ho6dBtrrumt2_gZukWgd9ihNWibLR3P0fntNxbnmFA_czGipa_OxUBdS5_RGfzElevWaKNeLcL6lBy1ehXw7Kf2ydvwfjx4zEYvD0-Dm1HW5MBjxkEqNYWyNUxUZaVYy_lUgW6NKKpK5pXQRkODDbaszHmeikqTssFCiQJM3icXe9_Ou48Nhlgv0w82nay54hUDoZRMFOypxrsQPLZ15xdr7bc1sHoXYf0nwqS53GuCnuGv6_-CLzLgcTg</recordid><startdate>202201</startdate><enddate>202201</enddate><creator>Antunes de Oliveira, Felipe</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>AFRWT</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202201</creationdate><title>Lost and Found: Bourgeois Dependency Theory and the Forgotten Roots of Neodevelopmentalism</title><author>Antunes de Oliveira, Felipe</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c312t-21566b18fd0498960f22b61afd47995394ada1cecef08323ef06ada8ce76471d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Bourgeoisie</topic><topic>Dependency theory</topic><topic>Developmentalism</topic><topic>Economic development</topic><topic>Marini, Ruy Mauro</topic><topic>Neoliberalism</topic><topic>Presidents</topic><topic>Resuscitation</topic><topic>Social change</topic><topic>Social revolution</topic><topic>Transformation</topic><topic>Washington Consensus</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Antunes de Oliveira, Felipe</creatorcontrib><collection>Sage Journals GOLD Open Access 2024</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Latin American perspectives</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Antunes de Oliveira, Felipe</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Lost and Found: Bourgeois Dependency Theory and the Forgotten Roots of Neodevelopmentalism</atitle><jtitle>Latin American perspectives</jtitle><date>2022-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>49</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>36</spage><epage>56</epage><pages>36-56</pages><issn>0094-582X</issn><eissn>1552-678X</eissn><abstract>Neodevelopmentalism emerged in Brazil and Argentina in the aftermath of the demoralization of the Washington Consensus. Although its intellectual proponents place it within the long tradition of Latin American developmentalism, an important theoretical origin of neodevelopmentalism—dependency theory—has so far been ignored. The term appeared for the first time in 1978 as an expletive in the heated controversy between Ruy Mauro Marini and Fernando Henrique Cardoso and José Serra in the Revista Mexicana de Sociología. Breaking with the supposition that underdevelopment could be overcome only through social revolution, Cardoso and Serra embraced a perspective of long-term social transformation based on class alliances with fractions of the national bourgeoisie and international capital. This perspective was gradually weakened and finally abandoned in favor of full-fledged neoliberalism when Cardoso became president of Brazil in 1994, only to be resuscitated by so-called pink-tide administrations after 2002.
O neodesenvolvimentismo surgiu no Brasil e na Argentina após a desmoralização do Consenso de Washington. Embora seus proponentes intelectuais o coloquem dentro da longa tradição do desenvolvimentismo latino-americano, uma importante origem teórica do neodesenvolvimentismo - a teoria da dependência - até agora foi ignorado. O termo apareceu pela primeira vez em 1978 como um palavrão na polêmica acalorada entre Ruy Mauro Marini e Fernando Henrique Cardoso e José Serra na Revista Mexicana de Sociología. Rompendo com a suposição de que o subdesenvolvimento só poderia ser superado por meio da revolução social, Cardoso e Serra abraçaram uma perspectiva de transformação social de longo prazo baseada em alianças de classe com frações da burguesia nacional e do capital internacional. Essa perspectiva foi gradualmente enfraquecida e finalmente abandonada em favor do neoliberalismo completo quando Cardoso se tornou presidente do Brasil em 1994, apenas para ser ressuscitada por administrações da chamada maré rosa após 2002.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/0094582X211037341</doi><tpages>21</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0094-582X |
ispartof | Latin American perspectives, 2022-01, Vol.49 (1), p.36-56 |
issn | 0094-582X 1552-678X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2629014665 |
source | PAIS Index; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; SAGE Complete A-Z List |
subjects | Bourgeoisie Dependency theory Developmentalism Economic development Marini, Ruy Mauro Neoliberalism Presidents Resuscitation Social change Social revolution Transformation Washington Consensus |
title | Lost and Found: Bourgeois Dependency Theory and the Forgotten Roots of Neodevelopmentalism |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T00%3A32%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Lost%20and%20Found:%20Bourgeois%20Dependency%20Theory%20and%20the%20Forgotten%20Roots%20of%20Neodevelopmentalism&rft.jtitle=Latin%20American%20perspectives&rft.au=Antunes%20de%20Oliveira,%20Felipe&rft.date=2022-01&rft.volume=49&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=36&rft.epage=56&rft.pages=36-56&rft.issn=0094-582X&rft.eissn=1552-678X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0094582X211037341&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2629014665%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2629014665&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0094582X211037341&rfr_iscdi=true |